Abstract
Dynein-driven cargo transport has a pivotal role in diverse cellular activities, central to which is dynein’s mechanochemical cycle. Here, we performed a systematic cryo-electron microscopic investigation of the conformational landscape of full-length human dynein 1 in reaction, in various nucleotide conditions, on and off microtubules. Our approach reveals over 40 high-resolution structures, categorized into eight states, providing a dynamic and comprehensive view of dynein throughout its mechanochemical cycle. The described intermediate states reveal mechanistic insights into dynein function, including a ‘backdoor’ phosphate release model that coordinates linker straightening, how microtubule binding enhances adenosine triphosphatase activity through a two-way communication mechanism and the crosstalk mechanism between AAA1 and the regulatory AAA3 site. Our findings also lead to a revised model for the force-generating powerstroke and reveal means by which dynein exhibits unidirectional stepping. These results improve our understanding of dynein and provide a more complete model of its mechanochemical cycle.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$32.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout






Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Models and cryo-EM maps were deposited to the PDB and EM Data Bank as outlined below.
Dynein in ATP buffer: PDB 9BLY and EMD-44681 (phi particle dynein), PDB 9BLZ and EMD-44682 (state 1), PDB 9BM0 and EMD-44683 (state 2), PDB 9BM1 and EMD-44684 (state 3), PDB 9BM2 and EMD-44685 (state 4), PDB 9BM3 and EMD-44686 (state 5a), PDB 9BM4 and EMD-44687 (state 5b), PDB 9BM5 and EMD-44688 (state 6), PDB 9BM6 and EMD-44689 (state 7a, post 2), PDB 9BM7 and EMD-44690 (state 7b, post 2) and PDB 9BM8 and EMD-44691 (state 7c, post 2).
Dynein in ATP-Vi buffer: PDB 9BMF and EMD-44697 (state 1), PDB 9BMG and EMD-44698 (state 2) and PDB 9BMH and EMD-44699 (state 4).
Dynein in 5 mM AMPPNP buffer with 2 mM Mg2+: PDB 9BMJ and EMD-44701 (state 1), PDB 9BML and EMD-44702 (state 2), PDB 9BMM and EMD-44703 (state 4), PDB 9BMN and EMD-44704 (state 5), PDB 9BMO and EMD-44705 (state 6) and PDB 9BMP and EMD-44706 (state 7, post 2).
Dynein in 5 mM AMPPNP buffer with 5 mM Mg2+: PDB 9DH5 and EMD-46856 (state 1), PDB 9DH6 and EMD-46857 (state 2), PDB 9DH7 and EMD-46858 (state 4), PDB 9DH8 and EMD-46859 (state 5), PDB 9DH9 and EMD-46860 (state 7, post 2) and PDB 9DHA and EMD-46861 (state 7, post 1)
Dynein in ADP buffer: PDB 9BMR and EMD-44708 (state 1), PDB 9BMS and EMD-44709 (state 2), PDB 9BMT and EMD-44710 (state 5), PDB 9BMU and EMD-44711 (state 6), PDB 9BMV and EMD-44712 (state 7, post 1) and PDB 9BMW and EMD-44714 (state 7, post 2).
Dynein in apo buffer: PDB 9BMY and EMD-44715 (state 1), PDB 9BMZ and EMD-44716 (state 2), PDB 9BN0 and EMD-44717 (state 7, post 2) and PDB 9BN1 and EMD-44718 (state 8, post 1).
Dynein bound to MTs: PDB 9BMA and EMD-44693 (apo, post 1), PDB 9BMB and EMD-44694 (ADP, post 1), PDB 9BMC and EMD-44695 (ADP, post 2) and PDB 9BMD and EMD-44696 (AMPPNP, post 1).
Dynein motor domain α registry mutant in ATP buffer: PDB 9BN3 and EMD-44720 (class 1) and PDB 9BN4 and EMD-44721 (class 2).
Dynein motor domain α registry mutant in ATP-Vi buffer: PDB 9BN5 and EMD-44722 (class 1) and PDB 9BN6 and EMD-44723 (class 2).
Previously reported atomic models used in this study (for model building and structural analysis) were obtained from the PDB under accession codes 5NUG, 7K58, 7K5B, 8FD6 and 7MGM. Additional data and materials can be obtained from the corresponding authors upon request. Source data are provided with this paper.
Code availability
All codes involved in general cryo-EM data processing and MT signal subtraction are publicly available from GitHub (https://github.com/JackZhang-Lab).
References
King, S. M. The dynein microtubule motor. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1496, 60–75 (2000).
Reck-Peterson, S. L., Redwine, W. B., Vale, R. D. & Carter, A. P. The cytoplasmic dynein transport machinery and its many cargoes. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 19, 382–398 (2018).
Torisawa, T. & Kimura, A. The generation of dynein networks by multi-layered regulation and their implication in cell division. Front Cell Dev. Biol. 8, 22 (2020).
Ricolo, D., Castro-Ribera, J. & Araujo, S. J. Cytoskeletal players in single-cell branching morphogenesis. Dev. Biol. 477, 22–34 (2021).
Klena, N. & Pigino, G.Structural biology of cilia and intraflagellar transport. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 38, 103–123 (2022).
King, S. M. Axonemal dynein arms. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 8, a028100 (2016).
Bachmann, A. & Straube, A. Kinesins in cell migration. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 43, 79–83 (2015).
Urnavicius, L. et al. Cryo-EM shows how dynactin recruits two dyneins for faster movement. Nature 554, 202–206 (2018).
Grotjahn, D. A. et al. Cryo-electron tomography reveals that dynactin recruits a team of dyneins for processive motility. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 25, 203–207 (2018).
Zhang, K. et al. Cryo-EM reveals how human cytoplasmic dynein is auto-inhibited and activated. Cell 169, 1303–1314 (2017).
Urnavicius, L. et al. The structure of the dynactin complex and its interaction with dynein. Science 347, 1441–1446 (2015).
McKenney, R. J., Huynh, W., Tanenbaum, M. E., Bhabha, G. & Vale, R. D. Activation of cytoplasmic dynein motility by dynactin–cargo adapter complexes. Science 345, 337–341 (2014).
Chowdhury, S., Ketcham, S. A., Schroer, T. A. & Lander, G. C. Structural organization of the dynein–dynactin complex bound to microtubules. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 22, 345–347 (2015).
Schlager, M. A., Hoang, H. T., Urnavicius, L., Bullock, S. L. & Carter, A. P. In vitro reconstitution of a highly processive recombinant human dynein complex. EMBO J. 33, 1855–1868 (2014).
Chaaban, S. & Carter, A. P.Structure of dynein–dynactin on microtubules shows tandem adaptor binding. Nature 610, 212–216 (2022).
Htet, Z. M. et al. LIS1 promotes the formation of activated cytoplasmic dynein-1 complexes. Nat. Cell Biol. 22, 518–525 (2020).
Marzo, M. G., Griswold, J. M. & Markus, S. M. Pac1/LIS1 stabilizes an uninhibited conformation of dynein to coordinate its localization and activity. Nat. Cell Biol. 22, 559–569 (2020).
Elshenawy, M. M. et al. LIS1 activates dynein motility by modulating its pairing with dynactin. Nat. Cell Biol. 22, 570–578 (2020).
McKenney, R. J. LIS1 cracks open dynein. Nat. Cell Biol. 22, 515–517 (2020).
Markus, S. M., Marzo, M. G. & McKenney, R. J. New insights into the mechanism of dynein motor regulation by lissencephaly-1. eLife 9, e59737 (2020).
Ton, W. D. et al. Microtubule-binding-induced allostery triggers LIS1 dissociation from dynein prior to cargo transport. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 30, 1365–1379 (2023).
Qiu, R., Zhang, J. & Xiang, X. LIS1 regulates cargo-adapter-mediated activation of dynein by overcoming its autoinhibition in vivo. J. Cell Biol. 218, 3630–3646 (2019).
Singh, K. et al. Molecular mechanism of dynein–dynactin complex assembly by LIS1. Science 383, eadk8544 (2024).
Zhao, Y., Oten, S. & Yildiz, A. Nde1 promotes LIS1-mediated activation of dynein. Nat. Commun. 14, 7221 (2023).
