Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Treatment options for male stress urinary incontinence

Abstract

The diagnosis and management of male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is complex. Various etiologies exist, with radical prostatectomy being the most common cause in men seeking treatment. SUI in this setting is often temporary and resolves within the first postoperative year. Therefore, it is important to understand the natural history of male SUI before initiating treatment. Generally, the initial management of SUI that persists after 12 months consists of conservative measures, such as pelvic floor muscle exercises. Several treatments are available for men whose continence does not improve after pelvic floor muscle exercises. In order of increasing complexity they are urethral bulking agents, male slings, and the artificial urinary sphincter (AUS). With over 30 years of published data suggesting excellent long-term outcomes, the AUS is considered the gold standard treatment of male SUI. Male slings have recently demonstrated efficacy for selected patients and are likely to be used more often in the future as experience with these devices grows.

Key Points

  • Currently, the most common etiology of male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is radical prostatectomy (RP)

  • The diagnosis of male SUI can be made with a detailed history, physical examination, and appropriate tests, such as urodynamics and cystoscopy

  • Most patients will recover urinary continence within 1 year of prostatectomy, therefore it is very important to understand the natural history of SUI after RP

  • Pelvic floor muscle exercises can hasten continence immediately after RP and should be attempted in all men presenting for evaluation of SUI after prostatectomy

  • The artificial urinary sphincter and male slings are efficacious in the treatment of male SUI

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nitti, V. W. The prevalence of urinary incontinence. Rev. Urol. 3 (Suppl. 1), S2–S6 (2001).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Smoger, S. H., Felice, T. L. & Kloecker, G. H. Urinary incontinence among male veterans receiving care in primary care clinics. Ann. Intern. Med. 132, 547–551 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. McGrother, C. W. et al. Storage symptoms of the bladder: prevalence, incidence and need for services in the U. K. BJU Int. 93, 763–769 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mardon, R. E., Halim, S., Pawlson, L. G. & Haffer, S. C. Management of urinary incontinence in Medicare managed care beneficiaries: results from the 2004 Medicare Health Outcomes Survey. Arch. Intern. Med. 166, 1128–1133 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Herschorn, S., Gajewski, J., Schulz, J. & Corcos, J. A population-based study of urinary symptoms and incontinence: the Canadian Urinary Bladder Survey. BJU Int. 101, 52–58 (2007).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Stothers, L., Thom, D. H. & Calhoun, E. A. Urinary incontinence in men. Urologic Diseases in America. US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [online], (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  7. American Urological Association. Guideline on the Management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) [online], (2010).

  8. Rassweiler, J., Teber, D., Kuntz, R. & Hofmann, R. Complications of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP)--incidence, management, and prevention. Eur. Urol. 50, 969–979 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Eastham, J. A. et al. Risk factors for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy. J. Urol. 156, 1707–1713 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wei, J. T., Dunn, R. L., Marcovich, R., Montie, J. E. & Sanda, M. G. Prospective assessment of patient reported urinary continence after radical prostatectomy. J. Urol. 164, 744–748 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Burkhard, F. C. et al. Nerve sparing open radical retropubic prostatectomy—does it have an impact on urinary continence? J. Urol. 176, 189–195 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Anast, J. W. et al. The impact of obesity on health related quality of life before and after radical prostatectomy (data from CaPSURE). J. Urol. 173, 1132–1138 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Konety, B. R., Sadetsky, N. & Carroll, P. R. Recovery of urinary continence following radical prostatectomy: the impact of prostate volume—analysis of data from the CaPSURE Database. J. Urol. 177, 1423–1425 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cambio, A. J. & Evans, C. P. Minimising postoperative incontinence following radical prostatectomy: considerations and evidence. Eur. Urol. 50, 903–913 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Myers, R. P. Male urethral sphincteric anatomy and radical prostatectomy. Urol. Clin. North Am. 18, 211–227 (1991).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Coakley, F. V. et al. Urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy: relationship with membranous urethral length on preoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging. J. Urol. 168, 1032–1035 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Walsh, P. C. Radical prostatectomy with reduced morbidity: an anatomic approach. NCI Monogr. 7, 133–137 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Begg, C. B. et al. Variations in morbidity after radical prostatectomy. N. Engl. J. Med. 346, 1138–1144 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Saranchuk, J. W. et al. Achieving optimal outcomes after radical prostatectomy. J. Clin. Oncol. 23, 4146–4151 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kielb, S. J. & Clemens, J. Q. Comprehensive urodynamics evaluation of 146 men with incontinence after radical prostatectomy. Urology 66, 392–396 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Groutz, A., Blaivas, J. G., Chaikin, D. C., Weiss, J. P. & Verhaaren, M. The pathophysiology of post-radical prostatectomy incontinence: a clinical and video urodynamic study. J. Urol. 163, 1767–1770 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Stone, N. N. & Stock, R. G. Long-term urinary, sexual, and rectal morbidity in patients treated with iodine-125 prostate brachytherapy followed up for a minimum of 5 years. Urology 69, 338–342 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu, M. et al. Urinary incontinence in patients treated with external beam radiotherapy. Radiother. Oncol. 74, 197–201 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Stephenson, A. J. et al. Morbidity and functional outcomes of salvage radical prostatectomy for locally recurrent prostate cancer after radiation therapy. J. Urol. 172, 2239–2243 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ward, J. F., Sebo, T. J., Blute, M. L. & Zincke, H. Salvage surgery for radiorecurrent prostate cancer: contemporary outcomes. J. Urol. 173, 1156–1160 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee, R., Te, A. E., Kaplan, S. A. & Sandhu, J. S. Temporal trends in adoption of and indications for the artificial urinary sphincter. J. Urol. 181, 2622–2627 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ko, Y., Lin, S. J., Salmon, J. W. & Bron, M. S. The impact of urinary incontinence on quality of life of the elderly. Am. J. Manag. Care 11, S103–S111 (2005).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Eustice, S., Roe, B. & Paterson, J. Prompted voiding for the management of urinary incontinence in adults. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2, CD0002113 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wallace, S. A., Roe, B., Williams, K. & Palmer, M. Bladder training for urinary incontinence in adults. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 1, CD001308 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Van Kampen, M. et al. Effect of pelvic-floor re-education on duration and degree of incontinence after radical prostatectomy: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 355, 98–102 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Filocamo, M. T. et al. Effectiveness of early pelvic floor rehabilitation treatment for post-prostatectomy incontinence. Eur. Urol. 48, 734–738 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Chang, P. L. et al. The early effect of pelvic floor muscle exercise after transurethral prostatectomy. J. Urol. 160, 402–405 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Porru, D. et al. Impact of early pelvic floor rehabilitation after transurethral resection of the prostate. Neurourol. Urodyn. 20, 53–59 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Burgio, K. L. et al. Preoperative biofeedback assisted behavioral training to decrease post-prostatectomy incontinence: a randomized, controlled trial. J. Urol. 175, 196–201 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wille, S., Sobottka, A., Heidenreich, A. & Hofmann, R. Pelvic floor exercises, electrical stimulation and biofeedback after radical prostatectomy: results of a prospective randomized trial. J. Urol. 170, 490–493 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Cummings, J. M., Boullier, J. A. & Parra, R. O. Transurethral collagen injections in the therapy of post-radical prostatectomy stress incontinence. J. Urol. 155, 1011–1013 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Smith, D. N., Appell, R. A., Rackley, R. R. & Winters, J. C. Collagen injection therapy for post-prostatectomy incontinence. J. Urol. 160, 364–367 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Westney, O. L., Bevan-Thomas, R., Palmer, J. L., Cespedes, R. D. & McGuire, E. J. Transurethral collagen injections for male intrinsic sphincter deficiency: the University of Texas-Houston experience. J. Urol. 174, 994–997 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Herschorn, S. et al. Surgical treatment of stress incontinence in men. Neurourol. Urodyn. 29, 179–190 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kaufman, J. J. Surgical treatment of post-prostatectomy incontinence: use of the penile crura to compress the bulbous urethra. J. Urol. 107, 293–297 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Schaeffer, A. J., Clemens, J. Q., Ferrari, M. & Stamey, T. A. The male bulbourethral sling procedure for post-radical prostatectomy incontinence. J. Urol. 159, 1510–1515 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Clemens, J. Q., Bushman, W. & Schaeffer, A. J. Questionnaire based results of the bulbourethral sling procedure. J. Urol. 162, 1972–1976 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Madjar, S. et al. Bone anchored sling for the treatment of post-prostatectomy incontinence. J. Urol. 165, 72–76 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Comiter, C. V. The male sling for stress urinary incontinence: a prospective study. J. Urol. 167, 597–601 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Ullrich, N. F. & Comiter, C. V. The male sling for stress urinary incontinence: urodynamic and subjective assessment. J. Urol. 172, 204–206 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Rajpurkar, A. D., Onur, R. & Singla, A. Patient satisfaction and clinical efficacy of the new perineal bone-anchored male sling. Eur. Urol. 47, 237–242 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Fischer, M. C., Huckabay, C. & Nitti, V. W. The male perineal sling: assessment and prediction of outcome. J. Urol. 177, 1414–1418 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Rehder, P. & Gozzi, C. Transobturator sling suspension for male urinary incontinence including post-radical prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. 52, 860–866 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Scott, F. B., Bradley, W. E. & Timm, G. W. Treatment of urinary incontinence by an implantable prosthetic urinary sphincter. J. Urol. 112, 75–80 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Leach, G. E. et al. Post-prostatectomy incontinence: urodynamic findings and treatment outcomes. J. Urol. 155, 1256–1259 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Haab, F., Trockman, B. A., Zimmern, P. E. & Leach, G. E. Quality of life and continence assessment of the artificial urinary sphincter in men with minimum 3.5 years of followup. J. Urol. 158, 435–439 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Montague, D. K., Angermeier, K. W. & Paolone, D. R. Long-term continence and patient satisfaction after artificial sphincter implantation for urinary incontinence after prostatectomy. J. Urol. 166, 547–549 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Gousse, A. E., Madjar, S., Lambert, M. M. & Fishman, I. J. Artificial urinary sphincter for post-radical prostatectomy urinary incontinence: long-term subjective results. J. Urol. 166, 1755–1758 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Leibovich, B. C. & Barrett, D. M. Use of the artificial urinary sphincter in men and women. World J. Urol. 15, 316–319 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Elliott, D. S. & Barrett, D. M. Mayo Clinic long-term analysis of the functional durability of the AMS 800 artificial urinary sphincter: a review of 323 cases. J. Urol. 159, 1206–1208 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Venn, S. N., Greenwell, T. J. & Mundy, A. R. The long-term outcome of artificial urinary sphincters. J. Urol. 164, 702–706 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Raj, G. V., Peterson, A. C., Toh, K. L. & Webster, G. D. Outcomes following revisions and secondary implantation of the artificial urinary sphincter. J. Urol. 173, 1242–1245 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Lai, H. H., Hsu, E. I., Teh, B. S., Butler, E. B. & Boone, T. B. 13 years of experience with artificial urinary sphincter implantation at Baylor College of Medicine. J. Urol. 177, 1021–1025 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Henry, G. D., Graham, S. M., Cleves, M. A., Simmons, C. J. & Flynn, B. Perineal approach for artificial urinary sphincter implantation appears to control male stress incontinence better than the transscrotal approach. J. Urol. 179, 1475–1479 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. DiMarco, D. S. & Elliott, D. S. Tandem cuff artificial urinary sphincter as a salvage procedure following failed primary sphincter placement for the treatment of post-prostatectomy incontinence. J. Urol. 170, 1252–1254 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Guralnick, M. L., Miller, E., Toh, K. L. & Webster, G. D. Transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter cuff placement in cases requiring revision for erosion and urethral atrophy. J. Urol. 167, 2075–2078 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Gomha, M. A. & Boone, T. B. Artificial urinary sphincter for post-prostatectomy incontinence in men who had prior radiotherapy: a risk and outcome analysis. J. Urol. 167, 591–596 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Sotelo, T. M. & Westney, O. L. Outcomes related to placing an artificial urinary sphincter using a single-incision, transverse-scrotal technique in high-risk patients. BJU Int. 101, 1124–1127 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Fisher, M. B., Aggarwal, N., Vuruskan, H. & Singla, A. K. Efficacy of artificial urinary sphincter after failed bone-anchored male sling for postprostatectomy incontinence. Urology 70, 942–944 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Trigo-Rocha, F., Gomes, C. M., Pompeo, A. C., Lucon, A. M. & Arap, S. Prospective study evaluating efficacy and safety of Adjustable Continence Therapy (ProACT) for post radical prostatectomy urinary incontinence. Urology 67, 965–969 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Smaldone, M. C., Chen, M. L. & Chancellor, M. B. Stem cell therapy for urethral sphincter regeneration. Minerva Urol. Nefrol. 61, 27–40 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Désirée Lie, University of California, Orange, CA, is the author of and is solely resonsible for the content of the learning objectives, questions and answers of the MedscapeCME-accredited continuing medical education activity associated with this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares that he has worked as a Consultant for American Medical Systems.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sandhu, J. Treatment options for male stress urinary incontinence. Nat Rev Urol 7, 222–228 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2010.26

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2010.26

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing