Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Communications Earth & Environment
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. communications earth & environment
  3. articles
  4. article
Evaluating the carbon benefits of multinational enterprises from a production linkages perspective
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 20 April 2026

Evaluating the carbon benefits of multinational enterprises from a production linkages perspective

  • Yunyun Wu1,
  • Huiping Huang1,2 &
  • Zhida Jin  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-3709-17701,2 

Communications Earth & Environment (2026) Cite this article

  • 1186 Accesses

  • 2 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Economics
  • Environmental studies

Abstract

Multinational enterprises are essential to achieving climate goals, yet the carbon benefits of their production linkages with domestic-owned enterprises remain unclear. Here we construct an extreme counterfactual scenario and use an environmentally extended input-output model, structural path analysis and structural decomposition analysis to evaluate these benefits. The results reveal that domestic-owned enterprises-multinational enterprises production linkages cumulatively reduced carbon emissions in China by over thirteen thousand megatons from 2000 to 2020. These carbon benefits primarily originated in the energy and material sectors, especially coke and refined petroleum and basic metals, and propagated toward technology-intensive manufacturing and service industries. Carbon efficiency was the largest proximate contributor to emission reductions, whereas domestic final demand remained the main contributor to emission growth. These findings provide insights into better aligning foreign investment with climate mitigation goals.

Similar content being viewed by others

How can China’s manufacturing industry achieve better development? A carbon resilience perspective based on the system GMM model

Article Open access 29 July 2025

Value chain carbon footprints of Chinese listed companies

Article Open access 16 May 2023

A cost-effective climate mitigation pathway for China with co-benefits for sustainability

Article Open access 02 November 2024

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available on Figshare under the identifier https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.31834180.

Code availability

The custom MATLAB (R2024a) codes used for the analysis are publicly available on Figshare under the identifier https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.31834627.

References

  1. Fuso Nerini, F. et al. Connecting climate action with other Sustainable Development Goals. Nat. Sustain. 2, 674–680 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Xia, C. et al. Heterogeneity in carbon footprint trends and trade-induced emissions in China’s urban agglomerations. Commun. Earth Environ. 6, 723 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Meng, B. et al. Developing countries’ responsibilities for CO2 emissions in value chains are larger and growing faster than those of developed countries. One Earth 6, 167–181 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Biermann, F. et al. Four governance reforms to strengthen the SDGs. Science 381, 1159–1160 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Soergel, B. et al. A sustainable development pathway for climate action within the UN 2030 Agenda. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 656–664 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lei, T. et al. Global iron and steel plant CO2 emissions and carbon-neutrality pathways. Nature 622, 514–520 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Di Lucia, L., Slade, R. & Khan, J. Decision-making fitness of methods to understand sustainable development goal interactions. Nat. Sustain. 5, 131–138 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Deng, L., Lu, Y. & Tang, Y. Does FDI increase product innovation of domestic firms? Evidence from China. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 222, 1–24 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chen, J. & Zhou, Z. The effects of FDI on innovative entrepreneurship: A regional-level study. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 186, 122159 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fu, X., Buckley, P. J. & Fu, X. M. The growth impact of Chinese direct investment on host developing countries. Int. Bus. Rev. 29, 101658 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fu, X., Emes, D. & Hou, J. Multinational enterprises and structural transformation in emerging and developing countries: A survey of the literature. Int. Bus. Rev. 30, 101801 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Javorcik, B. S. Does foreign direct investment increase the productivity of domestic firms? In search of spillovers through backward linkages. Am. Econ. Rev. 94, 605–627 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Alfaro-Ureña, A., Manelici, I. & Vasquez, J. P. The effects of joining multinational supply chains: New evidence from firm-to-firm linkages. Q. J. Econ. 137, 1495–1552 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Liu, Z. Foreign direct investment and technology spillovers: Theory and evidence. J. Dev. Econ. 85, 176–193 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mahadevan, R. & Sun, Y. Effects of foreign direct investment on carbon emissions: Evidence from China and its Belt and Road countries. J. Environ. Manag. 276, 111321 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shahbaz, M., Nasir, M. A. & Roubaud, D. Environmental degradation in France: the effects of FDI, financial development, and energy innovations. Energy Econ. 74, 843–857 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Duan, Y. & Jiang, X. Pollution haven or pollution halo? A re-evaluation on the role ofmultinational enterprises in global CO2 emissions. Energy Econ. 97, 105181 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dechezleprêtre, A. et al. Searching for carbon leaks in multinational companies. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 112, 102601 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fang, H. et al. Does “stabilizing FDI” enable a low-carbon transition in Chinese cities?. J. Clean. Prod. 437, 140780 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tian, L. et al. Pollution emission reduction effect of the coordinated development of inward and outward FDI in China. J. Clean. Prod. 391, 136233 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yan, Y. et al. Black monster or green giant? Revaluating the role of Chinese multinational enterprises in Belt and Road countries on carbon emissions. J. Clean. Prod. 468, 143036 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Antràs, P. & De Gortari, A. On the geography of global value chains. Econometrica 88, 1553–1598 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zhu, K., Guo, X. & Zhang, Z. Reevaluation of the carbon emissions embodied in global value chains based on an inter-country input-output model with multinational enterprises. Appl. Energy 307, 118220 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wang, Z. et al. Tracing value added in the presence of foreign direct investment. NBER Working Paper (2021).

  25. Zhang, Z. et al. Embodied carbon emissions in the supply chains of multinational enterprises. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 1096–1101 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  26. López, L. et al. The carbon footprint of the US multinationals’ foreign affiliates. Nat. Commun. 10, 1672 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wang, A. et al. Tracing the CO2 emissions embodied in Chinese mainland’s exports with multinational enterprises: From source to sink. J. Clean. Prod. 414, 137430 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yan, Y. et al. Mapping carbon footprint along global value chains: A study based on firm heterogeneity in China. Struct. Change Econ. Dyn. 61, 398–408 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Yan, Y. et al. Decomposing the carbon footprints of multinational enterprises along global value chains. Struct. Change Econ. Dyn. 66, 13–28 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jiang, X. et al. The emissions responsibility accounting of multinational enterprises for an efficient climate policy. Glob. Environ. Change 75, 102545 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Jiang, X., Guan, D. & Zhang, J. Firm ownership, China’s export related emissions, and the responsibility issue. Energy Econ. 51, 466–474 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zheng, H. et al. Leveraging opportunity of low carbon transition by super-emitter cities in China. Sci. Bull. 68, 2456–2466 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wang, Z. et al. Measures of participation in global value chains and global business cycles. NBER Working Paper (2017).

  34. Tian, K. et al. Regional trade agreement burdens global carbon emissions mitigation. Nat. Commun. 13, 408 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Tian, K. et al. Leveraging multinational enterprises to reduce the escalating regional carbon inequality in China. Nat. Commun. 16, 6603 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Los, B., Timmer, M. P. & De Vries, G. J. Tracing value-added and double counting in gross exports: Comment. Am. Econ. Rev. 106, 1958–1966 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Yang, X. et al. Net-zero greenhouse gas mitigation potential across multi-tier supply chains. Commun. Earth Environ. 6, 230 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wang, J. et al. Significant inequality shown in Chinese provincial export-related fine particle matter pollution and their contributors. Commun. Earth Environ. 6, 467 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Defourny, J. & Thorbecke, E. Structural path analysis and multiplier decomposition within a social accounting matrix framework. Econ. J. 94, 111–136 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Li, Y., Su, B. & Dasgupta, S. Structural path analysis of India’s carbon emissions using input-output and social accounting matrix frameworks. Energy Econ. 76, 457–469 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Su, B., Ang, B. W. & Li, Y. Structural path and decomposition analysis of aggregate embodied energy and emission intensities. Energy Econ. 83, 345–360 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Li, Q., Wu, S. & Li, S. Weighing China’s embodied CO2 emissions and value added under global value chains: trends, characteristics, and paths. J. Environ. Manag. 316, 115302 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Xu, D. et al. Identifying the critical paths and sectors for carbon transfers driven by global consumption in 2015. Appl. Energy 306, 118137 (2022).

  44. Mi, Z. et al. Chinese CO2 emission flows have reversed since the global financial crisis. Nat. Commun. 8, 1712 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Zhang, Z. et al. Occupational carbon footprints and exposure to climate transition risks. Nat. Commun. 16, 5886 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Xia, C. et al. Outsourced carbon mitigation efforts of Chinese cities from 2012 to 2017. Nat. Cities 1, 480–488 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Meng, J. et al. The rise of South–South trade and its effect on global CO2 emissions. Nat. Commun. 9, 1871 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Su, B. & Ang, B. W. Structural decomposition analysis applied to energy and emissions: some methodological developments. Energy Econ. 34, 177–188 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Jiang, X., Zhu, K. & Wang, S. The potential for reducing China’s carbon dioxide emissions: role of foreign-invested enterprises. Glob. Environ. Change 35, 22–30 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Social Science Foundation of China (19ZDA054).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Economics, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, China

    Yunyun Wu, Huiping Huang & Zhida Jin

  2. Hubei Provincial Center for Scientific & Technological Innovation and Economic Development, Wuhan, China

    Huiping Huang & Zhida Jin

Authors
  1. Yunyun Wu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Huiping Huang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhida Jin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Y.W.: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal analysis, Visualization, Writing—Original Draft, Writing—review & editing. H.H.: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Formal analysis, Resources, Writing—Original Draft, Writing—review & editing. Z.J.: Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing—Original Draft, Writing—review & editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhida Jin.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Communications Earth and Environment thanks Ilaria Fusacchia and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editors: Yuwan Duan and Nandita Basu. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Reporting Summary (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, Y., Huang, H. & Jin, Z. Evaluating the carbon benefits of multinational enterprises from a production linkages perspective. Commun Earth Environ (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-026-03513-z

Download citation

  • Received: 29 July 2025

  • Accepted: 03 April 2026

  • Published: 20 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-026-03513-z

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • Calls for Papers
  • Referees
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Editorial policies
  • Conferences
  • Contact

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Communications Earth & Environment (Commun Earth Environ)

ISSN 2662-4435 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing