Abstract
ARL6IP5 (ADP-ribosylation-like factor 6 interacting protein 5) plays an important role in a variety of physiological or pathological processes, including in cancers. However, the biological roles of ARL6IP5 in cancers are controversial. In this mini-review, we summarized the current understanding on the role of ARL6IP5 in cancers, particularly in the progression of chronic hepatitis virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma, as well as the potential values of ARL6IP5 in cancer therapy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide, creating a significant health, social, and economic burdens [1,2,3]. Cancer-related deaths have increased by 25.4% worldwide per year between 2007 and 2017 [4]. The absolute disability-adjusted life years of cancer have increased by 20.9% during 2010 to 2019 [5]. Understanding the molecular pathogenesis of cancers is a pre-requisite for developing more efficient anti-cancer therapies.
Accumulation of multiple genetic alterations and the complex interactions between oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes play important roles in cancer development [6,7,8,9]. Identification of key driver genes for cancer formation can facilitate the development of targeted therapies.
ADP-ribosylation-like factor 6 interacting protein 5 (ARL6IP5, also known as JWA, DER11, GTRAP3-18, or HSPC127) was initially cloned from all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA)-treated human bronchial epithelial cells, but was later found to be ubiquitously expressed in most of the human tissues [10]. The gene encoding ARL6IP5 is located at chromosome 3p, and its protein is localized to endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and Golgi apparatus. ARL6IP5 is a homolog of Drosophila PRAF2, a small protein from the prenylated Rab acceptor family that plays a role in ER-to-Golgi transport [11]. The rodent homologs of ARL6IP5, addicsin in mice and glutamate transporter-associated protein 3-18 (GTRAP3-18) in rats, are abundantly present in the brain and play important roles in neuronal differentiation and glutathione regulation [12,13,14,15,16].
ARL6IP5 is involved in the regulation of multiple physiological and pathological processes, such as glutamate transportation, oxidative stress, autophagy, and DNA damage repair [17,18,19,20,21,22]. Publicly available Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA) dataset (gepia.cancer-pku.cn) reveals an overexpression of ARL6IP5 in the cancer tissues originating from lymph, brain, kidney, blood, pancreas, skin, and thymus, relative to their respective normal tissues. However, in other cancer tissues including those from bladder cancer, squamous carcinoma of the cervix, squamous cell lung carcinoma, endometrial cancer, and sarcoma of the uterus, a down-regulation of ARL6IP5 was observed. These data indicate that the roles of ARL6IP5 in cancers may be bidirectional and context-dependent.
As shown in Table 1, the role of ARL6IP5 in human cancers is mixed and contradictory: it functions as a tumor suppressor in most cancers, but in some cancers, it acts as an oncogene. The biological functions of ARL6IP5 may depend on many factors such as tumor microenvironment and etiological factors. For example, in liver cancer, ARL6IP5 is more involved in the pathogenesis of hepatitis c virus (HCV)-related cancers.
In this article, we aim to provide an overview of the consensus and controversies of the roles of ARL6IP5 in human cancers. The review provides valuable insights in the search for novel therapeutic strategies for cancers.
ARL6IP5 plays bidirectional roles in different cancers
ARL6IP5 is expressed in many human tissues where it functions as a tumor suppressor gene. For instance, functional studies have shown that down-regulation of ARL6IP5 in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and non-small cell lung cancer can promote tumor invasion and predict a poor prognosis [23, 24]. In gastric cancer, ARL6IP5 deficiency together with p53 mutation promotes tumor invasion and metastasis [25]. Combination of murine double minute 2 (MDM2, a negative regulator for p53) overexpression and ARL6IP5 down-regulation led to a shorter overall survival in patients with gastric cancer [26]. Mechanistic studies have shown that ARL6IP5 insufficiency and up-regulation of matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) can increase tumor micro vessel density in gastric cancer [27]. Thus, ARL6IP5 has been regarded as an effective biomarker for gastric cancer [28]. The tumor suppressor roles of ARL6IP5 have also been observed in other common cancers, including esophagus, liver cancer, breast cancer, cervical cancer, and skin cancer [29,30,31,32,33,34].
However, ARL6IP5 also functions as an oncogene in some cancers [35, 36]. Three novel functional genetic polymorphisms of ARL6IP5, namely -76GC, 454CA, and 723TG, have been identified to contribute to the development of bladder cancer [37]. The functional variations of the -76C allele are correlated to the significantly increased odds of leukemia, whereas those of the 723 G allele are associated with markedly decreased odds of leukemia [38]. A meta-analysis showed that increased expression of ARL6IP5 is related to worse overall survival and event-free survival of leukemia patients, and ARL6IP5 overexpression is an independent risk factor of poor survival in leukemia patients [39]. ARL6IP5 overexpression is also strongly associated to Burkitt lymphoma progression [40]. The mechanisms of how ARL6IP5 exerts a tumor suppressor or oncogenic effects in cancers will be further discussed below.
Functional mechanisms and regulatory network of ARL6IP5
The differential biological functions of ARL6IP5 across different cancers may be attributed to multifactorial mechanisms [41, 42]. Under the physiological conditions, GTRAP3-18 (one of the homologous proteins of ARL6IP5) was found to suppress excitatory amino-acid carrier 1 (EAAC1)-mediated glutamate transport by impairing its affinity to the substrate, reducing the L-glutathione level at the plasma membrane, or delaying the exit of EAAC1 from the endoplasmic reticulum [13, 17, 18, 43, 44]. GTRAP3-18 was also shown to negatively regulate excitatory amino acid transporter 3 (EAAT3) functions. ARL6IP5 can promote apoptosis of mouse embryonic cells, which is directly targeted by CCAAT/enhancer binding protein (C/EBP) alpha. C/EBP alpha can bind and activate the ARL6IP5 promoter [45]. In the early secretory pathway, ARL6IP5 inhibits Rab1, thus reducing the transportation efficiency of ER-to-Golgi [46]. Under the pathological conditions, ARL6IP5 plays important role in oxidative stress. It was found that ARL6IP5 is an important signaling molecule in hydrogen-peroxide-induced cell injury [47]. It enhances intracellular defense mechanisms against oxidative stress in myelogenous leukemia cells, participates in the signaling pathways of DNA damage and repair, especially excision repair [48, 49]. In breast cancer, ARL6IP5 is involved in the estrogen receptor-related signal transduction pathways [21].
Mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) signaling pathway is one of the most ancient signaling pathways that participate in many physiological processes. It converts extracellular stimuli into cellular responses, which can be divided into seven groups, and the most extensively studied mammalian MAPK groups are ERK1/2, JNK, and p38 isoforms [50, 51]. In some cancers, ARL6IP5 exerts its roles through regulating the activity of MAPKs. For example, Chen H et al. showed that ARL6IP5 inhibits tumor cellular migration via activating MAPK cascades and rearranging the F-actin cytoskeleton [29]. ARL6IP5 up-regulates the activity of E2F transcription factor 1 (E2F1) via activating MAPK signaling pathway and subsequently the activation of X-ray repair cross complementing 1 (XRCC1). Additionally, ARL6IP5 protects the XRCC1 protein from ubiquitination and degradation by proteasomes [52]. In several cancers, such as skin cancer, pancreatic cancer, and breast cancer, the tumor suppressive role of ARL6IP5 was found to be mediated via its inhibitory effects on MAPK signaling pathway and JNK pathways [53,54,55,56].
Human NF-κB repressing factor (NKRF) is a negative regulator for NF-κB. Using a genome-wide expression profile analysis, Sun Y et al. validated that knockdown of NKRF in HEK293 cells led to a significant up-regulation of ARL6IP5, suggesting ARL6IP5 may play an important role in the NF-κB signaling cascade [57] (Fig. 1).
It is well-known that PI3K-Akt-mTOR signaling pathway is closely related to cancers. In FAK-PI3K-Akt-mTOR cascade, the deficiency of ARL6IP5 can increase the number of neurons and enhance the long-term potentiation induction in the hippocampal dentate gyrus, thereby leading to spatial cognitive potentiation [58]. Through this signaling pathway, ARL6IP5 deletion in astrocytes exacerbates dopaminergic neurodegeneration by decreasing glutamate transporters in mice [59]. From these findings, we speculate that ARL6IP5 may regulate cancers via PI3K-Akt-mTOR signaling pathway.
