Disproportionate prevalence of ocular pathology
There is a high prevalence of ocular disorder among people with Down syndrome. Refractive errors and/or squint may be present from an early age and persist into adolescence and adulthood [1, 2]. The majority of children with Down syndrome have reduced accommodation at near [3]. Compared to the general population there is a tenfold increase in congenital cataract [4] and infantile glaucoma may also occur [5]. Nystagmus is present in at least 10% and severely impacts visual acuity [6, 7]. Cataracts may develop in teenage years or later and studies suggest that these are approximately 4 times more common than in the adult general population, and are often bilateral (45%) [8]. Keratoconus onset is often in adolescence or early adulthood and there are wide-ranging prevalence estimates, although most studies suggest rates around 20–30% [9, 10]. Most of these disorders are a significant cause of preventable secondary disability at all ages and there should be extra vigilance.
Newborn screening as part of the Newborn and Infant Physical Examination (NIPE)
As with all children, newborns with Down syndrome should be examined for congenital cataract and other eye anomalies within 72 h by a trained person and this should be repeated at 6–8 weeks [11].
Monitoring during infancy
Visual behaviour should be monitored by the child’s paediatrician particularly before the first formal ophthalmologic review. Those who start to squint or show other abnormalities of gaze, visual behaviour or attention should be referred for ophthalmological review.
Formal ocular assessment at 18–24 months
Between 18 months and 2 years, all children with Down syndrome should have formal ocular/visual assessment by an orthoptist and ophthalmologist/optometrist in accordance with local arrangements. This should include orthoptic assessment, refraction, and fundus examination with vigilance for cataract, nystagmus, and refractive error in particular. At least one-third will have ocular/visual defects by this age [1, 12]. Those with deviation from normal should be kept under appropriate specialist review. Refractive errors, most commonly hypermetropia, which often reduce spontaneously in other children, are likely to persist beyond infancy [2, 13]. Correction for hypermetropia may be helpful at a younger age than that for typically developing children especially since the majority will have defective accommodation [3].
Preschool assessment at 4 years
Those with no abnormality at first review should nevertheless have further full ocular/visual assessment including refraction around age 4 years [14]. As most subsequent abnormalities following first assessment are detectable with automated vision screening techniques or direct visual inspection of the eyes and ocular adnexa, formal optometrist visual screening or community orthoptic assessment could possibly replace a subsequent formal ophthalmological examination, if the preferable formal ophthalmological examination is not available [15]. Contrast sensitivity is also commonly significantly reduced in this group and should be assessed at this review to guide any learning resource adaptation requirements in the early stages of schooling [16]. At this age at least 50% are likely to have refractive errors [1].
School-age monitoring
After age 4, eye checks should be at least 2 yearly, preferably annually, until age 10 by professionals with appropriate skills and expertise [14]. These may be optometrists (hospital or high-street based), orthoptists or ophthalmologists. Refractive error should be monitored to ensure optimal correction and clinicians should be alert to the potential for myopia and astigmatism to develop at any age [7, 13].
Ongoing surveillance during adolescent and adulthood: vigilance for keratoconus
Annual checks are advised from age 10 onwards, with particular emphasis on the early detection of keratoconus. Assessment should include detailed corneal evaluation using corneal topography, if available [9]. Prompt specialist referral is essential to prevent disease progression, through reducing provoking factors such as eye rubbing, often exacerbated by ocular surface symptoms, and for consideration of corneal cross-linking [17, 18].
Optimising assessment and spectacle correction
Children and adults with Down syndrome should be expected to respond to standard vision testing procedures at appropriate developmental age but a distraction free environment and extra time may be necessary to optimise performance. Distance and near functioning vision should be checked at every review whenever developmentally possible and a prescription for near correction or bifocals considered at all ages [13, 19]. Assessment of accommodative lag should ideally involve dynamic retinoscopy as there is a lack of correlation with near visual acuity [20]. There is increasing evidence bifocals are superior to unifocals, with improved near visual acuity in patients with accommodative lag, reduced manifest angle of strabismus and improved spectacle compliance demonstrated in studies [19, 21]. Visual acuity is likely to remain poorer than expected throughout life even when appropriate spectacles are worn, with a deficit of approximately 0.2 logMAR compared to children without Down syndrome [7].
Specialist and community eye care provision
Many high street opticians/optometrists give an excellent service particularly for older children, but younger children and those who find it difficult to tolerate this setting should be seen in a specialist clinic. The SeeAbility charity maintains a register of optometrists accredited to provide the Easy Eye Care service, a specialist eye care service for people of all ages with learning disabilities and autism [22]. Children enroled in special schools across England now benefit from on-site eye care services following a recent proposal from several UK eye care organisations [23].
Management of common external and lacrimal disorders
Blepharitis has been reported to occur in up to 30% of children with Down syndrome [6] and can be managed in the usual way, although compliance issues may complicate management. Nasolacrimal duct obstruction (8.5%) and congenital lacrimal fistula (4%) also commonly occur and may need specialist referral* [6, 24].
Cerebral Visual Impairment (CVI)
A significant proportion of children with Down syndrome have visual perceptual problems. Cerebral Visual Impairment, or CVI, refers to difficulty in interpreting vision despite reasonable visual acuity. Common symptoms include difficulties in judging depth and movement difficulties finding an object in an array, and problems with face and object recognition. Once any refractive error is corrected, any child with unexplained visual difficulties should be referred for assessment of CVI [25].
Urgent referral
In view of the high prevalence of ocular disorders and the communication difficulties encountered in this client group any child or adult with pain, and/or changing vision, and/or red eye should be referred in the normal way.
References
Woodhouse JM, Pakeman VH, Cregg M, Saunders KJ, Parker M, Fraser WI, et al. Refractive errors in young children with Down syndrome. Optom Vis Sci. 1997;74:844–51.
Cregg M, Woodhouse JM, Stewart RE, Pakeman VH, Bromham NR, Gunter HL, et al. Development of refractive error and strabismus in children with Down syndrome. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:1023–30.
Cregg M, Woodhouse JM, Pakeman VH, Stewart RE, Gunter HL, Parker M, et al. Accommodation and refractive error in children with Down syndrome: cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:55–63.
Källén B, Mastroiacovo P, Robert E. Major congenital malformations in Down syndrome. Am J Med Genet. 1996;65:160–6.
Traboulsi EI, Levine E, Mets MB, Parelhoff ES, O’Neill JF, Gaasterland DE. Infantile glaucoma in Down’s syndrome (trisomy 21). Am J Ophthalmol. 1988;105:389–94.
da Cunha Pires, Belmiro de Castro Moreira R. J. Ocular findings in Down’s syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996;122:236–44.
Zahidi AAA, McIlreavy L, Erichsen JT, Woodhouse JM. Visual and refractive status of children with Down’s syndrome and nystagmus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2022;63:28.
Li EY, Chan TC, Lam NM, Jhanji V. Cataract surgery outcomes in adult patients with Down’s syndrome. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014;98:1273–6.
Alió JL, Vega-Estrada A, Sanz P, Osman AA, Kamal AM, Mamoon A, et al. Corneal morphologic characteristics in patients with Down syndrome. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018;136:971–8.
Kristianslund O, Drolsum L. Prevalence of keratoconus in persons with Down syndrome: a review. BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2021;6:e000784.
Public Health England. Newborn and infant physical examination (NIPE) screening programme handbook [Internet]. London: UK Government; 2021 [cited 2025 Jun 28]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/newborn-and-infant-physical-examination-programme-handbook/newborn-and-infant-physical-examination-screening-programme-handbook
Wong V, Ho D. Ocular abnormalities in Down syndrome: an analysis of 140 Chinese children. Pediatr Neurol. 1997;16:311–4.
Haugen OH, Høvding G, Lundström I. Refractive development in children with Down’s syndrome: a population based, longitudinal study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001;85:714–9.
Children’s Eye Health Working Party, a joint working party comprising members of the Royal College of Ophthalmologists, College of Optometrists and British Orthoptics Society. Guidelines for children’s eye care. London: Royal College of Ophthalmologists; 2002.
Umfress AC, Hair CD, Donahue SP. Prevalence of ocular pathology on initial screening and incidence of new findings on follow-up examinations in children with trisomy 21. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019;207:373–7.
Little JA, McCullough S, McClelland J, Jackson AJ, Saunders KJ. Low-contrast acuity measurement: does it add value in the visual assessment of Down syndrome and cerebral palsy populations?. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:251–7.
Moran S, Gomez L, Zuber K, Gatinel D. A case-control study of keratoconus risk factors. Cornea. 2020;39:697–701.
Larkin DFP, Chowdhury K, Burr JM, Raynor M, Edwards M, Tuft SJ, et al. KERALINK Trial Study Group. Effect of corneal cross-linking versus standard care on keratoconus progression in young patients: the KERALINK randomized controlled trial. Ophthalmology. 2021;128:1516–26.
de Weger C, Boonstra N, Goossens J. Bifocals reduce strabismus in children with Down syndrome: evidence from a randomized controlled trial. Acta Ophthalmol. 2020;98:89–97.
Satgunam P, Datta S, Sumalini R. Near vision in individuals with Down syndrome: a vision screening study. Eye. 2019;33:1254–60.
de Weger C, Boonstra N, Goossens J. Effects of bifocals on visual acuity in children with Down syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. Acta Ophthalmol. 2019;97:378–83.
SeeAbility. Find an optometrist: Easy Eye Care service [Internet]. SeeAbility; [cited 2025 Feb 11]. Available from: https://www.seeability.org/optometrists
The Royal College of Ophthalmologists, SeeAbility, ABDO, BIOS, The College of Optometrists, LOCSU. Framework for proposed special schools eye care service [Internet]. London: The Royal College of Ophthalmologists; 2022 [cited 2025 Jun 29]. Available from: https://www.rcophth.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Framework-for-Proposed-Special-Schools-Service-Final-ABDO-BIOS-College-of-Optometrists-LOCSU-RcOphth-and-SeeAbility.pdf
Lee S, Kim N, Khwarg SI, Choung HK, Lee MJ. Congenital lacrimal fistula associated with Down syndrome. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012;250:1515–9.
Wilton GJ, McConnell EL, Eyre K, Buckley D, Salt AT, Woodhouse JM, et al. Behavioural features of cerebral visual impairment are common in children with Down syndrome. Front Hum Neurosci. 2021;15:673342.
Acknowledgements
We would also like to acknowledge the 2012 DSMIG Vision Guideline Steering Group – Pat Charleton, Margaret Woodhouse, Barbara Croft, Jennifer Dennis, Jill Ellis and Marian MacGowan – whose work provided an invaluable foundation for this update. We are additionally grateful to Professor Jay Self and the Royal College of Ophthalmologists paediatric subcommittee for their endorsement of the best practice recommendation output.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Contributions
GR and SJ collated, reviewed and summarised the literature. GR and SJ drafted the manuscript. GR, GC and SJ meticulously revised the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Riding, G., Croft, G., Jain, S. et al. Ophthalmic screening in down syndrome: A DSMIG UK Best practice recommendation (Revised 2025). Eye (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-026-04310-w
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-026-04310-w