Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Benevolent and hostile sexism in a shifting global context

Nature Reviews Psychology volume 2, pages 98–111 (2023)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

The theory of and research on ambivalent sexism — which encompasses both attitudes that are overtly negative (hostile sexism) and those that seem subjectively positive but are actually harmful (benevolent sexism) — have made substantial contributions to understanding how sexism operates and the consequences it has for women. It is now clear that sexism takes different forms, some of which can be disguised as protection and flattery. However, all forms of sexism have negative effects on how women are perceived and treated by others as well as on women themselves. Some of these findings have implications for understanding other social inequalities, such as ableism, ageism, racism and classism. In this Review, we summarize what is known about the predictors of ambivalent sexism and its effects. Although we focus on women, we also consider some effects on men, in particular those that indirectly influence women. Throughout the Review we point to societal shifts that are likely to influence how sexism is manifested, experienced and understood. We conclude by discussing the broader implications of these changes and specifying areas of enquiry that need to be addressed to continue making progress in understanding the mechanisms that underlie social inequalities.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Predictors of benevolent and hostile sexism.
Fig. 2: Cardiovascular responses to ambivalent sexism.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. United Nations. Gender equality. Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls. Sustainable Development Goals https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/gender-equality/ (2015).

  2. Glick, P. & Fiske, S. T. An ambivalent alliance: hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. Am. Psychol. 56, 109–118 (2001). This is the first comprehensive articulation of ambivalent sexism theory.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hammond, M. D. & Cimpian, A. “Wonderful but weak”: children’s ambivalent attitudes toward women. Sex Roles 84, 76–90 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gutierrez, B. C., Halim, M. L. D., Martinez, M. A. & Arredondo, M. The heroes and the helpless: the development of benevolent sexism in children. Sex Roles 82, 558–569 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. de Lemus, S., Moya, M. & Glick, P. When contact correlates with prejudice: adolescents’ romantic relationship experience predicts greater benevolent sexism in boys and hostile sexism in girls. Sex Roles 63, 214–225 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ferragut, M., Blanca, M. J., Ortiz-Tallo, M. & Bendayan, R. Sexist attitudes and beliefs during adolescence: a longitudinal study of gender differences. Eur. J. Dev. Psychol. 14, 32–43 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Glick, P. et al. Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 79, 763–775 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. de Geus, R., Ralph-Morrow, E. & Shorrocks, R. Understanding ambivalent sexism and its relationship with electoral choice in Britain. Br. J. Polit. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123421000612 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Connor, R. A., Glick, P. & Fiske, S. T. in The Cambridge Handbook of the Psychology of Prejudice (eds Sibley, C. G. & Barlow, F. K.) 295–320 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2017).

  10. Hyde, J. S., Bigler, R. S., Joel, D., Tate, C. C. & van Anders, S. M. The future of sex and gender in psychology: five challenges to the gender binary. Am. Psychol. 74, 171–193 (2019). This article presents a compelling analysis of how current psychological insights challenge binary notions of gender, which suggests the need to broaden sexism research.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. van der Gaag, N., Heilman, B., Gupta, T., Nembhard, C. & Barker, G. State of the world’s fathers: unlocking the power of men’s care. ProMundo https://promundoglobal.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/BLS19063_PRO_SOWF_REPORT_015.pdf (2019).

  12. ONS. Families and the labour market UK: 2019. Census 2021 https://www.ons.gov.uk/employmentandlabourmarket/peopleinwork/employmentandemployeetypes/articles/familiesandthelabourmarketengland/2019 (2019).

  13. Alon, T., Doepke, M., Olmstead-Rumsey, J. & Tertilt, M. This time it’s different: the role of women’s employment in a pandemic recession. National Bureau of Economic Research http://www.nber.org/papers/w27660.pdf (2020).

  14. Giurge, L. M., Whillans, A. V. & Yemiscigil, A. A multicountry perspective on gender differences in time use during COVID-19. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2018494118 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Golombok, S. Modern Families: Parents And Children In New Family Forms (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2015).

  16. The Williams Institute. How many same-sex couples in the US are raising children? UCLA https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/Same-Sex-Parents-Jul-2018.pdf (2018).

  17. Goudarzi, S., Badaan, V. & Knowles, E. D. Neoliberalism and the ideological construction of equity beliefs. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 17, 1431–1451 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Government Equalities Office. Gender equality monitor: tracking progress on gender equality. Gov.uk https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/814080/GEO_GEEE_Strategy_Gender_Equality_Monitor_tagged.pdf (2019).

  19. Chisango, T. & Javangwe, G. Are people better at recognizing ambivalent sexism on the basis of the non-standard profiles than the standard ASI ones? Sex Roles 67, 69–82 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Glick, P. & Fiske, S. T. The ambivalence toward men inventory: differentiating hostile and benevolent beliefs about men. Psychol. Women Q. 23, 519–536 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Glick, P. et al. Bad but bold: ambivalent attitudes toward men predict gender inequality in 16 nations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 86, 713–728 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Allport, G. W. The Nature Of Prejudice (Addison-Wesley, 1954).

  23. Eagly, A. H. & Mladinic, A. Are people prejudiced against women? Some answers from research on attitudes, gender stereotypes, and judgments of competence. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 5, 1–35 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C. & Glick, P. Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence. Trends Cogn. Sci. 11, 77–83 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Glick, P. & Fiske, S. T. The ambivalent sexism inventory: differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 70, 491–512 (1996). This article presents the development of the original ambivalent sexism inventory.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Salomon, K. et al. The experiences with ambivalent sexism inventory (EASI). Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 42, 235–253 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Becker, J. C. & Wright, S. C. Yet another dark side of chivalry: benevolent sexism undermines and hostile sexism motivates collective action for social change. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 101, 62–77 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Barreto, M. & Ellemers, N. The burden of benevolent sexism: how it contributes to the maintenance of gender inequalities. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 35, 633–642 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bosson, J. K., Pinel, E. C. & Vandello, J. A. The emotional impact of ambivalent sexism: forecasts versus real experiences. Sex Roles 62, 520–531 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rudman, L. A. & Heppen, J. B. Implicit romantic fantasies and women’s interest in personal power: a glass slipper effect? Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 29, 1357–1370 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bohner, G., Ahlborn, K. & Steiner, R. How sexy are sexist men? Women’s perception of male response profiles in the ambivalent sexism inventory. Sex Roles 62, 568–582 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hopkins-Doyle, A., Sutton, R. M., Douglas, K. M. & Calogero, R. M. Flattering to deceive: why people misunderstand benevolent sexism. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 116, 167–192 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Leone, R. M., Schipani-McLaughlin, A. M., Haikalis, M. & Parrott, D. J. The “white knight” effect: benevolent sexism accounts for bystander intervention in party situations among high status men. Psychol. Men. Masc. 21, 704–709 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Moya, M., Glick, P., Expósito, F., de Lemus, S. & Hart, J. It’s for your own good: benevolent sexism and women’s reactions to protectively justified restrictions. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 33, 1421–1434 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Jost, J. T. & Kay, A. C. Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 88, 498–509 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Connelly, K. & Heesacker, M. Why is benevolent sexism appealing?: Associations with system justification and life satisfaction. Psychol. Women Q. 36, 432–443 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Brandt, M. J. Sexism and gender inequality across 57 societies. Psychol. Sci. 22, 1413–1418 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Schiralli, J. E., Peragine, D. E., Chasteen, A. L. & Einstein, G. Explicit and implicit gender-related stereotyping in transgender, gender expansive, and cisgender adults. Arch. Sex. Behav. 51, 2065–2076 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Khorashad, B. S., Roshan, G. M., Talaei, A., Arezoomandan, S. & Sadr, M. Views of individuals with gender dysphoria and disorders of sex development on sexism: an Iranian study. Int. J. Transgend. 20, 459–470 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Hammond, M. D., Milojev, P., Huang, Y. & Sibley, C. G. Benevolent sexism and hostile sexism across the ages. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 9, 863–874 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Davis, T. M., Settles, I. H. & Jones, M. K. Standpoints and situatedness: examining the perception of benevolent sexism in Black and white undergraduate women and men. Psychol. Women Q. 46, 8–26 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Hayes, E.-R. & Swim, J. K. African, Asian, Latina/o, and European Americans’ responses to popular measures of sexist beliefs: some cautionary notes. Psychol. Women Q. 37, 155–166 (2013). This article highlights measurement invariance across ethnic/racial groups, pointing to the need to consider the cultural context of ambivalent sexism.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Cowie, L. J., Greaves, L. M. & Sibley, C. G. Sexuality and sexism: differences in ambivalent sexism across gender and sexual identity. Personal. Individ. Differ. 148, 85–89 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. López-Sáez, M. Á., García-Dauder, D. & Montero, I. Correlate attitudes toward LGBT and sexism in Spanish psychology students. Front. Psychol. 11, 2063 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Pistella, J., Tanzilli, A., Ioverno, S., Lingiardi, V. & Baiocco, R. Sexism and attitudes toward same-sex parenting in a sample of heterosexuals and sexual minorities: the mediation effect of sexual stigma. Sex. Res. Soc. Policy 15, 139–150 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Cross, E. J., Muise, A. & Hammond, M. D. Do scales measuring sexist attitudes have equivalent meaning for sexual minorities and majorities? Sex Roles 85, 707–720 (2021). This article describes how sexual orientation influences the meaning of items in the ambivalent sexism inventory, suggesting the need for further research on how sexism operates for sexual-minority individuals.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Deak, C. K., Hammond, M. D., Sibley, C. G. & Bulbulia, J. Individuals’ number of children is associated with benevolent sexism. PLoS One 16, e0252194 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Glick, P., Lameiras, M. & Castro, Y. R. Education and Catholic religiosity as predictors of hostile and benevolent sexism towards women and men. Sex Roles 47, 433–441 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Mikołajczak, M. & Pietrzak, J. Ambivalent sexism and religion: connected through values. Sex Roles 70, 387–399 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Burn, S. M. & Busso, J. Ambivalent sexism, scriptural literalism, and religiosity. Psychol. Women Q. 29, 412–418 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Maitner, A. T. & Henry, P. J. Ambivalent sexism in the United Arab Emirates: quantifying gender attitudes in a rapidly modernizing society. Group Process Intergroup Relat. 21, 831–843 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Taşdemir, N. & Sakallı-Uğurlu, N. The relationships between ambivalent sexism and religiosity among Turkish university students. Sex Roles 62, 420–426 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Haggard, M. C., Kaelen, R., Saroglou, V., Klein, O. & Rowatt, W. C. Religion’s role in the illusion of gender equality: supraliminal and subliminal religious priming increases benevolent sexism. Psychol. Relig. Spiritual. 11, 392–398 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Inglehart, R. Religion’s Sudden Decline: What’s Causing It, And What Comes Next? (Oxford Univ. Press, 2021).

