Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Protocol
  • Published:

STRAIGHT-IN: a platform for rapidly generating panels of genetically modified human pluripotent stem cell lines

Nature Protocols (2024)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Targeted integration of large DNA cargoes (>10 kb) or genomic replacements in mammalian cells, such as human pluripotent stem cells (hPS cells), remains challenging. Here we describe a platform termed serine and tyrosine recombinase-assisted integration of genes for high-throughput investigation (STRAIGHT-IN) to circumvent this. First, a landing pad cassette is precisely inserted or used to replace specific genomic regions. The site-specific integrase Bxb1 then enables DNA constructs, including those >50 kb, to be integrated into the genome, while Cre recombinase excises auxiliary DNA sequences to prevent postintegrative silencing. Using a strategy whereby the positive selection marker is only expressed if the donor plasmid carrying the payload is correctly targeted, we can obtain 100% enrichment for cells containing the DNA payload. Procedures for expressing Cre efficiently also mean that a clonal isolation step is no longer essential to derive the required genetically modified hPS cells containing the integrated DNA, potentially reducing clonal variability. Furthermore, STRAIGHT-IN facilitates rapid and multiplexed generation of genetically matched hPS cells when multiple donor plasmids are delivered simultaneously. STRAIGHT-IN has various applications, which include integrating complex genetic circuits for synthetic biology, as well as creating panels of hPS cells lines containing, as necessary, hundreds of disease-linked variants for disease modeling and drug discovery. After establishing the hPS cell line containing the landing pad, the entire procedure, including donor plasmid synthesis, takes 1.5–3 months, depending on whether single or multiple DNA payloads are integrated. This protocol only requires the researcher to be skilled in molecular biology and standard cell culture techniques.

Key points

  • STRAIGHT-IN is a method for generating panels of genetically modified human pluripotent stem cell lines. Once a landing pad cassette is precisely inserted, the site-specific integrase Bxb1 enables DNA constructs, including those >50 kb, to be integrated into the genome, while Cre recombinase excises auxiliary DNA sequences.

  • This enables rapid and targeted integration of DNA payloads, irrespective of the size, and is achieved with minimal scarring.

Access through your institution
Buy or subscribe

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Access through your institution

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Overview of LP and donor plasmid constructs, and genomic targeting of the LP.
Fig. 2: Workflow for generating STRAIGHT-IN acceptor hPS cell lines.
Fig. 3: Replacing genomic regions with the STRAIGHT-IN LP.
Fig. 4: Workflow for targeted integration of a donor plasmid carrying a DNA payload into the STRAIGHT-IN acceptor hPS cell line and subsequent enrichment.
Fig. 5: Workflow for Cre recombinase delivery and recovery of hPS cells with excised auxiliary sequences.
Fig. 6: Excising the auxiliary elements improves expression of the transgenes present in the DNA payload.
Fig. 7: ddPCR assays developed for determining LP copy number, quantifying donor plasmid integration and auxiliary element excision.
Fig. 8: Confluency of hPS cells.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The STRAIGHT-IN constructs used in this study are available from Addgene (https://www.addgene.org/Richard_Davis/). The datasets generated and analyzed in this study are provided as Source Data files. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Kumar, M., Keller, B., Makalou, N. & Sutton, R. E. Systematic determination of the packaging limit of lentiviral vectors. Hum. Gene Ther. 12, 1893–1905 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Munoz-Lopez, M. & Garcia-Perez, J. DNA transposons: nature and applications in genomics. Curr. Genomics 11, 115–128 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Ellis, J. Silencing and variegation of gammaretrovirus and lentivirus vectors. Hum. Gene Ther. 16, 1241–1246 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jinek, M. et al. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337, 816–821 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Mali, P. et al. RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science 339, 823–826 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Turan, S., Zehe, C., Kuehle, J., Qiao, J. & Bode, J. Recombinase-mediated cassette exchange (RMCE)–A rapidly expanding toolbox for targeted genomic modifications. Gene 515, 1–27 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brown, W. R. A., Lee, N. C. O., Xu, Z. & Smith, M. C. M. Serine recombinases as tools for genome engineering. Methods 53, 372–379 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Duportet, X. et al. A platform for rapid prototyping of synthetic gene networks in mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 13440–13451 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Davis, R. P. et al. A protocol for removal of antibiotic resistance cassettes from human embryonic stem cells genetically modified by homologous recombination or transgenesis. Nat. Protoc. 3, 1550–1558 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Li, J., Li, Y., Pawlik, K. M., Napierala, J. S. & Napierala, M. A CRISPR–Cas9, Crelox, and Flp-FRT cascade strategy for the precise and efficient integration of exogenous DNA into cellular genomes. CRISPR J. 3, 470–486 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Blanch-Asensio, A. et al. STRAIGHT-IN enables high-throughput targeting of large DNA payloads in human pluripotent stem cells. Cell Rep. Methods 2, 100300 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Blanch-Asensio, A. et al. Generation of AAVS1 and CLYBL STRAIGHT-IN v2 acceptor human iPSC lines for integrating DNA payloads. Stem Cell Res. 66, 102991 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bulcha, J. T., Wang, Y., Ma, H., Tai, P. W. L. & Gao, G. Viral vector platforms within the gene therapy landscape. Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 6, 53 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Vijayachandran, L. S. et al. Gene gymnastics synthetic biology for baculovirus expression vector system engineering. Bioengineered 4, 279–287 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Aulicino, F. et al. Highly efficient CRISPR-mediated large DNA docking and multiplexed prime editing using a single baculovirus. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, 7783–7799 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Rostovskaya, M. et al. Transposon-mediated BAC transgenesis in human ES cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, e150 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Friedman, C. E. et al. CRaTER enrichment for on-target gene editing enables generation of variant libraries in hiPSCs. J. Mol. Cell Cardiol. 179, 60–71 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Iacovino, M. et al. Inducible cassette exchange: a rapid and efficient system enabling conditional gene expression in embryonic stem and primary cells. Stem Cells 29, 1580–1588 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhu, F. et al. DICE, an efficient system for iterative genomic editing in human pluripotent stem cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, e34 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Low, B. E., Hosur, V., Lesbirel, S. & Wiles, M. V. Efficient targeted transgenesis of large donor DNA into multiple mouse genetic backgrounds using bacteriophage Bxb1 integrase. Sci. Rep. 12, 5424 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Brosh, R. et al. A versatile platform for locus-scale genome rewriting and verification. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, 1–11 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tarailo-Graovac, M. et al. The genotypic and phenotypic spectrum of PIGA deficiency. Orphanet. J. Rare Dis. 10, 23 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Rosti, V. et al. Murine embryonic stem cells without pig-a gene activity are competent for hematopoiesis with the PNH phenotype but not for clonal expansion. J. Clin. Investig. 100, 1028–1036 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Yarnall, M. T. N. et al. Drag-and-drop genome insertion of large sequences without double-strand DNA cleavage using CRISPR-directed integrases. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 500–512 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Anzalone, A. V. et al. Programmable deletion, replacement, integration and inversion of large DNA sequences with twin prime editing. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 731–740 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pallarès-Masmitjà, M. et al. Find and cut-and-transfer (FiCAT) mammalian genome engineering. Nat. Commun. 12, 1–9 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Xu, Z. et al. Accuracy and efficiency define Bxb1 integrase as the best of fifteen candidate serine recombinases for the integration of DNA into the human genome. BMC Biotechnol. 13, 1–17 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Durrant, M. G. et al. Systematic discovery of recombinases for efficient integration of large DNA sequences into the human genome. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 488–499 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Oceguera-Yanez, F. et al. Engineering the AAVS1 locus for consistent and scalable transgene expression in human iPSCs and their differentiated derivatives. Methods 101, 43–55 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Concordet, J. P. & Haeussler, M. CRISPOR: intuitive guide selection for CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing experiments and screens. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, W242–W245 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Roberts, B. et al. Systematic gene tagging using CRISPR/Cas9 in human stem cells to illuminate cell organization. Mol. Biol. Cell 28, 2854–2874 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Weber, E., Engler, C., Gruetzner, R., Werner, S. & Marillonnet, S. A modular cloning system for standardized assembly of multigene constructs. PLoS One 6, e16765 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Papapetrou, E. P. & Schambach, A. Gene insertion into genomic safe harbors for human gene therapy. Mol. Ther. 24, 678–684 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Cerbini, T. et al. Transcription activator-like effector nuclease (TALEN)-mediated CLYBL targeting enables enhanced transgene expression and one-step generation of dual reporter human induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) and neural stem cell (NSC) lines. PLoS One 10, 1–18 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Hsu, P. D. et al. DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 827–832 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang, H. X., Zhang, Y. & Yin, H. Genome editing with mRNA encoding ZFN, TALEN, and Cas9. Mol. Ther. 27, 735–746 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Vallone, V. F. et al. Methods for automated single cell isolation and sub-cloning of human pluripotent stem cells. Curr. Protoc. Stem Cell Biol. 55, e123 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Jacquot, S., Chartoire, N., Piguet, F., Hérault, Y. & Pavlovic, G. Optimizing PCR for mouse genotyping: recommendations for reliable, rapid, cost effective, robust and adaptable to high-throughput genotyping protocol for any type of mutation. Curr. Protoc. Mouse Biol. 9, e65 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Fu, J., Teucher, M., Anastassiadis, K., Skarnes, W. & Stewart, A. F. A recombineering pipeline to make conditional targeting constructs. Meth. Enzymol. vol. 477, 125–144 (2010).

  40. Wang, H. et al. Improved seamless mutagenesis by recombineering using ccdB for counterselection. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, e37 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Matreyek, K. A., Stephany, J. J., Chiasson, M. A., Hasle, N. & Fowler, D. M. An improved platform for functional assessment of large protein libraries in mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, e1 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Cabrera, A. et al. The sound of silence: transgene silencing in mammalian cell engineering. Cell Syst. 13, 950–973 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Johnstone, C. P. & Galloway, K. E. Supercoiling-mediated feedback rapidly couples and tunes transcription. Cell Rep. 41, 111492 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Ludwig, T. E. et al. ISSCR standards for the use of human stem cells in basic research. Stem Cell Reports 18, 1744–1752 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Capes-Davis, A. et al. Match criteria for human cell line authentication: where do we draw the line? Int. J. Cancer 132, 2510–2519 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Baker, D. et al. Detecting genetic mosaicism in cultures of human pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cell Rep. 7, 998–1012 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Assou, S. et al. Recurrent genetic abnormalities in human pluripotent stem cells: definition and routine detection in culture supernatant by targeted droplet digital PCR. Stem Cell Rep. 14, 1–8 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Miller, L. R. et al. Considering sex as a biological variable in preclinical research. FASEB J. 31, 29–34 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Crossley, B. M. et al. Guidelines for Sanger sequencing and molecular assay monitoring. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 32, 767–775 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. McIntire, E., Taapken, S., Leonhard, K. & Larson, A. L. Genomic stability testing of pluripotent stem cells. Curr. Protoc. Stem Cell Biol. 52, e107 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Adewumi, O. et al. Characterization of human embryonic stem cell lines by the International Stem Cell Initiative. Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 803–816 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Allison, T. F. et al. Assessment of established techniques to determine developmental and malignant potential of human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Commun. 9, 1925 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Bell, A. D., Usher, C. L. & McCarroll, S. A. Analyzing copy number variation with droplet digital PCR. Meth. Mol. Biol. 1768, 143–160 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the LUMC hiPSC Hotel for co-ordinating the distribution of the Acceptor hiPS cell lines, N. Geijsen for providing Cas9 protein and F. Stewart for sharing plasmids and bacterial strains for recombineering. This work was supported by the Netherlands Organ-on-Chip Initiative, a Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Gravitation project funded by the Ministry of Education, Culture, and Science of the government of the Netherlands (024.003.001), a Starting Grant (STEMCARDIORISK; grant agreement no. 638030) from the European Research Council, a VIDI fellowship from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; ILLUMINATE; no. 91715303) and a ZonMw PSIDER consortium grant (no. 10250022120002; GREAT). The Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Stem Cell Medicine (reNEW) is supported by a Novo Nordisk Foundation grant (NNF21CC0073729).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anatomy and Embryology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands

    Albert Blanch-Asensio, Catarina Grandela, Christine L. Mummery & Richard P. Davis

  2. The Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Stem Cell Medicine (reNEW), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands

    Albert Blanch-Asensio, Christine L. Mummery & Richard P. Davis

Authors
  1. Albert Blanch-Asensio
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Catarina Grandela
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christine L. Mummery
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Richard P. Davis
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

A.B.-A. developed and optimized some of the protocols described in this manuscript, designed and performed the experiments, analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. C.G. developed and optimized some of the protocols described in this manuscript, contributed to drafting the manuscript and revised it for important intellectual content. C.L.M. acquired some of the funding and revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. R.P.D. developed, designed and supervised the protocol, acquired some of the funding and wrote and revised the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard P. Davis.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

C.L.M. is a cofounder of Pluriomics BV (now Ncardia BV) and has advisory roles in HeartBeat.bio AG, Angios GmBH, Mogrify Limited and Sartorius AG. C.L.M. and R.P.D. declare research funding from Sartorius AG; however, this is for an unrelated study. A.B.-A. and C.G. declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Protocols thanks Alessandro Bertero, Ran Brosh and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Related links

Key references using this protocol

Blanch-Asensio, A. et al. Cell Rep. Methods 2, 100300 (2022): https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CRMETH.2022.100300

Blanch-Asensio, A. et al. Stem Cell Res. 66, 102991 (2023): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scr.2022.102991

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–3, Note, Procedures 1–5 and Table 1.

Supplementary Data 1

ddPCR source data for Supplementary Fig. 3.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 6

Flow cytometry and ddPCR source data.

Source Data Fig. 7

ddPCR source data.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Blanch-Asensio, A., Grandela, C., Mummery, C.L. et al. STRAIGHT-IN: a platform for rapidly generating panels of genetically modified human pluripotent stem cell lines. Nat Protoc (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-024-01039-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-024-01039-2

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research