Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Pose-Bazarra S, López-Valladares MJ, López-de-Ullibarri I, Azuara-Blanco A. Surgical and laser interventions for pseudoexfoliation glaucoma systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Eye. 2021;35:1551–61.
Kent SS, Hutnik CM, Birt CM, Damji KF, Harasymowycz P, Si F, et al. A randomized clinical trial of selective laser trabeculoplasty versus argon laser trabeculoplasty in patients with pseudoexfoliation. J Glaucoma. 2015;24:344–7.
Georgopoulos GT, Chalkiadakis J, Livir-Rallatos G, Theodossiadis PG, Theodossiadis GP. Combined clear cornea phacoemulsification and trabecular aspiration in the treatment of pseudoexfoliative glaucoma associated with cataract. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2000;238:816–21.
Jacobi PC, Dietlein TS, Krieglstein GK. Comparative study of trabecular aspiration vs trabeculectomy in glaucoma triple procedure to treat pseudoexfoliation glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:1311–8.
Jacobi PC, Dietlein TS, Krieglstein GK. The risk profile of trabecular aspiration versus trabeculectomy in glaucoma triple procedure. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2000;238:545–51.
Bagli E, Gartzios C, Asproudis I, Kitsos G. Comparison of one-site versus two-site phacotrabeculectomy without the use of antimetabolites intraoperatively in patients with pseudoexfoliation glaucoma and primary open-angle glaucoma. Clin Ophthalmol. 2009;3:297–305.
Takmaz T, Akmese HA, Onursever N. Comparison of combined phacoemulsification -non -penetrating deep sclerectomy and phacoemulsification-trabeculectomy. Int Eye Sci. 2015;15:1851–6.
Li XG. Clinical efficacy of different incision phacoemulsification and trabeculectomy for cataract and glaucoma. Chin J Pract Ophthalmol. 2017;35:411–4.
Hartung J, Knapp G. On tests of the overall treatment effect in meta-analysis with normally distributed responses. Stat Med. 2001;20:1771.
Sidik K, Jonkman JN. Robust variance estimation for random-effects meta-analysis. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2006;50:3681.
IntHout J, Ioannidis J, Borm G. The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects meta-analysis is straightforward and considerably outperforms the standard DerSimonian-Laird method. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14:25.
Friede T, Röver C, Wandel S, Neuenschwander B. Meta-analysis of two studies in the presence of heterogeneity with applications in rare diseases. Biometrical J. 2017;59:658.
Röver C. “Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis using the bayesmeta R package. J Stat Softw. 2020;93:1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SPB, MJLV, AAB conceived and designed the work. SPB, MJLV, AAB collected and analyzed the data. ILU performed the statistical analysis. SPB, MJLV, A.A.B, ILU interpreted the results. SPB wrote the article and MJLV, AAB critically reviewed it and prepared the final approval of the version to be published.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pose-Bazarra, S., López-Valladares, M.J., López-de-Ullibarri, I. et al. Response to ‘Comment on “Surgical and laser interventions for pseudoexfoliation glaucoma systematic review of randomized controlled trials”’. Eye 36, 478–479 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-021-01758-w
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-021-01758-w