  55. Hellmer, K., Stenson, J. T. & Jylhä, K. M. What’s (not) underpinning ambivalent sexism?: revisiting the roles of ideology, religiosity, personality, demographics, and men’s facial hair in explaining hostile and benevolent sexism. Personal. Individ. Differ. 122, 29–37 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Sibley, C. G., Wilson, M. S. & Duckitt, J. Antecedents of men’s hostile and benevolent sexism: the dual roles of social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 33, 160–172 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Phelan, J. E., Sanchez, D. T. & Broccoli, T. L. The danger in sexism: the links among fear of crime, benevolent sexism, and well-being. Sex Roles 62, 35–47 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Fitzgerald, H. N., McDonald, R., Thomas, R. & Shook, N. J. Disease avoidance: a predictor of sexist attitudes toward females. Curr. Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01343-6 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Valved, T., Kosakowska-Berezecka, N., Besta, T. & Martiny, S. E. Gender belief systems through the lens of culture — differences in precarious manhood beliefs and reactions to masculinity threat in Poland and Norway. Psychol. Men. Masc. 22, 265–276 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Fisher, M. I. & Hammond, M. D. Personal ties and prejudice: a meta-analysis of romantic attachment and ambivalent sexism. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 45, 1084–1098 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Glick, P., Diebold, J., Bailey-Werner, B. & Zhu, L. The two faces of Adam: ambivalent sexism and polarized attitudes toward women. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 23, 1323–1334 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Masser, B. & Abrams, D. Reinforcing the glass ceiling: the consequences of hostile sexism for female managerial candidates. Sex Roles 51, 609–615 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Kahn, K. B., van Breen, J. A., Barreto, M. & Kaiser, C. R. When is women’s benevolent sexism associated with support for other women’s agentic responses to gender‐based threat? Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 60, 786–807 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Huang, Y., Sibley, C. G. & Osborne, D. Breast is best, but where? Hostile sexism underlies men’s opposition to breastfeeding in public. J. Soc. Issues 76, 219–238 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Zaikman, Y. & Marks, M. J. Ambivalent sexism and the sexual double standard. Sex Roles 71, 333–344 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Forbes, G. B., Adams-Curtis, L. E., Hamm, N. R. & White, K. B. Perceptions of the woman who breastfeeds: the role of erotophobia, sexism, and attitudinal variables. Sex Roles 49, 379–388 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Sakalh‐Uğurlu, N. & Glick, P. Ambivalent sexism and attitudes toward women who engage in premarital sex in Turkey. J. Sex. Res. 40, 296–302 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Blumell, L. E., Huemmer, J. & Sternadori, M. Protecting the ladies: benevolent sexism, heteronormativity, and partisanship in online discussions of gender-neutral bathrooms. Mass Commun. Soc. 22, 365–388 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Carnaghi, A., Maass, A. & Fasoli, F. Enhancing masculinity by slandering homosexuals: the role of homophobic epithets in heterosexual gender identity. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 37, 1655–1665 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Rollè, L., Sechi, C., Santoniccolo, F., Trombetta, T. & Brustia, P. The relationship between sexism, affective states, and attitudes toward homosexuality in a sample of heterosexual Italian people. Sex. Res. Soc. Policy 19, 194–206 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Bosson, J. K., Prewitt-Freilino, J. L. & Taylor, J. N. Role rigidity: a problem of identity misclassification? J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 89, 552–565 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Rudman, L. A., Mescher, K. & Moss-Racusin, C. A. Reactions to gender egalitarian men: perceived feminization due to stigma-by-association. Group Process Intergroup Relat. 16, 572–599 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Konopka, K., Rajchert, J., Dominiak-Kochanek, M. & Roszak, J. The role of masculinity threat in homonegativity and transphobia. J. Homosex. 68, 802–829 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Uluboy, Z. & Husnu, S. Turkish speaking young adults attitudes toward transgender individuals: transphobia, homophobia and gender ideology. J. Homosex. 69, 101–119 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Barreto, M., Ellemers, N., Piebinga, L. & Moya, M. How nice of us and how dumb of me: the effect of exposure to benevolent sexism on women’s task and relational self-descriptions. Sex Roles 62, 532–544 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Dumont, M., Sarlet, M. & Dardenne, B. Be too kind to a woman, she’ll feel incompetent: benevolent sexism shifts self-construal and autobiographical memories toward incompetence. Sex Roles 62, 545–553 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Forbes, G. B., Collinsworth, L. L., Jobe, R. L., Braun, K. D. & Wise, L. M. Sexism, hostility toward women, and endorsement of beauty ideals and practices: are beauty ideals associated with oppressive beliefs? Sex Roles 56, 265–273 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Calogero, R. M. & Jost, J. T. Self-subjugation among women: exposure to sexist ideology, self-objectification, and the protective function of the need to avoid closure. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 100, 211–228 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Forbes, G. B. et al. Body dissatisfaction in college women and their mothers: cohort effects, developmental effects, and the influences of body size, sexism, and the thin body ideal. Sex Roles 53, 281–298 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Forbes, G. B. et al. Body dissatisfaction and disordered eating in three cultures: Argentina, Brazil, and the US. Sex Roles 66, 677–694 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Franzoi, S. L. Is female body esteem shaped by benevolent sexism? Sex Roles 44, 177–188 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Oswald, D. L., Franzoi, S. L. & Frost, K. A. Experiencing sexism and young women’s body esteem. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 31, 1112–1137 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Atkins, D. Looking Queer (Routledge, 2012).

