Fig. 2: Conductance polarity dependence measurement. | npj Unconventional Computing

Fig. 2: Conductance polarity dependence measurement.

From: Demonstration of 4-quadrant analog in-memory matrix multiplication in a single modulation

Fig. 2

a Conductance measured in negative voltage polarity as a function of conductance measured in positive voltage polarity at Vread 0.2 V for 130 k PCM devices of an AIMC core. The blue line is a guide to the eye that shows the average trend. In order to compare the polarity dependence of devices that have different SET conductance on the same graph, the conductance of each device is normalized by the SET conductance of that device for each polarity. The mean SET conductance of all devices is approximately 20 μS. b Low-angle annular darkfield scanning transmission electron microscope image of a fully RESET PCM device showing a substantially large amorphous region that fully blocks the bottom electrode. Electrode-amorphous and amorphous-crystalline interfaces are highlighted. c Band diagrams of the PCM device at equilibrium, under positive and negative polarity bias. Only the valence band is shown because the Ge2Sb2Te5 material is a p-type semiconductor in the amorphous phase. Schottky barriers for holes appear at both interfaces, with the barrier of the amorphous-crystalline interface greater than that of the electrode-amorphous interface16. When a positive bias is applied at the top electrode with respect to the bottom electrode, the back-to-back diode configuration entails the amorphous-crystalline interface being reverse-biased and the electrode-amorphous interface forward-biased. This effect reverses when the polarity is negative. Thus, larger current flows when the dominating diode is forward-biased, which is the amorphous-crystalline interface. This occurs for the negative polarity of the applied bias, i.e., when Vcm is applied at the top electrode and V+ at the bottom electrode.

Back to article page