Nature Search

Publisher Correction: Land-based climate change mitigation measures can affect agricultural markets and food security

Shinichiro Fujimori
Wenchao Wu
Kiyoshi Takahashi
Amendments and Corrections30 Mar 2022
Nature Food

Volume: 3, P: 294
Reply to: An appeal to cost undermines food security risks of delayed mitigation

Tomoko Hasegawa
Shinichiro Fujimori
Peter Witzke
Research30 Apr 2020
Nature Climate Change

Volume: 10, P: 420-421
Scientific reflection on the European Commission’s Vision for Agriculture and Food

This Perspective presents a reflection on the Vision’s level of ambition, how it deviates from the Strategic Dialogue that preceded it and how scientists can contribute to a more sustainable agri-food system in Europe.

Hannah H. E. van Zanten
Jessica Duncan
Sjoukje Heimovaara
Reviews11 Jul 2025
Nature Food

Volume: 6, P: 653-656
Short- and long-term warming effects of methane may affect the cost-effectiveness of mitigation policies and benefits of low-meat diets

Owing to its short atmospheric life, methane’s contribution to agricultural emissions and climate change may vary substantially depending on the temporal scale considered. Based on projections from three agricultural economic models, this study reveals how different appreciations of methane’s global warming potential may affect the cost-effectiveness of carbon pricing and low-meat diets.

Ignacio Pérez-Domínguez
Agustin del Prado
María José Sanz-Sánchez
ResearchOpen Access13 Dec 2021
Nature Food

Volume: 2, P: 970-980
Bending the curve of terrestrial biodiversity needs an integrated strategy

To promote the recovery of the currently declining global trends in terrestrial biodiversity, increases in both the extent of land under conservation management and the sustainability of the global food system from farm to fork are required.

David Leclère
Michael Obersteiner
Lucy Young
Research10 Sept 2020
Nature

Volume: 585, P: 551-556
Land-based climate change mitigation measures can affect agricultural markets and food security

Emissions abatement efforts in the agriculture, forestry and land-use sector are vital to achieve climate change mitigation targets, but their effects on food security remain poorly understood. Using six global agroeconomic models, this study explores how afforestation, bioenergy and non-CO₂ emissions reductions could impact agricultural prices and the risk of hunger under different scenarios.

Shinichiro Fujimori
Wenchao Wu
Kiyoshi Takahashi
Research24 Feb 2022
Nature Food

Volume: 3, P: 110-121
A multi-model assessment of food security implications of climate change mitigation

Urgent action is needed to ensure food security and mitigate climate change. Through a multi-model comparison exercise, this study shows the potential negative trade-offs between food security and climate change mitigation if mitigation policies are carelessly designed.

Shinichiro Fujimori
Tomoko Hasegawa
Detlef van Vuuren
Research13 May 2019
Nature Sustainability

Volume: 2, P: 386-396
Key determinants of global land-use projections

There lacks model comparison of global land use change projections. Here the authors explored how different long-term drivers determine land use and food availability projections and they showed that the key determinants population growth and improvements in agricultural efficiency.

Elke Stehfest
Willem-Jan van Zeist
Keith Wiebe
ResearchOpen Access15 May 2019
Nature Communications

Volume: 10, P: 1-10
Economic, social and environmental spillovers decrease the benefits of a global dietary shift

The indirect effects of adopting the EAT–Lancet diet in the wider economy—and what this means for key social and environmental indicators—require further exploration. Using a general equilibrium model and tracing physical biomass, this study reveals spillover effects of a dietary shift on food prices, wages, trade, land use, biomass production and greenhouse gas emissions.

Alessandro Gatto
Marijke Kuiper
Hans van Meijl
Research05 Jun 2023
Nature Food

Volume: 4, P: 496-507
Agricultural non-CO₂ emission reduction potential in the context of the 1.5 °C target

Agricultural CH₄ and N₂O emissions represent around 11% of total anthropogenic GHGs. Here agriculture mitigation potentials are quantified, in the context of the 1.5 °C target, and decomposed by emission source, region and mitigation mechanism.

Stefan Frank
Petr Havlík
Hugo Valin
Research17 Dec 2018
Nature Climate Change

Volume: 9, P: 66-72
Rigorous anticipatory governance is needed for responsible food system transformation

Unintended and undesirable consequences can hinder policymaking. This Perspective explores how anticipatory governance can reduce ignorance, manage errors and avoid imperious immediacy when shaping future technological innovation to support more sustainable food systems transformations.

Daniel Mason-D’Croz
Cody Kugler
Mario Herrero
Reviews25 Sept 2025
Nature Food

Volume: 6, P: 920-926
Risk of increased food insecurity under stringent global climate change mitigation policy

Economy-wide GHG emissions reductions may negatively affect food security. Stringent mitigation policies, modelled as carbon prices, are shown to lead to an increase in production costs, food prices and the population’s risk of hunger.

Tomoko Hasegawa
Shinichiro Fujimori
Peter Witzke
Research30 Jul 2018
Nature Climate Change

Volume: 8, P: 699-703
The Russia-Ukraine war decreases food affordability but could reduce global greenhouse gas emissions

High food and energy prices due to the Russia-Ukraine war decrease food affordability but could reduce global greenhouse gas emissions according to a computable general equilibrium model simulating the medium-term impact of the conflict.

Hans van Meijl
Heleen Bartelings
Willem Jan van Zeist
ResearchOpen Access30 Jan 2024
Communications Earth & Environment

Volume: 5, P: 1-12

Search

Filter By:

Search

Quick links