Extended Data Fig. 3: Comparison of different-lineages (DL) accuracy measure distributions for HUNTRESS, PhISCS-BnB, ScisTree and SPhyR on simulated data with no false positives. | Nature Computational Science

Extended Data Fig. 3: Comparison of different-lineages (DL) accuracy measure distributions for HUNTRESS, PhISCS-BnB, ScisTree and SPhyR on simulated data with no false positives.

From: Fast intratumor heterogeneity inference from single-cell sequencing data

Extended Data Fig. 3: Comparison of different-lineages (DL) accuracy measure distributions for HUNTRESS, PhISCS-BnB, ScisTree and SPhyR on simulated data with no false positives.

Here n, m and fn, respectively, denote the number of cells, the number of mutations and the false negative error rate for single-cell sequencing. For each setting of n and m, we report the different-lineages (DL) accuracy measure for each tool with respect to the ground truth. The experiments were performed over 10 distinct trees of tumor progression, with a false negative error rate varying across 0.05, 0.1 and 0.2. Each tool was run with a time limit of 8 hours (those cases that exceed the time limit are not included here). Note that we have not included results of PhISCS-I and PhISCS-B separately as their accuracy values match those of PhISCS-BnB (on these instances on which they completed the task) due to the same underlying objective function and optimality guarantee that they all provide.

Source data

Back to article page