Okada, K. et al. Conserved roles for the dynein intermediate chain and Ndel1 in assembly and activation of dynein. Nat. Commun. 14, 5833 (2023).
Pandey, J. P., Shi, L., Brebion, R. A. & Smith, D. S. LIS1 and Ndel1 regulate axonal trafficking of mitochondria in mature neurons. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 15, 841047 (2022).
Garrott, S. R., Gillies, J. P. & DeSantis, M. E. Nde1 and Ndel1: outstanding mysteries in dynein-mediated transport. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 10, 871935 (2022).
Chu, Y. et al. Alterations in axonal transport motor proteins in sporadic and experimental Parkinson’s disease. Brain 135, 2058–2073 (2012).
Hoang, H. T., Schlager, M. A., Carter, A. P. & Bullock, S. L. DYNC1H1 mutations associated with neurological diseases compromise processivity of dynein–dynactin–cargo adaptor complexes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E1597–E1606 (2017).
Reiner, O. et al. Isolation of a Miller–Dieker lissencephaly gene containing G protein β-subunit-like repeats. Nature 364, 717–721 (1993).
Marzo, M. G. et al. Molecular basis for dyneinopathies reveals insight into dynein regulation and dysfunction. eLife 8, e47246 (2019).
Scherer, J., Yi, J. & Vallee, R. B. Role of cytoplasmic dynein and kinesins in adenovirus transport. FEBS Lett. 594, 1838–1847 (2020).
Schmidt, H. & Carter, A. P. Review: structure and mechanism of the dynein motor ATPase. Biopolymers 105, 557–567 (2016).
Cianfrocco, M. A., DeSantis, M. E., Leschziner, A. E. & Reck-Peterson, S. L. Mechanism and regulation of cytoplasmic dynein. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 31, 83–108 (2015).
Rao, L. & Gennerich, A. Structure and function of dynein’s non-catalytic subunits. Cells 13, 330 (2024).
Numata, N., Shima, T., Ohkura, R., Kon, T. & Sutoh, K. C-sequence of the Dictyostelium cytoplasmic dynein participates in processivity modulation. FEBS Lett. 585, 1185–1190 (2011).
Cho, C., Reck-Peterson, S. L. & Vale, R. D. Regulatory ATPase sites of cytoplasmic dynein affect processivity and force generation. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 25839–25845 (2008).
Kon, T., Mogami, T., Ohkura, R., Nishiura, M. & Sutoh, K. ATP hydrolysis cycle-dependent tail motions in cytoplasmic dynein. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 12, 513–519 (2005).
Kon, T., Nishiura, M., Ohkura, R., Toyoshima, Y. Y. & Sutoh, K. Distinct functions of nucleotide-binding/hydrolysis sites in the four AAA modules of cytoplasmic dynein. Biochemistry 43, 11266–11274 (2004).
Kon, T. et al. Helix sliding in the stalk coiled coil of dynein couples ATPase and microtubule binding. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 325–333 (2009).
Gennerich, A., Carter, A. P., Reck-Peterson, S. L. & Vale, R. D. Force-induced bidirectional stepping of cytoplasmic dynein. Cell 131, 952–965 (2007).
Mogami, T., Kon, T., Ito, K. & Sutoh, K. Kinetic characterization of tail swing steps in the ATPase cycle of Dictyostelium cytoplasmic dynein. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 21639–21644 (2007).
Reck-Peterson, S. L. et al. Single-molecule analysis of dynein processivity and stepping behavior. Cell 126, 335–348 (2006).
Schmidt, H., Zalyte, R., Urnavicius, L. & Carter, A. P. Structure of human cytoplasmic dynein-2 primed for its power stroke. Nature 518, 435–438 (2015).
Carter, A. P. Crystal clear insights into how the dynein motor moves. J. Cell Sci. 126, 705–713 (2013).
Kon, T. et al. The 2.8 Å crystal structure of the dynein motor domain. Nature 484, 345–350 (2012).
Schmidt, H., Gleave, E. S. & Carter, A. P. Insights into dynein motor domain function from a 3.3-Å crystal structure. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 19, 492–497 (2012).
Carter, A. P., Cho, C., Jin, L. & Vale, R. D. Crystal structure of the dynein motor domain. Science 331, 1159–1165 (2011).
Bhabha, G. et al. Allosteric communication in the dynein motor domain. Cell 159, 857–868 (2014).
Canty, J. T., Tan, R., Kusakci, E., Fernandes, J. & Yildiz, A. Structure and mechanics of dynein motors. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 50, 549–574 (2021).
Roberts, A. J. et al. ATP-driven remodeling of the linker domain in the dynein motor. Structure 20, 1670–1680 (2012).
Burgess, S. A., Walker, M. L., Sakakibara, H., Knight, P. J. & Oiwa, K. Dynein structure and power stroke. Nature 421, 715–718 (2003).
Rao, L., Berger, F., Nicholas, M. P. & Gennerich, A. Molecular mechanism of cytoplasmic dynein tension sensing. Nat. Commun. 10, 3332 (2019).
Rao, Q. et al. Structures of outer-arm dynein array on microtubule doublet reveal a motor coordination mechanism. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 28, 799–810 (2021).
Sweeney, H. L. & Houdusse, A. Structural and functional insights into the myosin motor mechanism. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 39, 539–557 (2010).
Oosterheert, W. et al. Molecular mechanisms of inorganic-phosphate release from the core and barbed end of actin filaments. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 30, 1774–1785 (2023).
Moore, J. D. & Endow, S. A. Kinesin proteins: a phylum of motors for microtubule-based motility. Bioessays 18, 207–219 (1996).
Can, S., Lacey, S., Gur, M., Carter, A. P. & Yildiz, A. Directionality of dynein is controlled by the angle and length of its stalk. Nature 566, 407–410 (2019).
DeWitt, M. A., Cypranowska, C. A., Cleary, F. B., Belyy, V. & Yildiz, A. The AAA3 domain of cytoplasmic dynein acts as a switch to facilitate microtubule release. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 22, 73–80 (2015).
Carter, A. P. & Vale, R. D. Communication between the AAA+ ring and microtubule-binding domain of dynein. Biochem. Cell Biol. 88, 15–21 (2010).
Nishida, N. et al. Structural basis for two-way communication between dynein and microtubules. Nat. Commun. 11, 1038 (2020).
Niekamp, S., Coudray, N., Zhang, N., Vale, R. D. & Bhabha, G. Coupling of ATPase activity, microtubule binding, and mechanics in the dynein motor domain. EMBO J. 38, e101414 (2019).
Kato, Y. S. et al. Structure of the microtubule-binding domain of flagellar dynein. Structure 22, 1628–1638 (2014).
Nishikawa, Y. et al. Structure of the entire stalk region of the dynein motor domain. J. Mol. Biol. 426, 3232–3245 (2014).
Redwine, W. B. et al. Structural basis for microtubule binding and release by dynein. Science 337, 1532–1536 (2012).
Carter, A. P. et al. Structure and functional role of dynein’s microtubule-binding domain. Science 322, 1691–1695 (2008).
Lacey, S. E., He, S., Scheres, S. H. & Carter, A. P. Cryo-EM of dynein microtubule-binding domains shows how an axonemal dynein distorts the microtubule. eLife 8, e47145 (2019).
Uchimura, S. et al. A flipped ion pair at the dynein–microtubule interface is critical for dynein motility and ATPase activation. J. Cell Biol. 208, 211–222 (2015).
Li, L., Alper, J. & Alexov, E. Cytoplasmic dynein binding, run length, and velocity are guided by long-range electrostatic interactions. Sci. Rep. 6, 31523 (2016).
Holzbaur, E. L. & Johnson, K. A. Microtubules accelerate ADP release by dynein. Biochemistry 28, 7010–7016 (1989).
Amos, L. A. Brain dynein crossbridges microtubules into bundles. J. Cell Sci. 93, 19–28 (1989).
Toropova, K. et al. Structure of the dynein-2 complex and its assembly with intraflagellar transport trains. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 26, 823–829 (2019).
Chai, P., Rao, Q., Wang, Y. & Zhang, K. High-resolution structural analysis of dyneins by cryo-electron microscopy. Methods Mol. Biol. 2623, 257–279 (2023).
Chai, P., Rao, Q. & Zhang, K. Multi-curve fitting and tubulin-lattice signal removal for structure determination of large microtubule-based motors. J. Struct. Biol. 214, 107897 (2022).
Miura, M., Matsubara, A., Kobayashi, T., Edamatsu, M. & Toyoshima, Y. Y. Nucleotide-dependent behavior of single molecules of cytoplasmic dynein on microtubules in vitro. FEBS Lett. 584, 2351–2355 (2010).
Holzbaur, E. L. F. & Johnson, K. A. Adp release is rate limiting in steady-state turnover by the dynein adenosine-triphosphatase. Biochemistry 28, 5577–5585 (1989).
Nishikawa, Y., Inatomi, M., Iwasaki, H. & Kurisu, G. Structural change in the dynein stalk region associated with two different affinities for the microtubule. J. Mol. Biol. 428, 1886–1896 (2016).
Gillies, J. P. et al. Structural basis for cytoplasmic dynein-1 regulation by LIS1. eLife 11, e71229 (2022).
Roberts, A. J. et al. AAA+ ring and linker swing mechanism in the dynein motor. Cell 136, 485–495 (2009).
Hanson, P. I. & Whiteheart, S. W. AAA+ proteins: have engine, will work. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6, 519–529 (2005).
Can, S., Lacey, S., Gur, M., Carter, A. & Yildiz, A. Dynein’s directionality is controlled by the angle and length of its stalk. Biophys. J. 116, 309a (2019).
Lin, J., Okada, K., Raytchev, M., Smith, M. C. & Nicastro, D. Structural mechanism of the dynein power stroke. Nat. Cell Biol. 16, 479–485 (2014).
Nicholas, M. P. et al. Cytoplasmic dynein regulates its attachment to microtubules via nucleotide state-switched mechanosensing at multiple AAA domains. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 6371–6376 (2015).
Yildiz, A. Mechanics of dynein motility. In Handbook of Dynein (ed. Hirose, K.) (Jenny Stanford Publishing, 2019).
Carter, A. P., Diamant, A. G. & Urnavicius, L. How dynein and dynactin transport cargos: a structural perspective. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 37, 62–70 (2016).
Peng, C. S. et al. Nanometer-resolution tracking of single cargo reveals dynein motor mechanisms. Nat. Chem. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-024-01694-2 (2024).
Slivka, J. et al. Stepping dynamics of dynein characterized by MINFLUX. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.16.603667 (2024).
Schleske, J. M. et al. MINFLUX reveals dynein stepping in live neurons. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2412241121 (2024).
Cleary, F. B. et al. Tension on the linker gates the ATP-dependent release of dynein from microtubules. Nat. Commun. 5, 4587 (2014).
Dutta, M. & Jana, B. Computational modeling of dynein motor proteins at work. Chem. Commun. 57, 272–283 (2021).
Ibusuki, R. et al. Programmable molecular transport achieved by engineering protein motors to move on DNA nanotubes. Science 375, 1159–1164 (2022).
Rao, L. et al. The power of three: dynactin associates with three dyneins under load for greater force production. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.01.14.632506 (2025).
Ecklund, K. H. et al. She1 affects dynein through direct interactions with the microtubule and the dynein microtubule-binding domain. Nat. Commun. 8, 2151 (2017).
Mahamdeh, M., Simmert, S., Luchniak, A., Schaffer, E. & Howard, J. Label-free high-speed wide-field imaging of single microtubules using interference reflection microscopy. J. Microsc. 272, 60–66 (2018).
Mastronarde, D. N. Automated electron microscope tomography using robust prediction of specimen movements. J. Struct. Biol. 152, 36–51 (2005).
Punjani, A., Rubinstein, J. L., Fleet, D. J. & Brubaker, M. A. cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods 14, 290–296 (2017).
Zheng, S. Q. et al. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 14, 331–332 (2017).
Zhang, K. Gctf: real-time CTF determination and correction. J. Struct. Biol. 193, 1–12 (2016).
Goddard, T. D. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: meeting modern challenges in visualization and analysis. Protein Sci. 27, 14–25 (2018).
Rosenthal, P. B. & Henderson, R. Optimal determination of particle orientation, absolute hand, and contrast loss in single-particle electron cryomicroscopy. J. Mol. Biol. 333, 721–745 (2003).
Chen, S. et al. High-resolution noise substitution to measure overfitting and validate resolution in 3D structure determination by single particle electron cryomicroscopy. Ultramicroscopy 135, 24–35 (2013).
Kucukelbir, A., Sigworth, F. J. & Tagare, H. D. Quantifying the local resolution of cryo-EM density maps. Nat. Methods 11, 63–65 (2014).
Kidmose, R. T. et al. Namdinator—automatic molecular dynamics flexible fitting of structural models into cryo-EM and crystallography experimental maps. IUCrJ 6, 526–531 (2019).
Casanal, A., Lohkamp, B. & Emsley, P. Current developments in Coot for macromolecular model building of electron cryo-microscopy and crystallographic data. Protein Sci. 29, 1069–1078 (2020).
Brown, A. et al. Tools for macromolecular model building and refinement into electron cryo-microscopy reconstructions. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 71, 136–153 (2015).
Afonine, P. V. et al. Real-space refinement in PHENIX for cryo-EM and crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D Struct. Biol. 74, 531–544 (2018).
Chen, V. B. et al. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 12–21 (2010).
Acknowledgements
We are very grateful to members of the K.Z. and S.M.M. laboratories for their valuable discussions. We thank R. Yang for the initial dynein 1 expression and preparations in the lab. This work was funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM139483 to S.M.M. and R35GM142959 to K.Z.) and in part by a Collaboration Development Award Program (to K.Z.) from the Pittsburgh Center for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Protein Interactions (U54AI170791). We would like to thank K. Zhou, J. Lin, M. Llaguno and S. Wu, for their help with cryo-EM data collection at the Yale Cryo-EM facility. The Yale Cryo-EM resource is funded in part by the NIH grant S10OD023603 awarded to F. Sigworth. We thank L. Wang, J. Kaminsky and G. Hu at the LBMS for help with cryo-EM data collection. The LBMS is supported by the Department of Energy Office of Biological and Environmental Research (KP1607011).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
K.Z. designed the study. J.Y. and Y.W. purified the full-length human proteins. J.Y., Y.W. and P.C. prepared the cryo-EM samples and collected the data. P.C., J.Y., Y.W. and K.Z. processed the images and built the PDB models. S.M.M. purified the human MT-B dynein motor domain. I.C.G. generated the yeast strains and purified the proteins from yeast. I.C.G. and S.M.M. performed and analyzed the ATPase and single-molecule assays. P.C., J.Y. Y.W., K.Z. and S.M.M. generated the figures and videos. P.C., J.Y. and K.Z. wrote the manuscript. P.C., J.Y., Y.W., K.Z. and S.M.M. edited and revised the manuscript. S.M.M. and K.Z. acquired funding.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology thanks Stephen King, Xin Xiang and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available. Primary Handling Editor: Katarzyna Ciazynska, in collaboration with the Nature Structural & Molecular Biology team.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data
Extended Data Fig. 1 Cryo-EM data processing of full-length human dynein-1 in the presence of 5 mM ATP.
(a) A representative negative staining micrograph (total 100 micrographs) of purified full-length human dynein-1 and corresponding 2D class averages. (b) A typical cryo-EM micrograph (total 33,302 micrographs) and the flowchart of cryo-EM image processing. (c) Image processing of full-length phi dynein and tail region. (d, e) Orientation distribution of phi dynein and a representative state from open dynein. (f, g) The Fourier shell correlation (FSC) curves of the motor domain in different states and the tail domain. Datasets for dynein in other nucleotide conditions (ATP-Vi, AMPPNP, ADP, apo) were processed similarly.
Extended Data Fig. 2 Local resolution analysis and identification of bound nucleotides in AAA1, AAA3, and AAA4 in different states from the dynein-ATP dataset.
The color scheme for the motor domain is consistent with Fig. 4.
Extended Data Fig. 3 Cryo-EM data processing of full-length human dynein-1 bound to MTs.
(a) Flowchart of sample preparation and typical cryo-EM micrographs of dynein bound to MTs in apo, ADP, and AMPPNP conditions. The number of micrographs is shown in the panel. (b) Microtubule signal subtraction and image processing flowchart. (c) Orientation distribution of dynein-MT-ADP reconstruction. (d) FSC curves of four MT-bound motors. (e) Plot for the full-length dynein bound to MTs in different conformations (two stable heads, one stable trailing head, and one stable leading head).
Extended Data Fig. 4 Cryo-EM analysis of dynein in ATP-Vi and AMPPNP conditions.
(a) Cartoon schematic depicting the experimental method for cryo-EM analysis of full-length dynein in different nucleotide conditions. (b) Typical cryo-EM micrographs of dynein in different nucleotide conditions, with total number of micrographs shown in the panel. (c, d, e) FSC curves and local resolution analysis of dynein in ATP-Vi, AMPPNP-low Mg2+, and AMPPNP-high Mg2+ conditions.
Extended Data Fig. 5 Cryo-EM analysis of dynein in ADP and apo conditions and dynein-bound to microtubules.
(a, b) FSC curves and local resolution analysis of dynein in ADP and apo conditions. (c) FSC curves and local resolution analysis of dynein-bound to microtubules.
Extended Data Fig. 6 The conformational landscapes of active cycle motor domains in different nucleotide conditions.
(a-f) Conformation landscapes of motor domains in ATP, ATP-Vi, AMPPNP, ADP, and apo conditions. Arrows indicate mechanochemical pathways. Percentages indicate the proportion of particles in each state. The missing states in each condition are shown in grey. Phi dynein is not included in this figure.
Extended Data Fig. 8 Structural comparisons of MT-bound and -unbound dynein motors.
(a) Comparison between MT-dynein in apo condition with state-8 motor domain. (b) Comparison between MT-dynein in ADP condition with state-7 motor domains. (c) Comparison between MT-dynein in AMPPNP condition with state-7 motor domains. The nucleotide states in AAA1, AAA3, and AAA4 and the linker docking mode are listed. The MT-bound dynein motor domains (from linker to C-terminus) were used as references for structural fitting in ChimeraX.
Extended Data Fig. 9 Systematic analysis of linker-ring interactions among four MT-bound motor domains.
(a) Cartoon and molecular models showing the interaction interfaces including linker-AAA2L, linker-AAA5L, and linker-AAA3-4-connector helix. (b-e) Comparison of linker docking modes between dynein-1 and outer-arm dynein.
Extended Data Fig. 10 Structural survey of motor domains and statistical analysis of crosstalk between AAA1 and AAA3.
(a) Flowchart of structural survey of 56 motor domain structures. (b) Statistical graphs showing how AAA1 communicates to AAA3, linker and MTBD. (c) Statistical graphs showing how AAA3 communicates to AAA1, linker and MTBD. (d) Cartoon model summarizing communication between AAA1, AAA3, linker and MTBD.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Notes 1–5, Figs. 1 and 2 and Tables 1–8.
Supplementary Data 1
Features of the motor domains in different states.
Supplementary Data 2
Structural survey of the dynein 1 motor domains.
Supplementary Video 1
High-resolution cryo-EM map of phi dynein and representative local density maps.
Supplementary Video 2
High-resolution cryo-EM reconstruction of dynein bound to MTs.
Supplementary Video 3
The release of Pi from dynein AAA1 through the backdoor mechanism, triggering the linker straightening.
Supplementary Video 4
Communication between AAA1 pocket dynamics and MTBD.
Supplementary Video 5
The forward-stepping mechanism of dynein along MTs.
Source data
Source Data Fig. 1
Statistical source data (dynein conformational distribution).
Source Data Fig. 2
Statistical source data (ATPase values).
Source Data Fig. 3
Statistical source data (single-molecule motility data).
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Chai, P., Yang, J., Geohring, I.C. et al. The mechanochemical cycle of reactive full-length human dynein 1. Nat Struct Mol Biol 32, 1383–1395 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-025-01543-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-025-01543-3
This article is cited by
-
Nde1 promotes Lis1 binding to full-length autoinhibited human dynein 1
Nature Chemical Biology (2025)
-
Cryo-EM captures early intermediate steps in dynein activation by LIS1
Nature Communications (2025)
-
Multiple steps of dynein activation by Lis1 visualized by cryo-EM
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology (2025)