Table 3 Logistic regression estimates of the effect of a one-unit increase in scale/factor values on the odds that a woman ever withholds food or water
From: Sanitation-related withholding and suppression among women in urban Uganda and India
Scale/factor score | Kampala (n = 697) | Tiruchirappalli (n = 611) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Odds ratio | 95% CI | Odds ratio | 95% CI | |
Privacy scale | 5.06 | 3.38 to 7.59 | 2.38 | 1.22 to 4.63 |
Safety and security scale | 4.28 | 2.99 to 6.13 | 3.26 | 1.90 to 5.59 |
Safety and security factor 1: perceptions of women’s risk of harm when going for sanitation | 0.89 | 0.61 to 1.29 | 1.29 | 0.78 to 2.14 |
Safety and security factor 2: perceptions of women’s risk of harm when going to sanitation-related meetings | 1.33 | 0.90 to 1.95 | 1.27 | 0.76 to 2.14 |
Safety and security factor 3: perceptions of women’s risk of domestic violence related to sanitation | 1.41 | 1.04 to 1.90 | 1.13 | 0.75 to 1.71 |
Safety and security factor 4: perceptions of own risk of harm when going for sanitation | 3.01 | 2.11 to 4.29 | 2.44 | 1.58 to 3.77 |
Safety and security factor 5: perceptions of general personal safety related to sanitation | 0.90 | 0.67 to 1.19 | 0.69 | 0.43 to 1.10 |
Health factor 1: sanitation-related illness | 1.70 | 1.25 to 2.31 | 2.52 | 1.01 to 6.28 |
Health factor 3: fear of injury | 1.92 | 1.23 to 2.98 | 0.85 | 0.30 to 2.39 |
Health factor 4: sanitation-related anxiety, embarrassment and shame | 1.32 | 0.80 to 2.20 | 0.70 | 0.23 to 2.17 |
Health factor 5: sanitation-related stress and fear | 1.44 | 1.09 to 1.89 | 2.93 | 1.59 to 5.41 |