Advanced search

Filter By:

Journal Check one or more journals to show results from those journals only.

Choose more journals

Article type Check one or more article types to show results from those article types only.
Subject Check one or more subjects to show results from those subjects only.
Date Choose a date option to show results from those dates only.

Custom date range

Clear all filters
Sort by:
Showing 1–5 of 5 results
Advanced filters: Author: Jake E. Bicknell Clear advanced filters

  • The defaunation of vertebrates may disrupt forest functioning through the loss of plant-animal interactions, but impacts on forests remain unquantified. Here the authors show that seed dispersal is a key interaction and defaunation of primates and birds negatively impacts forest regeneration.

    • Charlie J. Gardner
    • Jake E. Bicknell
    • Zoe G. Davies
    ResearchOpen Access
    Nature Communications
    Volume: 10, P: 1-7

  • An expert-elicitation process identifies current methodological barriers for monitoring terrestrial biodiversity, and how technological and procedural development of robotic and autonomous systems may contribute to overcoming these challenges.

    • Stephen Pringle
    • Martin Dallimer
    • Zoe G. Davies
    ResearchOpen Access
    Nature Ecology & Evolution
    Volume: 9, P: 1031-1042

  • Agriculture is the largest threat to tropical ecosystems. This study finds that setting aside land for nature in targeted fashion, especially alongside rivers, can increase biodiversity and ecosystem services without reducing the net area cultivated.

    • Jake E. Bicknell
    • Jesse R. O’Hanley
    • Zoe G. Davies
    ResearchOpen Access
    Nature Sustainability
    Volume: 6, P: 513-525

  • An analysis of the impact of logging intensity on biodiversity in tropical forests in Sabah, Malaysia, identifies a threshold of tree biomass removal below which logged forests still have conservation value.

    • Robert M. Ewers
    • C. David L. Orme
    • Cristina Banks-Leite
    ResearchOpen Access
    Nature
    Volume: 631, P: 808-813

  • Randomised controlled experiments are the gold standard for scientific inference, but environmental and social scientists often rely on different study designs. Here the authors analyse the use of six common study designs in the fields of biodiversity conservation and social intervention, and quantify the biases in their estimates.

    • Alec P. Christie
    • David Abecasis
    • William J. Sutherland
    ResearchOpen Access
    Nature Communications
    Volume: 11, P: 1-11