Extended Data Fig. 3: Error assessment of the hierarchical V-A model. | Nature Water

Extended Data Fig. 3: Error assessment of the hierarchical V-A model.

From: Evolving resource potential of glacial lakes with ongoing deglaciation

Extended Data Fig. 3: Error assessment of the hierarchical V-A model.The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

We evaluate the median difference between observed and predicted lake volumes on either side of the suspected breakpoints at A = 0.5 km2 (light red and light blue lines) or A = 5 km2 (dark red and dark blue lines). Legend in the top right applies to all panels. a, Absolute errors for log10-transformed data (that is, the direct output of the V-A model). These errors represent differences in exponents between observation and prediction, effectively showing errors in terms of orders of magnitude. b, Absolute errors after back-transforming the median predicted volume to the original scale, measured in 106 m³. c, Relative errors, expressed as the ratio between predicted and observed lake volume. Positive values indicate an n-fold overestimation, while negative values indicate an n-fold underestimation.

Back to article page