Table 2 Assembly quality metrics.
Subsampled | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GA25 | GA32 | 454 | LC25 | LC32 | LE25 | LE32 | MP25 | MP32 | MP25 | MP32 | |
Contig metrics | |||||||||||
No of transcripts | 73,139 | 40,440 | 23,725 | 65,998 | 37,718 | 71,508 | 41,307 | 108,623 | 48,400 | 74,623 | 46,505 |
Read mapping metrics | |||||||||||
% fragments mapped | 92 | 94 | 82 | 92 | 95 | 92 | 95 | 91 | 86 | 90 | 93 |
% good mappings | 82 | 84 | 71 | 83 | 84 | 83 | 84 | 79 | 74 | 79 | 80 |
% bases uncovered | 24 | 0 | 6 | 25 | 0 | 23 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 0 |
Comparative metrics | |||||||||||
% contigs with CRBB | 48 | 51 | 76 | 51 | 55 | 46 | 50 | 27 | 44 | 39 | 44 |
% refs with CRBB | 60 | 58 | 49 | 60 | 59 | 60 | 59 | 60 | 59 | 59 | 59 |
Reference coverage | 60 | 59 | 37 | 60 | 59 | 60 | 60 | 61 | 59 | 60 | 59 |
TransRate score | |||||||||||
TransRate assembly score | 0.2343 | 0.4564 | 0.3438 | 0.2367 | 0.4666 | 0.2587 | 0.4607 | 0.2746 | 0.3795 | 0.2755 | 0.4183 |
% good contigs | 66 | 80 | 81 | 70 | 77 | 71 | 81 | 75 | 76 | 68 | 75 |
BUSCO score | |||||||||||
% complete | 92 | 90 | 62 | 93 | 91 | 93 | 90 | 93 | 91 | 93 | 90 |
% duplicated | 47 | 21 | 18 | 45 | 20 | 44 | 21 | 41 | 23 | 39 | 23 |
% fragmented | 1.5 | 1.4 | 16 | 1.6 | 2.0 | 1.4 | 2.4 | 1.1 | 1.7 | 0.9 | 2.3 |
% missing | 5.5 | 7.7 | 20 | 4.6 | 6.7 | 5.2 | 7.2 | 5.7 | 6.9 | 5.3 | 7.1 |