Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Micro-level inequalities in plumbing completeness along the US–Mexico borderlands

Abstract

Plumbing poverty remains an issue in parts of the United States, including the US–Mexico borderlands. Previous research has suffered from data limitations including reliance on area-level data and small sample sizes. We address these limitations with American Community Survey restricted microdata. These individual- and household-level data permit us to assess social inequalities, including those related to intra-household demographic heterogeneity, in an incomplete plumbing border-wide analysis in the United States and by residence in a colonia (informal peri-urban settlements) versus non-colonia. We use restricted individual and household data for 2015–2019 (n = 145,500) with fine-scale geographic identifiers to locate households within/outside community water system and colonia boundaries. We employed multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression models. Half a percent of households had incomplete plumbing. Households without any non-Latinx white member and those with only foreign-born non-citizen members had greater odds of incomplete plumbing. Non-English-proficient households were more likely to experience incomplete plumbing. Additionally, incomplete plumbing was associated with disability, working age, poverty and home ownership. There were more inequalities outside of colonias than within them. This Article documents the unequal nature of plumbing poverty in the borderlands. Future initiatives and planning efforts must consider the specific inequalities experienced there to reduce plumbing poverty in the region.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: US southern borderlands.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data and code availability cannot be shared due to Census Bureau disclosure regulations and data protection laws related to data sensitivity. For more information on secure research facilities and access to Census Bureau microdata, you can fill out the Standard Application Process at https://www.census.gov/about/adrm/fsrdc/about.html or contact a regional Research Data Center adminstrator at https://www.census.gov/about/adrm/fsrdc/contact.html.

References

  1. Meehan, K. et al. Exposing the myths of household water insecurity in the global north: a critical review. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Water 7, e1486 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Deitz, S. & Meehan, K. Plumbing poverty: mapping hot spots of racial and geographic inequality in US household water insecurity. Ann. Am. Assoc. Geogr. 109, 1092–1109 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Meehan, K., Jurjevich, J. R., Chun, N. M. & Sherrill, J. Geographies of insecure water access and the housing–water nexus in US cities. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 28700–28707 (2020a).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Wutich, A. et al. Water insecurity in the global north: a review of experiences in US colonias communities along the Mexico border. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Water 9, e1595 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Environmental Justice (American Public Health Association, 2025); https://www.apha.org/topics-and-issues/environmental-health/environmental-justice

  6. Grineski, S. E. & Collins, T. W. in The Routledge Handbook of Environmental Justice (eds Holifield, R. et al.) 528–542 (Routledge, 2017).

  7. Prado, C. Just community participation and Border environmental governance: a view from the border 2020 program. J. Environ. Plann. Policy Manage. 21, 662–674 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. McDonald, Y. J. & Grineski, S. E. Disparities in access to residential plumbing: a binational comparison of environmental injustice in El Paso and Ciudad Juárez. Popul. Environ. 34, 194–216 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ward, P. M. Colonias and Public Policy in Texas and Mexico: Urbanization by Stealth (Univ. Texas Press, 1999).

  10. Belury, L. Poco a poco: post-flood survival in the colonias of the Rio Grande Valley. Geogr. Rev. 113, 585–602 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mier, N. et al. Health-related quality of life among Mexican Americans living in colonias at the Texas–Mexico border. Social Sci. Med. 66, 1760–1771 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Larson, R. & Hendel, D. Advancing water security in colonias. Ariz. State Law J. 54, 853 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Vélez-Ibañez, C. G. & Heyman, J. (eds) The US–Mexico Transborder Region: Cultural Dynamics and Historical Interactions (Univ. Arizona Press, 2017).

  14. Giner, M. E. & Pavon, M. A retrospective analysis of program outcomes and lessons learned on implementing first-time wastewater infrastructure in underserved communities in Texas from 1995 through 2017. Environ. Challenges 5, 100342 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gu, Z. et al. Applying machine learning to understand water security and water access inequality in underserved colonia communities. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 102, 101969 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pulido, L. Flint, environmental racism, and racial capitalism. Capitalism Nat. Socialism 27, 1–16 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tippin, C. The household water insecurity nexus: portraits of hardship and resilience in US–Mexico border colonias. Geoforum 124, 65–74 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tippin, C. Ranked-out waterscapes: an ethnography of resistance and exclusion in a US–Mexico border colonia. J. Polit. Ecol. 29, 208–222 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  19. US–Mexico Border Needs Assessment and Support Project: Phase II Assessment Report (RCAP, 2015); https://rcap.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/RCAP_Colonias-Phase-II-Assessment-Report_FINAL_web.pdf

  20. Jepson, W. & Vandewalle, E. Household water insecurity in the global north: a study of rural and periurban settlements on the Texas–Mexico border. Prof. Geogr. 68, 66–81 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mueller, J. T. & Gasteyer, S. The widespread and unjust drinking water and clean water crisis in the United States. Nat. Commun. 12, 3544 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Sobek, M. in International Handbook of Migration and Population Distribution (ed. White, M. J.) 157–174 (Springer, 2016).

  23. Wong, D. W. in WorldMinds: Geographical Perspectives on 100 Problems: Commemorating the 100th Anniversary of the Association of American Geographers 1904–2004 571–575 (Springer Netherlands, 2004).

  24. Spielman, S. E. & Folch, D. C. Reducing uncertainty in the American Community Survey through data-driven regionalization. PLoS ONE 10, e0115626 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Connor, P. Immigration reform keeps millions of mixed-status families together. FWD.us https://www.fwd.us/news/mixed-status-families-1/ (18 January 2024).

  26. The U.S.-Mexico border region at a glance—border lens: a border research project. Southern Border Communities Coalition https://www.southernborder.org/border_lens_southern_border_region_at_a_glance (28 June 2023).

  27. Sommet, N. & Morselli, D. Keep calm and learn multilevel logistic modeling: a simplified three-step procedure using Stata, R, mplus, and SPSS. Int. Rev. Social Psychol. 30, 203–218 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pellow, D. & Vazin, J. The intersection of race, immigration status, and environmental justice. Sustainability 11, 3942 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Méndez, M., Flores-Haro, G. & Zucker, L. The (in) visible victims of disaster: understanding the vulnerability of undocumented Latino/a and indigenous immigrants. Geoforum 116, 50–62 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Flores, A. B., Collins, T. W., Grineski, S. E. & Chakraborty, J. Social vulnerability to Hurricane Harvey: unmet needs and adverse event experiences in Greater Houston, Texas. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 46, 101521 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chakraborty, J., Collins, T. W. & Grineski, S. E. Cancer risks from exposure to vehicular air pollution: a household level analysis of intra-ethnic heterogeneity in Miami, Florida. Urban Geogr. 38, 112–136 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Liévanos, R. S. Race, deprivation, and immigrant isolation: the spatial demography of air-toxic clusters in the continental United States. Social Sci. Res. 54, 50–67 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Collins, T. W., Jimenez, A. M. & Grineski, S. E. Hispanic health disparities after a flood disaster: results of a population-based survey of individuals experiencing home site damage in El Paso (Texas, USA). J. Immigrant Minority Health 15, 415–426 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Robinson, C. Energy poverty and gender in England: a spatial perspective. Geoforum 104, 222–233 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Middlemiss, L. Who is vulnerable to energy poverty in the global north, and what is their experience? Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Energy Environ. 11, e455 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kelley, E., Johnson, K. J. & Milla, S. Translation is not enough: meaningfully serving communities speaking languages other than English. Proc. 2022 ACEEE Summer Study Energy Effic. Build. 2, 359–370 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Eichelberger, L. Household water insecurity and its cultural dimensions: preliminary results from Newtok, Alaska. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.25, 32938–32951 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Jampel, C. Intersections of disability justice, racial justice and environmental justice. Environ. Sociol. 4, 122–135 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Lawrence, P. R. & Anderson, R. K. Poverty and disability: a state-level geospatial analysis. Clin. Nurs. Res. 33, 344–354 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Collins, T. W. The production of unequal risk in hazardscapes: an explanatory frame applied to disaster at the US–Mexico border. Geoforum 40, 589–601 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Uribe, M. G., Faust, K. M. & Charnitski, J. Policy driven water sector and energy dependencies in Texas border colonias. Sustainable Cities Soc. 48, 101568 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. McDonald, Y. J. et al. A systematic review of geospatial representation of United States community water systems. AWWA Water Sci. 4, e1266 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Belury, L. Precarity, Poverty, and Predatory lending: Post-Flood Survival in Colonias of the Rio Grande Valley. Ph.D dissertation, The George Washington University (2020).

  44. Henneberger, J. Substandard colonias are an enduring result of housing segregation that we can fix. Texas Housers https://texashousers.org/2020/01/27/substandard-colonias-are-an-enduring-result-of-housing-segregation-that-we-can-fix/ (27 January 2020).

  45. Rosenbloom, R. & Batalova, J. Mexican immigrants in the United States. migrationpolicy.org https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/mexican-immigrants-united-states?gad_source=1&gclid=CjwKCAjwuJ2xBhA3EiwAMVjkVF-M5EqSVWNxZITTXLdKH5Zva049tGiFaJhBquAOaRvw1TuNnG6Z9hoCo9kQAvD_BwE (13 October 2022).

  46. Kone, D. Transforming sanitation to combat the global water crisis. Nat. Water 1, 752–753 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Poehler, E. American community survey and Puerto Rico community survey design and methodology. Census.gov https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/methodology/design-and-methodology.html (28 November 2022).

  48. Border 2025: United States–Mexico Environmental Program (EPA, 2024); https://www.epa.gov/usmexicoborder

  49. Vermunt, J. K. Mixed-effects logistic regression models for indirectly observed discrete outcome variables. Multivar. Behav. Res. 40, 281–301 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. O’Dwyer, L. M. & Parker, C. E. A Primer for Analyzing Nested Data: Multilevel Modeling in SPSS Using an Example from a REL Study REL 2015-046 (Regional Educational Laboratory Northeast and Islands, 2014).

  51. Naman, J. M. & Gibson, J. M. Disparities in water and sewer services in North Carolina: an analysis of the decision-making process. Am. J. Public Health 105, e20–e26 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Alin, A. Multicollinearity. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Stat. 2, 370–374 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Van Hook, J. & Bachmeier, J. D. How well does the American Community Survey count naturalized citizens? Demogr. Res. 29, 1–32 (2013).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank A. Kamimura and J. VanDerslice for their constructive feedback on an earlier version of this paper. Additionally, we are thankful to K. Ramos who aided in the construction and verification of the border-wide colonia boundaries utilized in the analysis. University of Utah funds were used to pay fees for the Federal Statistical Research Data Center project (#2717, principal investigator: T.W.C.) under which analyses for this paper were conducted. The US Census Bureau reviewed the data products reported in this paper to ensure appropriate access, use and disclosure avoidance protection of the confidential source data. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not represent the views of the US Census Bureau.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

R.R. was responsible for conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology and writing the original draft and review and editing. S.E.G. and T.W.C. were responsible for conceptualization, funding acquisition, methodology, supervision, validation and writing—review and editing. D.E.A. was responsible for methodolgy validation and writing. Y.J.M. was responsible for writing, review and editing, and provided access to her community water systems dataset.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ricardo Rubio.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Water thanks Shiloh Deitz, Raul Pacheco-Vega and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rubio, R., Grineski, S.E., Collins, T.W. et al. Micro-level inequalities in plumbing completeness along the US–Mexico borderlands. Nat Water 3, 793–805 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-025-00463-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-025-00463-2

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene