Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Graft-versus-host Disease

Six-month freedom from treatment failure is an important end point for acute GVHD clinical trials

Abstract

We studied the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (ASBMT) 6-month (m) freedom from treatment failure (FFTF) as a predictor of survival for patients with acute GVHD (aGVHD) requiring treatment. Adult patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) from February 2007 to March 2009 who were enrolled in a prospective biomarker clinical trial and developed aGVHD requiring systemic corticosteroids by day +100 were included (N=44). Six-month FFTF was defined as per the ASBMT guidelines (absence of death, malignancy relapse/progression or systemic immunosuppression change within 6 months of starting steroids and before chronic GVHD development). aGVHD was treated with systemic corticosteroids in 44 patients. Day 28 response after steroid initiation (complete response+very good partial response+partial response) occurred in 38 (87%) patients, but only 28 (64%) HCT recipients met the 6-m FFTF end point. Day 28 response predicted 6-m FFTF. Achieving 6-m FFTF was associated with improved 2-year (y) OS (81% vs 48%; P=0.03) and decreased 2-y non-relapse mortality (8% vs 49%; P=0.01). In multivariate analysis, 6-m FFTF continued to predict improved OS (hazard ratio, 0.27; P=0.03). The 6-m FFTF end point measures fixed outcomes, predicts long-term therapeutic success and could be less prone to measurement error than aGVHD clinical response at day 28.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Martin PJ, Rizzo JD, Wingard JR, Ballen K, Curtin PT, Cutler C et al. First- and second-line systemic treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease: recommendations of the american society of blood and marrow transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2012; 18: 1150–1163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. MacMillan ML, DeFor TE, Weisdorf DJ . The best endpoint for acute GVHD treatment trials. Blood 2010; 115: 5412–5417.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wolf D, von Lilienfeld-Toal M, Wolf AM, Schleuning M, von Bergwelt-Baildon M, Held SA et al. Novel treatment concepts for graft-versus-host disease. Blood 2012; 119: 16–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Saliba RM, Couriel DR, Giralt S, Rondon G, Okoroji GJ, Rashid A et al. Prognostic value of response after upfront therapy for acute GVHD. Bone Marrow Transplant 2012; 47: 125–131.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Levine JE, Logan B, Wu J, Alousi AM, Ho V, Bolanos-Meade J et al. Graft-versus-host disease treatment: predictors of survival. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2010; 16: 1693–1699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Martin PJ . Study design and endpoints in graft-versus-host disease. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 2008; 21: 357–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Engelhardt BG, Sengsayadeth SM, Jagasia M, Savani BN, Kassim AA, Lu P et al. Tissue-specific regulatory T cells; biomarker for acute graft-versus-host disease and survival. Exp Hematol 2012; 40: 974–982.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Przepiorka D, Weisdorf D, Martin P, Klingemann HG, Beatty P, Hows J et al. 1994 Consensus Conference on Acute GVHD Grading. Bone Marrow Transplant 1995; 15: 825–828.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Filipovich AH, Weisdorf D, Pavletic S, Socie G, Wingard JR, Lee SJ et al. National Institutes of Health consensus development project on criteria for clinical trials in chronic graft-versus-host disease: I. Diagnosis and staging working group report. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2005; 11: 945–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Martin PJ, Bachier CR, Klingemann HG, McCarthy PL, Szabolcs P, Uberti JP et al. Endpoints for clinical trials testing treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease: a joint statement. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2009; 15: 777–784.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute Grant (No. K12 CA090625), the American Cancer Society-Institutional Research Grant (No. IRG-58-009-48) and the Sartain-Lanier Family Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B G Engelhardt.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Supplementary Information accompanies this paper on Bone Marrow Transplantation website

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sengsayadeth, S., Savani, B., Jagasia, M. et al. Six-month freedom from treatment failure is an important end point for acute GVHD clinical trials. Bone Marrow Transplant 49, 236–240 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2013.157

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2013.157

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links