Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Cyclic-di-AMP modulates cellular turgor in response to defects in bacterial cell wall synthesis

Abstract

Cyclic-di-AMP (c-di-AMP) is an essential second messenger in Bacillus subtilis and many other Gram-positive bacteria. Work over the past decade has revealed that this cyclic nucleotide controls cation and osmolyte transporters, leading to the hypothesis that c-di-AMP regulates cytoplasmic turgor pressure. Although the targets of c-di-AMP are well established, the signals that control the levels of this second messenger and the factors that transduce these signals are unknown. Here we report that c-di-AMP levels are modulated by the cyclase regulator CdaR in response to cell wall defects. We further demonstrate that changing the levels of c-di-AMP alters turgor pressure. Our data support a model in which CdaR senses defects in the cell wall and activates c-di-AMP synthesis in response. The increase in c-di-AMP reduces turgor, preventing lysis and enabling fortification of the peptidoglycan meshwork. Thus, a central function of c-di-AMP is to control cellular turgor in response to envelope defects.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: CdaA-dependent c-di-AMP synthesis is important for cell envelope integrity.
Fig. 2: c-di-AMP levels increase in response to impaired cell wall synthesis.
Fig. 3: CdaR’s IDR is important for cell envelope integrity.
Fig. 4: CdaR’s IDR is required to modulate c-di-AMP levels in response to cell wall stress.
Fig. 5: c-di-AMP controls cytoplasmic turgor pressure.
Fig. 6: Schematic model of the CdaAR signalling pathway.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

No large-scale datasets were generated over the course of this study. All relevant data are available in the supplementary material. Raw data for all graphs and uncropped immunoblots have been uploaded as source data. Primers, synthetic DNA constructs and strains used can be found in supplementary tables. The RefSeq database downloaded from NCBI (https://ftp.ncbi.nih.gov/refseq/release/) as of June 2019 was used for the described bioinformatics analysis. The phylogenetic tree was generated from 5,767 unique bacterial taxa assembled from the assembled reference genomes in the prokaryotic RefSeq database as of June 2019. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Oberkampf, M. et al. c-di-AMP signaling is required for bile salt resistance, osmotolerance, and long-term host colonization by Clostridioides difficile. Sci. Signal. 15, eabn8171 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Corrigan, R. M., Bowman, L., Willis, A. R., Kaever, V. & Gründling, A. Cross-talk between two nucleotide-signaling pathways in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 5826–5839 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Mehne, F. M. P. et al. Cyclic di-AMP homeostasis in Bacillus subtilis: both lack and high level accumulation of the nucleotide are detrimental for cell growth. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 2004–2017 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Devaux, L. et al. Cyclic di-AMP regulation of osmotic homeostasis is essential in Group B Streptococcus. PLoS Genet. 14, e1007342 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Witte, C. E. et al. Cyclic di-AMP is critical for Listeria monocytogenes growth, cell wall homeostasis, and establishment of infection. mBio 4, e00282-13 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Stülke, J. & Krüger, L. Cyclic di-AMP signaling in bacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 74, 159–179 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gundlach, J. et al. Control of potassium homeostasis is an essential function of the second messenger cyclic di-AMP in Bacillus subtilis. Sci. Signal. 10, eaal3011 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gundlach, J. et al. Sustained sensing in potassium homeostasis: cyclic di-AMP controls potassium uptake by KimA at the levels of expression and activity. J. Biol. Chem. 294, 9605–9614 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Fuss, M. F. et al. Cyclic di-AMP traps proton-coupled K+ transporters of the KUP family in an inward-occluded conformation. Nat. Commun. 14, 3683 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Cereija, T. B., Guerra, J. P. L., Jorge, J. M. P. & Morais-Cabral, J. H. c-di-AMP, a likely master regulator of bacterial K+ homeostasis machinery, activates a K+ exporter. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2020653118 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Nelson, J. W. et al. Riboswitches in eubacteria sense the second messenger c-di-AMP. Nat. Chem. Biol. 9, 834–839 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Block, K. F., Hammond, M. C. & Breaker, R. R. Evidence for widespread gene control function by the ydaO riboswitch candidate. J. Bacteriol. 192, 3983–3989 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Foster, A. J., van den Noort, M. & Poolman, B. Bacterial cell volume regulation and the importance of cyclic di-AMP. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 88, e00181-23 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Commichau, F. M., Gibhardt, J., Halbedel, S., Gundlach, J. & Stülke, J. A delicate connection: c-di-AMP affects cell integrity by controlling osmolyte transport. Trends Microbiol. 26, 175–185 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rohs, P. D. A. & Bernhardt, T. G. Growth and division of the peptidoglycan matrix. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 75, 15.1–15.22 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cho, H. et al. Bacterial cell wall biogenesis is mediated by SEDS and PBP polymerase families functioning semi-autonomously. Nat. Microbiol. 1, 16172 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Luo, Y. & Helmann, J. D. Analysis of the role of Bacillus subtilis σM in β‐lactam resistance reveals an essential role for c‐di‐AMP in peptidoglycan homeostasis. Mol. Microbiol. 83, 623–639 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Corrigan, R. M., Abbott, J. C., Burhenne, H., Kaever, V. & Gründling, A. c-di-AMP is a new second messenger in Staphylococcus aureus with a role in controlling cell size and envelope stress. PLoS Pathog. 7, e1002217 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Kobras, C. M. et al. Loss of Pde1 function acts as an evolutionary gateway to penicillin resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2308029120 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Banerjee, R., Gretes, M., Harlem, C., Basuino, L. & Chambers, H. F. A mecA-negative strain of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with high-level β-lactam resistance contains mutations in three genes. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 54, 4900–4902 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Dengler, V. et al. Mutation in the C-di-AMP cyclase dacA affects fitness and resistance of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus. PLoS ONE 8, e73512 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Rismondo, J. et al. Phenotypes associated with the essential diadenylate cyclase CdaA and its potential regulator CdaR in the human pathogen Listeria monocytogenes. J. Bacteriol. 198, 416–426 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Whiteley, A. T. et al. c‐di‐AMP modulates Listeria monocytogenes central metabolism to regulate growth, antibiotic resistance and osmoregulation. Mol. Microbiol. 104, 212–233 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Pham, H. T. et al. Cyclic di-AMP oversight of counter-ion osmolyte pools impacts intrinsic cefuroxime resistance in Lactococcus lactis. mBio 12, e00324-21 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Nolan, A. C. et al. Purine nucleosides interfere with c-di-AMP levels and act as adjuvants to re-sensitize MRSA to β-lactam antibiotics. mBio 14, e02478-22 (2022).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Galperin, M. Y. All DACs in a row: domain architectures of bacterial and archaeal diadenylate cyclases. J. Bacteriol. 205, e00023-23 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Popham, D. L. & Setlow, P. Phenotypes of Bacillus subtilis mutants lacking multiple class A high-molecular-weight penicillin-binding proteins. J. Bacteriol. 178, 2079–2085 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Rosenberg, J. et al. Structural and biochemical analysis of the essential diadenylate cyclase CdaA from Listeria monocytogenes. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 6596–6606 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Cleverley, R. M. et al. The cell cycle regulator GpsB functions as cytosolic adaptor for multiple cell wall enzymes. Nat. Commun. 10, 261 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Brunet, Y. R., Habib, C., Brogan, A. P., Artzi, L. & Rudner, D. Z. Intrinsically disordered protein regions are required for cell wall homeostasis in Bacillus subtilis. Genes Dev. 36, 970–984 (2022).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. van Heijenoort, J. Formation of the glycan chains in the synthesis of bacterial peptidoglycan. Glycobiology 11, 25R–36R (2001).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Schwedt, I., Wang, M., Gibhardt, J. & Commichau, F. M. Cyclic di-AMP, a multifaceted regulator of central metabolism and osmolyte homeostasis in Listeria monocytogenes. microLife 4, uqad005 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Zeden, M. S. et al. Cyclic di-adenosine monophosphate (c-di-AMP) is required for osmotic regulation in Staphylococcus aureus but dispensable for viability in anaerobic conditions. J. Biol. Chem. 293, 3180–3200 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Ye, M. et al. DhhP, a cyclic di-AMP phosphodiesterase of Borrelia burgdorferi, is essential for cell growth and virulence. Infect. Immun. 82, 1840–1849 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Yang, J. et al. Deletion of the cyclic di-AMP phosphodiesterase gene (cnpB) in Mycobacterium tuberculosis leads to reduced virulence in a mouse model of infection. Mol. Microbiol. 93, 65–79 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Bardetti, P., Barber, F. & Rojas, E. R. Non-linear stress-softening of the bacterial cell wall confers cell shape homeostasis. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.03.611099 (2024).

