Sir,

The authors would like to thank Dr Cheung and colleagues for their letter and interest in the article.1 The authors agree with Dr Cheung and colleagues that for the descriptions of the correlations between the epiretinal membranes and the ocular and general parameters, the correlation coefficient, the P-value, and the 95% confidence intervals of the odds ratios were given, while the odd ratios themselves were omitted. The description of the statistical analysis would have been considerably more precise, if the odds ratios had additionally been given, which now can only be estimated from their 95% confidence intervals in the manuscript.

Log in or create a free account to read this content

Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com

Access through your institution

or

Sign in or create an account
Continue with Google
Continue with ORCiD