Table 3 Logistic regression estimates of the effect of a one-unit increase in scale/factor values on the odds that a woman ever withholds food or water

From: Sanitation-related withholding and suppression among women in urban Uganda and India

Scale/factor score

Kampala (n = 697)

Tiruchirappalli (n = 611)

Odds ratio

95% CI

Odds ratio

95% CI

Privacy scale

5.06

3.38 to 7.59

2.38

1.22 to 4.63

Safety and security scale

4.28

2.99 to 6.13

3.26

1.90 to 5.59

Safety and security factor 1: perceptions of women’s risk of harm when going for sanitation

0.89

0.61 to 1.29

1.29

0.78 to 2.14

Safety and security factor 2: perceptions of women’s risk of harm when going to sanitation-related meetings

1.33

0.90 to 1.95

1.27

0.76 to 2.14

Safety and security factor 3: perceptions of women’s risk of domestic violence related to sanitation

1.41

1.04 to 1.90

1.13

0.75 to 1.71

Safety and security factor 4: perceptions of own risk of harm when going for sanitation

3.01

2.11 to 4.29

2.44

1.58 to 3.77

Safety and security factor 5: perceptions of general personal safety related to sanitation

0.90

0.67 to 1.19

0.69

0.43 to 1.10

Health factor 1: sanitation-related illness

1.70

1.25 to 2.31

2.52

1.01 to 6.28

Health factor 3: fear of injury

1.92

1.23 to 2.98

0.85

0.30 to 2.39

Health factor 4: sanitation-related anxiety, embarrassment and shame

1.32

0.80 to 2.20

0.70

0.23 to 2.17

Health factor 5: sanitation-related stress and fear

1.44

1.09 to 1.89

2.93

1.59 to 5.41

  1. Models adjusted for all 18 covariates are listed in Table 2.