Therapeutic potentials of ARL6IP5 in cancers
The potential application of ARL6IP5 as a therapeutic target in cancer therapy has been reported. Studies on N-methyl-N’-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG) have inspired researchers to harness the tumor-suppressing effects of ARL6IP5 to conquer cancers. MNNG treatment can activate nuclear transcription factor binding to the ARL6IP5 proximal promoter, thereby triggering apoptosis [60]. Arsenic trioxide is a standard therapy for refractory acute promyelocytic leukemia, and it can induce apoptosis in a variety of malignant cells. Arsenic trioxide up-regulates the expression of ARL6IP5 by stimulating the production of reactive oxygen species in a dose-dependent manner, and ARL6IP5 induces apoptosis and loss of mitochondrial transmembrane potential in breast cancer cells [61]. Arsenic trioxide-induced apoptosis depends in part on tubulin polymerization. The activation of p38 MAPK contributes to ARL6IP5-promoted tubulin polymerization which also improves the sensitivity of breast cancer cells to arsenic trioxide [62]. Cadmium chloride treatment can also promote apoptosis, which is attributed to the up-regulation of ARL6IP5 and its promoter activity [63]. In ovarian cancer, ARL6IP5 appeared to exert a tumor suppressive role, and as such, recombinant ARL6IP5 protein was demonstrated to sensitize the ovarian cancer cells to cisplatin [64]. Similarly, ARL6IP5 was shown to reverse cisplatin-resistance in gastric cancer [65]. Other studies have shown that targeting the upstream molecules of ARL6IP5 maybe an effective cancer therapeutic strategy. In this regard, inhibition of ring finger protein 185 (RNF185) was found to inhibit the metastasis of gastric cancer [66].
However, because ARL6IP5 allows cells to escape from DNA damage, strategies enhancing sensitivity of tumors to antitumor drugs by downregulating ARL6IP5 have been reported [52]. In this regard, inhibition of ARL6IP5 may enhance the sensitivity of certain anticancer agents. For example, inhibiting ARL6IP5-XRCC1-mediated DNA single-strand-break repair (SSBR) could reverse the resistance of ovarian cancer cells to Cx-platin-Cl and Cx-DN604-Cl (two Pt(IV) prodrugs), and restore the sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells to cisplatin [67]. Cis-wog, a cytotoxic agent, has been shown to improve the antitumor activity of its corresponding Pt(II)-based drugs and reverse resistance to by inhibiting ARL6IP5-mediated SSBR in lung adenocarcinoma cells [68].
Considering the controversial expression patterns and biological functions of ARL6IP5 across different cancers, the therapeutic potential of this gene needs more extensive studies. ARL6IP5 has tumor-suppressing effects, such as promoting apoptosis. ARL6IP5 can also make tumor cells resistant to drugs via promoting SSBR. Therefore, both up-regulation and down-regulation of ARL6IP5 may be utilized as strategies in cancer therapy (Table 2). At present, researchers have taken the first step toward specifying the cancer therapeutic strategies surrounding ARL6IP5. Extensive research is needed to clarify the context-dependent role of ARL6IP5 in different cancers.
ARL6IP5 plays an important role in HCV-related HCC
Expression profiling shows that most of cancers, including HCC, express high level of ARL6IP5. However, the functions of ARL6IP5 are likely to be cell- and context-dependent. Moreover, microbiota can modulate cancer development by shaping the immune system [58]. For instance, persistent Helicobacter pylori infection is significantly associated with gastric cancer and lymphoma. Hepatitis B (HBV) or C (HCV) viruses are known risk factors for HCC [69]. HCV can synergistically promote HCC development with other risk factors such as alcohol, HBV X protein, and aflatoxin B1 [70]. We previously showed that ARL6IP5 is involved in the pathogenesis of HCV-related liver cancer, and this was supported by other studies [17, 71, 72]. In HCV-infected liver, ARL6IP5 increases the levels of oxidative stress markers such as 8-oxo-dG, 4-hydroxynonenal, and malondialdehyde [10, 72,73,74].
It is also noteworthy that ARL6IP5 also acts as a tumor suppressor in HCC. ARL6IP5 negatively regulates MMP-2 and FAK, which are factors facilitating cell attachment, motility, and invasion [23]. The tumor suppressive role of ARL6IP5 in liver cancer has also been reported, where ARL6IP5 was shown to inhibit HCC growth by inhibiting MAPK signaling pathway [75].
These studies indicate that there is a complex regulatory network among HCV, ARL6IP5 and HCC (Fig. 2). First, ARL6IP5 inhibits the development of HCC by inhibiting MMP-2, FAK and MAPK signaling pathway. However, ARL6IP5 can promote HCV replication by inhibiting EAAC1, and thus promote HCC. ARL6IP5 also enhances oxidative stress in HCV-infected liver, thereby increasing the risk of HCC.
The footnote of Fig. 2: ARL6IP5 inhibits HCC by suppressing MMP-2, FAK, and MAPK signaling pathway. However, ARL6IP5 can promote HCV replication by inhibiting EAAC1, and thus promote HCC. ARL6IP5 also enhances oxidative stress in HCV-infected liver, thereby increasing the risk of HCC. Meanwhile, MAPKs analogs suppress HCC via inhibiting HCV replication.
It is likely that ARL6IP5 may play different or even conflicting roles in HCC under different microenvironments. More studies are needed to elucidate the role of ARL6IP5 and its therapeutic potential in HCC.
Summary and conclusions
ARL6IP5 is abnormally expressed at different levels across different human cancers, hence, its biological role in different cancers may vary. The complex nature of ARL6IP5 is also reflected in the fact that it may exert both tumor-suppressing and oncogenic roles in the same cancer type. The biological functions of ARL6IP5 cannot be deduced based on its expression level. For instance, in gastric cancer, ARL6IP5 is significantly downregulated in cancerous tissues compared to matched non-cancerous mucosa. Despite this down-regulation, conditional ARL6IP5-knockout mice do not show spontaneous tumor formation [76]. This suggests that the biological function of ARL6IP5 in a given cancer type may be highly dependent on the tumor microenvironment, emphasizing its complex, context-dependent roles in cancer progression. As such, developing ARL6IP5 into a therapeutic target is likely premature. Further research is essential to unravel the precise mechanisms by which ARL6IP5 interacts with other molecules, signaling pathways, and tumor microenvironment. Understanding how ARL6IP5 influences tumorigenesis in different contexts will be critical for developing new, safe, and effective therapeutic strategies.
Future perspectives
Studies on the roles of ARL6IP5 in cancers are still scarce, and the existing data do not entirely reveal the functional mechanisms and regulatory network of ARL6IP5. The dual role of ARL6IP5 in cancers implies that the biological roles of ARL6IP5 in different cancers may be context-dependent, and tumor microenvironments may be an important contributor therein. In liver cancer in particular, considering the potential importance of ARL6IP5 in the hepatitis-related HCC, and HBV and HCV are still major causes for HCC (currently worldwide, approximately 60% of new HCC cases can be attributed to chronic HBV infection) [77,78,79,80], further studies on the precise roles of ARL6IP5 in the pathogenesis of liver cancer are warranted.
Change history
19 May 2025
The acknowledgment section has been amended: The study was supported by the grants from the following funders: NHMRC(APP1047417); National Natural Science Foundation of China (32460305); Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province of China (22JR5RA902). We appreciate Prof. Jacob George from The University of Sydney and Prof. Yongning Zhou from Lanzhou University for their supervision.
References
Mattiuzzi C, Lippi G. Current cancer epidemiology. J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2019;9:217–22.
Torre LA, Siegel RL, Ward EM, Jemal A. Global cancer incidence and mortality rates and trends-an update. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2016;25:16–27.
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–49.
Global, regional, and national age-sex-specific mortality for 282 causes of death in 195 countries and territories, 1980-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392:1736-88.
Kocarnik JM, Compton K, Dean FE, Fu W, Gaw BL, Harvey JD, et al. Cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life years for 29 cancer groups from 2010 to 2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. JAMA Oncol. 2022;8:420–44.
Wood LD, Parsons DW, Jones S, Lin J, Sjöblom T, Leary RJ, et al. The genomic landscapes of human breast and colorectal cancers. Science. 2007;318:1108–13.
Bonnal SC, López-Oreja I, Valcárcel J. Roles and mechanisms of alternative splicing in cancer - implications for care. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2020;17:457–74.
Nishiyama A, Nakanishi M. Navigating the DNA methylation landscape of cancer. Trends Genet. 2021;37:1012–27.
Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144:646–74.
Zhou J. A novel cytoskeleton associate gene-cloning, identification, sequencing, regulation of expression and tissue distribution of JWA. Beijing: Military Medical Sciences Press; 1999.
Fo CS, Coleman CS, Wallick CJ, Vine AL, Bachmann AS. Genomic organization, expression profile, and characterization of the new protein PRA1 domain family, member 2 (PRAF2). Gene. 2006;371:154–65.
Akiduki S, Ochiishi T, Ikemoto MJ. Neural localization of addicsin in mouse brain. Neurosci Lett. 2007;426:149–54.
Watabe M, Aoyama K, Nakaki T. Regulation of glutathione synthesis via interaction between glutamate transport-associated protein 3-18 (GTRAP3-18) and excitatory amino acid carrier-1 (EAAC1) at plasma membrane. Mol Pharm. 2007;72:1103–10.
Akiduki S, Ikemoto MJ. Modulation of the neural glutamate transporter EAAC1 by the addicsin-interacting protein ARL6IP1. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:31323–32.
Inoue K, Akiduki S, Ikemoto MJ. Expression profile of addicsin/GTRAP3-18 mRNA in mouse brain. Neurosci Lett. 2005;386:184–8.
Weller AE, Ferraro TN, Doyle GA, Reiner BC, Crist RC, Berrettini WH. Single Nucleus Transcriptome Data from Alzheimer’s Disease Mouse Models Yield New Insight into Pathophysiology. J Alzheimers Dis. 2022;90:1233–47.
Lin CI, Orlov I, Ruggiero AM, Dykes-Hoberg M, Lee A, Jackson M, et al. Modulation of the neuronal glutamate transporter EAAC1 by the interacting protein GTRAP3-18. Nature. 2001;410:84–8.
Ikemoto MJ, Inoue K, Akiduki S, Osugi T, Imamura T, Ishida N, et al. Identification of addicsin/GTRAP3-18 as a chronic morphine-augmented gene in amygdala. Neuroreport. 2002;13:2079–84.
Butchbach ME, Lai L, Lin CL. Molecular cloning, gene structure, expression profile and functional characterization of the mouse glutamate transporter (EAAT3) interacting protein GTRAP3-18. Gene. 2002;292:81–90.
Butchbach ME, Guo H, Lin CL. Methyl-beta-cyclodextrin but not retinoic acid reduces EAAT3-mediated glutamate uptake and increases GTRAP3-18 expression. J Neurochem. 2003;84:891–4.
Chen R, Li A, Zhu T, Li C, Liu Q, Chang HC, et al. JWA-a novel environmental-responsive gene, involved in estrogen receptor-associated signal pathway in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 breast carcinoma cells. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2005;68:445–56.
Siddique I, Kamble K, Gupta S, Solanki K, Bhola S, Ahsan N, et al. ARL6IP5 Ameliorates α-Synuclein Burden by Inducing Autophagy via Preventing Ubiquitination and Degradation of ATG12. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:10499.
Wu X, Chen H, Gao Q, Bai J, Wang X, Zhou J, et al. Downregulation of JWA promotes tumor invasion and predicts poor prognosis in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol Carcinog. 2014;53:325–36.
Li Y, Shen X, Wang X, Li A, Wang P, Jiang P, et al. EGCG regulates the cross-talk between JWA and topoisomerase IIα in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells. Sci Rep. 2015;5:11009.
Liu X, Wang S, Xia X, Chen Y, Zhou Y, Wu X, et al. Synergistic role between p53 and JWA: prognostic and predictive biomarkers in gastric cancer. PLoS One. 2012;7:e52348.
Ye Y, Li X, Yang J, Miao S, Wang S, Chen Y, et al. MDM2 is a useful prognostic biomarker for resectable gastric cancer. Cancer Sci. 2013;104:590–8.
Chen Y, Huang Y, Huang Y, Xia X, Zhang J, Zhou Y, et al. JWA suppresses tumor angiogenesis via Sp1-activated matrix metalloproteinase-2 and its prognostic significance in human gastric cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2014;35:442–51.
Wang W, Yang J, Yu Y, Deng J, Zhang H, Yao Q, et al. Expression of JWA and XRCC1 as prognostic markers for gastric cancer recurrence. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2020;13:3120–7.
Chen H, Bai J, Ye J, Liu Z, Chen R, Mao W, et al. JWA as a functional molecule to regulate cancer cells migration via MAPK cascades and F-actin cytoskeleton. Cell Signal. 2007;19:1315–27.
Xu L, Cheng L, Yang F, Pei B, Liu X, Zhou J, et al. JWA suppresses the invasion of human breast carcinoma cells by downregulating the expression of CXCR4. Mol Med Rep. 2018;17:8137–44.
Mao WG, Liu ZL, Chen R, Li AP, Zhou JW. JWA is required for the antiproliferative and pro-apoptotic effects of all-trans retinoic acid in Hela cells. Clin Exp Pharm Physiol. 2006;33:816–24.
Lu J, Tang Y, Farshidpour M, Cheng Y, Zhang G, Jafarnejad SM, et al. JWA inhibits melanoma angiogenesis by suppressing ILK signaling and is an independent prognostic biomarker for melanoma. Carcinogenesis. 2013;34:2778–88.
Lu J, Tang Y, Cheng Y, Zhang G, Yip A, Martinka M, et al. ING4 regulates JWA in angiogenesis and their prognostic value in melanoma patients. Br J Cancer. 2013;109:2842–52.
Lin J, Ma T, Jiang X, Ge Z, Ding W, Wu Y, et al. JWA regulates human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and human esophageal cells through different mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathways. Exp Ther Med. 2014;7:1767–71.
Romanuik TL, Wang G, Holt RA, Jones SJ, Marra MA, Sadar MD. Identification of novel androgen-responsive genes by sequencing of LongSAGE libraries. BMC Genomics. 2009;10:476.
Cunha IW, Carvalho KC, Martins WK, Marques SM, Muto NH, Falzoni R, et al. Identification of genes associated with local aggressiveness and metastatic behavior in soft tissue tumors. Transl Oncol. 2010;3:23–32.
Li CP, Zhu YJ, Chen R, Wu W, Li AP, Liu J, et al. Functional polymorphisms of JWA gene are associated with risk of bladder cancer. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2007;70:876–84.
Shen Q, Tang WY, Li CP, Chen R, Zhu YJ, Huang S, et al. Functional variations in the JWA gene are associated with increased odds of leukemias. Leuk Res. 2007;31:783–90.
Li Z, Herold T, He C, Valk PJ, Chen P, Jurinovic V, et al. Identification of a 24-gene prognostic signature that improves the European LeukemiaNet risk classification of acute myeloid leukemia: an international collaborative study. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:1172–81.
Walther N, Ulrich A, Vockerodt M, von Bonin F, Klapper W, Meyer K, et al. Aberrant lymphocyte enhancer-binding factor 1 expression is characteristic for sporadic Burkitt’s lymphoma. Am J Pathol. 2013;182:1092–8.
Shen Q, Zhou JW, Sheng RL, Zhu GR, Cao HX, Lu H. JWA gene in regulating committed differentiation of HL-60 cells induced by ATRA, Ara-C and TPA]. Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2005;13:804–8.
Huang S, Shen Q, Mao WG, Li AP, Ye J, Liu QZ, et al. JWA, a novel signaling molecule, involved in all-trans retinoic acid induced differentiation of HL-60 cells. J Biomed Sci. 2006;13:357–71.
Ruggiero AM, Liu Y, Vidensky S, Maier S, Jung E, Farhan H, et al. The endoplasmic reticulum exit of glutamate transporter is regulated by the inducible mammalian Yip6b/GTRAP3-18 protein. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:6175–83.
Watabe M, Aoyama K, Nakaki T. A dominant role of GTRAP3-18 in neuronal glutathione synthesis. J Neurosci. 2008;28:9404–13.
Wang GL, Shi X, Salisbury E, Timchenko NA. Regulation of apoptotic and growth inhibitory activities of C/EBPalpha in different cell lines. Exp Cell Res. 2008;314:1626–39.
Maier S, Reiterer V, Ruggiero AM, Rothstein JD, Thomas S, Dahm R, et al. GTRAP3-18 serves as a negative regulator of Rab1 in protein transport and neuronal differentiation. J Cell Mol Med. 2009;13:114–24.
Wang NP, Zhou JW, Li AP, Cao HX, Wang XR. The mechanism of JWA gene involved in oxidative stress of cells]. Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi. 2003;21:212–5.
Zhu T, Chen R, Li A, Liu J, Gu D, Liu Q, et al. JWA as a novel molecule involved in oxidative stress-associated signal pathway in myelogenous leukemia cells. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2006;69:1399–411.
Chen R, Qiu W, Liu Z, Cao X, Zhu T, Li A, et al. Identification of JWA as a novel functional gene responsive to environmental oxidative stress induced by benzo[a]pyrene and hydrogen peroxide. Free Radic Biol Med. 2007;42:1704–14.
Cargnello M, Roux PP. Activation and function of the MAPKs and their substrates, the MAPK-activated protein kinases. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2011;75:50–83.
Widmann C, Gibson S, Jarpe MB, Johnson GL. Mitogen-activated protein kinase: conservation of a three-kinase module from yeast to human. Physiol Rev. 1999;79:143–80.
Wang S, Gong Z, Chen R, Liu Y, Li A, Li G, et al. JWA regulates XRCC1 and functions as a novel base excision repair protein in oxidative-stress-induced DNA single-strand breaks. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:1936–50.
Gong Z, Shi Y, Zhu Z, Li X, Ye Y, Zhang J, et al. JWA deficiency suppresses dimethylbenz[a]anthracene-phorbol ester induced skin papillomas via inactivation of MAPK pathway in mice. PLoS One. 2012;7:e34154.
Wu YY, Ma TL, Ge ZJ, Lin J, Ding WL, Feng JK, et al. JWA gene regulates PANC-1 pancreatic cancer cell behaviors through MEK-ERK1/2 of the MAPK signaling pathway. Oncol Lett. 2014;8:1859–63.
Zhai Z, Ren Y, Shu C, Chen D, Liu X, Liang Y, et al. JAC1 targets YY1 mediated JWA/p38 MAPK signaling to inhibit proliferation and induce apoptosis in TNBC. Cell Death Discov. 2022;8:169.
Chen X, Feng J, Ge Z, Chen H, Ding W, Zhu W, et al. Effects of the JWA gene in the regulation of human breast cancer cells. Mol Med Rep. 2015;11:3848–53.
Gagliani N, Hu B, Huber S, Elinav E, Flavell RA. The fire within: microbes inflame tumors. Cell. 2014;157:776–83.
Sha S, Xu J, Lu ZH, Hong J, Qu WJ, Zhou JW, et al. Lack of JWA enhances neurogenesis and long-term potentiation in hippocampal dentate gyrus leading to spatial cognitive potentiation. Mol Neurobiol. 2016;53:355–68.
Wang R, Zhao X, Xu J, Wen Y, Li A, Lu M, et al. Astrocytic JWA deletion exacerbates dopaminergic neurodegeneration by decreasing glutamate transporters in mice. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9:352.
Xu YQ, Li AP, Chen R, Zhou JW. The role of JWA in N-methyl-N’-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine induced human bronchial epithelial cell apoptosis. Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi. 2006;24:205–8.
Zhou J, Ye J, Zhao X, Li A, Zhou J. JWA is required for arsenic trioxide induced apoptosis in HeLa and MCF-7 cells via reactive oxygen species and mitochondria linked signal pathway. Toxicol Appl Pharm. 2008;230:33–40.
Shen L, Xu W, Li A, Ye J, Zhou J. JWA enhances As2O3-induced tubulin polymerization and apoptosis via p38 in HeLa and MCF-7 cells. Apoptosis. 2011;16:1177–93.
Cao XJ, Chen R, Li AP, Zhou JW. JWA gene is involved in cadmium-induced growth inhibition and apoptosis in HEK-293T cells. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2007;70:931–7.
Kim JY, Bahar E, Lee JY, Chang S, Kim SH, Park EY, et al. ARL6IP5 reduces cisplatin-resistance by suppressing DNA repair and promoting apoptosis pathways in ovarian carcinoma. Cell Death Dis. 2022;13:239.
Xu W, Chen Q, Wang Q, Sun Y, Wang S, Li A, et al. JWA reverses cisplatin resistance via the CK2-XRCC1 pathway in human gastric cancer cells. Cell Death Dis. 2014;5:e1551.
Qiu D, Wang Q, Wang Z, Chen J, Yan D, Zhou Y, et al. RNF185 modulates JWA ubiquitination and promotes gastric cancer metastasis. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 2018;1864:1552–61.
Chen F, Pei S, Wang X, Zhu Q, Gou S. Emerging JWA-targeted Pt(IV) prodrugs conjugated with CX-4945 to overcome chemo-immune-resistance. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2020;521:753–61.
Wang X, Li L, Pei S, Zhu Q, Chen F. Disruption of SSBs repair to combat platinum resistance via the JWA-targeted Pt(IV) prodrug conjugated with a wogonin derivative. Pharmazie. 2020;75:94–101.
Greten FR, Grivennikov SI. Inflammation and cancer: triggers, mechanisms, and consequences. Immunity. 2019;51:27–41.
Rusyn I, Lemon SM. Mechanisms of HCV-induced liver cancer: what did we learn from in vitro and animal studies? Cancer Lett. 2014;345:210–5.
Wilson GH, Z; Qiao, L Characterization of ARL6IP5 in hepatitis C induced liver cancer. Australian Gastroenterology Week; Adelaide 2012.
Sumida Y, Nakashima T, Yoh T, Nakajima Y, Ishikawa H, Mitsuyoshi H, et al. Serum thioredoxin levels as an indicator of oxidative stress in patients with hepatitis C virus infection. J Hepatol. 2000;33:616–22.
De Maria N, Colantoni A, Fagiuoli S, Liu GJ, Rogers BK, Farinati F, et al. Association between reactive oxygen species and disease activity in chronic hepatitis C. Free Radic Biol Med. 1996;21:291–5.
Shimoda R, Nagashima M, Sakamoto M, Yamaguchi N, Hirohashi S, Yokota J, et al. Increased formation of oxidative DNA damage, 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine, in human livers with chronic hepatitis. Cancer Res. 1994;54:3171–2.
Schoggins JW, Wilson SJ, Panis M, Murphy MY, Jones CT, Bieniasz P, et al. A diverse range of gene products are effectors of the type I interferon antiviral response. Nature. 2011;472:481–5.
Wang S, Wu X, Chen Y, Zhang J, Ding J, Zhou Y, et al. Prognostic and predictive role of JWA and XRCC1 expressions in gastric cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:2987–96.
Wose Kinge CN, Bhoola NH, Kramvis A. In vitro systems for studying different genotypes/sub-genotypes of hepatitis B virus: strengths and limitations. Viruses. 2020;12:353.
Liu Z, Suo C, Mao X, Jiang Y, Jin L, Zhang T, et al. Global incidence trends in primary liver cancer by age at diagnosis, sex, region, and etiology, 1990-2017. Cancer. 2020;126:2267–78.
Spearman CW, Dusheiko GM, Hellard M, Sonderup M. Hepatitis C. Lancet. 2019;394:1451–66.
Tang A, Hallouch O, Chernyak V, Kamaya A, Sirlin CB. Epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma: target population for surveillance and diagnosis. Abdom Radio. 2018;43:13–25.
Acknowledgements
The study was supported by the grants from the following funders: NHMRC(APP1047417); National Natural Science Foundation of China (32460305); Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province of China (22JR5RA902). We appreciate Prof. Jacob George from The University of Sydney and Prof. Yongning Zhou from Lanzhou University for their supervision.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by CAUL and its Member Institutions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
ZH and HY performed the literature search and analyzed data; ZH and HY wrote the manuscript; LQ supervised and critically revised the manuscript; LQ provided administrative support; all authors edited the paper. The authors read and approved the final paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Hu, Z., Yue, H. & Qiao, L. ARL6IP5 in cancers: bidirectional function and therapeutic value. Cancer Gene Ther 32, 744–749 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41417-025-00903-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41417-025-00903-x