Advanced search

Filter By:

Journal Check one or more journals to show results from those journals only.

Choose more journals

Article type Check one or more article types to show results from those article types only.
Subject Check one or more subjects to show results from those subjects only.
Date Choose a date option to show results from those dates only.

Custom date range

Clear all filters
Sort by:
Showing 1–6 of 6 results
Advanced filters: Author: James E. Lingeman Clear advanced filters

  • Despite large numbers of patients being affected by stones, a surprising lack of knowledge exists on the relevance of stone compositions and pathological features to the outcomes of patients with stones. Here authors describe the potential of new technologies such as high-resolution endoscopes, and micro-CT imaging to address this lack of knowledge.

    • Michael S. Borofsky
    • Casey A. Dauw
    • James E. Lingeman
    Reviews
    Nature Reviews Urology
    Volume: 13, P: 549-557

  • When the Dornier HM3 lithotriptor was introduced in the early 1980s, shock-wave lithotripsy (SWL) rapidly became the preferred treatment for most upper-tract calculi. A number of second- and third-generation machines have since become available. This Viewpoint discusses the evolution of SWL technology, and highlights concerns over the limitations of modern devices.

    • Nicole L Miller
    • James E Lingeman
    Reviews
    Nature Clinical Practice Urology
    Volume: 3, P: 236-237

  • Shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) represents the only noninvasive surgical treatment for urinary tract stones. Drawing on their considerable experience, Lingeman and colleagues outline the current utility and limitations of SWL, and highlight the technological advances that hold promise for improving the safety and efficacy of this treatment modality in the future.

    • James E. Lingeman
    • James A. McAteer
    • Andrew P. Evan
    Reviews
    Nature Reviews Urology
    Volume: 6, P: 660-670

  • Kidney stone disease causes significant morbidity and increases in health care utilization. Here, the authors define the spatial molecular landscape and specific pathways contributing to stone-mediated injury in the human renal papilla and identify associated urinary biomarkers.

    • Victor Hugo Canela
    • William S. Bowen
    • Tarek M. El-Achkar
    ResearchOpen Access
    Nature Communications
    Volume: 14, P: 1-17

  • Most kidney and ureteral stones can be considered for treatment with a noninvasive or minimally invasive approach, with improved safety and morbidity compared with traditional open surgical approaches. However, improvements in laparoscopic surgical techniques mean that nearly any open surgery can be performed in a minimally invasive fashion. Here, Borofsky and Lingeman discuss the role of these techniques in modern stone surgery.

    • Michael S. Borofsky
    • James E. Lingeman
    Reviews
    Nature Reviews Urology
    Volume: 12, P: 392-400