Filter By:

Journal Check one or more journals to show results from those journals only.

Choose more journals

Article type Check one or more article types to show results from those article types only.
Subject Check one or more subjects to show results from those subjects only.
Date Choose a date option to show results from those dates only.

Custom date range

Clear all filters
Sort by:
Showing 1–5 of 5 results
Advanced filters: Author: Nils Markusson Clear advanced filters
  • Achieving net zero means balancing remaining emissions with carbon removal, and understanding the nature and scope of residual emissions is key to planning decarbonized energy and industrial systems. However, our analysis of long-term climate strategies shows that many governments lack clear projections for residual emissions at net zero.

    • Holly Jean Buck
    • Wim Carton
    • Nils Markusson
    News & Views
    Nature Climate Change
    Volume: 13, P: 317-319
  • Using carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS) for carbon removal is crucial to climate policy, but implementation at scale is at risk owing to political obstacles. Climate policies must avoid relying on empty promises of CCS for carbon removal without necessary financial resourcing and support emissions reductions separately from carbon removal.

    • Nils Markusson
    Comments & Opinion
    Nature Reviews Earth & Environment
    Volume: 5, P: 481-482
  • Residual emissions, as a noticeable component of net-zero plans, should be analysed transparently and with specificity. By examining the national long-term strategies, the authors find that currently residual emissions are not clearly defined and are unlikely to be balanced by land-based carbon removal.

    • Holly Jean Buck
    • Wim Carton
    • Nils Markusson
    ResearchOpen Access
    Nature Climate Change
    Volume: 13, P: 351-358
  • This Perspective maps the history of climate targets and shows how the international goal of avoiding dangerous climate change has been reinterpreted in the light of new modelling methods and technological promises, ultimately enabling policy prevarication and limiting mitigation.

    • Duncan McLaren
    • Nils Markusson
    Reviews
    Nature Climate Change
    Volume: 10, P: 392-397
  • Carbon capture and storage is a climate mitigation technology designed to reduce emissions from fossil-fuel power plants and industrial sources. This Perspective argues that the very limited implementation of carbon capture and storage technology so far is largely the result of political, economic and social factors, rather than a technological inability to deliver.

    • Vivian Scott
    • Stuart Gilfillan
    • R. Stuart Haszeldine
    Reviews
    Nature Climate Change
    Volume: 3, P: 105-111