Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Assessing diverse values of nature requires multilingual evidence

Global assessments of people’s values of nature should be based on multilingual evidence to capture the plurality of nature’s values across cultures and languages, avoid overlooking valuable knowledge, and inform policy and decision-making on the basis of unbiased evidence. We propose practical approaches to conducting multilingual evidence synthesis based on collaborations.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: A framework for effective synthesis of multilingual evidence.

References

  1. Coscieme, L. et al. Multiple conceptualizations of nature are key to inclusivity and legitimacy in global environmental governance. Environ. Sci. Policy 104, 36–42 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jiang, W. The relationship between culture and language. ELT J. 54, 328–334 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Everett, C., Blasi, D. E. & Roberts, S. G. Climate, vocal folds, and tonal languages: connecting the physiological and geographic dots. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 1322–1327 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Maddieson, I. & Coupé, C. Human spoken language diversity and the acoustic adaptation hypothesis. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 138, 1838 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pascual, U. et al. Diverse values of nature for sustainability. Nature 620, 813–823 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Inglis, D. & Pascual, U. On the links between nature’s values and language. People Nat. 5, 326–342 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. I. Summary for Policymakers of the Methodological Assessment of the Diverse Values and Valuation of Nature of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) (IPBES, 2022).

  8. Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. I. Methodological Assessment of the Diverse Values and Valuation of Nature of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES, 2022).

  9. Amano, T. et al. Tapping into non-English-language science for the conservation of global biodiversity. PLoS Biol. 19, e3001296 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kulczycki, E. et al. Multilingual publishing in the social sciences and humanities: a seven-country European study. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 71, 1371–1385 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Konno, K. et al. Ignoring non-English-language studies may bias ecological meta-analyses. Ecol. Evol. 10, 6373–6384 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Balvanera, P. et al. in Methodological Assessment Report on the Diverse Values and Valuation of Nature of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (eds. Balvanera, P. et al.) ch. 1, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6418971 (IPBES, 2022).

  13. Amano, T., González-Varo, J. P. & Sutherland, W. J. Languages are still a major barrier to global science. PLoS Biol. 14, e2000933 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ward, R. ‘National’ and ‘official’ languages across the independent Asia-Pacific. PORTAL J. Multidiscip. Int. Stud. 16, 82–100 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. van de Schoot, R. et al. An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews. Nat. Mach. Intell. 3, 125–133 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

V.B.-E. and T.A. were supported by the Australian Research Council Future Fellowship (FT180100354) and Discovery Project (DP230101734).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

V.B.-E. conceptualized the article, wrote the original draft, and reviewed and edited the manuscript. T.A. conceptualized the article, and reviewed and edited the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Violeta Berdejo-Espinola.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Related links

ASReview: https://asreview.nl/

CNKI: https://cnki.net/

Cochrane Engage: https://engage.cochrane.org

Google Scholar: https://scholar.google.com/

J-STAGE: https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/

KoreaScience: https://www.koreascience.or.kr/

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Berdejo-Espinola, V., Amano, T. Assessing diverse values of nature requires multilingual evidence. Nat. Rev. Biodivers. 1, 5–6 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44358-024-00003-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44358-024-00003-y

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing