Abstract
Since the introduction of intermittent self-catheterisation by Lapides et al,1 low pressure voiding methods have been adopted actively in our centre. A retrospective review of 47 patients with cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) who performed independent (self) clean intermittent catheterisation (CIC) on discharge is presented. Their functional abilities were evaluated by both the Frankel2 and the Zancolli scales.3 Fourteen out of the 47 patients could manage independent CIC, 17 assisted CIC, nine tapped or voided voluntarily, two were discharged with a diaper, one with a suprapubic catheter, and four with an indwelling catheter. According to Frankel's classification, four patients were in A category, four in B, one in C and five in D among the group of complete CIC. C6A/C5B (right/left hand) by Zancolli's classification was the highest level of ability for all these 14 patients; and one patient (a 30-year-old male, Frankel B classification) could manage independent CIC with the aid of our special device. However, the practical limit of functional hands for independent CIC appeared to be about C6B1.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Lapides J, Diokuno A C, Silver S J, Lowe B S . Clean intermittent self-catheterisation in the treatment of urinary tract disease. J Urol 1972; 107: 458–461.
Frankel H L et al. The value of postural reduction in the initial management of closed injuries to the spine with paraplegia and tetraplegia. Paraplegia 1969; 7: 179–192.
Zancolli E . Surgery for the tetraplegic hand with active, strong wrist extension preserved. Clin Orthop 1975; 112: 101–113.
Viera A, Merritt J L, Erickson R P . Renal function in spinal cord injury: A preliminary report. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1986; 25: 257–259.
Madersbacher G, Oberwalser M . The elderly para- and tetraplegic: Special aspects of the urological care. Paraplegia 1987; 25: 318–323.
Maynaed F M, Glass J . Management of the neuropathic bladder by clean intermittent catheterisation: 5 year outcome. Paraplegia 1987; 25: 106–110.
Hill V B, Davies W E . A swing to intermittent clean self-catheterisation as a preferred mode of management of the neuropathic bladder for the dextrous spinal cord patient. Paraplegia 1988; 26: 405–412.
Kuhn W, Rist M, Zaech G A . Intermittent urethral self-catheterisation: Long term results (bacteriological evolution, continence, acceptance, complications). Paraplegia 1991; 29: 222–232.
Daily H, Michael R . Non sterile self-intermittent catheterization for male quadriplegic patients. Am J Occup Ther 1977; 31: 86–89.
Sutton G, Shah S, Hill V . Clean intermittent self-catheterisation for quadriplegic patients—a five year follow-up. Paraplegia 1991; 29: 542–549.
Iwatsubo E et al. Over-distension therapy of the bladder in paraplegic patients using self-catheterisation: A preliminary study. Paraplegia 1984; 22: 210–215.
Hill V B, Davies W E . A swing to intermittent clean self-catheterisation as a preferred mode of management of the neuropathic bladder for the dextrous spinal cord patient. Paraplegia 1988; 26: 405–412.
Jackson A B, DeVivo M . Urological long-term follow-up in women with spinal cord injuries. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992; 73: 1029–1035.
Bakke Z et al. Clean intermittent catheterisation – performing abilities, aversive experiences and distress. Paraplegia 1993; 31: 288–297.
Timoney A G, Shaw P J R . Urological outcome in female patients with spinal cord injury: The effectiveness of intermittent catheterisation. Paraplegia 1990; 28: 556–563.
King R B et al. Clean and sterile intermittent catheterization methods in hospitalized patients with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992; 73: 798–802.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Asayama, K., Kihara, K., Shidoh, T. et al. The functional limitations of tetraplegic hands for intermittent clean self-catheterisation. Spinal Cord 33, 30–33 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.1995.7
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.1995.7
