Table 8 EDAH minimal clinical important difference based on Anchor methods and distribution methods (effect size)
From: Decreased impulsiveness and MEG normalization after AI-digital therapy in ADHD children: a RCT
Anchor-based | Fisher p value | Distribution-based | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDAH | Group | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.7 | ||
EDAH-H | Experimental | (5/25) 20% | 0.729 | (5/25) 20% | (10/25) 40% | (8/25) 32% |
Control | (6/21) 28.57% | (6/21) 28.57% | (11/23) 47.83% | (7/23) 30.43% | ||
EDAH-DA | Experimental | (11/25) 44% | 0.551 | (11/25) 44% | (11/25) 44% | (9/25) 36% |
Control | (7/21) 33.33% | (7/21) 33.33% | (10/21) 47.62% | (8/21) 38.1% | ||
EDAH-DAH | Experimental | (10/25) 40% | 0.762 | (10/25) 40% | (11/25) 44% | (9/25) 36% |
Control | (7/21) 33.33% | (7/21) 33.33% | (10/21) 47.62% | (8/21) 38.1% | ||
EDAH-GLOBAL | Experimental | (11/25) 44% | 0.363 | (18/25) 72% | (17/25) 68% | (16/25) 64% |
Control | (6/21) 28.57% | (16/21) 76.19% | (15/21) 71.43% | (15/21) 71.43% | ||
