Fig. 5: A first approximate potential match between Luna 9’s camera view of the lunar surface and a 3D rendering of the site in which the YOLO-ETA machine learning model has made an identification of the spacecraft. | npj Space Exploration

Fig. 5: A first approximate potential match between Luna 9’s camera view of the lunar surface and a 3D rendering of the site in which the YOLO-ETA machine learning model has made an identification of the spacecraft.

From: Possible identification of the Luna 9 Moon landing site using a novel machine learning algorithm

Fig. 5: A first approximate potential match between Luna 9’s camera view of the lunar surface and a 3D rendering of the site in which the YOLO-ETA machine learning model has made an identification of the spacecraft.The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Top left: One of the first images transmitted by Luna 9 (image courtesy: NASA and RIA Novosti). Top Right: a contemporaneous Lockheed Electronics sketch interpreting the image; the Lockheed analysts posited the ‘spherical’ object toward the top left of the image (circled) to be part of the main spacecraft lander (image courtesy: NASA and Lockheed Electronics Company). Bottom: A QuickMap Tile Server we rendered of the site from LROC image M132071202LC (NASA/GSFC/ASU), was scaled and rotated to explore a tentative match of the terrain between the Luna 9 camera image and the LROC orthogonal view from orbit. Possible Luna 9 artefacts are labelled (a) through (e) as in Fig. 6. Assuming (c) may represent the Luna 9 lander, the largest artefact identified by the model at (a) could potentially be the flight module and align per the arrow to the spherical object posited by the Lockheed analysts.

Back to article page