  84. Molix, L. Sex differences in cardiovascular health: does sexism influence women’s health? Am. J. Med. Sci. 348, 153–155 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Vogel, B. et al. The Lancet Women and Cardiovascular Disease Commission: reducing the global burden by 2030. Lancet 397, 2385–2438 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Lamarche, V. M., Seery, M. D., Kondrak, C. L., Saltsman, T. L. & Streamer, L. Clever girl: benevolent sexism and cardiovascular threat. Biol. Psychol. 149, 107781 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Salomon, K., Burgess, K. D. & Bosson, J. K. Flash fire and slow burn: women’s cardiovascular reactivity and recovery following hostile and benevolent sexism. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 144, 469–479 (2015). This is one of the few papers that examines physiological responses to ambivalent sexism, paving the way for an improved understanding of their impact on women’s health.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Dardenne, B. et al. Benevolent sexism alters executive brain responses. NeuroReport 24, 572–577 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Himmelstein, M. S., Kramer, B. L. & Springer, K. W. Stress in strong convictions: precarious manhood beliefs moderate cortisol reactivity to masculinity threats. Psychol. Men Masc. 20, 491–502 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Pacilli, M. G., Spaccatini, F., Giovannelli, I., Centrone, D. & Roccato, M. System justification moderates the relation between hostile (but not benevolent) sexism in the workplace and state anxiety: an experimental study. J. Soc. Psychol. 159, 474–481 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Spaccatini, F. & Roccato, M. The palliative function of sexism: individual sexism buffers the relationship between exposure to workplace sexism and psychological distress. Sex. Cult. 25, 767–785 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Lemonaki, E., Manstead, A. S. R. & Maio, G. R. Hostile sexism (de)motivates women’s social competition intentions: the contradictory role of emotions. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 54, 483–499 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Oswald, D. L., Baalbaki, M. & Kirkman, M. Experiences with benevolent sexism: scale development and associations with women’s well-being. Sex Roles 80, 362–380 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Bosson, J. K. & Vandello, J. A. Precarious manhood and its links to action and aggression. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 20, 82–86 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Begany, J. J. & Milburn, M. A. Psychological predictors of sexual harassment: authoritarianism, hostile sexism, and rape myths. Psychol. Men Masc. 3, 119–126 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Russell, B. L. & Trigg, K. Y. Tolerance of sexual harassment: an examination of gender differences, ambivalent sexism, social dominance, and gender roles. Sex Roles 50, 565–573 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Abrams, D., Viki, G. T., Masser, B. & Bohner, G. Perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape: the role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 84, 111–125 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Chapleau, K. M., Oswald, D. L. & Russell, B. L. How ambivalent sexism toward women and men support rape myth acceptance. Sex Roles 57, 131–136 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Viki, G. T., Abrams, D. & Masser, B. Evaluating stranger and acquaintance rape: the role of benevolent sexism in perpetrator blame and recommended sentence length. Law Hum. Behav. 28, 295–303 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Brownhalls, J. et al. Make it safe at night or teach women to fight? Sexism predicts views on men’s and women’s responsibility to reduce men’s violence toward women. Sex Roles 84, 183–195 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Brown-Iannuzzi, J. L., Cooley, E., Cipolli, W. & Mehta, S. Race, ambivalent sexism, and perceptions of situations when police shoot black women. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 13, 127–138 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Rudman, L. A. & Mescher, K. Of animals and objects: men’s implicit dehumanization of women and likelihood of sexual aggression. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 38, 734–746 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Cikara, M., Eberhardt, J. L. & Fiske, S. T. From agents to objects: sexist attitudes and neural responses to sexualized targets. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 23, 540–551 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Viki, G. T. & Abrams, D. Infra-humanization: ambivalent sexism and the attribution of primary and secondary emotions to women. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 39, 492–499 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Connor, R. A. & Fiske, S. T. Not minding the gap: how hostile sexism encourages choice explanations for the gender income gap. Psychol. Women Q. 43, 22–36 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Sakalli-Ugurlu, N. & Beydogan, B. Turkish college students’ attitudes toward women managers: the effects of patriarchy, sexism, and gender differences. J. Psychol. 136, 647–656 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. King, E. B. et al. Benevolent sexism at work: gender differences in the distribution of challenging developmental experiences. J. Manag. 38, 1835–1866 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  108. Biernat, M., Tocci, M. J. & Williams, J. C. The language of performance evaluations: gender-based shifts in content and consistency of judgment. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 3, 186–192 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Vescio, T. K., Gervais, S. J., Snyder, M. & Hoover, A. Power and the creation of patronizing environments: the stereotype-based behaviors of the powerful and their effects on female performance in masculine domains. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 88, 658–672 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. Cassidy, B. S. & Krendl, A. C. A crisis of competence: benevolent sexism affects evaluations of women’s competence. Sex Roles 81, 505–520 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Shnabel, N., Bar-Anan, Y., Kende, A., Bareket, O. & Lazar, Y. Help to perpetuate traditional gender roles: benevolent sexism increases engagement in dependency-oriented cross-gender helping. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 110, 55–75 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Reilly, E. D., Rackley, K. R. & Awad, G. H. Perceptions of male and female STEM aptitude: the moderating effect of benevolent and hostile sexism. J. Career Dev. 44, 159–173 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Becker, J. C., Glick, P., Ilic, M. & Bohner, G.Damned if she does, damned if she doesn't: consequences of accepting versus confronting patronizing help for the female target and male actor. Eur. J. Social Psychol. 41, 761–773 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Good, J. J. & Rudman, L. A. When female applicants meet sexist interviewers: the costs of being a target of benevolent sexism. Sex Roles 62, 481–493 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. Hideg, I. & Ferris, D. L. The compassionate sexist? How benevolent sexism promotes and undermines gender equality in the workplace. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 111, 706–727 (2016). This article provides an excellent empirical analysis of how benevolent sexism influences women’s workplace outcomes.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. Farkas, T. & Leaper, C. Chivalry’s double-edged sword: how girls’ and boys’ paternalistic attitudes relate to their possible family and work selves. Sex Roles 74, 220–230 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  117. Fernández, M. L., Castro, Y. R., Otero, M. C., Foltz, M. L. & Lorenzo, M. G. Sexism, vocational goals, and motivation as predictors of men’s and women’s career choice. Sex Roles 55, 267–272 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  118. Montañés, P. et al. Intergenerational transmission of benevolent sexism from mothers to daughters and its relation to daughters’ academic performance and goals. Sex Roles 66, 468–478 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  119. Gervais, S. J. & Vescio, T. K. The effect of patronizing behavior and control on men and women’s performance in stereotypically masculine domains. Sex Roles 66, 479–491 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  120. Jones, K. et al. Negative consequence of benevolent sexism on efficacy and performance. Gend. Manag. Int. J. 29, 171–189 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  121. Dardenne, B., Dumont, M. & Bollier, T. Insidious dangers of benevolent sexism: consequences for women’s performance. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 93, 764–779 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  122. Hideg, I. & Shen, W. Why still so few? A theoretical model of the role of benevolent sexism and career support in the continued underrepresentation of women in leadership positions. J. Leadersh. Organ. Stud. 26, 287–303 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  123. Wakefield, J. R. H., Hopkins, N. & Greenwood, R. M. Thanks, but no thanks: women’s avoidance of help-seeking in the context of a dependency-related stereotype. Psychol. Women Q. 36, 423–431 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  124. Samulowitz, A., Gremyr, I., Eriksson, E. & Hensing, G. “Brave men” and “emotional women”: a theory-guided literature review on gender bias in health care and gendered norms towards patients with chronic pain. Pain. Res. Manag. 2018, 1–14 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  125. Prego-Jimenez, S. et al. The impact of sexism and gender stereotypes on the legitimization of women’s low back pain. Pain Manag. Nurs. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2022.03.008 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  126. Lee, J., Hardesty, L. A., Kunzler, N. M. & Rosenkrantz, A. B. Direct interactive public education by breast radiologists about screening mammography: impact on anxiety and empowerment. J. Am. Coll. Radiol. 13, 12–20 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  127. Sutton, R. M., Douglas, K. M. & McClellan, L. M. Benevolent sexism, perceived health risks, and the inclination to restrict pregnant women’s freedoms. Sex Roles 65, 596–605 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  128. Huang, Y., Davies, P. G., Sibley, C. G. & Osborne, D. Benevolent sexism, attitudes toward motherhood, and reproductive rights: a multi-study longitudinal examination of abortion attitudes. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 42, 970–984 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  129. Osborne, D. & Davies, P. G. When benevolence backfires: benevolent sexists’ opposition to elective and traumatic abortion. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 42, 291–307 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  130. Alotey, P., Ravindran, S. & Sathivelu, V. Trends in abortion policies in low- and middle-income countries. Annu. Rev. Public Health 42, 505–518 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  131. Greubel, A. D. Benevolent sexism in the targeted regulation of abortion providers (TRAP): a case study of Texas House Bill 2. Sex Roles 85, 1–11 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  132. Vilda, D. et al. State abortion policies and maternal death in the United States, 2015–2018. Am. J. Public Health 111, 1696–1704 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  133. Duerksen, K. N. & Lawson, K. L. “Not brain-washed, but heart-washed”: a qualitative analysis of benevolent sexism in the anti-choice stance. Int. J. Behav. Med. 24, 864–870 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  134. Rachlinski, J. J. & Wistrich, A. J. Benevolent sexism in judges. San. Diego Law Rev. 58, 101–142 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  135. Jackman, M. R. The Velvet Glove: Paternalism And Conflict In Gender, Class, And Race Relations (Univ. California Press, 1994). This is a classic analysis of paternalism in three different intergroup contexts, which inspired ambivalent sexism theory and continues to inspire understandings of the complexity of prejudice.

  136. Hammond, M. D. & Overall, N. C. Dynamics within intimate relationships and the causes, consequences, and functions of sexist attitudes. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 26, 120–125 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  137. Lamont, E. Negotiating courtship: reconciling egalitarian ideals with traditional gender norms. Gend. Soc. 28, 189–211 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  138. Gul, P. & Kupfer, T. R. Benevolent sexism and mate preferences: why do women prefer benevolent men despite recognizing that they can be undermining? Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 45, 146–161 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  139. Cross, E. J. & Overall, N. C. Women’s attraction to benevolent sexism: needing relationship security predicts greater attraction to men who endorse benevolent sexism. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 48, 336–347 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  140. Lee, T. L., Fiske, S. T., Glick, P. & Chen, Z. Ambivalent sexism in close relationships: (hostile) power and (benevolent) romance shape relationship ideals. Sex Roles 62, 583–601 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  141. Travaglia, L. K., Overall, N. C. & Sibley, C. G. Benevolent and hostile sexism and preferences for romantic partners. Personal. Individ. Differ. 47, 599–604 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  142. Paynter, A. & Leaper, C. Heterosexual dating double standards in undergraduate women and men. Sex Roles 75, 393–406 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  143. Silván-Ferrero, M. D. P. & Bustillos López, A. Benevolent sexism toward men and women: justification of the traditional system and conventional gender roles in Spain. Sex Roles 57, 607–614 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  144. Chen, Z., Fiske, S. T. & Lee, T. L. Ambivalent sexism and power-related gender-role ideology in marriage. Sex Roles 60, 765–778 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  145. Gaunt, R. & Pinho, M. Do sexist mothers change more diapers? Ambivalent sexism, maternal gatekeeping, and the division of childcare. Sex Roles 79, 176–189 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  146. Bareket, O., Shnabel, N., Kende, A., Knab, N. & Bar-Anan, Y. Need some help, honey? Dependency-oriented helping relations between women and men in the domestic sphere. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 120, 1175–1203 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  147. Overall, N. C. & Hammond, M. D. How intimate relationships contribute to gender inequality: sexist attitudes encourage women to trade off career success for relationship security. Policy Insights Behav. Brain Sci. 5, 40–48 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  148. Fitz, C. C. & Zucker, A. N. Everyday exposure to benevolent sexism and condom use among college women. Women Health 55, 245–262 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  149. Harris, E. A., Hornsey, M. J. & Barlow, F. K. On the link between benevolent sexism and orgasm frequency in heterosexual women. Arch. Sex. Behav. 45, 1923–1931 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  150. Harris, E. A., Hornsey, M. J., Larsen, H. F. & Barlow, F. K. Beliefs about gender predict faking orgasm in heterosexual women. Arch. Sex. Behav. 48, 2419–2433 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  151. Chisango, T., Mayekiso, T. & Thomae, M. The social nature of benevolent sexism and the antisocial nature of hostile sexism: is benevolent sexism more likely to manifest in public contexts and hostile sexism in private contexts?: antisocial and social sexism. Int. J. Psychol. 50, 363–371 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  152. Hammond, M. D., Overall, N. C. & Cross, E. J. Internalizing sexism within close relationships: perceptions of intimate partners’ benevolent sexism promote women’s endorsement of benevolent sexism. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 110, 214–238 (2016). This particularly interesting paper focuses on sexism within couples, demonstrating the dynamic and interactive nature of these attitudes.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  153. Hammond, M. D. & Overall, N. C. Men’s hostile sexism and biased perceptions of partners’ support: underestimating dependability rather than overestimating challenges to dominance. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 46, 1491–1506 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  154. Leaper, C., Gutierrez, B. C. & Farkas, T. Ambivalent sexism and reported relationship qualities in emerging adult heterosexual dating couples. Emerg. Adulthood 10, 776–787 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  155. Cross, E. J., Overall, N. C., Low, R. S. T. & McNulty, J. K. An interdependence account of sexism and power: men’s hostile sexism, biased perceptions of low power, and relationship aggression. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 117, 338–363 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  156. Overall, N. C., Chang, V. T., Cross, E. J., Low, R. S. T. & Henderson, A. M. E. Sexist attitudes predict family-based aggression during a COVID-19 lockdown. J. Fam. Psychol. 35, 1043–1052 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  157. Alvarez, C., Lameiras-Fernandez, M., Holliday, C. N., Sabri, B. & Campbell, J. Latina and Caribbean immigrant women’s experiences with intimate partner violence: a story of ambivalent sexism. J. Interpers. Violence 36, 3831–3854 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  158. Hammond, M. D. & Overall, N. C. Benevolent sexism and support of romantic partner’s goals: undermining women’s competence while fulfilling men’s intimacy needs. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 41, 1180–1194 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  159. Hammond, M. D. & Overall, N. C. When relationships do not live up to benevolent ideals: women’s benevolent sexism and sensitivity to relationship problems. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 43, 212–223 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  160. Hammond, M. D. & Overall, N. C. Endorsing benevolent sexism magnifies willingness to dissolve relationships when facing partner-ideal discrepancies. Pers. Relatsh. 21, 272–287 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  161. Cross, E. J., Overall, N. C. & Hammond, M. D. Perceiving partners to endorse benevolent sexism attenuates highly anxious women’s negative reactions to conflict. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 42, 923–940 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  162. Hashim, P. H., Michniewicz, K. & Richmond, K. Attitudes toward transnational surrogacy, ambivalent sexism, and views on financial allocation. Womens Reprod. Health https://doi.org/10.1080/23293691.2022.2062923 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  163. Li, D. & Zheng, L. Intimate partner violence and controlling behavior among male same-sex relationships in China: relationship with ambivalent sexism. J. Interpers. Violence 36, 208–230 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  164. Zhao, R. & Zheng, Y. Child development in same-sex families: beliefs of Chinese lesbians, gays, and heterosexuals. Sex. Res. Soc. Policy 18, 588–597 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  165. Ortiz-Ospira, E. & Tzvetkova, S. Working women: key facts and trends in female labor force participation. Our World In Data https://ourworldindata.org/female-labor-force-participation-key-facts (2017).

