Key Points
-
Uses robust methodology to provide a useful insight into dental handpiece decontamination.
-
Demonstrates that 97% of dental surgeries studied autoclaved their handpieces between patients.
-
The variety in processes for cleaning, lubricating, packing and sterilisation suggests that handpiece manufacturers need to clarify and validate their reprocessing instructions.
Abstract
Objectives To determine how dental handpieces are decontaminated and maintained in general dental practice. Design Observational survey.
Setting The survey was carried out in general dental practice in Scotland. Survey visits ran from January 2003 until the end of March 2004.
Methods Data were collected by interview and observation in 179 dental surgeries in Scotland.
Results In virtually all surgeries, handpieces were cleaned before disinfection or autoclaving (99%; n = 177), most commonly by wiping the external surface with a cloth impregnated with disinfectant. Most surgeries lubricated their handpieces after cleaning and before sterilisation (91%; n = 162), although a number of surgeries (24%; n = 42) also lubricated their handpieces after sterilisation. In the majority (97%; n = 174) of dental surgeries, all handpieces were autoclaved after use, most frequently (89%; n = 160) in a bowl and instrument steriliser. In 38 surgeries (21%), handpieces were being wrapped (paper pouches) before sterilisation in bowl and instrument sterilisers. A minority of surgeries (20%; n = 36) had a dedicated handpiece for surgical procedures.
Conclusions: The majority of dental handpieces are manually cleaned externally with a disinfectant impregnated cloth and processed in a type N (bowl and instrument) bench top steam steriliser. Handpieces are lubricated with non-water soluble lubricants at different stages of reprocessing, indicating clarification is required in this area. More work is required by manufacturers to establish a validated cleaning and lubrication process to facilitate the sterilisation of handpieces.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Lewis D L, Boe R K . Cross-infection risks associated with current procedures for using high-speed dental handpieces. J Clin Microbiol 1992; 30: 401–406.
Lewis D L, Arens M, Appleton S S et al. Cross-contamination potential with dental equipment. Lancet 1992; 340: 1252–1254.
Epstein J B, Rea G, Sherlock C H, Mathias R G . Continuing investigation and controversy regarding risk of transmission of infection via dental handpieces. J Can Dent Assoc 1996; 6: 485–491.
Edwardsson S, Svensatar G, Birkhed D . Steam sterilisation of air turbine dental handpieces. Acta Odontol Scand 1983; 41: 321–326.
Kolstad R A . How well does the Chemiclave sterlize handpieces? J Am Dent Assoc 1998; 129: 985–991.
Parker H H, Johnsson R B . Effectiveness of ethylene oxide for sterilisation of dental handpieces. J Dent 1995; 23: 113–115.
Bray F, Chapman S . AIDS and dentistry in Australia: knowledge, infection control practices and attitudes to treatment in a random sample of Australian dentists. Community Health Stud 1990; 14: 384–393.
Checchi L, Montebugnoli L, Samaritani S . Contamination of the turbine air chamber: a risk of cross infection. J Clin Periodontol 1998; 8: 607–611.
Pelzner R B, Kempler D, Stark M M, Barkin P R, Graham D A . Laser evaluation of handpiece contamination. J Dent Res 1977; 56: 1629–1634.
Kellet M, Holbrook W P . Bacterial contamination of dental handpieces. J Dent 1980; 8: 249–253.
Abel L C, Miller R L, Micik R E, Rige G . Studies on dental aerobiology: VI. Bacterial contamination of water delivered by dental units. J Dent Res 1971; 50: 1567–1569.
Walker J T, Bradshaw D J, Bennett A M et al. Microbial biofilm formation and contamination of dental-unit water systems in general dental practice. Appl Environ Microbiol 2000; 66: 3, 363–363, 367.
Medical Devices Agency. Sterilisation, disinfection and cleaning of medical equipment: Guidance on decontamination from the Microbiology Advisory Committee to Department of Health. Section 2. London: The Stationery Office. 2002.
British Dental Association. Advice Sheet A12. London: British Dental Association, 2003.
Kohn W G, Collins A S, Cleveland J L, Harte J A, Eklund K J, Malvitz D M ; Centres for Disease Control and Prevention(CDC). Guidelines for infection control in dental health care settings - 2003. MMWR Recomm Rep 2003; 52(RR-17): 1–61.
Pflug I J, Holcomb R G, Gomez M M . Principles of the thermal destruction of microorganisms. In Block S S (ed) Disinfection, sterilisation and preservation. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2001.
Leonard D L, Charlton D G . Performance of high-speed dental handpieces subjected to simulated clinical use and sterilisation. J Am Dent Assoc 1999; 130: 1301–1311.
Lloyd L, Burke F J, Cheung S W . Handpiece asepsis: a survey of the attitudes of dental practitioners. Br Dent J 1995; 178: 23–27.
Bentley E M, Sarll D W . Improvements in cross infection control in general dental practice. Br Dent J 1995; 179: 19–20.
Healy C M, Kearns H P O, Coulter W A, Stevenson M, Burke F J T . Autoclave use in dental practice in the Republic of Ireland. Int Dent J 2004; 54: 182–186.
Smith A, Hurrell D, Bagg J, McHugh S, Mathewson H, Henry M A . A method for surveying instrument decontamination procedures in general dental practice. Br Dent J 2007; 202: E20.
NHS Scotland Property and Environmental Forum. SHTM 2030: Washer disinfectors. Edinburgh: HMSO, 2001.
NHS Estates. HTM 2030: Washer disinfectors. Edinburgh: HMSO, 1997.
NHS Scotland. Sterile Services Provision Review Group: first report - The Glennie Framework. Edinburgh: NHS Scotland, 2001.
Medical Devices Regulations. Londond: HMSO, 2002.
Health and Safety at Work Act 1974. London: HMSO, 1974.
The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999. London: HMSO, 1999.
KaVo care systems and materials webpage. http://www.kavo.com/En/produkte/pflege/pflege.asp?navid=6000&lan=En (accessed 31 July 2009).
Direct Turbine handpiece maintenance guide webpage. http://www.directturbine.com/maintenance_guide.html (accessed 31 July 2009).
W&H International sterilization, hygienic and maintenance webpage. http://www.wh.com/en_global/products/hygienicmaintenance/ accessed 31 July 2009).
Andersen H K, Fiehn N E, Larsen T . Effect of steam sterilisation inside the turbine chambers of dental turbines. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999; 87: 184–188.
Medical Devices Agency. Device Bulletin 2002(06). Benchtop steam sterilisers – guidance on purchase, operation and maintenance. London: Medical Devices Agency, 2002.
Smith A J, Bagg J, Hurrell D, McHugh S . Sterilisation of re-usable instruments in general dental practice. Br Dent J 2007; 203: E16.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Refereed paper
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smith, G., Smith, A., Creanor, S. et al. Survey of the decontamination and maintenance of dental handpieces in general dental practice. Br Dent J 207, E7 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2009.761
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2009.761
This article is cited by
-
Representative survey on the reprocessing of endodontic instruments in Germany
British Dental Journal (2016)
-
Operator's ability at assessing a high-speed (air turbine) handpiece before use: an audit
British Dental Journal (2015)
-
Evidence summary: what 'cost of illness' evidence is there about cross-infection related infections in dental practice?
British Dental Journal (2010)
-
Handpiece decontamination survey
Vital (2009)
