Filter By:

Journal Check one or more journals to show results from those journals only.

Choose more journals

Article type Check one or more article types to show results from those article types only.
Subject Check one or more subjects to show results from those subjects only.
Date Choose a date option to show results from those dates only.

Custom date range

Clear all filters
Sort by:
Showing 1–6 of 6 results
Advanced filters: Author: Lukas Fesenfeld Clear advanced filters
  • Taxing meat could benefit the environment, animal welfare and public health. However, such demand-side policies often face political obstacles, and politicians fear public backlash; strategic policy framing and design offer leeway.

    • Lukas Fesenfeld
    News & Views
    Nature Food
    Volume: 4, P: 209-210
  • The reduction of food loss and waste is urgent, yet strict food waste regulations can be costly and unpopular. Drawing on a large set of survey experiments conducted in a high-income country, this study assesses the positive impact that specific policy framing, design and feedback may have on citizens’ level of support to these regulations.

    • Lukas Fesenfeld
    • Lukas Rudolph
    • Thomas Bernauer
    Research
    Nature Food
    Volume: 3, P: 227-235
  • Policy packages for reducing the environmental impact of food systems were tested for acceptability through conjoint experiments in China, Germany and the United States. Achieving a sustainable food system may involve unpopular measures, but strategic policy bundling may increase citizen support for these measures.

    • Lukas Paul Fesenfeld
    • Michael Wicki
    • Thomas Bernauer
    Research
    Nature Food
    Volume: 1, P: 173-182
  • The success of the European Union’s Farm to Fork strategy depends on the success of the expected legislative framework for sustainable food systems and the design and implementation of a new food systems governance architecture. Key elements include deliberative food systems governance and democracy, science–policy interfaces, independent progress monitoring, obligatory reporting rules and strategic and adaptive policy design.

    • Lukas Paul Fesenfeld
    • Jeroen Candel
    • Franziska Gaupp
    Comments & Opinion
    Nature Food
    Volume: 4, P: 826-829
  • The current focus on the long-term global warming potential in climate policy-making runs the risk of mitigation options for short-lived climate pollutants being ignored, and tipping points being crossed. We outline how a more balanced perspective on long- and short-lived climate pollutants could become politically feasible.

    • Lukas P. Fesenfeld
    • Tobias S. Schmidt
    • Alexander Schrode
    Comments & Opinion
    Nature Climate Change
    Volume: 8, P: 933-936