Abstract
Study designs:
Longitudinal and correlational study with repeated measures.
Objectives:
The aim of this study was to test the concurrent validity of the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) for a spinal cord injury (SCI) population.
Participants:
A total of 32 individuals with an ASIA D SCI walking 10 m independently, with or without walking assistive devices.
Setting:
An intensive rehabilitation center in Montréal, Canada.
Methods:
Subjects were evaluated on the BBS, the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI II), the Spinal Cord Injury Functional Ambulation Inventory (SCI-FAI), the 10-m walk test (10MWT) and the Timed Up and Go (TUG). Individuals were reassessed during rehabilitation when progressing to a device providing less support or to unassisted gait.
Results:
All walking tests were highly correlated with the BBS (0.714<Rs<0.816, P⩽0.01). A significant ceiling effect was found on the BBS, the WISCI and on most subsections of the SCI-FAI. Assistive devices used for walking relate well to the BBS score (Spearman's ρ 0.714, P<0.01).
Conclusion:
The BBS is an appropriate assessment of standing balance for individuals with SCI. Complementary evaluation with the 10MWT or the 2MWT is recommended to supplement the ceiling effect on the BBS.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Ditunno PL, Patrick M, Stineman M, Ditunno JF . Who wants to walk? Preferences for recovery after SCI: a longitudinal and cross-sectional study. Spinal Cord 2008; 46: 500–506.
Barbeau H, Ladouceur M, Norman KE, Pepin A, Leroux A . Walking after spinal cord injury: evaluation, treatment, and functional recovery. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80: 225–235.
Marino RJ, Barros T, Biering-Sorensen F, Burns SP, Donovan WH, Graves DE et al. International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2003; 26 (Suppl 1): S50–S56.
Scivoletto G, Di Donna V, Scivoletto G, Di Donna V . Prediction of walking recovery after spinal cord injury. Brain Res Bull 2009; 78: 43–51.
Dittuno PL, Dittuno Jr JF . Walking index for spinal cord injury (WISCI II): scale revision. Spinal Cord 2001; 39: 654–656.
Field-Fote EC, Fluet GG, Schafer SD, Schneider EM, Smith R, Downey PA et al. The Spinal Cord Injury Functional Ambulation Inventory (SCI-FAI). J Rehabil Med 2001; 33: 177–181.
Berg K, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI, Gayton D . Measuring balance in the elderly: preliminary development of an instrument. Physiother Can 1989; 41: 304–311.
Cattaneo D, Regola A, Meotti M, Cattaneo D, Regola A, Meotti M . Validity of six balance disorders scales in persons with multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil 2006; 28: 789–795.
Newstead AH, Hinman MR, Tomberlin JA, Newstead AH, Hinman MR, Tomberlin JA . Reliability of the Berg Balance Scale and balance master limits of stability tests for individuals with brain injury. J Neurol Phys Ther 2005; 29: 18–23.
Qutubuddin AA, Pegg PO, Cifu DX, Brown R, McNamee S, Carne W et al. Validating the Berg Balance Scale for patients with Parkinson's disease: a key to rehabilitation evaluation [see comment]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86: 789–792.
Liston RA, Brouwer BJ . Reliability and validity of measures obtained from stroke patients using the Balance Master. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 77: 425–430.
Tyson SF, DeSouza LH . Development of the Brunel Balance assessment: a new measure of balance disability post stroke. Clin Rehabil 2004; 18: 801–810.
Berg KO, Maki BE, Williams JI, Holliday PJ, Wood-Dauphinee SL . Clinical and laboratory measures of postural balance in an elderly population. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992; 73: 1073–1080.
Lam T, Noonan VK, Eng JJ, Team SR . A systematic review of functional ambulation outcome measures in spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2008; 46: 246–254.
Ditunno Jr JF, Ditunno PL, Graziani V, Scivoletto G, Bernardi M, Castellano V et al. Walking index for spinal cord injury (WISCI): an international multicenter validity and reliability study. Spinal Cord 2000; 38: 234–243.
Mao HF, Hsueh IP, Tang PF, Sheu CF, Hsieh CL, Mao H-F et al. Analysis and comparison of the psychometric properties of three balance measures for stroke patients. Stroke 2002; 33: 1022–1027.
Scivoletto G, Romanelli A, Mariotti A, Marinucci D, Tamburella F, Mammone A et al. Clinical factors that affect walking level and performance in chronic spinal cord lesion patients. Spine 2008; 33: 259–264.
Ditunno Jr JF, Barbeau H, Dobkin BH, Elashoff R, Harkema S, Marino RJ et al. Validity of the walking scale for spinal cord injury and other domains of function in a multicenter clinical trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2007; 21: 539–550.
Bateni H, Maki BE . Assistive devices for balance and mobility: benefits, demands, and adverse consequences. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86: 134–145.
Waters RL, Yakura JS, Adkins RH . Gait performance after spinal cord injury. Clin Orthop 1993; 288: 87–96.
van Hedel HJ, Wirz M, Dietz V, van Hedel HJA . Standardized assessment of walking capacity after spinal cord injury: the European network approach. Neurol Res 2008; 30: 61–73.
Lapointe R, Lajoie Y, Serresse O, Barbeau H . Functional community ambulation requirements in incomplete spinal cord injured subjects. Spinal Cord 2001; 39: 327–335.
Bohannon RW . Comfortable and maximum walking speed of adults aged 20–79 years: reference values and determinants. Age Ageing 1997; 26: 15–19.
Acknowledgements
The project was supported by funding from the Ordre professionnel de la Physiothérapie du Québec and the Multidisciplinary Team on Locomotor Rehabilitation after Spinal Cord Injury and Stroke. JF Lemay holds a scholarship from Fonds de la recherche en Santé du Québec (FRSQ) and S Nadeau has a senior scientist salary from FRSQ. The authors thank Isabelle Robidoux and Catherine Dansereau for their collaboration throughout the project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lemay, JF., Nadeau, S. Standing balance assessment in ASIA D paraplegic and tetraplegic participants: concurrent validity of the Berg Balance Scale. Spinal Cord 48, 245–250 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2009.119
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2009.119
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Development and validation of the sitting balance assessment for spinal cord injury (SitBASCI)
Spinal Cord (2022)
-
Feasibility and tolerance of a robotic postural training to improve standing in a person with ambulatory spinal cord injury
Spinal Cord Series and Cases (2021)
-
Postural control strategy after incomplete spinal cord injury: effect of sensory inputs on trunk–leg movement coordination
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation (2020)
-
Berg Balance Scale: inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of the Spanish version with incomplete spinal cord injured subjects
Spinal Cord Series and Cases (2020)
-
Effects of water immersion on quasi-static standing exploring center of pressure sway and trunk acceleration: a case series after incomplete spinal cord injury
Spinal Cord Series and Cases (2019)
