Fig. 15: BER performance comparing the performance of Zak-OTFS and AFDM with \({c}_{1}MN,{c}_{2}MN\in {\mathbb{Z}}\) for Gauss-sinc pulse shaping with ατ = αν = 1.584, M = 11, N = 13, νp = 30 kHz. | npj Wireless Technology

Fig. 15: BER performance comparing the performance of Zak-OTFS and AFDM with \({c}_{1}MN,{c}_{2}MN\in {\mathbb{Z}}\) for Gauss-sinc pulse shaping with ατ = αν = 1.584, M = 11, N = 13, νp = 30 kHz.

From: Low-complexity equalization of Zak-OTFS in the frequency domain

Fig. 15: BER performance comparing the performance of Zak-OTFS and AFDM with $${c}_{1}MN,{c}_{2}MN\in {\mathbb{Z}}$$ c 1 M N , c 2 M N ∈ Z for Gauss-sinc pulse shaping with ατ = αν = 1.584, M = 11, N = 13, νp = 30 kHz.The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Veh-A channel with \({\nu }_{\max }=815\) Hz. There is essentially no difference between AFDM and Zak-OTFS.

Back to article page