Table 1 Comparison of cellular contrast of the different methods
Image | Peak height (a. u.) |
|---|---|
Sparse sampling | 0.06 ± 0.03 |
ESRGAN | 0.09 ± 0.03 |
SwinIR | 0.09 ± 0.03 |
RRTGAN (ours) | 0.12 ± 0.02 |
Dense sampling | 0.11 ± 0.06 |
Image | Peak height (a. u.) |
|---|---|
Sparse sampling | 0.06 ± 0.03 |
ESRGAN | 0.09 ± 0.03 |
SwinIR | 0.09 ± 0.03 |
RRTGAN (ours) | 0.12 ± 0.02 |
Dense sampling | 0.11 ± 0.06 |