Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Perspective
  • Published:

A contextualized reinforcer pathology approach to addiction

Abstract

Behavioural economic accounts of addiction conceptualize harmful drug use as an operant reinforcer pathology, emphasizing that a drug is consumed because of overvaluation of smaller immediate rewards relative to larger delayed rewards (delay discounting) and high drug reinforcing value (drug demand). These motivational processes are within-individual determinants of behaviour. A third element of learning theory posits that harmful drug use depends on the relative constraints on access to other available activities and commodities in the choice context (alternative reinforcers), reflecting the substantial influence of environmental factors. In this Perspective, we integrate alternative reinforcers into the contemporary behavioural economic account of harmful drug use — the contextualized reinforcer pathology model — and review empirical literature across the translational spectrum in support of this model. Furthermore, we consider how increases in drug-related mortality and health disparities in addiction can be understood and potentially ameliorated via a contextualized reinforcer pathology model in which lack of alternative reinforcement is a major risk factor for addiction.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Behavioural economic demand and delayed reward discounting.
Fig. 2: Situating behavioural economic theories of addiction.
Fig. 3: A contextualized reinforcer pathology approach.
Fig. 4: Interactions between substance cost and alternative reward.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Key substance use and mental health indicators in the United States: results from the 2020 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration https://www.samhsa.gov/data/ (2021).

  2. McKetta, S. & Keyes, K. M. Heavy and binge alcohol drinking and parenting status in the United States from 2006 to 2018: an analysis of nationally representative cross-sectional surveys. PLoS Med. 16, e1002954 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Acuff, S. F., Strickland, J. C., Tucker, J. A. & Murphy, J. G. Changes in alcohol use during COVID-19 and associations with contextual and individual difference variables: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol. Addict. Behav. 36, 1–19 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Global Status Report On Alcohol And Health 2018. WHO https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241565639 (2018).

  5. World Drug Report 2021. United Nations https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/data-and-analysis/wdr2021.html (2021).

  6. Tapper, E. B. & Parikh, N. D. Mortality due to cirrhosis and liver cancer in the United States, 1999–2016: observational study. BMJ 362, k2817 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Long-term trends in deaths of despair; Report Of The Social Capital Project. Joint Economic Committee https://www.jec.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/0f2d3dba-9fdc-41e5-9bd1-9c13f4204e35/jec-report-deaths-of-despair.pdf (2019).

  8. White, A. M., Castle, I.-J. P., Powell, P. A., Hingson, R. W. & Koob, G. F. Alcohol-related deaths during the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 327, 1704–1706 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Remington, P. L. & Brownson, R. C. Fifty years of progress in chronic disease epidemiology and control. Morb. Mortal. Wkly Rep. 60, 70–77 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sacks, J. J., Gonzales, K. R., Bouchery, E. E., Tomedi, L. E. & Brewer, R. D. 2010 national and state costs of excessive alcohol consumption. Am. J. Prev. Med. 49, e73–e79 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Friedman, J., Beletsky, L. & Schriger, D. L. Overdose-related cardiac arrests observed by emergency medical services during the US COVID-19 epidemic. JAMA Psychiat. 78, 562–564 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Patterson, S., Westfall, J. & Miller, B. F. Projected Deaths Of Despair During The Coronavirus Recession (Well Being Trust, 2020).

  13. Bickel, W. K. & Athamneh, L. N. A reinforcer pathology perspective on relapse. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 113, 48–56 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bickel, W. K., Johnson, M. W., Koffarnus, M. N., MacKillop, J. & Murphy, J. G. The behavioral economics of substance use disorders: reinforcement pathologies and their repair. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 10, 641–677 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Rachlin, H. Four teleological theories of addiction. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 4, 462–473 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Murphy, J. G. & MacKillop, J. Relative reinforcing efficacy of alcohol among college student drinkers. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 14, 219–227 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang, S. et al. A Bayesian hierarchical model for individual participant data meta-analysis of demand curves. Stat. Med. 41, 2276–2290 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kaplan, B. A. et al. Understanding alcohol motivation using the alcohol purchase task: a methodological systematic review. Drug. Alcohol. Depend. 191, 117–140 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Martínez-Loredo, V., González-Roz, A., Secades-Villa, R., Fernández-Hermida, J. R. & MacKillop, J. Concurrent validity of the Alcohol Purchase Task for measuring the reinforcing efficacy of alcohol: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Addiction https://doi.org/10.1111/add.15379 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jacobs, E. A. & Bickel, W. K. Modeling drug consumption in the clinic using simulation procedures: demand for heroin and cigarettes in opioid-dependent outpatients. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 7, 412–426 (1999).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lemley, S. M., Kaplan, B. A., Reed, D. D., Darden, A. C. & Jarmolowicz, D. P. Reinforcer pathologies: predicting alcohol related problems in college drinking men and women. Drug. Alcohol. Depend 167, 57–66 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pickover, A. M., Messina, B. G., Correia, C. J., Garza, K. B. & Murphy, J. G. A behavioral economic analysis of the nonmedical use of prescription drugs among young adults. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 24, 38–47 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Aston, E. R., Metrik, J., Amlung, M. T., Kahler, C. W. & MacKillop, J. Interrelationships between marijuana demand and discounting of delayed rewards: convergence in behavioral economic methods. Drug. Alcohol. Depend. 169, 141–147 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Petry, N. M. & Bickel, W. K. Polydrug abuse in heroin addicts: a behavioral economic analysis. Addiction 93, 321–335 (1998).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Acuff, S. F., Soltis, K. E., Dennhardt, A. A., Berlin, K. S. & Murphy, J. G. Evaluating behavioral economic models of heavy drinking among college students. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res 42, 1304–1314 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Aston, E. R., Metrik, J. & MacKillop, J. Further validation of a marijuana purchase task. Drug. Alcohol. Depend. 152, 32–38 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Bertholet, N., Murphy, J. G., Daeppen, J. B., Gmel, G. & Gaume, J. The alcohol purchase task in young men from the general population. Drug. Alcohol. Depend 146, 39–44 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gex, K. S. et al. Change in alcohol demand following a brief intervention predicts change in alcohol use: a latent growth curve analysis. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res. 46, 1525–1538 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gaume, J. et al. Behavioral economics indices predict alcohol use and consequences in young men at 4-year follow-up. Addiction 117, 2816–2825 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Mazur, J. E. in The Effect Of Delay And Of Intervening Events On Reinforcement Value (eds Commons, M. L., Mazur, J. E., Nevin, J. A. & Rachlin, H.) 55–73 (Lawrence Erlbaum, 1987).

  31. Ainslie, G. & Herrnstein, R. J. Preference reversal and delayed reinforcement. Anim. Learn. Behav 9, 476–482 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Vuchinich, R. E. & Heather, N. (eds) Choice, Behavioural Economics And Addiction (Pergamon/Elsevier Science, 2003).

  33. Vuchinich, R. E. Alcohol abuse as molar choice: an update of a 1982 proposal. Psychol. Addict. Behav. 9, 223–235 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Odum, A. L. & Rainaud, C. P. Discounting of delayed hypothetical money, alcohol, and food. Behav. Process. 64, 305–313 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Odum, A. L. et al. Delay discounting of different outcomes: review and theory. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 113, 657–679 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Rung, J. M. & Madden, G. J. Experimental reductions of delay discounting and impulsive choice: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 147, 1349–13831 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Voss, A. T., Jorgensen, M. K. & Murphy, J. G. Episodic future thinking as a brief alcohol intervention for heavy drinking college students: a pilot feasibility study. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 30, 313–325 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Stein, J. S., Tegge, A. N., Turner, J. K. & Bickel, W. K. Episodic future thinking reduces delay discounting and cigarette demand: an investigation of the good-subject effect. J. Behav. Med. 41, 269–276 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Bulley, A. & Gullo, M. J. The influence of episodic foresight on delay discounting and demand for alcohol. Addict. Behav. 66, 1–6 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Bickel, W. K. et al. in Recent Advances In Research On Impulsivity And Impulsive Behaviors (eds De Wit, H. & Jentsch, J. D.) 139–162 (Springer, 2020).

  41. Hursh, S. R. Economic concepts for the analysis of behavior. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 34, 219–238 (1980).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Hursh, S. R. Behavioral economics. J. Exp. Anal. Behav 42, 435–452 (1984).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Heyman, G. M. How individuals make choices explains addiction’s distinctive, non-eliminable features. Behav. Brain Res. 397, 112899 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Hume, D. A Treatise Of Human Nature (eds Norton, D. F. & Norton, M. J.) (Clarendon Press, 2000).

  45. Tucker, J. A., Buscemi, J., Murphy, J. G., Reed, D. D. & Vuchinich, R. E. Addictive behavior as molar behavioral allocation: distinguishing efficient and final causes in translational research and practice. Psychol. Addict. Behav. https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000845 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Heilig, M., Mackillop, J. & Leggio, L. Addiction as a brain disease revised: why it still matters, and the need for consilience. Neuropsychopharmacology https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-020-00950-y (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Volkow, N. D., Koob, G. F. & McLellan, A. T. Neurobiologic advances from the brain disease model of addiction. N. Engl. J. Med. 374, 363–371 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Bennett, A. & Golub, A. in APA Addiction Syndrome Handbook Vol. 1 Foundations, Influences, And Expressions Of Addiction (eds Shaffer, H. J., LaPlante, D. A. & Nelson, S. E.) 195–210 (American Psychological Association, 2012).

  49. Singer, M. Anthropology and addiction: an historical review. Addiction 107, 1747–1755 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Acuff, S. F. & Murphy, J. G. Commentary on Martínez-Loredo et al.: Where do we go from here? Increasing the clinical utility of alcohol purchase tasks by expanding our definition of constraint. Addiction 116, 2651–2652 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Amlung, M. T. & MacKillop, J. Understanding the effects of stress and alcohol cues on motivation for alcohol via behavioral economics. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 38, 17801789 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Rose, A. K., Brown, K., MacKillop, J., Field, M. & Hogarth, L. Alcohol devaluation has dissociable effects on distinct components of alcohol behaviour. Psychopharmacology 235, 1233–1244 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Ferguson, E., Bush, N., Yurasek, A. & Boissoneault, J. The effect of next day responsibilities and an adaptive purchase task on cannabis demand. Drug. Alcohol. Depend. 227, 108919 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Joyner, K. J. et al. High opportunity cost demand as an indicator of weekday drinking and distinctly severe alcohol problems: a behavioral economic analysis. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 43, 2607–2619 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Acuff, S. F., MacKillop, J. & Murphy, J. G. Integrating behavioral economic and social network influences in understanding alcohol misuse among emerging adults. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.14351 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Acuff, S. F., Soltis, K. E. & Murphy, J. G. Using demand curves to quantify the reinforcing value of social and solitary drinking. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 44, 1497–1507 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Acuff, S. F., Amlung, M. T., Dennhardt, A. A., MacKillop, J. & Murphy, J. G. Experimental manipulations of behavioral economic demand for addictive commodities: a meta-analysis. Addiction 115, 817–831 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Bujarski, S., MacKillop, J. & Ray, L. A. Understanding naltrexone mechanism of action and pharmacogenetics in Asian Americans via behavioral economics: a preliminary study. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 20, 181–190 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Dennhardt, A. A., Yurasek, A. M. & Murphy, J. G. Change in delay discounting and substance reward value following a brief alcohol and drug use intervention. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 103, 125–140 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Koffarnus, M. N., Jarmolowicz, D. P., Mueller, E. T. & Bickel, W. K. Changing delay discounting in the light of the competing neurobehavioral decision systems theory: a review. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 99, 32–57 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Berry, M. S., Sweeney, M. M., Morath, J., Odum, A. L. & Jordan, K. E. The nature of impulsivity: visual exposure to natural environments decreases impulsive decision-making in a delay discounting task. PLoS One 9, e97915 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Snider, S. E. et al. Reinforcer pathology: narrative of hurricane-associated loss increases delay discounting, demand, and consumption of highly palatable snacks in the obese. Psychol. Addict. Behav. 34, 136–146 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Bickel, W. K., George Wilson, A., Chen, C., Koffarnus, M. N. & Franck, C. T. Stuck in time: negative income shock constricts the temporal window of valuation spanning the future and the past. PLoS One 11, e0163051 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Sze, Y. Y., Stein, J. S., Bickel, W. K., Paluch, R. A. & Epstein, L. H. Bleak present, bright future: online episodic future thinking, scarcity, delay discounting, and food demand. Clin. Psychol. Sci. 5, 683–697 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Herrnstein, R. J. Formal properties of the matching law. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 21, 159–164 (1974).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Herrnstein, R. J. Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 4, 267–272 (1961).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. de Villiers, P. A. & Herrnstein, R. J. Toward a law of response strength. Psychol. Bull. 83, 1131–1153 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Rachlin, H. On the tautology of the matching law. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 15, 249–251 (1971).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Acuff, S. F., Dennhardt, A. A., Correia, C. J. & Murphy, J. G. Measurement of substance-free reinforcement in addiction: a systematic review. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 70, 79–90 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Hunt, P. S., Lant, G. M. & Carroll, C. A. Enhanced intake of ethanol in preweanling rats following interactions with intoxicated siblings. Dev. Psychobiol. 37, 90–99 (2000).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Carroll, M. E. in Advances In Behavioral Economics 37–68 (Ablex Publishing, 1996).

  72. Carroll, M. E., Krattiger, K. L., Gieske, D. & Sadoff, D. A. Cocaine-base smoking in rhesus monkeys: reinforcing and physiological effects. Psychopharmacology https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02247123 (1990).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Griffiths, R. R., Troisi, J. R. II, Silverman, K. & Mumford, G. K. Multiple choice procedure: an efficient approach for investigating drug reinforcement in humans. Behav. Pharmacol. 4, 3–13 (1993).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Griffiths, R. R., Bigelow, G. E. & Liebson, I. A. Effect of ethanol self-administration on choice behavior: money vs. socializing. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 3, 443–446 (1975).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Griffiths, R. R., Rush, C. R. & Puhala, K. A. Validation of the multiple-choice procedure for investigating drug reinforcement in humans. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. https://doi.org/10.1037/1064-1297.4.1.97 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Ahmed, S. H. Trying to make sense of rodents’ drug choice behavior. Prog. Neuro-psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiat. 87, 3–10 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Ahmed, S. H. & Koob, G. F. Transition from moderate to excessive drug intake: change in hedonic set point. Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.282.5387.298 (1998).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Augier, E. et al. A molecular mechanism for choosing alcohol over an alternative reward. Science 360, 1321–1326 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Ahmed, S. H. Individual decision-making in the causal pathway to addiction: contributions and limitations of rodent models. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 164, 22–31 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Hutsell, B. A., Negus, S. S. & Banks, M. L. A generalized matching law analysis of cocaine vs. food choice in rhesus monkeys: effects of candidate “agonist-based” medications on sensitivity to reinforcement. Drug. Alcohol. Depend. 146, 52–60 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Chow, J. J. & Beckmann, J. S. Remifentanil–food choice follows predictions of relative subjective value. Drug. Alcohol Depend. 218, 108369 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Negus, S. S. Rapid assessment of choice between cocaine and food in rhesus monkeys: effects of environmental manipulations andtreatment with d-amphetamine and flupenthixol. Neuropsychopharmacology 28, 919–931 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Madsen, H. B. & Ahmed, S. H. Drug versus sweet reward: greater attraction to and preference for sweet versus drug cues. Addict. Biol. 20, 433–444 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Herrnstein, R. J. & Prelec, D. in Choice Over Time (eds Loewenstein, G. & Elster, J.) 331–361 (Sage, 1992).

  85. Heyman, G. M. Consumption dependent changes in reward value: a framework for understanding addiction. In Choice, Behavioural Economics And Addiction (eds Vuchinich, R. E. & Heather, N.) 95–127 (Pergamon/Elsevier Science, 2003).

  86. Heyman, G. M. & Dunn, B. Decision biases and persistent illicit drug use: an experimental study of distributed choice and addiction. Drug. Alcohol. Depend. 67, 193–203 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. MacKillop, J. The behavioral economics and neuroeconomics of alcohol use disorders. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 40, 672–685 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. Baum, W. M. On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 22, 231–242 (1974).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Alexander, B. K., Coambs, R. B. & Hadaway, P. F. The effect of housing and gender on morphine self-administration in rats. Psychopharmacology 58, 175–179 (1978).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Alexander, B. K., Beyerstein, B. L., Hadaway, P. F. & Coambs, R. B. Effect of early and later colony housing on oral ingestion of morphine in rats. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 15, 571–576 (1981).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Ginsburg, B. C. & Lamb, R. J. Frustration stress (unexpected loss of alternative reinforcement) increases opioid self-administration in a model of recovery. Drug. Alcohol. Depend. 182, 33–39 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Smith, M. A. & Pitts, E. G. Access to a running wheel inhibits the acquisition of cocaine self-administration. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav 100, 237–243 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. Cosgrove, K. P., Hunter, R. G. & Carroll, M. E. Wheel-running attenuates intravenous cocaine self-administration in rats: sex differences. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 73, 663–671 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Lenoir, M. & Ahmed, S. H. Supply of a nondrug substitute reduces escalated heroin consumption. Neuropsychopharmacology 33, 2272–2282 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Huynh, C., Fam, J., Ahmed, S. H. & Clemens, K. J. Rats quit nicotine for a sweet reward following an extensive history of nicotine use. Addict. Biol. 22, 142–151 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Carroll, M. E. Voluntary exercise as a treatment for incubated and expanded drug craving leading to relapse to addiction: animal models. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 208, 173210 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Miller, M. L. et al. Reciprocal inhibitory effects of intravenous d-methamphetamine self-administration and wheel activity in rats. Drug. Alcohol. Depend. 121, 90–96 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Kim, J. S. & Kearns, D. N. Reduced ethanol self-administration in rats produced by the introduction of a high value non-drug alternative reinforcer. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 184, 139–148 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Venniro, M., Panlilio, L. V., Epstein, D. H. & Shaham, Y. The protective effect of operant social reward on cocaine self-administration, choice, and relapse is dependent on delay and effort for the social reward. Neuropsychopharmacology 46, 2350–2357 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. Cohen, M., Liebson, I. A., Faillace, L. A. & Allen, R. P. Moderate drinking by chronic alcoholics: a schedule dependent phenomenon. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 153, 434–444 (1971).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Griffiths, R. R., Bigelow, G. E. & Liebson, I. A. Suppression of ethanol self-administration in alcoholics by contingent time-out from social interactions. Behav. Res. Ther. 12, 327–334 (1974).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Bigelow, G. E. in International Handbook Of Alcohol Dependence And Problems (eds Heather, N., Peters, T. J. & Stockwell, T.) 299–315 (Wiley, 2001).

  103. Vuchinich, R. E. & Tucker, J. A. Behavioral theories of choice as a framework for studying drinking behavior. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 92, 408–416 (1983).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Higgins, S. T., Bickel, W. K. & Hughes, J. R. Influence of an alternative reinforcer on human cocaine self-administration. Life Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3205(94)00878-7 (1994).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Strickland, J. C. et al. Contribution of cocaine-related cues to concurrent monetary choice in humans. Psychopharmacology 235, 2871–2881 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  106. Strickland, J. C., Lile, J. A. & Stoops, W. W. Contribution of cannabis-related cues to concurrent reinforcer choice in humans. Drug. Alcohol. Depend. 199, 85–91 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  107. Comer, S. D. et al. Effects of an alternative reinforcer on intravenous heroin self- administration by humans. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 345, 13–26 (1998).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Hogarth, L. & Hardy, L. Alcohol use disorder symptoms are associated with greater relative value ascribed to alcohol, but not greater discounting of costs imposed on alcohol. Psychopharmacology 235, 2257–2266 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  109. Haney, M., Comer, S. D., Ward, A. S., Foltin, R. W. & Fischman, M. W. Factors influencing marijuana self-administration by humans. Behav. Pharmacol. 8, 101–112 (1997).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Lile, J. A. et al. Pharmacological validation of a translational model of cocaine use disorder: effects of d-amphetamine maintenance on choice between intravenous cocaine and a non-drug alternative in humans and rhesus monkeys. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 28, 169–180 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Hart, C. L., Haney, M., Foltin, R. W. & Fischman, M. W. Alternative reinforcers differentially modify cocaine self-administration by humans. Behav. Pharmacol. 11, 87–91 (2000).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Fischman, M. W. & Foltin, R. W. Self-administration of cocaine by humans: a laboratory perspective. Ciba Found. Symp. 166, 165–173 (1992).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Foltin, R. W., Haney, M., Bedi, G. & Evans, S. M. Modafinil decreases cocaine choice in human cocaine smokers only when the response requirement and the alternative reinforcer magnitude are large. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 150–151, 8–13 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  114. Hogarth, L. & Field, M. Relative expected value of drugs versus competing rewards underpins vulnerability to and recovery from addiction. Behav. Brain Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2020.112815 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  115. Davison, M. & Baum, W. M. Choice in a variable environment: every reinforcer counts. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 74, 1–24 (2000).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  116. Schneider, W. Reinforcer effectiveness as a function of reinforcer rate and magnitude: a comparison of concurrent performances. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 20, 461–471 (1973).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  117. Young, J. S. Discrete-trial choice in pigeons: effects of reinforcer magnitude. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 35, 23–29 (1981).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  118. Davison, M. & Baum, W. M. Every reinforcer counts: reinforcer magnitude and local preference. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 80, 95–129 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  119. Hallgren, K. A., Greenfield, B. L. & Ladd, B. O. Psychometric properties of the Adolescent Reinforcement Survey Schedule — alcohol use version with college student drinkers. Subst. Use Misuse 51, 812–822 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  120. Delmée, L., Roozen, H. G. & Steenhuis, I. The engagement of non-substance-related pleasant activities is associated with decreased levels of alcohol consumption in university students. Int. J. Ment. Health Addict. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-017-9857-5 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  121. Audrain-McGovern, J. E., Rodriguez, D., Rodgers, K. & Cuevas, J. Declining alternative reinforcers link depression to young adult smoking. Addiction 106, 178–187 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  122. Rogers, R. E. et al. Abstinence-contingent reinforcement and engagement in non-drug-related activities among illicit drug abusers. Psychol. Addict. Behav. 22, 544–550 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  123. Meshesha, L. Z., Dennhardt, A. A. & Murphy, J. G. Polysubstance use is associated with deficits in substance-free reinforcement in college students. J. Stud. Alcohol. Drugs 76, 106–116 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Andrabi, N., Khoddam, R. & Leventhal, A. M. Socioeconomic disparities in adolescent substance use: role of enjoyable alternative substance-free activities. Soc. Sci. Med. 176, 175–182 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  125. Andrabi, N., Leventhal, A. M. & Khoddam, R. Diminished alternative reinforcement mediates socioeconomic disparities in adolescent substance ase: a longitudinal study. Drug. Alcohol. Depend. 171, e8 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  126. Correia, C. J., Carey, K. B., Simons, J. S. & Borsari, B. E. Relationships between binge drinking and substance-free reinforcement in a sample of college students: a preliminary investigation. Addict. Behav. 28, 361–368 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  127. Correia, C. J., Simons, J. S., Carey, K. B. & Borsari, B. E. Predicting drug use: application of behavioral theories of choice. Addict. Behav. 23, 705–709 (1998).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Van Etten, M. L., Higgins, S. T., Budney, A. J. & Badger, G. J. Comparison of the frequency and enjoyability of pleasant events in cocaine abusers vs. non-abusers using a standardized behavioral inventory. Addiction 93, 1669–1680 (1998).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. Tucker, J. A., Chandler, S. D. & Witkiewitz, K. Epidemiology of recovery from alcohol use disorder. Alcohol. Res. Curr. Rev. 40, 1–12. (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  130. Lee, D. C., Stanger, C. & Budney, A. J. A comparison of delay discounting in adolescents and adults in treatment for cannabis use disorders. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038792 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  131. Murphy, J. G. et al. Behavioral economic predictors of brief alcohol intervention outcomes. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 83, 1033–1043 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  132. Schnoll, R. A. et al. Longitudinal changes in smoking abstinence symptoms and alternative reinforcers predict long-term smoking cessation outcomes. Drug. Alcohol. Depend. 165, 245–252 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  133. Worley, M. J., Shoptaw, S. J., Bickel, W. K. & Ling, W. Using behavioral economics to predict opioid use during prescription opioid dependence treatment. Drug. Alcohol. Depend. 148, 62–68 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  134. Tucker, J. A., Vuchinich, R. E. & Rippens, P. D. Predicting natural resolution of alcohol-related problems: a prospective behavioral economic analysis. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 10, 248–257 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  135. Tucker, J. A., Cheong, J. W., James, T. G., Jung, S. & Chandler, S. D. Preresolution drinking problem severity profiles associated with stable moderation outcomes of natural recovery attempts. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 44, 738–745 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  136. Tucker, J. A., Foushee, H. R. & Black, B. C. Behavioral economic analysis of natural resolution of drinking problems using IVR self-monitoring. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 16, 332–340 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  137. Tucker, J. A., Vuchinich, R. E. & Rippens, P. D. Environmental contexts surrounding resolution of drinking problems among problem drinkers with different help-seeking experiences. J. Stud. Alcohol 63, 334–341 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. Tucker, J. A., Vuchinich, R. E. & Gladsjo, J. A. Environmental events surrounding natural recovery from alcohol-related problems. J. Addict. Nurs. https://doi.org/10.3109/10884609409021737 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  139. Witkiewitz, K., Litten, R. Z. & Leggio, L. Advances in the science and treatment of alcohol use disorder. Sci. Adv. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax4043 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  140. Vilsaint, C. L. et al. Development and validation of a Brief Assessment of Recovery Capital (BARC-10) for alcohol and drug use disorder. Drug. Alcohol. Depend. 177, 71–76 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  141. Best, D. & Hennessy, E. A. The science of recovery capital: where do we go from here? Addiction 117, 1139–1145 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  142. McKay, J. R. Making the hard work of recovery more attractive for those with substance use disorders. Addiction 112, 751–757 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  143. Higgins, S. T., Heil, S. H. & Lussier, J. P. Clinical implications of reinforcement as a determinant of substance use disorders. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 55, 431–461 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  144. Meyers, R. J., Roozen, H. G. & Smith, J. E. The community reinforcement approach. Alcohol. Res. Health 33, 380–388 (2011).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  145. Petry, N. M., Martin, B., Cooney, J. L. & Kranzler, H. R. Give them prizes, and they will come: contingency management for treatment of alcohol dependence. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.68.2.250 (2000).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  146. Petry, N. M., Barry, D., Alessi, S. M., Rounsaville, B. J. & Carroll, K. M. A randomized trial adapting contingency management targets based on initial abstinence status of cocaine-dependent patients. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026883 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  147. Bolívar, H. A. et al. Contingency management for patients receiving medication for opioid use disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiat. 78, 1092–1102 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  148. Higgins, S. T. et al. A behavioral approach to achieving initial cocaine abstinence. Am. J. Psychiat. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.148.9.1218 (1991).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  149. Davis, D. R. et al. A review of the literature on contingency management in the treatment of substance use disorders, 2009–2014. Prev. Med. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.08.008 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  150. Petry, N. M., Alessi, S. M., Hanson, T. & Sierra, S. Randomized trial of contingent prizes versus vouchers in cocaine-using methadone patients. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 75, 983–991 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  151. Rawson, R. A. et al. A comparison of contingency management and cognitive-behavioral approaches during methadone maintenance treatment for cocaine dependence. Psychosoc. Treat. 59, 87–104 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  152. Epstein, D. H., Hawkins, W. E., Covi, L., Umbricht, A. & Preston, K. L. Cognitive-behavioral therapy plus contingency management for cocaine use: findings during treatment and across 12-month follow-up. Psychol. Addict. Behav. 17, 73–82 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  153. Pfund, R. A., Ginley, M. K., Rash, C. J., & Zajac, K. Contingency management for treatment attendance: a meta-analysis. J. Subst. Abuse Treat 133, 108556 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  154. Archer, M., Harwood, H., Stevelink, S., Rafferty, L. & Greenberg, N. Community reinforcement and family training and rates of treatment entry: a systematic review. Addiction 115, 1024–1037 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  155. De Crescenzo, F. et al. Comparative efficacy and acceptability of psychosocial interventions for individuals with cocaine and amphetamine addiction: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. PLoS Med 15, e10027 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  156. Lewinsohn, P. M. in The Psychology Of Depression: Contemporary Theory And Research 157–178 (1974).

  157. Daughters, S. B., Magidson, J. F., Lejuez, C. W. & Chen, Y. LETS Act: a behavioral activation treatment for substance use and depression. Adv. Dual Diagn. 9, 74–84 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  158. Daughters, S. B. et al. The effect of a behavioral activation treatment for substance use on post-treatment abstinence: a randomized controlled trial. Addiction 113, 535–544 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  159. Murphy, J. G. et al. A randomized controlled trial of a behavioral economic supplement to brief motivational interventions for college drinking. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 80, 876–886 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  160. Murphy, J. G. et al. A randomized clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of a brief alcohol intervention supplemented with a substance-free activity session or relaxation training. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 87, 657–669 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  161. Gex, K. S. et al. A randomized pilot trial of a mobile delivered brief motivational interviewing and behavioral economic alcohol intervention for emerging adults. Psychol. Addict. Behav. https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000838 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  162. Meshesha, L. Z. et al. Pilot trial investigating a brief behavioral economic intervention as an adjunctive treatment for alcohol use disorder. J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 113, 108002 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  163. Mulia, N., Tam, T., Bond, J., Zemore, S. E. & Li, L. Racial/ethnic differences in life-course heavy drinking from adolescence to midlife. J. Ethn. Subst. Abuse 17, 167–186 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  164. Mulia, N., Zemore, S. E., Murphy, R., Liu, H. & Catalano, R. Economic loss and alcohol consumption and problems during the 2008 to 2009 U.S. recession. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 38, 1026–1034 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  165. Probst, C., Roerecke, M., Behrendt, S. & Rehm, J. Gender differences in socioeconomic inequality of alcohol-attributable mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Drug. Alcohol. Rev 34, 267–277 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  166. Matthay, E. C., Mousli, L., Ponicki, W. R., Glymour, M. M. & Apollonio, E. A spatiotemporal analysis of the association of California city and county cannabis policies with cannabis outlet densities. Epidemiology 33, 715–725 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  167. Pedersen, E. R. et al. Examining associations between licensed and unlicensed outlet density and cannabis outcomes from preopening to postopening of recreational cannabis outlets. Am. J. Addict. 30, 122–130 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  168. Lee, J. P., Ponicki, W., Mair, C., Gruenewald, P. & Ghanem, L. What explains the concentration of off-premise alcohol outlets in Black neighborhoods. SSM Popul. Health 12, 100669 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  169. Romley, J. A., Cohen, D., Ringel, J. & Sturm, R. Alcohol and environmental justice: the density of liquor stores and bars in urban neighborhoods in the United States. J. Stud. Alcohol. Drugs 68, 48–55 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  170. Brenner, A. B., Borrell, L. N., Barrientos-Gutierrez, T. & Diez Roux, A. V. Longitudinal associations of neighborhood socioeconomic characteristics and alcohol availability on drinking: results from the Multi-ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Soc. Sci. Med. 145, 17–25 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  171. Hogarth, L. in Evaluating the Brain Disease Model of Addiction (Heather, N., Field, M., Moss, A. C. & Satel, S.) 216–236 (Routledge, 2022).

  172. Lee, J. O. et al. Developmental pathways from parental socioeconomic status to adolescent substance use: alternative and complementary reinforcement. J. Youth Adolesc. 47, 334–348 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  173. Oshri, A. et al. Socioeconomic hardship and delayed reward discounting: associations with working memory and emotional reactivity. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 37, 100642 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  174. Mullins, T. S., Campbell, E. M. & Hogeveen, J. Neighborhood deprivation shapes motivational-neurocircuit recruitment in children. Psychol. Sci. 31, 881–889 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  175. Collins, S. E. Associations between socioeconomic factors and alcohol outcomes. Alcohol. Res. Curr. Rev. 38, 83–94 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  176. Rothstein, R. The Color Of Law (W. W. Norton Co., 2017).

  177. Kamin, D. Home appraised with a black owner: $472,000. With a white owner: $750,000. The New York Times https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/18/realestate/housing-discrimination-maryland.html (2022).

  178. Humphreys, K. & Rappaport, J. From the community mental health movement to the war on drugs: a study in the definition of social problems. Am. Psychol. 48, 892–901 (1993).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  179. US Commission on Marihuana and Drug Abuse. Marihuana: A Signal of Misunderstanding (New American Library, 1972).

  180. Nellis, A. The color of justice: racial and ethnic disparity in state prisons. Sentencing Project https://www.sentencingproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/The-Color-of-Justice-Racial-and-Ethnic-Disparity-in-State-Prisons.pdf%7B%5C%25%7D0A (2016).

  181. Zapolski, T. C., Pedersen, S. L., McCarthy, D. M., & Smith, G. T. Less drinking, yet more problems: understanding African American drinking and related problems. Psychol. Bull. 140, 188–223 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  182. Monnat, S. M. Factors associated with county-level differences in U.S. drug-related mortality rates. Am. J. Prev. Med. 54, 611–619 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  183. Knapp, E. A., Bilal, U., Dean, L. T., Lazo, M. & Celentano, D. D. Economic insecurity and deaths of despair in US counties. Am. J. Epidemiol. 188, 2131–2139 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  184. CDC vital signs: opioid prescribing. Center for Disease Control and Prevention https://www.cdc.gov/vitalsigns/opioids/index.html (2017).

  185. Smallwood, R., Woods, C., Power, T. & Usher, K. Understanding the impact of historical trauma due to colonization on the health and well-being of indigenous young peoples: a systematic scoping review. J. Transcult. Nurs. 32, 59–68 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  186. Spillane, S. et al. Trends in alcohol-induced deaths in the United States, 2000–2016. JAMA Netw. Open 3, e1921451 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  187. Brave Heart, M. Y. H. et al. Psychiatric disorders and mental health treatment in American Indians and Alaska Natives: results of the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Soc. Psychiat. Psychiatric Epidemiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-016-1225-4 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  188. Santopietro, G. D. & Zipper, C. E. in Appalachia’s Coal-Mined Landscapes: Resources And Communities In A New Energy Era (eds Zipper, C. E. & Skousen, J.) 287–310 (Springer, 2021).

  189. Sigfusdottir, I. D., Kristjansson, A. L., Thorlindsson, T. & Allegrante, J. P. Trends in prevalence of substance use among Icelandic adolescents, 1995–2006. Subst. Abuse Treat. Prev. Policy https://doi.org/10.1186/1747-597X-3-12 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  190. Kristjansson, A. L. et al. Implementing the Icelandic model for preventing adolescent substance use. Health Promot. Pract. 21, 70–79 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  191. Kristjansson, A. L., James, J. E., Allegrante, J. P., Sigfusdottir, I. D. & Helgason, A. R. Adolescent substance use, parental monitoring, and leisure-time activities: 12-year outcomes of primary prevention in Iceland. Prev. Med. 51, 168–171 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  192. Kristjansson, A. L. et al. Population trends in smoking, alcohol use and primary prevention variables among adolescents in Iceland, 1997–2014. Addiction 111, 645–652 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  193. Hibell, B. et al. The 2011 ESPAD Report: substance use among students in 36 European countries. ESPAD https://www.drugsandalcohol.ie/17644/ (2012).

  194. Merrill, J. E. & Aston, E. R. Alcohol demand assessed daily: validity, variability, and the influence of drinking-related consequences. Drug. Alcohol. Depend. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.107838 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  195. DePhilippis, D., Petry, N. M., Bonn-Miller, M. O., Rosenbach, S. B. & McKay, J. R. The national implementation of contingency management (CM) in the Department of Veterans Affairs: attendance at CM sessions and substance use outcomes. Drug. Alcohol. Depend. 185, 367–373 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  196. Rachlin, H., Kagel, J. H. & Battalio, R. C. Substitutability in time allocation. Psychol. Rev. 87, 355–374 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  197. William, B. M. Matching, undermatching, and overmatching in studies of choice. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 32, 269–281 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  198. Stewart, R. & Uggen, C. Criminal records and college admissions: a modified experimental audit. Criminology 58, 156–188 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  199. Craigie, T. A. Ban the box, convictions, and public employment. Econ. Inq. 58, 425–445 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

J.G.M. is supported by the Peter Boris Chair in Translational Addictions Research and a Tier 1 Canada Research Chair.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The authors contributed equally to all aspects of the article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James G. Murphy.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

J.G.M. is a principal in BEAM Diagnostics, Inc and a consultant to Clairvoyant Therapeutics, Inc. The other authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Reviews Psychology thanks Yavin Shaham, who co-reviewed with Jonathan Chow, and the other, anonymous, reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Acuff, S.F., MacKillop, J. & Murphy, J.G. A contextualized reinforcer pathology approach to addiction. Nat Rev Psychol 2, 309–323 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-023-00167-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-023-00167-y

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing