Search

Ambient AI “digital scribes” are rapidly moving into routine practice, easing documentation burden and physician burnout. Early evidence suggests these tools can increase billing and risk-adjustment coding intensity, prompting payer responses such as downcoding and risk-score recalibration. This Policy Brief contrasts their implications in fee-for-service and Medicare Advantage models, notes relevance for systems blending encounter-based and capitated payment, and outlines steps to preserve value without fueling a coding arms race.

Monitoring the symptoms of a large cohort of asthma patients is made possible by a smartphone app created using Apple ResearchKit.

In “A Randomized Controlled Trial of Mobile Intervention Using Health Support Bubbles to Prevent Social Frailty”, Hayashi et al. investigated the effects of using a mobile health app with family or individually. Greater improvements in social behavior and frailty were noted in participants who used the app with family. In an era of remote healthcare and app-based health interventions, Hayashi et al.’s study reminds of the importance of human connection.

Chen et al. demonstrate that large language models (LLMs) frequently prioritize agreement over accuracy when responding to illogical medical prompts, a behavior known as sycophancy. By reinforcing user assumptions, this tendency may amplify misinformation and bias in clinical contexts. The authors find that simple prompting strategies and LLM fine-tuning can markedly reduce sycophancy without impairing performance, highlighting a path toward safer, more trustworthy applications of LLMs in medicine.

Digital medicine offers the possibility of continuous monitoring, behavior modification and personalized interventions at low cost, potentially easing the burden of chronic disease in cost-constrained healthcare systems.

Integrating large language models (LLMs) into oncology holds promise for clinical decision support. Woollie is an LLM recently developed by Zhu et al., fine-tuned using radiology impression notes from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and externally validated on UCSF oncology datasets. This methodology prioritizes data accuracy, preempts catastrophic forgetting, and demonstrates unparalleled rigor in predicting the progression of various cancer types. This work establishes a foundation for reliable, scalable, and equitable applications of LLMs in oncology.

Wu et al.’s recent article, “Noninvasive early prediction of preeclampsia in pregnancy using retinal vascular features,” documents significant differences in retinal vascular features among women who develop preeclampsia and those with normotensive pregnancies. These findings provide evidence that retinal screening has the potential to be used as a low-cost, non-invasive screening strategy to support the earlier detection, prevention, and treatment of preeclampsia.

Winter et al.’s recent investigation, “A Comparison of Self-Reported COVID-19 Symptoms Between Android and iOS CoronaCheck App Users,” reveals differences in the demographics and COVID-19 symptoms reported by users of Android and iOS systems. These findings not only provide more information about the varied experiences of individuals during the COVID-19 pandemic but also suggest that conclusions reached in studies using one operating platform may not be generalizable to users of other platforms.

Collaborative use of population-level health data and artificial intelligence is essential for achieving precision health through a learning health system. Two groundbreaking initiatives—the European Health Data Space (EHDS), covering 449 million EU citizens, and Germany’s forthcoming Health Data Lab, providing access to data from 75 million insured individuals (90% of the country’s population)—offer unprecedented opportunities to advance digital health innovation and research with global impact.

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) causes significant morbidity/mortality and timely diagnosis often via ultrasound is critical. However, the shortage of trained ultrasound providers has been an ongoing challenge. Recently, Speranza and colleagues (2025) demonstrated that an artificial intelligence (AI) guided ultrasound system used by non-ultrasound-trained nurses with remote clinician review can achieve sensitivities of 90–98% and specificities of 74–100% for diagnosing DVT. This study highlights the potential for AI guided imaging to address important gaps in health care delivery.

Digital health tools have the potential to support patients in managing their chronic diseases. Recently, Ullrich and colleagues (2025) introduced PreventiPlaque, a mobile health application that provides patients with up-to-date ultrasound images of their carotid plaques and tracks their lifestyle habits. Through a randomized controlled trial, the authors provide evidence of PreventiPlaque’s efficacy in improving patients’ cardiovascular risk profiles. This study highlights the potential for digital health interventions to provide personalized health information to patients and empower them to take actionable steps to improve their cardiovascular health.

Cardiovascular disease is underdiagnosed and undertreated in women compared to men. Wearable technologies (wearables) help shed light on women’s cardiovascular by collecting continuous cardiovascular data and correlating it with hormonal fluctuations across the menstrual cycle. In this context, Jasinski et al. propose that the new metric, cardiovascular amplitude, enables non-invasive monitoring of female physiology and health across the menstrual cycle.

Alzheimer’s disease is the fifth-leading cause of death for adults over the age of 65. Retinal imaging has emerged to find more accurate diagnostic tool for Alzheimer’s Disease. This paper highlights Hao et al.’s development of a new deep learning tool, EyeAD, which studies Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography (OCT-A) of patients with Alzheimer’s. Integrating this model into clinical workflows may offer novel insights into the progression of this disease.

Large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in reducing time, costs, and errors associated with manual data extraction. A recent study demonstrated that LLMs outperformed natural language processing approaches in abstracting pathology report information. However, challenges include the risks of weakening critical thinking, propagating biases, and hallucinations, which may undermine the scientific method and disseminate inaccurate information. Incorporating suitable guidelines (e.g., CANGARU), should be encouraged to ensure responsible LLM use.

Liu et al.’s recent study reveals that telemedicine expanded access to cardiovascular care in China, enabling patients in poorer areas of the country to access care in cities with more resources. While these findings may support the global expansion of telemedicine, implementation often proves challenging. This article examines the potential and limitations of adopting similar telemedicine efforts within the U.S. to advance geographic health equity.

Radin et al.’s recent study on patients with long COVID demonstrates that personal wearable data can provide critical insight into complex conditions. This editorial argues that research insights gained through personal wearables support the integration of personal wearables into healthcare. Challenges in incorporating wearable data in the clinic point towards AI data sorting, data sharing, device interoperability, FDA oversight, and expanded insurance coverage as first steps towards addressing these challenges.

Qiao et al. recently investigated the ability of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans and a smartphone app to provide detailed body composition and shape data. In a healthcare system that continues to rely on crude and stigmatizing measurements like body-mass index (BMI), their findings point to the potential of newer technologies to capture markers (i.e., visceral adiposity and fat distribution patterns) that provide clearer insights into metabolic health.

This piece critiques the exclusion of healthcare practitioners (HCPs) from the digital health innovation process. Drawing on “Sync fast and solve things—best practices for responsible digital health” by Landers et al., the editorial argues for the importance of inclusive co-creation, in which clinicians play an active role in developing digital health solutions. It emphasizes that without the meaningful involvement of HCPs, digital health tools risk being clinically irrelevant.

There is a need for digital health innovation focused on bettering the health of marginalized populations. These communities, often insured by Medicaid and Medicare, face complex healthcare barriers that technology can address—emphasizing the role of the Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS) in fostering innovation. Dasari et al. identify four areas of CMS collaboration with startups: enhancing consumer awareness, leveraging telehealth, streamlining cross-state licensing and billing, and adopting technology-enabled tools.

Boussina et al. recently evaluated a deep learning sepsis prediction model (COMPOSER) in a prospective before-and-after quasi-experimental study within two emergency departments at UC San Diego Health, tracking outcomes before and after deployment. Over the five-month implementation period, they reported a 17% relative reduction in in-hospital sepsis mortality and a 10% relative increase in sepsis bundle compliance. This editorial discusses the importance of shifting the focus towards evaluating clinically relevant outcomes, such as mortality reduction or quality-of-life improvements, when adopting artificial intelligence (AI) tools. We also explore the ecosystem vital for AI algorithms to succeed in the clinical setting, from interoperability standards and infrastructure to dashboards and action plans. Finally, we suggest that algorithms may eventually fail due to the human nature of healthcare, advocating for the need for continuous monitoring systems to ensure the adaptability of these tools in the ever-evolving healthcare landscape.

The utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) in diabetes care has focused on early intervention and treatment management. Notably, usage has expanded to predict an individual’s risk for developing type 2 diabetes. A scoping review of 40 studies by Mohsen et al. shows that while most studies used unimodal AI models, multimodal approaches were superior because they integrate multiple types of data. However, creating multimodal models and determining model performance are challenging tasks given the multi-factored nature of diabetes. For both unimodal and multimodal models, there are also concerns of bias with the lack of external validations and representation of race, age, and gender in training data. The barriers in data quality and evaluation standardization are ripe areas for developing new technologies, especially for entrepreneurs and innovators. Collaboration amongst providers, entrepreneurs, and researchers must be prioritized to ensure that AI in diabetes care is providing quality and equitable patient care.

Generative AI is designed to create new content from trained parameters. Learning from large amounts of data, many of these models aim to simulate human conversation. Generative AI is being applied to many different sectors. Within healthcare there has been innovation specifically towards generative AI models trained on electronic medical record data. A recent review characterizes these models, their strengths, and weaknesses. Inspired by that work, we present our evaluation checklist for generative AI models applied to electronic medical records.

We explore the evolving landscape of diagnostic artificial intelligence (AI) in dermatology, particularly focusing on deep learning models for a wide array of skin diseases beyond skin cancer. We critically analyze the current state of AI in dermatology, its potential in enhancing diagnostic accuracy, and the challenges it faces in terms of bias, applicability, and therapeutic recommendations.

AI-based prediction models demonstrate equal or surpassing performance compared to experienced physicians in various research settings. However, only a few have made it into clinical practice. Further, there is no standardized protocol for integrating AI-based physician support systems into the daily clinical routine to improve healthcare delivery. Generally, AI/physician collaboration strategies have not been extensively investigated. A recent study compared four potential strategies for AI model deployment and physician collaboration to investigate the performance of an AI model trained to identify signs of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) on chest X-ray images. Here we discuss strategies and challenges with AI/physician collaboration when AI-based decision support systems are implemented in the clinical routine.

The usage of digital devices in clinical and research settings has rapidly increased. Despite their promise, optimal use of these devices is often hampered by low adherence. The relevant factors predictive of long-term adherence have yet to be fully explored. A recent study investigated device usage over 12 months in a cohort of the electronic Framingham Heart Study. It identified sociodemographic and health-related factors associated with the long-term use of three digital health components: a smartphone app, a digital blood pressure cuff, and a smartwatch. The authors found that depressive symptoms and lower self-rated health were associated with lower smartwatch usage. Female sex and higher education levels were associated with higher app-based survey completion. Here, we discuss factors predictive for adherence and personalized strategies to promote adherence to digital tools.

Artificial intelligence systems are increasingly being applied to healthcare. In surgery, AI applications hold promise as tools to predict surgical outcomes, assess technical skills, or guide surgeons intraoperatively via computer vision. On the other hand, AI systems can also suffer from bias, compounding existing inequities in socioeconomic status, race, ethnicity, religion, gender, disability, or sexual orientation. Bias particularly impacts disadvantaged populations, which can be subject to algorithmic predictions that are less accurate or underestimate the need for care. Thus, strategies for detecting and mitigating bias are pivotal for creating AI technology that is generalizable and fair. Here, we discuss a recent study that developed a new strategy to mitigate bias in surgical AI systems.

Digital health technologies (DHTs) have brought several significant improvements to clinical trials, enabling real-world data collection outside of the traditional clinical context and more patient-centered approaches. DHTs, such as wearables, allow the collection of unique personal data at home over a long period. But DHTs also bring challenges, such as digital endpoint harmonization and disadvantaging populations already experiencing the digital divide. A recent study explored the growth trends and implications of established and novel DHTs in neurology trials over the past decade. Here, we discuss the benefits and future challenges of DHT usage in clinical trials.

Due to its enormous capacity for benefit, harm, and cost, health care is among the most tightly regulated industries in the world. But with the rise of smartphones, an explosion of direct-to-consumer mobile health applications has challenged the role of centralized gatekeepers. As interest in health apps continue to climb, national regulatory bodies have turned their attention toward strategies to protect consumers from apps that mine and sell health data, recommend unsafe practices, or simply do not work as advertised. To characterize the current state and outlook of these efforts, Essén and colleagues map the nascent landscape of national health app policies and raise several considerations for cross-border collaboration. Strategies to increase transparency, organize app marketplaces, and monitor existing apps are needed to ensure that the global wave of new digital health tools fulfills its promise to improve health at scale.

Artificial intelligence (AI) and natural language processing (NLP) have found a highly promising application in automated clinical coding (ACC), an innovation that will have profound impacts on the clinical coding industry, billing and revenue management, and potentially clinical care itself. Dong et al. recently analyzed the technical challenges of ACC and proposed future directions. Primary challenges for ACC exist at the technological and implementation levels; clinical documents are redundant and complex, code sets like the ICD-10 are rapidly evolving, training sets are not comprehensive of codes, and ACC models have yet to fully capture the logic and rules of coding decisions. Next steps include interdisciplinary collaboration with clinical coders, accessibility and transparency of datasets, and tailoring models to specific use cases.

Artificial intelligence (AI) tools for endoscopy are now entering clinical practice after demonstrating substantial improvements to polyp detection on colonoscopy. As this technology continues to mature, efforts to develop and validate a new frontier of possibilities—including diagnostic classification, risk stratification, and clinical outcomes assessment—are now underway. In npj Digital Medicine, scientists from Cosmo AI/Linkverse and collaborators report an extension to the first FDA-cleared AI tool for colonoscopy that goes beyond polyp detection to enable video-based diagnostic characterization.

Even as innovation occurs within digital medicine, challenges around equity and racial health disparities remain. Golden et al. evaluate structural racism in their recent paper focused on reproductive health. They recommend a framework to Remove, Repair, Restructure, and Remediate. We propose applying the framework to three areas within digital medicine: artificial intelligence (AI) applications, wearable devices, and telehealth. With this approach, we can continue to work towards an equitable future for digital medicine.

In recent years, a steady swell of biological image data has driven rapid progress in healthcare applications of computer vision and machine learning. To make sense of this data, scientists often rely on detailed annotations from domain experts for training artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms. The time-consuming and costly process of collecting annotations presents a sizable bottleneck for AI research and development. HALS (Human-Augmenting Labeling System) is a collaborative human-AI labeling workflow that uses an iterative “review-and-revise” model to improve the efficiency of this critical process in computational pathology.

The vital signs—temperature, heart rate, respiratory rate, and blood pressure—are indispensable in clinical decision-making. These metrics are widely used to identify physiologic decline and prompt investigation or intervention. Vital sign monitoring is particularly important in acute care settings, where patients are at higher risk and may require additional vigilance. Conventional contact-based devices, while widespread and generally reliable, can be inconvenient or disruptive to patients, families, and staff. Non-contact, video-based methods present a more flexible and information-dense alternative that may enable creative improvements to patient care. Still, these approaches are susceptible to several sources of bias and require rigorous clinical validation. A recent study by Jorge et al. demonstrates that video-based monitoring can reliably capture heart rate and respiratory rate and overcome many potential sources of bias in post-operative settings. This presents real-world evaluation of a practical, noninvasive, and continuous monitoring technology that had previously only been tested in controlled settings.

As clinicians and scientists gather more data on the clinical trajectory of COVID-19 and the biology of its causative agent, the SARS-CoV-2 virus, novel strategies are needed to integrate these data to inform new therapies. A recent study by Howell et al. introduces a network model of viral-host interactions to produce explainable and testable predictions for treatment effects. Their model was consistent with experimental data and recommended treatments, and one of its predicted drug combinations was validated through in vitro assays. These findings support the utility of computational strategies for leveraging the vast literature on COVID-19 to generate insights for drug repurposing.