Filter By:

Journal Check one or more journals to show results from those journals only.

Choose more journals

Article type Check one or more article types to show results from those article types only.
Subject Check one or more subjects to show results from those subjects only.
Date Choose a date option to show results from those dates only.

Custom date range

Clear all filters
Sort by:
Showing 1–35 of 35 results
Advanced filters: Author: Daniel Sarewitz Clear advanced filters
  • A bill to make data for environmental regulation more transparent reveals the fuzzy boundary between science and ideology, argues Daniel Sarewitz.

    • Daniel Sarewitz
    Comments & Opinion
    Nature
    Volume: 525, P: 159
  • High-prestige research hogs the money, while the needs — and value — of the US science agencies closest to the public are ignored, says Daniel Sarewitz.

    • Daniel Sarewitz
    Comments & Opinion
    Nature
    Volume: 481, P: 7
  • Daniel Sarewitz says the new US president will need to promote creative science to benefit the disaffected millions who voted for him.

    • Daniel Sarewitz
    Comments & Opinion
    Nature
    Volume: 539, P: 331
  • Scientists in the United States are often perceived as a Democratic interest group. For science’s sake this has to change, argues Daniel Sarewitz.

    • Daniel Sarewitz
    Comments & Opinion
    Nature
    Volume: 493, P: 7
  • Monitoring the outcomes of incentivized e-cigarette use, not endless research, will be the key to sensible regulation, says Daniel Sarewitz.

    • Daniel Sarewitz
    Comments & Opinion
    Nature
    Volume: 512, P: 349
  • The Higgs boson, and its role in providing a rational explanation for the Universe, is only part of the story, says Daniel Sarewitz.

    • Daniel Sarewitz
    Comments & Opinion
    Nature
    Volume: 488, P: 431
  • Not all problems will yield to technology. Deciding which will and which won't should be central to setting innovation policy, say Daniel Sarewitz and Richard Nelson.

    • Daniel Sarewitz
    • Richard Nelson
    Comments & Opinion
    Nature
    Volume: 456, P: 871-872
  • Science policy must concentrate less on how much money is spent, and more on how to translate investments into public good, says Daniel Sarewitz.

    • Daniel Sarewitz
    Comments & Opinion
    Nature
    Volume: 502, P: 595
  • Congressman Lamar Smith hopes to ‘improve’ peer review by adding a layer of accountability, but his bill aims at imaginary ideals, argues Daniel Sarewitz.

    • Daniel Sarewitz
    Comments & Opinion
    Nature
    Volume: 497, P: 411
  • The Republican urge to cut funding is not necessarily anti-science, and the research community ought not to pick political sides, says Daniel Sarewitz.

    • Daniel Sarewitz
    Comments & Opinion
    Nature
    Volume: 516, P: 9
  • Trump’s nomination as Republican presidential candidate is a reminder that scientific progress has not benefited all Americans, says Daniel Sarewitz.

    • Daniel Sarewitz
    Comments & Opinion
    Nature
    Volume: 536, P: 7
  • Scientists must publish less, says Daniel Sarewitz, or good research will be swamped by the ever-increasing volume of poor work.

    • Daniel Sarewitz
    Comments & Opinion
    Nature
    Volume: 533, P: 147
  • This year, scientists should resolve to follow the lead of Pope Francis and seek an inclusive approach to climate change, says Daniel Sarewitz.

    • Daniel Sarewitz
    Comments & Opinion
    Nature
    Volume: 529, P: 6
  • Innovation policies are more likely to be successful if they leverage existing capabilities, argues Daniel Sarewitz.

    • Daniel Sarewitz
    News
    Nature
    Volume: 463, P: 607
  • Government surveillance technology programmes must aim to protect privacy and civil rights from the start, says Daniel Sarewitz.

    • Daniel Sarewitz
    News
    Nature
    Volume: 465, P: 546
  • More and earlier public involvement is required to steer powerful new technologies wisely, says Daniel Sarewitz.

    • Daniel Sarewitz
    News
    Nature
    Volume: 466, P: 688
  • Democratically weighing up the benefits and risks of gene editing and artificial intelligence is a political endeavour, not an academic one, says Daniel Sarewitz.

    • Daniel Sarewitz
    Comments & Opinion
    Nature
    Volume: 522, P: 413-414
  • The US defence department should be at the centre of the nation's energy policy, says Daniel Sarewitz.

    • Daniel Sarewitz
    News
    Nature
    Volume: 464, P: 672
  • Evidence is mounting that research is riddled with systematic errors. Left unchecked, this could erode public trust, warns Daniel Sarewitz.

    • Daniel Sarewitz
    Comments & Opinion
    Nature
    Volume: 485, P: 149
  • Science should focus more on understanding the present and less on predicting the future, argues Daniel Sarewitz.

    • Daniel Sarewitz
    News
    Nature
    Volume: 463, P: 24
  • Barack Obama is finding that sometimes politics needs to put science in its place, says Daniel Sarewitz.

    • Daniel Sarewitz
    News
    Nature
    Volume: 467, P: 26
  • An innovative approach to reducing toxic-chemical use scrambles to stay alive as big science prospers, says Daniel Sarewitz.

    • Daniel Sarewitz
    News
    Nature
    Volume: 462, P: 566
  • Unchallenged assumptions about how science works threaten its support and decrease its ability to contribute to society, says Daniel Sarewitz.

    • Daniel Sarewitz
    Comments & Opinion
    Nature
    Volume: 547, P: 139
  • Efforts by the US National Academy of Sciences to popularize science through movies will sanitize it as well, says Daniel Sarewitz.

    • Daniel Sarewitz
    News
    Nature
    Volume: 466, P: 27
  • Consensus reports are the bedrock of science-based policy-making. But disagreement and arguments are more useful, says Daniel Sarewitz.

    • Daniel Sarewitz
    Comments & Opinion
    Nature
    Volume: 478, P: 7
  • Effective action on climate requires better politics, not better science, explains Daniel Sarewitz.

    • Daniel Sarewitz
    News
    Nature
    Volume: 464, P: 28
  • A small non-profit organization shows how to reduce the vulnerability of poor countries to earthquakes, says Daniel Sarewitz.

    • Daniel Sarewitz
    News
    Nature
    Volume: 465, P: 29
  • Assessments of the wider value of research are unpopular. Proposed changes will only produce more hype and hypocrisy, says Daniel Sarewitz.

    • Daniel Sarewitz
    Comments & Opinion
    Nature
    Volume: 475, P: 141
  • Before research can rebuild the US economy it must learn from the prosperous heyday of the military–industrial complex, says Daniel Sarewitz.

    • Daniel Sarewitz
    Comments & Opinion
    Nature
    Volume: 471, P: 137
  • Renewed attention to policies for adapting to climate change cannot come too soon for Roger Pielke, Jr, Gwyn Prins, Steve Rayner and Daniel Sarewitz.

    • Roger Pielke Jr
    • Gwyn Prins
    • Daniel Sarewitz
    Comments & Opinion
    Nature
    Volume: 445, P: 597-598
  • The US government must make the Department of Defense a key customer for energy technologies and make greenhouse-gas reductions a public good, say John Alic, Daniel Sarewitz, Charles Weiss and William Bonvillian.

    • John Alic
    • Daniel Sarewitz
    • William Bonvillian
    Comments & Opinion
    Nature
    Volume: 466, P: 316-317
  • How the global change science community is currently portraying the character and role of the social sciences and humanities is problematic, according to this Perspective. Measures needed to bring other visions and voices into the debate about global environmental change are identified.

    • Noel Castree
    • William M. Adams
    • Brian Wynne
    Reviews
    Nature Climate Change
    Volume: 4, P: 763-768