  166. Lippa, R. A., Preston, K. & Penner, J. Women’s representation in 60 occupations from 1972 to 2010: more women in high-status jobs, few women in things-oriented jobs. PLoS One 9, e95960 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  167. Eagly, A. H., Nater, C., Miller, D. I., Kaufmann, M. & Sczesny, S. Gender stereotypes have changed: a cross-temporal meta-analysis of U.S. public opinion polls from 1946 to 2018. Am. Psychol. 75, 301–315 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  168. Donnelly, K. et al. Attitudes toward women’s work and family roles in the United States, 1976–2013. Psychol. Women Q. 40, 41–54 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  169. Hegarty, P., Ansara, Y. G. & Barker, M.-J. in Gender, Sex, And Sexualities: Psychological Perspectives 53–76 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2018).

  170. Xiao, L. & Wang, F. Examining the links between beauty ideals internalization, the objectification of women, and ambivalent sexism among Chinese women: the effects of sexual orientation. Arch. Sex. Behav. 50, 553–562 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  171. Aktan, T. & Yalçındağ, B. Çelişik Duygulu Cinsiyetçilik Ölçeğinin (ÇDCÖ) Yeniden Gözden Geçirilmesi: Korumacı Cinsiyetçiliğin Yapı Geçerliliği ve ÇDCÖ’nün Ölçüm Değişmezliği. Psikol. Çalışmaları Stud. Psychol. https://doi.org/10.26650/SP2022-820401 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  172. Trut, V., Sinovčić, P. & Milavić, B. Initial validation of the ambivalent sexism inventory in a military setting. Soc. Sci. 11, 176 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  173. McMahon, J. M. & Kahn, K. B. Benevolent racism? The impact of target race on ambivalent sexism. Group Process Intergroup Relat. 19, 169–183 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  174. Blumell, L. E. & Rodriguez, N. S. Ambivalent sexism and gay men in the US and UK. Sex. Cult. 24, 209–229 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  175. Charlesworth, T. E. S. & Banaji, M. R. Patterns of implicit and explicit stereotype. III: Long-term change in gender stereotypes. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 13, 14–26 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  176. Kite, M. E., Togans, L. J. & Schultz, T. J. in Cross-Cultural Psychology (ed. Keith, K. D.) 427–448 (Wiley, 2019).

