Table 4 Path analyses examining the mutual mediating mechanisms of cognitive adaptation and routine disruptions on probable depression/anxiety.

From: Investigating the reciprocity between cognition and behavior in adaptation to large-scale disasters

Outcome

Direct/Indirect effects

Direct/Indirect effect β [95% CI]

T2 Probable depression

T1 Cognitive adaptation

0.021 [–0.078, 0.120]

T1 Cognitive adaptation → T2 Routine disruptions

–0.009 [–0.025, 0.007]

T1 Routine disruptions

–0.042 [–0.149, 0.065]

T1 Routine disruptions → T2 Cognitive adaptation

0.032 [0.006, 0.058]*

T2 Probable anxiety

T1 Cognitive adaptation

0.060 [–0.049, 0.170]

T1 Cognitive adaptation → T2 Routine disruptions

–0.011 [–0.027, 0.006]

T1 Routine disruptions

0.024 [–0.097, 0.145]

T1 Routine disruptions → T2 Cognitive adaptation

0.036 [0.006, 0.066]*

  1. Probable depression was defined by scores of 10 or above on the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9); Probable anxiety was defined by scores of 10 or above on the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7); Cognitive adaptation and routine disruptions were binary variables (based on median split). Results of the sensitivity analysis based on continuous variables are presented in Supplementary Table 3.
  2. *p < 0.050.