Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Bell RWD, O'brien C . Accuracy of referral to a glaucoma clinic. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1997; 17: 7–11.
Tuck MW, Crick RP . Efficiency of referral for suspected glaucoma. BMJ 1991; 302: 998–1000.
Vernon SA . The changing pattern of glaucoma referrals by optometrists. Eye 1998; 12: 854–857.
Harrison RJ, Wild JM, Hobley AJ . Referral patterns to an ophthalmic out-patients clinic by general practitioners and ophthalmic opticians and the role of these professionals in screening for ocular disease. BMJ 1988; 297: 1162–1167.
Theodossaides J, Murdoch L . Positive predictive value of optometrist-initiated referrals for glaucoma. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1999; 19: 62–67.
Bell RWD, O'brien C . The diagnostic outcome of new glaucoma referrals. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1997; 17: 3–6.
Vernon SA, Ghosh G . Do locally agreed guidelines for optometrists concerning the referral of glaucoma suspects influence referral practice? Eye 2001; 15: 458–463.
Henson DB, Spencer AF, Harper R, Cadman EJ . Community refinement of glaucoma referrals. Eye 2003; 17: 21–26.
Gerada C, Wright N, Keen J . General practitioners with a special interest: new opportunities or the end of the general practitioner? Br J Gen Pract 2002; 52: 796–797.
Crick RP, Tuck MW . How can we improve the detection of glaucoma? BMJ 1995; 310: 546–547.
Harper R, Reeves B . Screening for primary open-angle glaucoma: a review. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1995; 15(Supp 2): S27–S34.
Acknowledgements
This study was presented as a poster presentation at the Oxford Congress, July 2003.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jones, L., Robinson, R. & Cook, N. General practitioner with special interest improves the efficiency of glaucoma referrals. Eye 20, 942 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6702048
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6702048
This article is cited by
-
Response to Jones et al
Eye (2007)