Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Communications Earth & Environment
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. communications earth & environment
  3. articles
  4. article
Rapid summer methane emission decline in high-latitude plains linked to 2021 drought
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 07 April 2026

Rapid summer methane emission decline in high-latitude plains linked to 2021 drought

  • Min Zhao  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0002-3066-26491,
  • Xiangjun Tian  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-8564-58171,2,
  • Yilong Wang  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7176-26921,
  • Yao Ge3,
  • Zhe Jin1,4,
  • Hongqin Zhang5,
  • Jinzhi Ding  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-3664-27021 &
  • …
  • Tao Wang  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-1323-86971 

Communications Earth & Environment , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 10 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Atmospheric chemistry

Abstract

In summer 2021, the northern high-latitude plains (NHP) of the Eurasian continent endured their most severe drought in nearly two decades, with important implications for regional methane emissions. Using the Global ObservatioN-based system for monitoring Greenhouse GAses for methane (GONGGA-CH4) inversion system along with a merged Greenhouse gases Observing SATellite (GOSAT) + TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) dataset, we quantified drought impacts on methane emissions. Independent validation confirmed the system’s high accuracy, revealing a 20% summer emission reduction in NHP during 2021 compared to baseline years. This reduction is primarily attributed to a decrease in liquid water content, which strongly affected wetland emissions. The underlying causes were heightened evaporation and the presence of a blocking high-pressure system within the atmospheric circulation. These findings highlight the profound impact of summer droughts on methane emissions in high-latitude regions, and emphasize the critical importance of integrating diverse data sources to refine methane emission estimates.

Data availability

The prior methane emissions are mainly include wetland emissions, agriculture and waste emissions, fossil fuel emissions, and biomass burning emissions. The wetland prior emissions are from WetCHARTS v1.3.1: https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1915. The agriculture and waste emissions and fossil fuels emissions are from Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR) v7.0: https://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu/dataset_ghg70. The biomass burning emissions are from Global Fire Emissions Database version 4.1 (GFEDv4): https://daac.ornl.gov/VEGETATION/guides/fire_emissions_v4_R1.html. The BLEND TROPOMI + GOSAT methane data are publicly available: https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/blended-tropomi-gosat-methane/index.html#data/. The ERA5-Land reanalysis data are publicly available: https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/. The GPCP data are publicly available: https://climatedataguide.ucar.edu/climate-data/gpcp-monthly-global-precipitation-climatology-project. The GRACE-FO data are publicly available: https://gracefo.jpl.nasa.gov/. The SPEI data are publicly available: https://climatedataguide.ucar.edu/climate-data/standardized-precipitation-evapotranspiration-index-spei. The GONGGA-CH4 data can be accessed at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.31442989.

Code availability

The code used for this study is available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18833841.

References

  1. Miner, K. R. et al. Permafrost carbon emissions in a changing Arctic. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 3, 55–67 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Olefeldt, D. et al. Circumpolar distribution and carbon storage of thermokarst landscapes. Nat. Commun. 7, 13043 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Saunois, M. et al. The global methane budget 2000-2017. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 12, 1561–1623 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Aronson, E. L., Allison, S. D. & Helliker, B. R. Environmental impacts on the diversity of methane-cycling microbes and their resultant function. Front. Microbiol. 4, 225 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Knox, S. H. et al. Identifying dominant environmental predictors of freshwater wetland methane fluxes across diurnal to seasonal time scales. Glob. Change Biol. 27, 3582–3604 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nwokolo, N. L., Enebe, M. C. Methane production and oxidation—a review on the pmoA and mcrA genes abundance for understanding the functional potentials of the agricultural soil. Pedosphere 35, 161–181 (2025).

  7. Schuur, E. A. G. et al. Climate change and the permafrost carbon feedback. Nature 520, 171–179 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sweeney, C. et al. No significant increase in long-term CH4 emissions on North Slope of Alaska despite significant increase in air temperature. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 6604–6611 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Canadell, J. G. et al. Global carbon and other biogeochemical cycles and feedbacks. In: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Masson-Delmotte V. et al.) (Cambridge University Press, 2021).

  10. White, J. D. et al. Methane producing and oxidizing microorganisms display a high resilience to drought in a Swedish hemi-boreal mire. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 128, e2022JG007362 (2023).

  11. Goodrich, J. P., Campbell, D. I., Roulet, N. T., Clearwater, M. J. & Schipper, L. A. Overriding control of methane flux temporal variability by water table dynamics in a Southern Hemisphere, raised bog. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 120, 819–831 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Unger, V. et al. Congruent changes in microbial community dynamics and ecosystem methane fluxes following natural drought in two restored fens. Soil Biol. Biochem. 160, 108348 (2021).

  13. Aronson, E. L. et al. ENSO-influenced drought drives methane flux dynamics in a tropical wet forest soil. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 124, 2267–2276 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Freeman, C. et al. Contrasted effects of simulated drought on the production and oxidation of methane in a mid-Wales wetland. Soil Biol. Biochem. 34, 61–67 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bruhwiler, L. et al. CarbonTracker-CH4: an assimilation system for estimating emissions of atmospheric methane. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 14, 8269–8293 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Turner, A. J., Frankenbergb, C., Wennberg, P. O. & Jacob, D. J. Ambiguity in the causes for decadal trends in atmospheric methane and hydroxyl. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 114, 5367–5372 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yin, Y. et al. Accelerating methane growth rate from 2010 to 2017: leading contributions from the tropics and East Asia. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 21, 12631–12647 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ishizawa, M. et al. Analysis of atmospheric CH4 in Canadian Arctic and estimation of the regional CH4 fluxes. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 19, 4637–4658 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Massart, S. et al. Assimilation of atmospheric methane products into the MACC-II system: from SCIAMACHY to TANSO and IASI. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 14, 6139–6158 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Turner, A. J. et al. Estimating global and North American methane emissions with high spatial resolution using GOSAT satellite data. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 15, 7049–7069 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fiore, A. M., Horowitz, L. W., Dlugokencky, E. J., West, J. J. Impact of meteorology and emissions on methane trends, 1990–2004. Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L12809 (2006).

  22. Hodson, E. L., Poulter, B., Zimmermann, N. E., Prigent, C. & Kaplan, J. O. The El Nino-Southern Oscillation and wetland methane interannual variability. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, 074009 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lunt, M. F. et al. Rain-fed pulses of methane from East Africa during 2018-2019 contributed to atmospheric growth rate. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 024021(2021).

  24. Liang, R. S. et al. East Asian methane emissions inferred from high-resolution inversions of GOSAT and TROPOMI observations: a comparative and evaluative analysis. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 23, 8039–8057 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Qu, Z. et al. Inverse modeling of 2010–2022 satellite observations shows that inundation of the wet tropics drove the 2020–2022 methane surge. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 121, e2402730121 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Balasus, N. et al. A blended TROPOMI+GOSAT satellite data product for atmospheric methane using machine learning to correct retrieval biases. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 16, 3787–3807 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zhao, M. et al. Slowdown in China’s methane emission growth. Natl. Sci. Rev. 11, nwae223 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bastos, A. et al. Direct and seasonal legacy effects of the 2018 heat wave and drought on European ecosystem productivity. Sci. Adv. 6, eaba2724 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Peng, S. et al. Wetland emission and atmospheric sink changes explain methane growth in 2020. Nature 612, 477–482 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  30. O’Connell, C. S., Ruan, L. & Silver, W. L. Drought drives rapid shifts in tropical rainforest soil biogeochemistry and greenhouse gas emissions. Nat. Commun. 9, 1348 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zhu, X., Jia, G. & Xu, X. Accelerated rise in wildfire carbon emissions from Arctic continuous permafrost. Sci. Bull. 69, 2430–2438 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zheng, B. et al. Record-high CO2 emissions from boreal fires in 2021. Science 379, 912–917 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Saito, M., Kim, H.-S., Ito, A., Yokota, T. & Maksyutov, S. Enhanced methane emissions during Amazonian drought by biomass burning. Plos One 11, e0166039 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  34. He, W. et al. Do state-of-the-art atmospheric CO2 inverse models capture drought impacts on the European land carbon uptake? J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 15, e2022MS003150 (2023).

  35. Smith, N. E. et al. Spring enhancement and summer reduction in carbon uptake during the 2018 drought in northwestern Europe. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B, Biol. Sci. 375, 20190509 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lin, X. et al. Recent methane surges reveal heightened emissions from tropical inundated areas. Nat. Commun. 15, 10894 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Zhao, Y. et al. Air pollution modulates trends and variability of the global methane budget. Nature 642, 369–375 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Cerlini, P. B., Meniconi, S., Brunone, B. Groundwater supply and climate change management by means of global atmospheric datasets. Preliminary results. In: 18th International Conference on Water Distribution System Analysis (WDSA)) (2016).

  39. Bloom, A. A., Palmer, P. I., Fraser, A., Reay, D. S. & Frankenberg, C. Large-scale controls of methanogenesis inferred from methane and gravity spaceborne data. Science 327, 322–325 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2024YFF0809103), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42405109, 42305120), the Science and Technology Projects of Xizang Autonomous Region, China (XZ202501ZY0126), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2025T180081), the Innovation Program for Young Scholars of TPESER (TPESER-QNCX2022ZD-01).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Tibetan Plateau Earth System, Environment and Resources (TPESER), Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

    Min Zhao, Xiangjun Tian, Yilong Wang, Zhe Jin, Jinzhi Ding & Tao Wang

  2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

    Xiangjun Tian

  3. Meteorological observatory of Shandong province, Jinan, China

    Yao Ge

  4. Institute of Carbon Neutrality, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China

    Zhe Jin

  5. Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

    Hongqin Zhang

Authors
  1. Min Zhao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiangjun Tian
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yilong Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yao Ge
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zhe Jin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hongqin Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jinzhi Ding
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Tao Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

X. Tian and Y. Wang designed the study. M. Zhao performed atmospheric 3D inversions and wrote the original manuscript. X. Tian, Z. Jin, and H. Zhang provided the GONGGA framework. Y. Ge provided climatological analysis. M. Zhao, X. Tian, Y. Wang, T. Wang, J. Ding contributed to writing and commenting on the draft manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xiangjun Tian or Yilong Wang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Communications Earth & Environment thanks Elton Chan and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editors Keiichiro Hara and Martina Grecequet. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, M., Tian, X., Wang, Y. et al. Rapid summer methane emission decline in high-latitude plains linked to 2021 drought. Commun Earth Environ (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-026-03433-y

Download citation

  • Received: 22 July 2025

  • Accepted: 12 March 2026

  • Published: 07 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-026-03433-y

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • Calls for Papers
  • Referees
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Editorial policies
  • Conferences
  • Contact

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Communications Earth & Environment (Commun Earth Environ)

ISSN 2662-4435 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing