Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Perspective
  • Published:

Systems thinking for hygiene in settings with high risk of infectious disease transmission

Abstract

Hygiene is critical for controlling infectious disease and delivering well-being. During the pandemic phase of COVID-19, there was widespread awareness of the importance of hygiene for disease control, and demand was high for action to improve access to hygiene materials. However, those efforts have faltered, and, in general, interventions to improve hygiene at scale have shown limited success in delivering sustained behaviour change and health impact. We convened experts in hygiene across sectors (for example, health, education and agriculture) and disciplines (for example, academia, policy and practice) in Dakar, Senegal, to discuss the critical barriers and opportunities for researching, developing and implementing systems-level hygiene interventions and promote learning across sectors, with a focus on systems approaches. We report what is needed to achieve catalytic improvements in hygiene in low-income settings and the Global South, with an emphasis on ‘hygienic systems’ that target all relevant hygiene moments—a set of associated behaviours at a given time and place with high pathogen exposure risk—and their enabling conditions and pre-conditions. This focus beyond individual behaviours will require removing silos across sectors and ministries, the generation of relevant evidence for policymakers and the localization of guidance.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Illustrative example of upstream influences on key hygiene moments.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

There are no data associated with this work.

References

  1. Sumpter, C. & Torondel, B. A systematic review of the health and social effects of menstrual hygiene management. PLoS ONE 8, e62004 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Stocks, M. E. et al. Effect of water, sanitation and hygiene on the prevention of trachoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 11, e1001605 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Ross, I. et al. Effectiveness of handwashing with soap for preventing acute respiratory infections in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 401, 1681–1690 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Srigley, J. A., Furness, C. D. & Gardam, M. Interventions to improve patient hand hygiene: a systematic review. J. Hosp. Infect. 94, 23–29 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Curtis, V. et al. Hygiene: new hopes, new horizons. Lancet Infect. Dis. 11, 312–321 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Taylor, D. L., Kahawita, T. M., Cairncross, S. & Ensink, J. H. J. The impact of water, sanitation and hygiene interventions to control cholera: a systematic review. PLoS ONE 10, e0135676 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Strunz, E. C. et al. Water, sanitation, hygiene and soil-transmitted helminth infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 11, e1001620 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries (Oxford Univ. Press and The World Bank, 1993).

  9. Sijbesma, C. & Christoffers, T. The value of hygiene promotion: cost-effectiveness analysis of interventions in developing countries. Health Policy Plan. 24, 418–427 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wolf, J. et al. Burden of disease attributable to unsafe drinking water, sanitation and hygiene in domestic settings: a global analysis for selected adverse health outcomes. Lancet 401, 2060–2071 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Gautam, O. P., Schmidt, W.-P., Cairncross, S., Cavill, S. & Curtis, V. Trial of a novel intervention to improve multiple food hygiene behaviors in Nepal. Am. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 96, 1415–1426 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Penakalapati, G. et al. Exposure to animal feces and human health: a systematic review and proposed research priorities. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 11537–11552 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Plesons, M. et al. Research priorities for improving menstrual health across the life-course in low- and middle-income countries. Glob. Health Action 16, 2279396 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Sweetman, C. & Medland, L. Introduction: gender and water, sanitation and hygiene. Gend. Dev. 25, 153–166 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cumming, O. et al. The implications of three major new trials for the effect of water, sanitation and hygiene on childhood diarrhea and stunting: a consensus statement. BMC Med. 17, 173 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Curtis, V. A. A natural history of hygiene. Can. J. Infect. Dis. Med. Microbiol. 18, 11–14 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. WHO. Recommendation to the Member States to Improve Hand Hygiene Practices Widely to Help Prevent the Transmission of the COVID-19 Virus (World Health Organization, 2020); https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/interim-recommendations-on-obligatory-hand-hygiene-against-transmission-of-covid-19

  18. Brauer, M., Zhao, J. T., Bennitt, F. B. & Stanaway, J. D. Global access to handwashing: implications for COVID-19 control in low-income countries. Environ. Health Perspect. 128, 057005 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Freeman, M. C. & Caruso, B. A. Comment on ‘Global access to handwashing: implications for COVID-19 control in low-income countries’. Environ. Health Perspect. 128, 098001 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Kurowski, C., Kumar, A., Mieses Ramirez, J. C., Schmidt, M. & Silfverberg, D. V. Health Financing in a Time of Global Shocks: Strong Advance, Early Retreat (World Bank, 2023); https://doi.org/10.1596/39864

  21. Joint Monitoring Program (JMP) (WHO, UNICEF); https://washdata.org/data

  22. Freeman, M. C. et al. Systematic review: Hygiene and health: systematic review of handwashing practices worldwide and update of health effects. Trop. Med. Int. Health 19, 906–916 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Allegranzi, B. et al. Burden of endemic health-care-associated infection in developing countries: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 377, 228–241 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Erasmus, V. et al. Systematic review of studies on compliance with hand hygiene guidelines in hospital care. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 31, 283–294 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ali, A. S., Yohannes, M. W. & Tesfahun, T. Hygiene behavior and COVID-19 pandemic: opportunities of COVID-19-imposed changes in hygiene behavior. Inq. J. Med. Care Organ. Provis. Financ. 60, 00469580231218421 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wilkinson, J., Goff, M., Rusoja, E., Hanson, C. & Swanson, R. C. The application of systems thinking concepts, methods and tools to global health practices: an analysis of case studies. J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 24, 607–618 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Peters, D. H. The application of systems thinking in health: why use systems thinking? Health Res. Policy Syst. 12, 51 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. de Savigny, D. & Adam, T. (eds) Systems Thinking for Health Systems Strengthening (WHO, 2009); https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/44204

  29. Sherr, K. et al. Systems analysis and improvement to optimize pMTCT (SAIA): a cluster randomized trial. Implement. Sci. 9, 55 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. McAlister, M. M. et al. Systems thinking for effective interventions in global environmental health. Environ. Sci. Technol. 56, 732–738 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Huston, A. & Moriarty, P. Understanding the WASH System and its Building Blocks (IRC-WASH, 2018).

  32. IRC, SIWI, UNICEF. Principles for Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Systems Strengthening (UNICEF, 2024).

  33. Crocker, J. et al. Hygiene system modeling for toileting in schools. SSRN https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5056224 (2025).

  34. Valcourt, N., Javernick-will, A., Walters, J. P. & Linden, K. System approaches to water, sanitation and hygiene: a systematic literature review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 17, 702 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. WASH BAT Map; https://www.washbat.org/map/list.html

  36. Rosenweig, F. Synthesis of Four Country Enabling Environment Assessments for Scaling Up Handwashing Programs. Water and Sanitation Program report (World Bank, 2008); http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/567221468325172546

  37. Kateule, E. et al. Multisectoral approach for the control of cholera outbreak—lessons and challenges from Lusaka district—Zambia, October 2023 - February 2024. Pan. Afr. Med. J. 48, 19 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Kapata, N. et al. A multisectoral emergency response approach to a cholera outbreak in Zambia: October 2017–February 2018. J. Infect. Dis. 218, S181–S183 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. CDC Clean Hands: About Handwashing (CDC, 2024); https://www.cdc.gov/clean-hands/about/index.html

  40. Crocker, J. et al. Hygiene system modeling for toileting in schools. Rev. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5056224 (2025).

  41. Principles for Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Systems Strengthening (RC, SIWI, UNICEF, 2024); https://clearinghouse.unicef.org/sites/ch/files/ch/sites-PD-WASH-WASH%20Knowledge%20unicef-2024%20Principles%20Paper-4.0.pdf

  42. Five Building Blocks (Sanitation and Water for All); https://www.sanitationandwaterforall.org/about/our-work/priority-areas/building-blocks

  43. Environmental Cleaning and Infection Prevention and Control in Health Care Facilities in Low- and Middle-Income Countries Trainer’s Guide (World Health Organization, 2023).

  44. Henson, S., Jaffee, S. & Wang, S. New Directions for Tackling Food Safety Risks in the Informal Sector of Developing Countries (CGIAR, 2023); https://hdl.handle.net/10568/130652

  45. Hygiene (Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary, 2024); https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hygiene

  46. Strategy for Water, Sanitation and Hygiene 2016–2030 (UNICEF, 2016).

  47. Haque, S. S. & Freeman, M. C. The applications of implementation science in water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) research and practice. Environ. Health Perspect. 129, 65002 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. WHO & UNICEF. Drinking Water, Sanitation and Hygiene in Schools: Global Baseline Report 2018 (World Health Organization, 2018).

  49. Macleod, C. et al. Recommendations for hand hygiene in community settings: a scoping review of current international guidelines. BMJ Open 13, e068887 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. WHO. Guidelines on Core Components of Infection Prevention and Control Programmes at the National and Acute Health Care Facility Level (World Health Organization, 2016).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Dakar Hygiene Roundtable was supported by the Reckitt Global Hygiene Institute (RGHI), including time and travel for all authors. RGHI was involved in the planning of the Dakar Roundtable Meeting, but not in the final publication or decision to publish this commentary.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew C. Freeman.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Water thanks Angela Huston, Guy Hutton and Nicholas Valcourt for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Freeman, M.C., Crocker, J., Chipungu, J. et al. Systems thinking for hygiene in settings with high risk of infectious disease transmission. Nat Water 3, 518–524 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-025-00424-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-025-00424-9

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing