Abstract
Study design:
Multi-center pilot study.
Objectives:
To investigate the use of an upper limb robotic rehabilitation device (Armeo Spring, Hocoma AG, Switzerland) in a subacute cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) population.
Setting:
Two Canadian inpatient rehabilitation centers.
Methods:
Twelve subjects (motor level C4–C6, ASIA Impairment Scale A–D) completed the training, which consisted of 16.1±4.6 sessions over 5.2±1.4 weeks. Two types of outcomes were recorded: (1) feasibility of incorporating the device into an inpatient rehabilitation program (compliance with training schedule, reduction in therapist time required and subject questionnaires) and (2) efficacy of the robotic rehabilitation for improving functional outcomes (Graded and Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP), action research arm test, grip dynamometry and range of motion).
Results:
By the end of the training period, the robot-assisted training was shown to require active therapist involvement for 25±11% (mean±s.d.) of the total session time. In the group of all subjects and in a subgroup composed of motor-incomplete subjects, no statistically significant differences were found between intervention and control limbs for any of the outcome measures. In a subgroup of subjects with partial hand function at baseline, the GRASSP-Sensibility component showed a statistically significant increase (6.0±1.6 (mean±s.e.m.) point increase between baseline and discharge for the intervention limbs versus 1.9±0.9 points for the control limbs).
Conclusion:
The pilot results suggest that individuals with some preserved hand function after SCI may be better candidates for rehabilitation training using the Armeo Spring device.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Krebs HI, Hogan N, Aisen ML, Volpe BT . Robot-aided neurorehabilitation. IEEE Trans Rehab Eng 1998; 1: 75–87.
Lum PS, Burgar CG, Shor PC, Majmundar M, Van der Loos M . Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83: 952–959.
Reinkensmeyer DJ, Kahn LE, Averbuch M, McKenna-Cole A, Schmit BD, Rymer WZ . Understanding and treating arm movement impairment after chronic brain injury: progress with the ARM guide. J Rehabil Res Dev 2000; 37: 653–662.
Hesse S, Schulte-Tigges G, Konrad M, Bardeleben A, Werner C . Robot-assisted arm trainer for the passive and active practice of bilateral forearm and wrist movements in hemiparetic subjects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 84: 915–920.
Loureiro R, Amirabdollahian F, Topping M, Driesse B, Harwin W . Upper limb robot mediated stroke therapy - GENTLE/s approach. Auton Robots 2003; 15: 35–51.
Sanchez RJ, Liu J, Rao S, Shah P, Smith R, Rahman T et al. Automating arm movement training following severe stroke: functional exercises with quantitative feedback in a gravity-reduced environment. IEEE Trans Neural Sys Rehab Eng 2006; 14: 378–389.
Housman SJ, Scott KM, Reinkensmeyer DJ . A randomized controlled trial of gravity-supported, computer-enhanced arm exercise for individuals with severe hemiparesis. Neurorehab Neural Repair 2009; 23: 505–514.
Staubli P, Nef T, Klamroth-Marganska V, Riener R . Effects of intensive arm training with the rehabilitation robot ARMin II in chronic stroke patients: four single-cases. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2009; 6: 46.
Reinkensmeyer DJ, Emken JL, Cramer SC . Robotics, motor learning, and neurologic recovery. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2004; 6: 497–525.
Prange GB, Jannink MJ, Groothuis-Oudshoorn CG, Hermens HJ, Ijzerman MJ . Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev 2006; 43: 171–184.
Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Krebs HI . Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Neurorehab Neural Repair 2008; 22: 111–121.
Fasoli SE, Krebs HI, Stein J, Frontera WR, Hughes R, Hogan N . Robotic therapy for chronic motor impairments after stroke: follow-up results. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 1106–1111.
Volpe BT, Lynch D, Rykman-Berland A, Ferraro M, Galgano M, Hogan N et al. Intensive sensorimotor arm training mediated by therapist or robot improves hemiparesis in patients with chronic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008; 22: 305–310.
Lo AC, Guarino PD, Richards LG, Haselkorn JK, Wittenberg GF, Federman DG et al. Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 1772–1783.
Anderson KD . Targeting recovery: priorities of the spinal cord injured population. J Neurotrauma 2004; 21: 1371–1383.
Gijbels D, Lamers I, Kerkhofs L, Alders G, Knippenberg E, Feys P . The Armeo Spring as training tool to improve upper limb functionality in multiple sclerosis: a pilot study. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2011; 8: 5.
Zariffa J, Kapadia N, Kramer JLK, Taylor P, Alizadeh-Meghrazi M, Zivanovic V et al. Effect of a robotic rehabilitation device on upper limb function in a sub-acute cervical spinal cord injury population. Proc. IEEE 12th Int Conf Rehab Robotics, June 29–July 1 2011, Zurich, Switzerland.
Kalsi-Ryan S, Beaton D, Curt A, Duff S, Popovic MR, Rudhe C et al. The graded redefined assessment of strength sensibility and prehension (GRASSP) - reliability and validity. J Neurotrauma (e-pub ahead of print 5 September 2011).
Carroll D . A quantitative test of upper extremity function. J Chronic Diseases 1965; 18: 479–491.
Carroll TJ, Herbert RD, Munn J, Lee M, Gandevia SC . Contralateral effects of unilateral strength training: evidence and possible mechanisms. J Appl Physiol 2006; 101: 1514–1522.
Steeves JD, Kramer JK, Fawcett JW, Cragg J, Lammertse DP, Blight AR et al. Extent of spontaneous motor recovery after traumatic cervical sensorimotor complete spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2011; 49: 257–265.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Rick Hansen Institute (grant number 2009-34). We are grateful to the study participants.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zariffa, J., Kapadia, N., Kramer, J. et al. Feasibility and efficacy of upper limb robotic rehabilitation in a subacute cervical spinal cord injury population. Spinal Cord 50, 220–226 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2011.104
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2011.104
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Upper Limb Recovery in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury After a Brain-Computer Interface Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation Intervention
Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering (2023)
-
A suite of automated tools to quantify hand and wrist motor function after cervical spinal cord injury
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation (2019)
-
A single-subject study of robotic upper limb training in the subacute phase for four persons with cervical spinal cord injury
Spinal Cord Series and Cases (2019)
-
Clinical efficacy of upper limb robotic therapy in people with tetraplegia: a pilot randomized controlled trial
Spinal Cord (2019)
-
Rehabilitation robots for the treatment of sensorimotor deficits: a neurophysiological perspective
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation (2018)
