Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Communications Earth & Environment
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. communications earth & environment
  3. articles
  4. article
Promoting just energy transition in ecologically fragile areas of China through a rural household survey
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 08 April 2026

Promoting just energy transition in ecologically fragile areas of China through a rural household survey

  • Haoming Xia1,2,
  • Zhiyu Chen1,2,
  • Jonathan Y. S. Leung  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-5846-34013,
  • Yuan Cai4,
  • Mimi Duan1,2,
  • Jiajia Pei1,2,
  • Jiaxin Zhu1,2,
  • Runbo Guo1,2,
  • Minghao Zhuang5 &
  • …
  • Lingyan Li  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-0005-15051,2 

Communications Earth & Environment , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Energy and society
  • Environmental studies
  • Psychology

Abstract

Promoting a just energy transition of rural households in ecologically fragile areas is a critical step to achieve the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), but there is a pressing need to clarify how policymakers can facilitate this transition process. Through a rural household survey of China, here we reveal the disparities in energy transition, energy poverty, and energy inequality among different household groups. While many rural households switch to clean energy for cooking and boiling, solid fuels are still used as the primary energy source, particularly for heating. Notably, small, low-income households and those from the Loess Plateau suffer disproportionate energy burden and energy poverty, energy inequality varies greatly by energy types, regions, ethnicity, and income levels. These findings highlight the importance of energy availability, affordability, sustainability, and acceptability for a just energy transition framework, which provides informative guidance for promoting just energy transition in ecologically fragile areas worldwide.

Data availability

All data used in this study to generate the results and figures are available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.31528588.

References

  1. Pärtel, M. et al. Global impoverishment of natural vegetation revealed by dark diversity. Nature 641, 917–924 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wang, X., Zhang, R. & Jiang, T. Energy justice and decarbonization: a critical assessment for just energy transition in China. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 105, 107420 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Addi, Y.-W. et al. Reconstruction of Indigenous settlements in ecologically fragile areas through spatial distribution patterns and suitability in Xiaoliangshan, SW China. Sci. Rep. 15, 37321 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yin, J., Wang, D. & Li, H. Spatial optimization of rural settlements in ecologically fragile regions: Insights from a social-ecological system. Habitat Int. 138, 102854 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nguyen, K.-A. & Liou, Y.-A. Global mapping of eco-environmental vulnerability from human and nature disturbances. Sci. Total Environ. 664, 995–1004 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Li, L., Fan, F. & Liu, X. Determinants of rural household clean energy adoption intention: Evidence from 72 typical villages in ecologically fragile regions of western China. J. Clean. Prod. 347, 131296 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shen, G. et al. Substantial transition to clean household energy mix in rural China. Natl. Sci. Rev. 9, nwac050 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sun, M., Xu, X., Wang, L., Li, C. & Zhang, L. Stable energy, energy inequality, and climate change vulnerability in Pan-Third Pole regions: empirical analysis in cross-national rural areas. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 147, 111197 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chen, Y. et al. Cytotoxicity and epithelial barrier toxicity of fine particles from residential biomass pellet burning. Environ. Sci. Technol. 58, 17786–17796 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Xu, X., González, J. E., Shen, S., Miao, S. & Dou, J. Impacts of urbanization and air pollution on building energy demands — Beijing case study. Appl. Energy 225, 98–109 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Han, X. & Wei, C. Household energy consumption: state of the art, research gaps, and future prospects. Environ., Dev. Sustain. 23, 12479–12504 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Liao, H., Tang, X. & Wei, Y.-M. Solid fuel use in rural China and its health effects. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 60, 900–908 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jiang, K. et al. Unclean but affordable solid fuels effectively sustained household energy equity. Nat. Commun. 15, 9761 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jiang, L. et al. Rural household energy consumption of farmers and herders in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Energy 192, 116649 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Asaee, S. R., Sharafian, A., Herrera, O. E., Blomerus, P. & Mérida, W. Housing stock in cold-climate countries: conversion challenges for net zero emission buildings. Appl. Energy 217, 88–100 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chen, Q., Lu, S., Xiong, K. & Zhao, R. Coupling analysis on ecological environment fragility and poverty in South China Karst. Environ. Res. 201, 111650 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Peng, Q. et al. VOC emission profiles from typical solid fuel combustion in Fenhe River Basin: field measurements and environmental implication. Environ. Pollut. 322, 121172 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lin, C. et al. Extreme air pollution from residential solid fuel burning. Nat. Sustain. 1, 512–517 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Qiu, S. et al. Solid fuel use, socioeconomic indicators and risk of cardiovascular diseases and all-cause mortality: a prospective cohort study in a rural area of Sichuan, China. Int. J. Epidemiol. 51, 501–513 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nyiwul, L. Climate change adaptation and inequality in Africa: Case of water, energy and food insecurity. J. Clean. Prod. 278, 123393 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rahut, D. B., Aryal, J. P., Manchanda, N. & Sonobe, T. Examining energy justice: empirical analysis of clean cooking transition across social groups in India, 2004–2018. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 193, 114260 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Perera, A. T. D., Nik, V. M., Chen, D., Scartezzini, J.-L. & Hong, T. Quantifying the impacts of climate change and extreme climate events on energy systems. Nat. Energy 5, 150–159 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ma, T. et al. Costs and health benefits of the rural energy transition to carbon neutrality in China. Nat. Commun. 14, 6101 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Osička, J. & Černoch, F. European energy politics after Ukraine: the road ahead. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 91, 102757 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Antje, K., Przemysław, P., Mariusz, B. & Ilona, O. M. Calling energy inequalities into the transition agenda. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 101, 103144 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Yang, Y., Xia, S., Huang, P. & Qian, J. Energy transition: connotations, mechanisms and effects. Energy Strategy Rev. 52, 101320 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Shen, Y. et al. Quantifying energy transition vulnerability helps more just and inclusive decarbonization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. Nexus 3, pgae427 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang, A. T. et al. Evidence of multidimensional gender inequality in energy services from a large-scale household survey in India. Nat. Energy 7, 698–707 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Carley, S. & Konisky, D. M. The justice and equity implications of the clean energy transition. Nat. Energy 5, 569–577 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Emodi, N. V. et al. Urban and rural household energy transition in Sub-Saharan Africa: does spatial heterogeneity reveal the direction of the transition? Energy Policy 168, 113118 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lee, H. & Shon, H. Spatial and temporal patterns of energy aid and poverty in four African countries: focusing on distributive and recognition justice. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 192, 114261 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Chan, C. & Delina, L. L. Energy poverty and beyond: the state, contexts, and trajectories of energy poverty studies in Asia. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 102, 103168 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sovacool, B. K. et al. Policy prescriptions to address energy and transport poverty in the United Kingdom. Nat. Energy 8, 273–283 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Yang, Y., Xue, J., Qian, J. & Qian, X. Mapping energy inequality between urban and rural China. Appl. Geogr. 165, 103220 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Millward-Hopkins, J. Inequality can double the energy required to secure universal decent living. Nat. Commun. 13, 5028 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Best, R. Energy inequity variation across contexts. Appl. Energy 309, 118451 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Nepal, R., Best, R. & Taylor, M. Strategies for reducing ethnic inequality in energy outcomes: a Nepalese example. Energy Econ. 126, 106910 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Cong, S., Nock, D., Qiu, Y. L. & Xing, B. Unveiling hidden energy poverty using the energy equity gap. Nat. Commun. 13, 2456 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Zhao, H. -x. & Magoulès, F. A review on the prediction of building energy consumption. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 16, 3586–3592 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Wu, S., Zheng, X. & Wei, C. Measurement of inequality using household energy consumption data in rural China. Nat. Energy 2, 795–803 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wang, Q. et al. Examining energy inequality under the rapid residential energy transition in China through household surveys. Nat. Energy 8, 251–263 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Fry, J. M., Farrell, L. & Temple, J. B. Energy poverty and food insecurity: is there an energy or food trade-off among low-income Australians? Energy Econ. 123, 106731 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Forrester, S. P., Montañés, C. C., O’Shaughnessy, E. & Barbose, G. Modeling the potential effects of rooftop solar on household energy burden in the United States. Nat. Commun. 15, 4676 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Guan, Y. et al. Burden of the global energy price crisis on households. Nat. Energy 8, 304–316 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Xie, L., Hu, X., Zhang, X. & Zhang, X.-B. Who suffers from energy poverty in household energy transition? Evidence from clean heating program in rural China. Energy Econ. 106, 105795 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Huang, L., Nock, D., Cong, S. & Qiu, Y. Inequalities across cooling and heating in households: energy equity gaps. Energy Policy 182, 113748 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Nie, P., Li, Q. & Sousa-Poza, A. Energy poverty and subjective well-being in China: new evidence from the China Family Panel Studies. Energy Econ. 103, 105548 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Lin, B. & Wang, Y. Does energy poverty really exist in China? From the perspective of residential electricity consumption. Energy Policy 143, 111557 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Bai, C. et al. Estimation of household energy poverty and feasibility of clean energy transition: evidence from rural areas in the Eastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. J. Clean. Prod. 388, 135852 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Li, M., Jin, T., Liu, S. & Zhou, S. The cost of clean energy transition in rural China: evidence based on marginal treatment effects. Energy Econ. 97, 105167 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Chen, H., Jang, S.-G., Zhang, Y. & Liu, Y. Clean energy for all? Mapping inequity potential in the clean energy transition in the United States. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 108, 103400 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Nguyen, T. T., Nguyen, T.-T., Hoang, V.-N., Wilson, C. & Managi, S. Energy transition, poverty and inequality in Vietnam. Energy Policy 132, 536–548 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Wang, Q., Kwan, M.-P., Fan, J. & Lin, J. Racial disparities in energy poverty in the United States. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 137, 110620 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Lowans, C., Foley, A., Del Rio, D. F. & Sovacool, B. K. Towards more equitable energy transitions in low-income households: an integrated analysis of energy and transport poverty in Northern Ireland. Energy Convers. Manag. 291, 117337 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Fan, S., Zha, S., Zhao, C., Sizheng, F. & Li, M. Using energy vulnerability to measure distributive injustice in rural heating energy reform: a case study of natural gas replacing bulk coal for heating in Gaocheng District, Hebei Province, China. Ecol. Econ. 197, 107456 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Su, F., Chang, J., Li, X., Fahad, S. & Ozturk, I. Assessment of diverse energy consumption structure and social capital: a case of southern Shaanxi province China. Energy 262, 125506 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Alem, Y., Beyene, A. D., Köhlin, G. & Mekonnen, A. Modeling household cooking fuel choice: a panel multinomial logit approach. Energy Econ. 59, 129–137 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Hiemstra-van der Horst, G. & Hovorka, A. J. Reassessing the “energy ladder”: household energy use in Maun, Botswana. Energy Policy 36, 3333–3344 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Rahut, D. B., Behera, B., Ali, A. & Marenya, P. A ladder within a ladder: understanding the factors influencing a household’s domestic use of electricity in four African countries. Energy Econ. 66, 167–181 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Wang, M. & Xie, L. Households’ participation in energy transition and sustained use of clean energy: evidence from China’s clean heating program. China Econ. Rev. 80, 102005 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Moore, R. Definitions of fuel poverty: implications for policy. Energy Policy 49, 19–26 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Okushima, S. Measuring energy poverty in Japan, 2004–2013. Energy Policy 98, 557–564 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Kahouli, S. An economic approach to the study of the relationship between housing hazards and health: the case of residential fuel poverty in France. Energy Econ. 85, 104592 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Tang, X. & Liao, H. Energy poverty and solid fuels use in rural China: Analysis based on national population census. Energy Sustain. Dev. 23, 122–129 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Damgaard, C. & Weiner, J. Describing inequality in plant size or fecundity. Ecology 81, 1139–1142 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Lorenz, M. O. Methods of measuring the concentration of wealth. Publ. Am. Stat. Assoc. 9, 209–219 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Liu, Z., Zhou, Z. & Liu, C. Estimating the impact of rural centralized residence policy interventions on energy poverty in China. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 187, 113687 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Ma, W., Zheng, H. & Gong, B. Rural income growth, ethnic differences, and household cooking fuel choice: evidence from China. Energy Econ. 107, 105851 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Shupler, M. et al. Modelling of supply and demand-side determinants of liquefied petroleum gas consumption in peri-urban Cameroon, Ghana and Kenya. Nat. Energy 6, 1198–1210 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Elasu, J., Ntayi, J. M., Adaramola, M. S. & Buyinza, F. Drivers of household transition to clean energy fuels: a systematic review of evidence. Renew. Sustain. Energy Transit. 3, 100047 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Ma, X., Li, C., Kang, Q., Chen, D. & Sun, Q. Rural household nonagricultural income and energy transition: evidence from central China. Energy Policy 188, 114099 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (72474171,72104191,72174197), The Youth Innovation Team of Shaanxi Universities (2023-2026), Guangdong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (2025A1515010933), Guangdong Provincial Department of Education (0202202300032), Intergovernmental International Science and Technology Innovation Collaboration Key Project (2025YFE0100600) and STU Scientific Research Initiation Grant (NTF23027T). We thank Haoyang Du, Bowen Zhang, Jinhong Yuan, Pingbo Li, Yao Zhang, Weixi Mi, Borui Dong, Mengmeng Wang, Chenxi Zhang, Yiwei Ma, Haojie Li, Xinyi Wang, Yijie Li, Ziwei Yang, Wenxuan Zhong, Xiang Zhang, Xi Zheng, Jingyan Li, Zhen Wen, Yongchao Zhu, Feng Wang, Huihui Song, Jiahui Nan, Jingyang Zhao, Yang Ye, Fangmei Fan and Ze Yuwen from Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology for their valuable efforts in data collection for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China

    Haoming Xia, Zhiyu Chen, Mimi Duan, Jiajia Pei, Jiaxin Zhu, Runbo Guo & Lingyan Li

  2. Key Research Base of Co-construction & Sharing for Human Settlement & Good Life in New Era, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China

    Haoming Xia, Zhiyu Chen, Mimi Duan, Jiajia Pei, Jiaxin Zhu, Runbo Guo & Lingyan Li

  3. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Disaster Prediction and Prevention, Shantou University, Shantou, Guangdong, China

    Jonathan Y. S. Leung

  4. Graduate School, Xi’an International Studies University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China

    Yuan Cai

  5. State Key Laboratory of Regional and Urban Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environment Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

    Minghao Zhuang

Authors
  1. Haoming Xia
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhiyu Chen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jonathan Y. S. Leung
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yuan Cai
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mimi Duan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jiajia Pei
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jiaxin Zhu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Runbo Guo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Minghao Zhuang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Lingyan Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

L.L. and H.X. conceived the research objectives, L.L., H.X., and M.Z. drafted the manuscript, L.L., H.X., and Z.C. led the data collection, H.X., Z.C., J.P. and M.D. did the data cleaning, L.L., H.X., Z.C., R.G., and J.Z. performed the modeling and wrote the codes and carried out the analyses, L.L., H.X., and M.Z. led the writing of the manuscript, J.Y.S.L. and Y.C. substantially revised the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Minghao Zhuang or Lingyan Li.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Communications Earth and Environment thanks Axel Bastian Poque Gonzalez and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editors: Martina Grecequet. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Supplementary Materials (download PDF )

Reporting Summary (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xia, H., Chen, Z., Leung, J.Y.S. et al. Promoting just energy transition in ecologically fragile areas of China through a rural household survey. Commun Earth Environ (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-026-03478-z

Download citation

  • Received: 14 September 2025

  • Accepted: 25 March 2026

  • Published: 08 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-026-03478-z

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • Calls for Papers
  • Referees
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Editorial policies
  • Conferences
  • Contact

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Communications Earth & Environment (Commun Earth Environ)

ISSN 2662-4435 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene