Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Communications Earth & Environment
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. communications earth & environment
  3. articles
  4. article
Improved European heat event simulation in eddy-resolving climate models
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 06 January 2026

Improved European heat event simulation in eddy-resolving climate models

  • Julian Krüger  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-0135-19831,2,3,
  • Joakim Kjellsson  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6405-52761,3,4,
  • Katja Lohmann2,
  • Daniela Matei2 &
  • …
  • Robin Pilch Kedzierski  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-3349-24545 

Communications Earth & Environment , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 962 Accesses

  • 12 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Atmospheric dynamics
  • Physical oceanography

Abstract

Owing to the rapid increase of European heat event occurrences over the past decades, the understanding of their physical drivers has become increasingly important for the scientific community. Recently, it has been shown that cold North Atlantic sea surface temperatures are strongly linked to European heat events such as in summers of 2015 and 2018. Thereby, an accurate representation of this mechanism in climate models is crucial for a more realistic European heat event simulation. Here, we investigate the mechanism by employing seven global coupled climate models, of which six models are embedded in the High Resolution Model Intercomparison Project. Our results show that, compared to the models with low-resolution versions, high-resolution ones simulate a more realistic relationship between North Atlantic sea surface temperatures and European summer temperature extremes. This is attributable to a better reproduction of the North Atlantic trough and the downstream ridge anomalies over central Europe. Improvements in high-resolution ocean configurations reduce the North Atlantic surface biases and improves air-sea interactions, thus having implications for the prediction and projection of climate extremes in the North Atlantic-European region.

Similar content being viewed by others

More extreme summertime North Atlantic Oscillation under climate change

Article Open access 18 June 2025

North American “warming holes” and European heat during abrupt Holocene cooling events in the Atlantic

Article Open access 13 October 2025

Subpolar Atlantic Ocean mixed layer heat content variability is increasingly driven by an active ocean

Article Open access 18 May 2022

Data availability

The HighResMIP data is retrieved from and publicly accessible through https://esgf-node.ipsl.upmc.fr/search/cmip6-ipsl/. The ERA5 Reanalysis data is retrieved from and publicly accessible through https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/datasets. The OA Flux data is retrieved from and publicly accessible through https://climatedataguide.ucar.edu/climate-data/.

Code availability

The analysis and production of all figures is performed using Python code as shown by Jupyter Notebooks, which are freely accessible on Github https://github.com/julian28295/HighResMIP_NA_SST_Euro_heat.

References

  1. Eyring, V. et al. Overview of the coupled model intercomparison project phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization. GMD 9, 1937–1958 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang, Q., Liu, B., Li, S. & Zhou, T. Understanding models’ global sea surface temperature bias in mean state: From CMIP5 to CMIP6. Geophys Res Lett 50, e2022GL100888 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lee, R. W. et al. Impact of Gulf Stream SST biases on the global atmospheric circulation. Climate Dyn. 51, 3369–3387 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Scaife, A. A. et al. Improved Atlantic winter blocking in a climate model. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L23703 (2011).

  5. Xu, G. et al. Impacts of model horizontal resolution on mean sea surface temperature biases in the Community Earth System Model. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 127, e2022JC019065 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Huo, W., Drews, A., Martin, T. & Wahl, S. Impacts of North Atlantic model biases on natural decadal climate variability. Geophys Res Atmos 129, e2023JD039778 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Moreno-Chamarro, E. et al. Impact of increased resolution on long-standing biases in highresmip-primavera climate models. GMD 15, 269–289 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ghinassi, P., Fabiano, F. & Corti, S. How well is Rossby wave activity represented in the primavera coupled simulations? WCD 3, 209–230 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fabiano, F. et al. Euro-atlantic weather regimes in the primavera coupled climate simulations: impact of resolution and mean state biases on model performance. Climate Dyn. 54, 5031–5048 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Patrizio, C. R. et al. Improved extratropical North Atlantic atmosphere-ocean variability with increasing ocean model resolution. J. Climate 36, 8403–8424 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Athanasiadis, P. J. et al. Mitigating climate biases in the midlatitude north Atlantic by increasing model resolution: Sst gradients and their relation to blocking and the jet. J. Climate 35, 3385–3406 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Michel, S. L. L., von der Heydt, A. S., van Westen, R. M., Baatsen, M. L. J. & Dijkstra, H. A. Increased wintertime European atmospheric blocking frequencies in general circulation models with an eddy-permitting ocean. npj Climate Atmospheric Sci. 6, 50 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Duchez, A. et al. Drivers of exceptionally cold North Atlantic Ocean temperatures and their link to the 2015 European heat wave. Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 074004 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mecking, J. V., Drijfhout, S. S., Hirschi, J. J.-M. & Blaker, A. T. Ocean and atmosphere influence on the 2015 European heatwave. Environ. Res. Lett. 14, 114035 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dunstone, N. et al. Skilful Real-Time Seasonal Forecasts of the Dry Northern European Summer 2018. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 12368–12376 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bischof, S., Pilch Kedzierski, R., Hänsch, M., Wahl, S. & Matthes, K. The role of the North Atlantic for heat wave characteristics in Europe, an ECHAM6 study. Geophys. Res. Lett. 50, e2023GL105280 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rousi, E. et al. The extremely hot and dry 2018 summer in central and northern Europe from a multi-faceted weather and climate perspective. NHESS 23, 1699–1718 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Krüger, J., Kjellsson, J., Pilch Kedzierski, R. & Claus, M. Connecting North Atlantic SST variability to European heat events over the past decades. Tellus A Dyn. Meteorol. Oceanogr. 75, 358–374 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pfahl, S., Schwierz, C., Croci-Maspoli, M., Grams, C. M. & Wernli, H. Importance of latent heat release in ascending air streams for atmospheric blocking. Nature Geosci. 8, 610–614 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Oltmanns, M. et al. European summer weather linked to North Atlantic freshwater anomalies in preceding years. WCD 5, 109–132 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Haarsma, R. J. et al. High resolution model intercomparison project (highresmip v1.0) for cmip6. GMD 9, 4185–4208 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hewitt, H. T. et al. Resolving and parameterising the ocean mesoscale in Earth system models. Curr. Climate Change Rep. 6, 137–152 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Matthes, K. et al. The flexible ocean and climate infrastructure version 1 (FOCI1): mean state and variability. GMD 13, 2533–2568 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hersbach, H. et al. The ERA5 global reanalysis. Q.J.R. Meteorol. Soc. 146, 1999–2049 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yu, L. & Weller, R. A. Objectively analyzed air-sea heat fluxes for the global ice-free oceans (1981–2005). Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 88, 527–540 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Belmonte Rivas, M. & Stoffelen, A. Characterizing era-interim and ERA5 surface wind biases using ASCAT. Ocean Sci. 15, 831–852 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dee, D. P. et al. The era-interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Q.J.R. Meteorol. Soc. 137, 553–597 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mayer, J., Haimberger, L. & Mayer, M. A quantitative assessment of air-sea heat flux trends from ERA5 since 1950 in the North Atlantic Basin. ESD 14, 1085–1105 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Roberts, M. J. et al. Description of the resolution hierarchy of the global coupled HadGEM3-GC3.1 model as used in CMIP6 HighResMIP experiments. GMD 12, 4999–5028 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wengel, C., Latif, M., Park, W., Harlaß, J. & Bayr, T. Eastern equatorial Pacific sea surface temperature annual cycle in the Kiel climate model: simulation benefits from enhancing atmospheric resolution. Climate Dyn. 52, 1983–2003 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Danabasoglu, G. et al. North Atlantic simulations in coordinated ocean-ice reference experiments phase II (core-II). Part I: Mean states. Ocean Model. 73, 76–107 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Crewell, S., Ruprecht, E. & Simmer, C. Latent heat flux over the North Atlantic Ocean–a case study. J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol. 30, 1627–1635 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Fairall, C. W., Bradley, E. F., Hare, J. E., Grachev, A. A. & Edson, J. B. Bulk parameterization of air-sea fluxes: Updates and verification for the CoARE algorithm. J. Climate 16, 571–591 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Keeley, S. P. E., Sutton, R. T. & Shaffrey, L. C. The impact of North Atlantic sea surface temperature errors on the simulation of north atlantic european region climate. Q.J.R. Meteorol. Soc. 138, 1774–1783 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Bellucci, A. et al. Air-sea interaction over the Gulf Stream in an ensemble of highresmip present climate simulations. Climate Dyn. 56, 2093–2111 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Famooss Paolini, L., Ruggieri, P., Pascale, S., Brattich, E. & Di Sabatino, S. Hybrid statistical-dynamical seasonal prediction of summer extreme temperatures in Europe. Q J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 151, e4900 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Woollings, T. et al. Blocking and its response to climate change. Curr. Climate Change Rep. 4, 287–300 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  38. De Luca, P., Jiménez-Esteve, B., Degenhardt, L., Schemm, S. & Pfahl, S. Enhanced blocking frequencies in very-high resolution idealized climate model simulations. Geophys. Res. Lett. 51, e2024GL111016 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Squintu, A. A. et al. Evaluation of trends in extreme temperatures simulated by highresmip models across Europe. Climate Dyn. 56, 2389–2412 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Vautard, R. et al. Heat extremes in western europe increasing faster than simulated due to atmospheric circulation trends. Nature Commun. 14, 6803 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kornhuber, K., Bartusek, S., Seager, R., Schellnhuber, H. J. & Ting, M. Global emergence of regional heatwave hotspots outpaces climate model simulations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 121, e2411258121 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Leutwyler, D., Lüthi, D., Ban, N., Fuhrer, O. & Schär, C. Evaluation of the convection-resolving climate modeling approach on continental scales. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 122, 5237–5258 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Moreno-Chamarro, E. et al. The very-high-resolution configuration of the EC-Earth global model for highresmip. GMD 18, 461–482 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Sutton, R. T. & Hodson, D. L. R. Atlantic Ocean Forcing of North American and European Summer Climate. Science 309, 115 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Debreu, L., Vouland, C. & Blayo, E. Agrif: Adaptive grid refinement in Fortran. Comput. Geosci. 34, 8–13 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Pacanowski, R. C. & Philander, S. G. H. Parameterization of vertical mixing in numerical models of tropical oceans. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 11, 1443–1451 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Voldoire, A. et al. Evaluation of cmip6 deck experiments with CNRM-CM6-1. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 11, 2177–2213 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Haarsma, R. et al. Highresmip versions of ec-earth: Ec-earth3p and ec-earth3p-hr - description, model computational performance and basic validation. GMD 13, 3507–3527 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Roberts, C. D. et al. Climate model configurations of the ECMWF Integrated Forecasting System (ecmwf-ifs cycle 43r1) for highresmip. GMD 11, 3681–3712 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Cherchi, A. et al. Global mean climate and main patterns of variability in the CMCC-CM2 coupled model. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 11, 185–209 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Gutjahr, O. et al. Max Planck Institute Earth System Model (mpi-esm1.2) for the high-resolution model intercomparison project (highresmip). GMD 12, 3241–3281 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Martin, T. & Biastoch, A. On the ocean’s response to enhanced Greenland runoff in model experiments: relevance of mesoscale dynamics and atmospheric coupling. Ocean Sci. 19, 141–167 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) data server for the freely available reanalysis data. Further, we thank the Earth System Grid Federation (ESGF) archive for the freely available HighResMIP data, the National Centre for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) for the freely available OA Flux data and Torge Martin for providing the FOCI data. The work of J. Krüger for this publication was supported by the Hans-Ertel-Centre for Weather Research, funded by the German Federal Ministry for Transportation and Digital Infrastructure (grant number BMVI/DWD 4823DWDP1B). J.Krüger, K.L. and D.M. receive funding for the research of this work from JPI Climate & JPI Oceans (ROADMAP, grant number 01LP2002C). K.L. and D.M. are provided with support from the European Union (Horizon Europe) project IMPETUS4CHANGE (grant number 101081555).

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. GEOMAR Helmholtz-Centre for Ocean Research, Kiel, Germany

    Julian Krüger & Joakim Kjellsson

  2. Max-Planck-Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany

    Julian Krüger, Katja Lohmann & Daniela Matei

  3. Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Kiel, Germany

    Julian Krüger & Joakim Kjellsson

  4. Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute (SMHI), Norrköping, Sweden

    Joakim Kjellsson

  5. Universität Wien, Wien, Austria

    Robin Pilch Kedzierski

Authors
  1. Julian Krüger
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joakim Kjellsson
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Katja Lohmann
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Daniela Matei
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Robin Pilch Kedzierski
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J. Krüger designed the analysis, produced the figures and wrote the manuscript. J.Kjellsson designed the analysis and contributed with helpful comments to the manuscript. K.L. provided data for the analysis and contributed together with D.M. and R.P.K. with helpful comments to the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julian Krüger.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Communications Earth and Environment thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editors: ChenRui Diao. [A peer review file is available].

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Transparent Peer Review file

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Krüger, J., Kjellsson, J., Lohmann, K. et al. Improved European heat event simulation in eddy-resolving climate models. Commun Earth Environ (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-03145-9

Download citation

  • Received: 25 September 2025

  • Accepted: 16 December 2025

  • Published: 06 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-03145-9

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • Calls for Papers
  • Referees
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Editorial policies
  • Conferences
  • Contact

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Communications Earth & Environment (Commun Earth Environ)

ISSN 2662-4435 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing