Table 3 Cross-lagged analyses examining the autoregressive and cross-lagged effects of cognitive adaptation, routine disruptions, and probable anxiety.

From: Investigating the reciprocity between cognition and behavior in adaptation to large-scale disasters

Effect

Variables

β [95% CI]

Autoregressive

T1 Cognitive adaptation → T2 Cognitive adaptation

0.427 [0.096, 0.758]*

T1 Routine disruptions → T2 Routine disruptions

0.396 [0.258, 0.534]***

T1 Probable anxiety → T2 Probable anxiety

0.421 [0.321, 0.520]***

Cross-lagged

T1 Cognitive adaptation → T2 Routine disruptions

–0.068 [–0.165, 0.030]

T1 Routine disruptions → T2 Cognitive adaptation

–0.157 [–0.296, –0.018]*

T1 Cognitive adaptation → T2 Probable anxiety

–0.075 [–0.176, 0.026]

T1 Routine disruptions → T2 Probable anxiety

0.155 [0.058, 0.252]**

T1 Probable anxiety → T2 Cognitive adaptation

–0.080 [–0.196, 0.037]

T1 Probable anxiety → T2 Routine disruptions

0.063 [–0.029, 0.154]

  1. Probable anxiety was defined by scores of 10 or above on the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7); Cognitive adaptation and routine disruptions were binary variables (based on median split). Results of the sensitivity analysis based on continuous variables are presented in Supplementary Table 2.
  2. *p < 0.050, **p < 0.010, ***p < 0.001.
Back to article page