Correction to: Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92100-7, published online 17 June 2021


The original version of this Article contained errors in Figure 3, where the x-axis label for the graph showing “Patients (%) with a good outcome” was obstructed by an image element.


The original Figure 3 and accompanying legend appear below.

Figure 3
figure 3

Proportions of a good outcome and adjusted odds ratios for a good outcome according to onset-to-reperfusion time (ORT) categories in each age subgroup. The proportion of a good outcome (defined as mRS score ≤ 2) was lower in the delayed ORT categories than in those with ORT < 180 min in each age subgroup, although the association was marginal in patients aged ≥ 80 years.


The original Article has been corrected.