  177. Azevedo, F., Jost, J. T., Rothmund, T. & Sterling, J. Neoliberal ideology and the justification of inequality in capitalist societies: why social and economic dimensions of ideology are intertwined: neoliberal ideology and justification. J. Soc. Issues 75, 49–88 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  178. Girerd, L. & Bonnot, V. Neoliberalism: an ideological barrier to feminist identification and collective action. Soc. Justice Res. 33, 81–109 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  179. Huang, Y., Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. The gradual move toward gender equality: a 7-year latent growth model of ambivalent sexism. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 10, 335–344 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  180. Gomes, A., Gonçalves, G., Sousa, C., Santos, J. & Giger, J.-C. Are we getting less sexist? A ten-year gap comparison analysis of sexism in a Portuguese sample. Psychol. Rep. 125, 2160–2177 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  181. Jones, C. W., Mitchell, J. S. & Martin, J. D. Ambivalent sexism? Shifting patterns of gender bias in five Arab countries. Int. Stud. Q. 65, 277–293 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  182. Mukkamala, S. & Suyemoto, K. L. Racialized sexism/sexualized racism: a multimethod study of intersectional experiences of discrimination for Asian American women. Asian Am. J. Psychol. 9, 32–46 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  183. Buchanan, N. T. & Ormerod, A. J. Racialized sexual harassment in the lives of African American women. Women Ther. 25, 107–124 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  184. Esqueda, C. W. & Harrison, L. A. The influence of gender role stereotypes, the woman’s race, and level of provocation and resistance on domestic violence culpability attributions. Sex Roles 53, 821–834 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  185. Keddie, A. Disrupting (gendered) Islamophobia: the practice of feminist ijtihad to support the agency of young Muslim women. J. Gend. Stud. 27, 522–533 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  186. Hamzeh, M. Pedagogies Of De-veiling: Muslim Girls And The Hijab Discourse (Information Age Publishing, 2012).

  187. Gaunt, R. Breadwinning moms, caregiving dads: double standard in social judgments of gender norm violators. J. Fam. Issues 34, 3–24 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  188. Bills, M. A. & Hayes, B. E. The association between adherence to sexist beliefs and traditional family norms, religion, and attitudes toward sexual minorities. J. Homosex. 69, 499–524 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  189. Davies, M. Correlates of negative attitudes toward gay men: sexism, male role norms, and male sexuality. J. Sex. Res. 41, 259–266 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  190. Sakalli, N. The relationship between sexism and attitudes toward homosexuality in a sample of Turkish college students. J. Homosex. 42, 53–64 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  191. Jordan, J. A., Lawler, J. R. & Bosson, J. K. Ambivalent classism: the importance of assessing hostile and benevolent ideologies about poor people. Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 43, 46–67 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  192. Cary, L. A., Chasteen, A. L. & Remedios, J. The ambivalent ageism scale: developing and validating a scale to measure benevolent and hostile ageism. Gerontologist 57, e27–e36 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  193. Nario‐Redmond, M. R., Kemerling, A. A. & Silverman, A. Hostile, benevolent, and ambivalent ableism: contemporary manifestations. J. Soc. Issues 75, 726–756 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  194. Cuddy, A. J. C. et al. Stereotype content model across cultures: towards universal similarities and some differences. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 48, 1–33 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all colleagues whose work has contributed to the state of the art in this field, whether or not space allowed for it to be explicitly mentioned in the article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK

    Manuela Barreto & David Matthew Doyle

Authors
  1. Manuela Barreto
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David Matthew Doyle
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Both authors contributed to all aspects of the article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manuela Barreto.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Reviews Psychology thanks Theresa Vescio and the other, anonymous, reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barreto, M., Doyle, D.M. Benevolent and hostile sexism in a shifting global context. Nat Rev Psychol 2, 98–111 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00136-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00136-x

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing