Table 2 Cross-lagged analyses examining the autoregressive and cross-lagged effects of cognitive adaptation, routine disruptions, and probable depression.

From: Investigating the reciprocity between cognition and behavior in adaptation to large-scale disasters

Effect

Variables

β [95% CI]

Autoregressive

T1 Cognitive adaptation → T2 Cognitive adaptation

0.412 [0.054, 0.771]*

T1 Routine disruptions → T2 Routine disruptions

0.429 [0.254, 0.604]***

T1 Probable depression → T2 Probable depression

0.440 [0.352, 0.528]***

Cross-lagged

T1 Cognitive adaptation → T2 Routine disruptions

–0.056 [–0.152, 0.040]

T1 Routine disruptions → T2 Cognitive adaptation

–0.159 [–0.312, –0.006]*

T1 Cognitive adaptation → T2 Probable depression

–0.093 [–0.213, 0.027]

T1 Routine disruptions → T2 Probable depression

0.107 [0.010, 0.204]*

T1 Probable depression → T2 Cognitive adaptation

–0.123 [–0.272, 0.025]

T1 Probable depression → T2 Routine disruptions

0.081 [–0.014, 0.176]

  1. *p < 0.050, *** p < 0.001.
  2. Probable depression was defined by scores of 10 or above on the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9); Cognitive adaptation and routine disruptions were binary variables (based on median split). Results of the sensitivity analysis based on continuous variables are presented in Supplementary Table 1.
Back to article page