  37. Rojas, E. R., Huang, K. C. & Theriot, J. A. Homeostatic cell growth is accomplished mechanically through membrane tension inhibition of cell-wall synthesis. Cell Syst. 5, 578–590.e6 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Brogan, A. P., Habib, C., Hobbs, S. J., Kranzusch, P. J. & Rudner, D. Z. Bacterial SEAL domains undergo autoproteolysis and function in regulated intramembrane proteolysis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2310862120 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Midonet, C. et al. MacP bypass variants of Streptococcus pneumoniae PBP2a suggest a conserved mechanism for the activation of bifunctional cell wall synthases. mBio 14, e02390-23 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Yin, W. et al. A decade of research on the second messenger c-di-AMP. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 44, 701–724 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Latoscha, A. et al. c-di-AMP hydrolysis by the phosphodiesterase AtaC promotes differentiation of multicellular bacteria. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 7392–7400 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhang, L., Li, W. & He, Z.-G. DarR, a TetR-like transcriptional factor, is a cyclic di-AMP-responsive repressor in Mycobacterium smegmatis. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 3085–3096 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Ba, X. et al. Truncation of GdpP mediates β-lactam resistance in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 74, 1182–1191 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Lai, L.-Y. et al. Altered PBP4 and GdpP functions synergistically mediate MRSA-like high-level, broad-spectrum β-lactam resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. mBio 15, e02889-23 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Chan, L. C. et al. Ceftobiprole- and Ceftaroline-resistant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 59, 2960–2963 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Gostev, V. et al. In vitro ceftaroline resistance selection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus involves different genetic pathways. Microb. Drug Resist. 25, 1401–1409 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Sommer, A. et al. Mutations in the gdpP gene are a clinically relevant mechanism for β-lactam resistance in meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus lacking mec determinants. Microb. Genom. 7, 000623 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Deng, Y., Sun, M. & Shaevitz, J. W. Direct measurement of cell wall stress stiffening and turgor pressure in live bacterial cells. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 158101 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Gundlach, J. et al. An essential poison: synthesis and degradation of cyclic di-AMP in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 197, 3265–3274 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Bejerano-Sagie, M. et al. A checkpoint protein that scans the chromosome for damage at the start of sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. Cell 125, 679–690 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Gibhardt, J. et al. An extracytoplasmic protein and a moonlighting enzyme modulate synthesis of c‐di‐AMP in Listeria monocytogenes. Environ. Microbiol. 22, 2771–2791 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Youngman, P. J., Perkins, J. B. & Losick, R. Genetic transposition and insertional mutagenesis in Bacillus subtilis with Streptococcus faecalis transposon Tn917. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 80, 2305–2309 (1983).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Harwood, C. R. & Cutting, S. M. Molecular Biological Methods for Bacillus (Wiley, 1990).

  54. Gibson, D. G. et al. Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases. Nat. Methods 6, 343–345 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Wang, X., Brandão, H. B., Le, T. B. K., Laub, M. T. & Rudner, D. Z. Bacillus subtilis SMC complexes juxtapose chromosome arms as they travel from origin to terminus. Science 355, 524–527 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Meeske, A. J. et al. MurJ and a novel lipid II flippase are required for cell wall biogenesis in Bacillus subtilis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 6437–6442 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Patrick, J. E. & Kearns, D. B. MinJ (YvjD) is a topological determinant of cell division in Bacillus subtilis. Mol. Microbiol. 70, 1166–1179 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Rudner, D. Z., Fawcett, P. & Losick, R. A family of membrane-embedded metalloproteases involved in regulated proteolysis of membrane-associated transcription factors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 14765–14770 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Miller, J. H. Experiments in Molecular Genetics (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 1972).

  60. Wang, X. et al. Condensin promotes the juxtaposition of DNA flanking its loading site in Bacillus subtilis. Genes Dev. 29, 1661–1675 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Fujita, M. & Sadaie, Y. Promoter selectivity of the Bacillus subtilis RNA polymerase 6k and CTH holoenzyme. J. Biochem. 124, 89–97 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Haeusser, D. P., Schwartz, R. L., Smith, A. M., Oates, M. E. & Levin, P. A. EzrA prevents aberrant cell division by modulating assembly of the cytoskeletal protein FtsZ. Mol. Microbiol. 52, 801–814 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Ducret, A., Quardokus, E. M. & Brun, Y. V. MicrobeJ, a tool for high throughput bacterial cell detection and quantitative analysis. Nat. Microbiol. 1, 16077 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Sievers, F. et al. Fast, scalable generation of high‐quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol. Syst. Biol. 7, 539 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Sayers, E. W. et al. Database resources of the National Center For Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, D20–D26 (2021).

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Erdős, G., Pajkos, M. & Dosztányi, Z. IUPred3: prediction of protein disorder enhanced with unambiguous experimental annotation and visualization of evolutionary conservation. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, W297–W303 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Letunic, I. & Bork, P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, W293–W296 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Halladin, D. K. et al. Entropy-driven translocation of disordered proteins through the Gram-positive bacterial cell wall. Nat. Microbiol. 6, 1055–1065 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank A. Gründling and all members of the Bernhardt–Rudner supergroup for helpful advice, discussions and encouragement, and the MicRoN core for advice on fluorescence microscopy. Electron Microscopy Imaging and services were performed in the HMS Electron Microscopy Facility. Portions of this research were conducted on the O2 High Performance Computing Cluster, which is supported by the Research Computing Group at Harvard Medical School. Support for this work was provided by National Institute of Health Grants R35GM145299, U19 AI158028 (D.Z.R.) and R35GM143057 (E.R.R.). A.P.B. was funded in part by NSF (DGE1745303) and NIH (F31AI181098).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A.P.B. and D.Z.R conceived the study. A.P.B. and P.B. performed the experiments and analyses. D.Z.R and E.R.R. supervised the study. A.P.B. and D.Z.R wrote the paper, with edits from P.B. and E.R.R.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Z. Rudner.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Microbiology thanks Fabian Commichau, Daniel Kearns and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Cells with reduced levels of c-di-AMP are more sensitive to envelope-targeting antibiotics, while cells with increased levels of c-di-AMP are more resistant.

Representative growth curves of the indicated strains grown in LB with 5, 50 µM, or 500 µM IPTG treated with sub-inhibitory concentrations of the indicated antibiotics. (A) Red lines show cells that express low levels of CdaA with 5 µM IPTG and grey lines show cells that express wild-type levels of CdaA with 50 µM IPTG. 50 µM IPTG is closest to physiological expression levels (Extended Data Fig. 3e). (B) Blue lines show cells that express high levels of CdaA with 500 µM IPTG in the absence of the phosphodiesterases GdpP and PgpH. All experiments in this figure were performed in biological triplicate and representative growth curves are shown.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Analysis of growth and c-di-AMP levels in mutants and after antibiotic exposure.

(A) Bar graph showing β-galactosidase activity from the riboswitch reporter of the indicated B. subtilis deletion mutants. Cells lacking cdaAR have lower c-di-AMP and cells lacking gdpP have higher c-di-AMP. All measurements were performed in biological triplicate except the ∆cdaS condition which was performed in duplicate. (B) Bar graph showing β-galactosidase activity from the kimA reporter in cells lacking disA, cdaS, and cdaAR, and harbouring an IPTG-regulated allele of cdaAR in the presence of 50 µM IPTG. The strain was treated with sub-inhibitory concentrations (0.5X MIC) of fosfomycin (FOS), bacitracin (BAC), penicillin G (PENG), oxacillin (OX), vancomycin (VAN), moenomycin (MOE), D-cycloserine (DCYC). Cells only increase c-di-AMP levels in the presence of moenomycin that inhibits the glycosyltransferase activity of class A PBPs. (C) Bar graph showing β-galactosidase activity from the kimA riboswitch reporter in cells expressing CdaAR or DisA as the only c-di-AMP cyclase in the presence of absence of PBP1. The center of error represents the average, and the error bars represent the standard deviation across three biological replicates. (D) 10-fold serial dilutions of the indicated strains spotted on LB agar supplemented with the indicated IPTG concentrations. CdaAR is critical in the absence of PBP1.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Analysis of CdaA and CdaR variants.

(A) Immunoblot of B. subtilis cells expressing cdaR-His at its native locus (first lane) or cdaR-His and variants at an ectopic location under IPTG-control with 15 µM IPTG. All strains lack disA and cdaS. (B) Immunoblot of cells expressing CdaA-His under IPTG-inducible control with 500 µM IPTG and CdaR-HA or CdaR∆ID-HA under xylose-inducible control with 30 mM xylose. cdaA and cdaR were inserted at separate genomic location. The strains express (+) or lack (∆) PBP1. (C) Cells expressing CdaR-His at its native locus (lanes 1 & 2) compared to CdaA-CdaR-His with and without its IDR (∆ID) under IPTG-inducible control at an ectopic locus with 50 µM IPTG. (D) Immunoblots from a co-immunoprecipitation assay using anti-His resin and detergent-solubilized membrane fractions. The load (L) and eluate (E) were probed for CdaA-His, CdaR-HA, CdaR∆ID-HA and the membrane protein EzrA. The B. subtilis strains expressed CdaA with or without a His-tag under IPTG-inducible control with 500 µM IPTG and CdaR-HA with or without its IDR under xylose-inducible control with 30 mM xylose. A non-specific cross-reactive band is indicated (*). The CdaA:CdaR complex does not require CdaR’s IDR. The co-IP was performed in biological duplicate and a representative experiment is shown. (E) Immunoblot of B. subtilis cells expressing CdaR-His at its native locus (lanes 1&2) or CdaA-CdaR-His with and without its IDR under IPTG-inducible control expressed with the indicated IPTG concentrations. SigA was used to control for loading in panels (A), (B), (C), and (E). 50 µM IPTG is closest to physiological expression of CdaA and CdaR. All Immunoblots are representative of three biological replicates.

Extended Data Fig. 4 An acute increase in c-di-AMP causes membrane invaginations.

(A) Growth curve of cells containing Phy-cdaS(L44F) induced with 500 µM (pink) or without (black) IPTG. (B) Representative fluorescence images of cells grown in the presence of 500 µM IPTG for the indicated times. Cells were harvested at the indicated times, but images were acquired ~5 minutes later due to cell concentration, mounting, and imaging. Cells contain constitutively expressed cytoplasmic mCherry and membranes are labeled using the membrane protein SpoIVFB-GFP (FB-GFP). Sites of cytoplasmic retraction and membrane invagination are highlighted (yellow carets). (C) The same experiment as described in (B) with membranes stained with the membrane dye TMA-DPH. Scale bars indicate 5 µm.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Analysis of c-di-AMP levels in cells expressing cdaS(L44F) or gdpP(cyto).

(A, B) Bar graphs showing β-galactosidase activity from the kimA riboswitch reporter in B. subtilis strains expressing cdaS(L44F) from (A) the Pspank (PIPTG) or (B) the Phyperspank (Phy) promoters. Expression was induced with 500 µM IPTG for 90 minutes. (C) Bar graph showing c-di-AMP levels as measured by ELISA assay in the same conditions as shown in (A, B). Values were normalized to the culture OD600. All ELISA measurements were performed in biological triplicate except the Phy condition which was performed in duplicate. (D) Bar graph showing β-galactosidase activity from the kimA reporter of cells expressing Phy-gdpP(cyto). Samples were taken at the indicated timepoints after addition (+) of 500 µM IPTG. (E) Bar graph showing c-di-AMP levels normalized to OD600 as measured by ELISA after 45 minutes of induction with Phy-gdpP(cyto). In all panels, the center of error represents the average, and the error bars represent the standard deviation across three biological replicates.

Extended Data Fig. 6 An acute increase in c-di-AMP causes membrane invaginations.

Transmission electron micrographs of exponentially growing cells harboring Phy-cdaS(L44F) before and at indicated timepoints after the addition of 500 µM IPTG. Cells were immediately fixed after harvest. Scale bars indicate 100 nm. Sample preparation and imaging were performed in biological duplicate and representative images are shown.

Extended Data Fig. 7 An acute increase in c-di-AMP levels causes membrane invaginations independent of phospholipid biosynthesis.

Representative images of B. subtilis cells harboring Phy-cdaS(L44F). Cells were induced with 500 µM IPTG for 10 min and then treated with cerulenin (12.5 µg/mL) to block phospholipid synthesis for 5 min prior to harvest. Images were acquired ~ 5 minutes later due to cell concentration, mounting, and imaging. The delay in cerulenin addition (10 min after IPTG-induction) was chosen based on control experiments showing that the drug rapidly inhibits transcription from an IPTG-regulated promoter (Supplementary Fig. 6). Importantly, no membrane invaginations are detectable at 10 min after IPTG addition (Extended Data Fig. 6). Thus, cerulenin treatment at 10 minutes enabled cdaS(L44F) expression and inhibition of phospholipid biosynthesis prior to the generation of membrane invaginations. Membrane accumulation did not increase over the next 75 minutes in cerulenin treated cells, suggesting that the severity of the membrane invaginations is partially due to uncoupled phospholipid synthesis from growth. Cells constitutively expressed cytoplasmic mCherry and were stained with TMA-DPH to label membranes. Sites of membrane invagination in the presence or absence of cerulenin are highlighted (yellow carets). Scale bar indicates 5 µm.

Extended Data Fig. 8 Membrane invaginations caused by an acute increase in c-di-AMP depend on the external osmolarity.

(A) Bar graph showing the osmolarity of LB and LB lacking salt (no salt) as measured using an osmometer. The center of error represents the average and error bars indicate the standard deviation among three replicates. (B) Representative fluorescence micrographs of cells harboring Phy-cdaS(L44F) before (-IPTG) or at indicated time points after the addition of 500 µM IPTG ( + IPTG). 10 or 15 min after induction, cells were pelleted, resuspended in LB or LB (no salt), spotted onto LB or LB (no salt) 2% agarose pads and imaged 5 min after harvest. Cells contain constitutively expressed cytoplasmic mCherry and membranes were labeled using a constitutively expressed membrane protein SpoIVFB-GFP (FB-GFP) and the membrane dye TMA-DPH. Carets highlight sites of cytoplasmic retraction and membrane invagination. Low external osmolarity (LB no salt) largely suppresses the membrane invagination caused by high c-di-AMP. Scale bars indicate 5 µm.

Extended Data Fig. 9 An acute decrease in c-di-AMP causes bulging and lysis.

(A) Growth curves of B. subtilis cells harboring Phy-gdpP(cyto) that lacks its transmembrane and PAS domains induced with 500 µM IPTG (red line) or without inducer (black line). (B) Representative fluorescence and phase-contrast images of Phy-gdpP(cyto) cells at the indicated time points in the presence or absence of 500 µM IPTG. Cells were harvested at the indicated timepoints, and images were acquired ~5 minutes after harvest due to cell concentrating, mounting, and imaging. Cells constitutively express cytoplasmic mCherry. Sites of cell bulging (yellow carets) and lysis (white carets) are indicated. Scale bar indicates 5 µm.

Extended Data Fig. 10 Cyclic-di-AMP controls cellular turgor.

(A) Diagram of a cell inflated by turgor pressure P = RT(Cin-Cout), where Cin is the cytosolic osmolarity and Cout is the extracellular osmolarity. Adapted from Bardetti et al36. (B,C,D) Osmotic force extension curves and lysis strains of cells lacking disA, cdaS, cdaAR and harboring PIPTG-cdaAR grown with 5 µM IPTG (B), wild-type (WT) (C), and cells with PIPTG-cdaS(L44F) grown with 500 µM IPTG (D). Cells grown in LB in a microfluidic chamber were exposed to a hyperosmotic shock of LB containing the indicated molarity of sorbitol (x-axis), and the mean percent change in cell length (εl) in response to the shock [(lengthfinal-lengthinitial)/lengthfinal] was measured. The solid horizontal line indicates the average change in cell length (Lysis strain) upon lysis with detergent. Lysis strain was determined by growing cells in LB in a microfluidic chamber and measuring the percent change in cell length [(lengthfinal-lengthinitial/lengthfinal] before and after exposure to LB containing 5% of the anionic detergent N-lauroylsarcosine. Dotted lines represent the linear regression used to find pressure, which was calculated as the shock magnitude that causes contraction of length to the rest length upon cell lysis. The colored dotted lines indicate the pressure (P) in units of molarity shown in Fig. 5k. For the lysis experiments, n = 136,82,116 for LOW, WT, and HIGH, respectively. For the hyperosmotic shock experiments, the n for increasing sorbitol concentration was n = 104,104,104,68(LOW), n = 116,116,116,376(WT), and n = 50,50,50,59,74(HIGH). Error bars indicate average longitudinal strain and standard error among replicates. (E) Spot dilutions on LB, LB (no salt), or LB ( + 500 mM sorbitol) agar all containing 15 µM IPTG. Strains lack disA, cdaS, and cdaAR and harbour the indicated IPTG-regulated allele of cdaAR. Images are shown after one and two days of incubation. High osmolarity suppresses the growth defects associated with cdaAR-∆ID expression in the absence of PBP1. (F) Bar graph showing the osmolarities of the indicated media as measured by an osmometer. The center of error represents the average and error bars represent the standard deviation among three replicates. (G) Bar graph showing β-galactosidase activity from the kimA riboswitch reporter of strains assayed in (A) grown to mid-log in LB ( + 500 mM sorbitol). The strains lack pbp1, disA, cdaS, and cdaAR and express the indicated cdaAR allele with 50 µM IPTG. High external osmolarity does not impact the intracellular c-di-AMP levels of the strains. The center of error represents the average and error bars indicate the standard deviation between two biological replicates. (H) Growth curves of the indicated strains in LB and LB ( + 500 mM sorbitol). High osmolarity suppresses the growth defect associated with cdaA mutants. Spot titers and growth curves are representative of three biological replicates.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Text and Figs. 1–8.

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Table 1

Strains used in the study.

Supplementary Table 2

Plasmids used in the study.

Supplementary Table 3

Oligonucleotides used in the study.

Supplementary Table 4

GBlock sequences used in the study.

Supplementary Video 1

Time course of lysozyme treatment from Fig. 5i.

Supplementary Data 1

Numerical source data separated by figure for the supplementary figures.

Source data

Source Data Figs. 1, 2, 4 and 5, and Extended Data Figs. 1, 2, 4, 5 and 8–10

All numerical source data in tabs labelled by figure panel.

Source Data Figs. 1–3 and Extended Data Fig. 3

Unprocessed western blots labelled by figure panel.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brogan, A.P., Bardetti, P., Rojas, E.R. et al. Cyclic-di-AMP modulates cellular turgor in response to defects in bacterial cell wall synthesis. Nat Microbiol 10, 1698–1710 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-025-02027-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-025-02027-2

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing