Introduction

The field of nanotechnology has emerged as an important protagonist in multiple domains, including biomedical research1,2,3, catalytic processes4, metal sensing5. Nanoparticles (NPs) have drawn a lot of attention due to their large surface-to-volume ratio and extremely small size, which falls in the nanometer range6,7. Nanotechnology has the potential to make significant contributions to the domains of drugs, agriculture, and curative diagnostics8. Among metal NPs, gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) are the subject of greater research, because of their distinctive medical, mechanical, electrical, size-dependent, and magnetic properties9. Antioxidant, antibacterial, targeted drug delivery, anticancer, antimycotic, and other uses have been made of metals such as silver, gold, and selenium and their oxides. AuNPs are synthesized by physical, chemical, and biological synthesis techniques10. As a result of the physical and chemical methods need specialized equipment and synthesis settings, use of hazardous chemicals, high energy consumption, and the release of toxic chemicals with hazardous byproducts, considered as unfavorable3,11. In contrast, the green synthesis methods are thought to be non-toxic, inexpensive, and ecologically benign12,13.

Due to their cost-effective, lack of toxicity, and green chemistry foundation, the biological synthesis of AuNPs employing plants, algae, fungi, and microbes, minimizes the drawbacks of the aforementioned approaches14. The biosynthesis of AuNPs using plants is attracting more researchers since the phytoconstituents of plant extract act as both reducing and stabilizing agents. Many plant extracts have potent phytoconstituents that facilitate sustained AuNPs synthesis for drug delivery, antibacterial, antioxidant, anticancer, and photochemical dye degradation. As reported in earlier research, multiple plant materials have been utilized to synthesized NPs15. It was observed that stable AuNPs synthesized using B. hispida peel extract with antibacterial and anticancer properties16. Additionally, it has been reported that curcumin from Curcuma pseudomontana produces AuNPs that have been used as antibacterial and anti-inflammatory agent. The synthesized AuNPs have been stable for up to five months17. Similarly, extracts from the leaves of Populas alba, Lantum camara, Hibiscus arboreus, and M. oleifera were utilized to synthesized stable AuNPs that shown potent antioxidant and antibacterial properties as well as the ability to photodegrade dyes18,19. The syntheses and stabilization of nanoparticles are facilitated by phytoconstituents, primarily flavonoids, according to earlier study20.

E. diffusum D. is the sole living representative of family Equisetaceae, native to Himalaya mountains and popularly referred to as the "Himalayan horse tail"21. E. diffusum is one of the most common medicinal plants with therapeutic qualities. E. diffusum D has been previously reported in the treatment of the bone fracture, kidney troubles22, diuretic effect23, bone dislocation24, fever, gonorrhea, urinary troubles, arthritis, as a cooling medicine25, scabies, skin disease26. The aim of the current study was to synthesize AuNPs using green synthesis approach. In addition, the green synthesized AuNPs were thoroughly characterized by different analytical and spectroscopic techniques and then evaluated the biological activities of the green synthesized AuNPs as antimicrobial, anticancer, antioxidant and antidiabetic agents.

Materials and methods

Materials

Samples of Equisetum diffusum were collected from the North Waziristan Tribal district, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. A botanist (Ms. Naima Huma Naveed), Assistant Professor from the Department of Botany, University of Sargodha, Punjab, Pakistan, identified and authenticated the plant sample. The voucher number (SARGU/CHEM-027), was assigned to the plant specimen and then deposited to the herbarium (University of Sargodha-SARGU), Department of Botany, University of Sargodha, Punjab, Pakistan. HAuCl4 (Sigma-Aldrich®), DPPH (Sigma-Aldrich®), ethanol (Sigma-Aldrich®), and Mueller Hinton agar (Oxide) were procured from the local market. All chemicals were of analytical grade, and no additional purification was required. The solutions were prepared and the extractions were carried out using deionized water (DH2O). Bacterial strains were obtained from the Biochemistry Lab at, Institute of Chemistry, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Pakistan.

Extraction of aqueous extract

Freshly collected E. diffusum sample were thoroughly washed with tap and deionized water to remove any impurities. Then cut into small pieces, and shade-dried for 12 days, following a the method described by Assad et al.27. The plant material was finely ground into a superfine powder using a pestle and mortar. To prepare the plant powder suspension, 10 g of the powdered material were mixed with 200 mL of deionized water (DH2O) and stirred at room temperature for 5 h. The mixture was then filtered through Whatman No. 42 filter paper. The resulting filtrate was poured into a Petri dish and allowed to dry completely for 24 h at 45 °C in an air-drying oven. Once fully dried, the extract was carefully collected from the Petri dish and stored in an Eppendorf tube for later use.

Green synthesis of AuNPs

For biosynthesis of AuNPs, 1 mM chloroauric acid (HAuCl4) was prepared by dissolving 33.97 mg in 100 mL DH2O. E. diffusum D extract and HAuCl4 solution were subjected to assessment in combination ratio 2:8, following the protocol of Geetha et al.28. The reaction mixture was stirrer for 10 min on hotplate at 60 °C. Within 10 min, the process of reducing gold ions to AuNPs was completed. As AuNPs develop the solution’s color changes from light yellow to ruby red. The synthesized AuNPs was centrifuge at 10,000 rpm for 20 min and then dried at 45 °C for 24 h as shown in Fig. 1. Then the dried sample was stored in Eppendorf tube and mentioned as ED@AuNPs. The decrease of metal ion concentration was carefully monitored using both visual examination and measurements by various analytical and spectroscopic techniques.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Preparation of AuNPs via green methodology.

Characterization

Biosynthesized ED@AuNPs was studied by recording their UV–vis absorption spectra at 300 to 800 nm using a Shimadzu UV-1800 spectrophotometer. Functional group starching as well as plant molecule functional groups on the particles surfaces were analyzed with, Fourier transform infrared spectrum (Shimadzu FTIR 8400S) in range of 4000–400 cm−1 region using the KBr pellets technique. The XRD analysis (JDX3532, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) was used to analyzed ED@AuNPs phases identity and crystalline size. The scanning electron microscopy technique (Carbon Sticker No. G3347) Plano, (Wetzlar, Germany) was used to study the morphological aspects, and EDX was used to assess the elemental spectrum of ED@AuNPs. The interface charges were studied using zeta potential, and their size was evaluated using a zeta size distribution analyzer (Malvern Zetasizer Nano ZS).

Antibacterial activity

For testing the antibacterial activity of biosynthesized ED@AuNPs, following methodology established by Afzal et al., (2024) with a few changes was employed29. Mueller Hinton agar (9.6 g, Oxoid) was dissolved in 160 mL of deionized water. Both the agar solution and Petri plates were sterilized in an autoclave at 121 °C for 20 min. The sterilized, MH agar medium was cooled to 50 °C, and about 25 mL was carefully poured into each Petri plate under aseptic conditions. The plates were then left at room temperature for 20 min to allow the agar to solidify before use. Pure strains were sub cultured on MH agar with in a rotating shaker set at 200 rpm at 37 °C. Following the streak plate procedure, the following bacterial strains were introduced into each Petri dish: Staphylococcus epidermidis (ATCC 12228), Listeria monocytogenes (ATCC 13932), Staphylococcus aureus (ATTC 9144), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 10145), Bordetella bronchiseptica (ATTC 4617), and Escherichia coli strain (ATCC 10536). Five wells were created using a cork borer after spreading bacterial strains, and were labelled according to alphabetical order. The following sample were added to each well of the Petri dishes: (A) 30 µg/mL of ciprofloxacin (positive controls), (B) 20 µg/mL of ED@AuNPs, (C) 30 µg/mL ED@AuNPs, (D) 40 µg/mL of ED@AuNPs and (E) DH2O (negative control). The dishes were thereafter put in an incubator set at 37 °C for 24 h. The whole procedure was carried out under controlled laboratory settings using a laminar flow cabinet. Values were shown as the mean ± standard deviation and the antibacterial activity was tested in triplicate.

The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of green-synthesized ED@AuNPs was assessed using the standard method outlined by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)30. To assess the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of ED@AuNPs, tested against six bacterial strains, including Gram-positive species (S. epidermidis, L. monocytogenes, S. aureus) and Gram-negative species (P. aeruginosa, B. bronchiseptica, E. coli). The bacterial strains were cultured in Mueller–Hinton (MH) broth at 37 °C with orbital agitation (200 rpm) for 24 h. Using optical density calibration, was standardized the inocula to a density of 1 × 10⁸ CFU/mL. To determine MIC values, the broth microdilution method, exposing bacteria to ED@AuNPs at concentrations ranging from 10 to 80 μg/mL was performed. For negative controls, nutrient broth supplemented with 80 μg/mL of ED@AuNPs, while positive controls contained only bacterial cultures in nutrient broth. Then incubated all test and control tubes at 37 °C for 24 h. After incubation, identified the MIC as the lowest ED@AuNPs concentration that completely prevented visible bacterial growth, based on optical clarity or turbidity measurements.

Anticancer activity

Cell culture

Hepatic carcinomas (HePG2) cells were procured from the American Type Culture Collections Virginia(USA). The cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and 20 uL/mL of penicillin and streptomycin. The cultures were kept in a humidified environment with 5% CO2 for an incubation period of 37 °C.

MTT cytotoxic assay

For cell culture, 96 well plates were used to cultivate 1 × 106 HePG2 cells. Then subjected the cells to an overnight incubation period before introducing varying quantities of PPGE along with PPE (200, 150, 100, 50, 20, and 10 µg/mL). The + ive control group took taxol, whereas the negative control group used unpolished media. After 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h 20 µg/mL of the MTT solution was added to each well and let it incubate for 4 h. In order to get exact results, we created three separate wells. The absorbance was measured using an ELISA reader to measure absorbance at two different wavelengths, 540 nm and 690 nm, after 100 µL of DMSO was added. The ED@AuNPs cytotoxicity was evaluated by comparing the absorbing capacity of control and treated cells using the provided formula (Eq. 1):

$${\text{\% Cytotoxicity}} = \left( {\frac{{Absorbance \;of\; treated \;cells\left( {A1} \right)}}{{absorbance \;of \;negative \;control \left( {AO} \right) }}} \right) \times 100$$
(1)

Antidiabetic activity

Starch hydrolysis

Starch hydrolysis was assess by observing the inhibitory zone on Petri plates, by following the method explained by Khan et al.1 with minimal modifications. On agar plates with 1.5% agar and 1% starch by weight, four holes were punched using a cork borer. As a control, well (A) was supplemented with an Aspergillus oryzae α-amylase mixture (EC 3.2.1.1) with 2 U/mL in a phosphate buffer solution (pH 6.9). In well B standard (Acarbose) (20, 30 µg/mL) and α-amylase, (C) ED@AuNPs (20, 30 µg/mL) and α-amylase and (D) ED extract (20, 30 µg/mL) and α-amylase, were mixed respectively. To quantify α-amylase activity, starch was stained using 0.5 mM I2 in 3% KI after 72 h incubation at 37 °C for 15 min. The hydrolyzed zone radius surrounding the wells was used to quantify the inhibitory results and measured in millimeter (mm). Results were presented as a percentage using (Eq. 2):

$$\% \; \alpha - amylase\; inhibition = \left( {\frac{diameter \;of\; control - diameter\; of\; sample)}{{diameter\; of\; the \;control }}} \right) \times 100$$
(2)

Enzyme kinetics

In order to conduct the amylase inhibition experiment, few adjustments to the standard operating procedure as stated in31 were employed. The mixture consisted of ED@AuNPs (ranging from 10 to 30 µg/mL) and 250 µg/L of amylase (0.4 U/mL) in a 0.02 M phosphate buffered solution (PBS) with a pH of 6.9 and 0.06 M sodium acetate. Adding 250 µL of starch solution 1% (w/v) in 0.02 M PBS with a pH of 6.9 and incubated for 10 min at 37 °C, and followed by another 30 min of incubation. After mixing 250 µL of dinitrosalicylic acid coloring reagent (DNS 96 mM, 30% Na–K tartrate, 0.4 M NaOH), the mixture was heated in a boiling water bath for 10 min to halt the reaction. After cooling to room temperature and diluted with to 2 mL PBS, absorbance was recorded at 540 nm.

The following formula was used to obtain the percentage of inhibition (Eq. 3):

$${\text{\% }}\;{\text{ inhibition}} = \left( {\frac{K - S)}{{K }}} \right) \times 100$$
(3)

K = Absorption of negative controls; S = Absorbance of sample/Absorbance of positive control.

Antioxidant activity

FRAP assay

FRAP assay was carried out following the protocol outlined by Shobha et al.32 with minor modifications. A solution was prepared by mixing 2.5 mL of sodium phosphate buffer (0.2 M, pH 6.6) with 2.5 mL of 1% potassium ferricyanide. Then added varying concentrations of ED@AuNPs solution, ranging from 100 to 500 µg/mL. The mixture was incubated at 50 °C for 20 min. After incubation, added 10% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid and centrifuged the solution at 3000 rpm for 10 min. Then collected the supernatant and treated it with 2.5 mL of deionized water and 0.1% ferric chloride solution. Subsequently measured the absorbance of the solution at 700 nm using a Shimadzu UV-1800 spectrophotometer. The antioxidant potential of FRAP was calculated using the following equation (Eq. 4).

$$\text{X}=\left(\frac{y)}{0.0027 }\right) R2=0.9801$$
(4)

DPPH assay

Based on the approach described by Assad et al.27 briefly 1 mL methanolic DPPH (0.1 mM) solution of ED@AuNPs at concentrations ranging between 100 to 500 µg mL−1. After all the components were well mixed, the solutions were incubated at room temperature for 30 min in a dark chamber. A Shimadzu UV-1800 spectrophotometer with the wavelength set to 517 nm was used in order to ascertain the absorbance. Equation (Eq. 5) was used to determine the antioxidant potential of DPPH.

$${\text{\% RSA}} = \left( {\frac{Absorbance\; of\; control\; 517 - absorbance\; of \;sample \;517) }{{absorbance\; of \;control \;517}}} \right) \times 100$$
(5)

Statistical analysis

Results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Origin Pro version 2021, and Office Excel 2016, were used for statistical analysis.

Results and discussion

Green synthesis of ED@AuNPs

The biosynthesis of AuNPs using E. diffusum extract involves a bioreduction process that is mediated through the phytochemicals of the plant19. The naturally occurring phytochemicals like flavonoids, terpenoids, and phenolic acids serve to act as reducing and stabilizing agents for the synthesis27. The mixing of extract of E. diffusum with chloroauric acid (HAuCl₄) solution, the phytochemicals reduce the gold ions (Au3⁺) by transferring electrons to them, converting into neutral gold atoms (Au⁰)33. The reaction is marked by a color change of the solution, typically ruby red or purple, as a sign of AuNP formation. The neutral gold atoms associate and create small clusters, which act as nucleation sites. As reduction proceeds, more Au atoms are deposited onto these clusters, and NPs growth occurs. The same phytochemicals that cause reduction also adsorb onto the surface of the newly formed AuNPs to form a capping layer. The capping layer prevents clumping of the NPs and renders them stable and well-dispersed in the solution. Mechanism of biosynthesis of AuNPs and reduction by phytochemicals are shown in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Mechanism of AuNPs green synthesis and phytochemicals involved in the reduction of Au ions.

UV–vis spectroscopy of green synthesized ED@AuNPs

A distinctive peak at 523 nm was observed in the UV–Vis absorption spectra of green synthesized ED@AuNPs. This peak represents the surface Plasmon resonance (SPR)19,34. The presence of a peak at 523 nm in current investigation is indicative of the stable and uniformly sized gold nanoparticles formed as shown in Fig. 3. As the visible range is dominated by the SPR band of AuNPs, the observed diminishing intensity at larger wavelengths is in agreement with their expected behavior, indicating that the ED@AuNPs synthesis was effective and efficient. In previous study AuNPs were synthesized using Ulva lactuca L. extract from red algae, and a significant LSPR band was observed in the spectra at 529 nm35. In another study Botteon et al.36 observed LSPR band at 523 nm.

Fig. 3
figure 3

UV–vis spectroscopy of E. diffusum mediated green synthesized ED@AuNPs.

XRD analysis

Different peaks of diffraction at 38.4°, 44.4°, 56.6°, 64.6°, as well as 77.5° were observed in the XRD pattern of the green synthesized ED@AuNPs as shown in Fig. 4A. These peaks corresponded roughly to the (111), (200), (210), (220), and (311) crystal structure planes of cubic face-centered (FCC) gold, respectively37. These distinctive peaks validate that the biosynthesized AuNPs are crystalline in structure. Possible secondary phases or contaminants, such as leftover plant biomolecules from the green synthesis process, were indicated by minor peaks with asterisk-marked. In general, the XRD pattern confirms that AuNPs possess high crystalline nature. Our results were in good agreement with previous reported literature38. The average crystallite size (42.66 nm) of the biosynthesized ED@AuNPs was calculated using Scherrer’s equation (Eq. 6)

$$D=\frac{k\lambda }{\beta Cos\theta }$$
(6)

where D = Crystal size (nm), K = Scherrer constant (dimensionless, typically 0.9), λ = X-ray wavelength (typically 1.5406 Å for Cu–Kα), β = Full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the diffraction peak (radians), θ = Bragg’s diffraction angle (in radians).

Fig. 4
figure 4

(A) Xrd analysis of green synthesized ED@AuNPs, (B) FTIR spectrum of E. diffusum D extract and green synthesized ED@AuNPs.

Dislocation density (δ) represents the number of dislocations present in a crystal structure per unit volume. The dislocation density (δ) of the biosynthesized ED@AuNPs is approximately 5.49 × 1014 lines/m2. Dislocation density (δ) was determined using the following equation (Eq. 7):

$$\updelta =\frac{1}{D2}$$
(7)

where δ = dislocation density (lines/m2), D = crystallite size (nm).

For ED@AuNPs, the calculated dislocation density (δ = 5.49 × 1014 lines/m2) suggests a moderately crystalline structure with some natural defects. This finding indicates that the biosynthesized NPs have high crystallinity, with minor imperfections likely resulting from the green synthesis process, such as residual biomolecules or lattice strain. The observed dislocation density reflects structural stability, making ED@AuNPs well-suited for applications in catalysis, biosensing, and biomedical fields, where controlled crystallinity is essential for optimal performance.

FTIR analysis of biosynthesized ED@AuNPs

The FTIR spectra show a comparison of the plant extract (ED Extract) with the green synthesized ED@AuNPs as shown in Fig. 4B. Several noticeable peaks can be seen regarding the ED Extract spectrum. The first among these is a wide range at 3485.56 cm⁻1, which is related to O–H vibrations of stretching released by hydroxyl groups39. The other two peaks, at 2906.94 cm⁻1 alongside 1668.51 cm⁻3, are linked to C–H stretching vibrations and C=O stretching vibrations, respectively, released by carbonyl groups. The reduction and stabilization of the AuNPs are accomplished by these functional groups found in the plant extract. ED@AuNPs spectrum shows few changes and new peaks, like at 2937.38 cm⁻3 and 1102.92 cm⁻3. This shows that ED@AuNPs and phytochemicals from the plant extract are interacting with each other, as shown in Table 1. These changes show that the plant extract effectively stabilized and capped the ED@AuNPs. Furthermore, the signal at 609.23 cm⁻1 provides further evidence that ED@AuNPs were synthesized and stabilized using environmentally friendly processes, since it implies the establishment of Au-O bonds.

Table 1 FTIR analysis of ED@AuNPs and ED extract.

SEM analysis

The size distribution histogram and scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of the green synthesized ED@AuNPs provide insight details about their shape and dimensions. The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image at 10,000 × magnification reveals a population of NPs, that is evenly distributed and has very little aggregation as shown in Fig. 5A. According to the histogram, the ED@AuNPs typically vary in size from 60 to 80 nm (nm), and the average diameter is 68.85 ± 0.96 nm, as shown in Fig. 5B. The effectiveness of the biological molecules in plants extraction in limiting excessive particle development or aggregation is supported by the minute presence of bigger particles, which shows that they are effectively capped and stabilized. Results from scanning electron microscopy (SEM) show that green synthesis successfully produced stable, appropriately sized NPs. Ghafoor et al.40 study, pineapple extract for green synthesis of AuNPs. The NPs were nearly spherical in shape, with particle sizes ranging from 20 to 70 nm, as evident from the SEM analysis.

Fig. 5
figure 5

(A) SEM analysis of green synthesized ED@AuNPs, (B) average size distribution histogram of ED@AuNPs, (C) EDX spectra of green synthesize ED@AuNPs.

EDX analysis

Elements present in the sample were confirmed by the EDX spectra of green synthsized ED@AuNPs as shown in Fig. 5C. The presence of noticeable peaks approximately 2.1 keV, 9.7 keV, and 11.4 keV for gold (Au) suggests that the production of ED@AuNPs was effective. Elements including silicon (Si), oxygen (O), carbon (C), and chlorine (Cl) are presumably derived from the plant extracts used in a green synthesis method, and peaks for these elements are also seen alongside gold. The existence of these extra components points to organic compounds that are stabilizing and encasing the ED@AuNPs. Potassium, sodium, and calcium found in the extract could be due to contaminants or lingering biomolecules. The production of ED@AuNPs and the role of biomolecules derived from plants in stabilizing them were both confirmed by the EDX study.

Dynamic light scattering analysis of ED@AuNPs

The dynamic light scattering (DLS) data shown in Fig. 6A, show how the green manufactured ED@AuNPs are spread out in terms of size. The measurement of an average particle size of 98.27 ± 2.8 nm suggests that the sizes of the nanoparticles are distributed very uniformly with little fluctuation. Applications requiring consistent particle behavior would benefit greatly from the green synthesis method’s ability to generate nanoparticles with constant sizes, as shown by the narrow peak in the particle size distribution. The plant extract effectively caps and stabilizes the mixture, preventing bigger aggregates from forming, which is reflected in its consistency.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Dynamic light scattering analysis of green synthesized ED@AuNPs, (A) zeta sizer, (B) zeta potential.

In Fig. 6B, the Zeta Potential Distribution measures the surface charge of the nanoparticles and provides insight into their stability in suspension. The Zeta potential of the gold nanoparticles is recorded as − 28.89 ± 0.78 mV, which indicates good colloidal stability. A Zeta potential with a high absolute value (either positive or negative) suggests that the nanoparticles are unlikely to aggregate due to electrostatic repulsion. The negative Zeta potential observed here suggests that the particles are well-dispersed and stable in solution, with a low likelihood of agglomeration, making them suitable for various biological and chemical applications.

Antibacterial activity of green synthesized ED@AuNPs

The misuse of antibiotics has become a prominent issue in recent years. Antibiotics released into the environment negatively impact bacteria in ecosystems, along with aquatic organisms, soil organisms, and plants. bacteria have the ability to become resistant to drugs, which may cause the rise of multi drug resistant (MDR) strains, often called "super bacteria." They can produce inactivating enzymes and hinder drugs by altering cytomembrane permeability41. Over 70% of bacteria currently demonstrate resistance to one or more antibiotics42. This necessitates an increase in antibiotic dosages by physicians, which may result in adverse reactions Fig. 7.

There is an urgent need to identify alternative materials to antibiotics for antibacterial applications. Research indicates that nanomaterial exhibit considerable antibacterial activity43. The elevated specific surface area enables nanoscale particles to attach significant amounts of functional ligands or serve as carriers for other active substances, thereby improving their interaction with target bacteria44.

As demonstrated in Fig. 8, green synthesized gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) exhibited antibacterial properties. Both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria were susceptible to the antibacterial effects of ED@AuNPs. Different concentrations of ED@AuNPs, shown by (a) (20 µg/mL) a positive control ciprofloxacin, (b) 20 µg/mL, (c) 30 µg/mL, (d) 40 µg/mL, ED@AuNPs and (e) negative control DH2O respectively, in each well, show that the ED@AuNPs have antibacterial activity. Larger zones surrounding the wells show higher antibacterial effects of the ED@AuNPs, whereas smaller zones show no inhibition of bacterial growth at all. The zones of inhibition against several bacterial strains, comprising S. epidermidis L. monocytogenes, S. aureus P. aeruginosa, B. bronchiseptica and E. coli, are measured in millimeters (mm) with respect to Fig. 7. Inhibition zones varied from approximately 24 to 35 mm throughout several strains and concentrations of AuNPs, as seen by the graph, demonstrating their strong antibacterial activities (Fig. 8). At 20 µg/mL, the zones of inhibition against S. epidermidis, L. monocytogenes, S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, B. bronchiseptica and E. coli, were 33, 33, 26, 31, 29, and 24 mm, respectively. Specifically, at a concentration of 30 µg/mL, the inhibition zones against S. epidermidis L. monocytogenes, S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, B. bronchiseptica and E. coli were 33, 36, 30, 33, 31, and 24 mm in that configuration. The zone of inhibition against S. epidermidis (35 mm), L. monocytogenes (37 mm), S. aureus (31 mm), P. aeruginosa (34 mm), B. bronchiseptica (33 mm), and E. coli (24 mm) at a concentration of 40 µg/mL. In compared to the positive control, erythromycin, our findings held up well across all concentrations. E. coli has the smallest inhibition zone, suggesting a relatively weak antibacterial response, in comparison with S. epidermidis, L. monocytogenes and P. aeruginosa, which all have bigger inhibition zones. Green produced AuNPs have a broad-spectrum antibacterial effect, as these studies show.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Antibacterial activity of green synthesize ED@AuNPs again both gram positive and gram negative bacterial strains, (A), S. epidermidis (B), L. monocytogenes, (C), S. aureus (D), P. aeruginosa, (E), B. bronchiseptica and (F), E. coli: (a) 30 µg/mL, positive control, (b) 20 µg/mL ED@AuNPs, (c) 30 µg/mL ED@AuNPs and (d) 40 µg/mL ED@AuNPs and (e) Negative control DH2O.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Graphical representation of antibacterial activity of green synthesize ED@AuNPs, (a) 30 µg/mL, positive control, (b) 20 µg/mL ED@AuNPs, (c) 30 µg/mL ED@AuNPs and (d) 40 µg/mL ED@AuNPs.

MIC of ED@AuNPs

The MICs of ED@AuNPs against the six bacterial species were estimated using the broth dilution method. The MIC was calculated by co-culturing bacteria for 24 h with different concentrations from 80 to 10 μg/mL, ED@AuNPs. The MIC is the lowest concentration at which the bacterial growth is completely inhibited. ED@AuNPs exhibited a MIC of 40 µg/mL against, S. epidermidis, 30 µg/mL against, L. monocytogenes, 50 µg/mL against, S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, B. bronchiseptica respectively and 60 µg/mL against, E. coli, (Table 2). Gram-positive bacteria showed greater susceptibility to ED@AuNPs compared to Gram-negative bacteria, as shown by the results of the antimicrobial susceptibility test. The size and zeta potential of AuNPs are important factors in their ability to penetrate the cell membrane and effectively killing the bacteria45,46. More specifically, the antibacterial activity of smaller ED@AuNPs is enhanced due to their smaller size and larger surface area compared to their larger counterparts. Moreover, the spherical shape of AuNPs is crucial for their absorption, which leads to cell death of microbes47.

Table 2 MIC (+ turbidity,—clarity) and ZOI of ED@AuNPs against gram positive and gram negative bacterial strains.

Anticancer activity

The anti-cancer activity of ED@AuNPs was evaluated by the MTT cytotoxic assay against liver carcinoma (HePG2) cells cultured in DMEM medium supplemented with FBS and antibiotics. The assay measured cell viability after treatment with a series of concentrations of ED@AuNPs (10–200 µg/mL) for 24 h. The absorbance of treated and control cells was recorded at 540 nm and 690 nm, respectively, using an ELISA reader. The results expressed dose-dependent cytotoxicity of ED@AuNPs against HePG2 cells. At low concentrations (10 µg/mL), comparatively high cell viability (71.28%) was observed, indicating low cytotoxicity. It indicates that at low doses, the nanoparticles may have fewer influences on the metabolic activity of cells, in line with possible applications requiring biocompatibility. When the concentration is raised, however, the notable reduction in the cell viability was observed. At 20 µg/mL, viability was reduced to 66.30%, with subsequent reductions at 50 µg/mL (61.32%) and 100 µg/mL (56.20%). The greatest cytotoxicity was produced by the highest concentration examined, 200 µg/mL, reducing viability to 47.62% as shown in Table 3.

Table 3 Anticancer activity of ED@AuNPs.

Increasing cytotoxicity with increased concentrations highlights the efficacy of ED@AuNPs in inducing metabolic stress in cancer cells, possibly through oxidative stress, membrane destabilization, or interference with cellular pathways. Reproducibility of results, as reflected by low standard deviations (for example, 0.83 at 10 µg/mL and 1.77 at 200 µg/mL), attests to the validity of the assay and reproducibility of results.

The results announce ED@AuNPs to be highly anticancer at elevated doses and can be perfect candidates for hepatic carcinoma therapeutics. Their dose-dependency suggests the potential to realize therapeutic effects through modulating their cytotoxicity to target selectively at desired locations, but with minimal damage to neighboring normal cells. Going forward, effort should be directed to understanding the molecular intricacies of this noted cytotoxicity and also exploring ED@AuNPs’ cancer cells vs. normal cell selectivity. Similar trends were reported by Paul et al.48.

In vitro antidiabetic activity

Starch hydrolysis

Glucose intolerance as a result of inadequate insulin synthesis characterizes the metabolic disease family known as diabetes mellitus. Diabetes mellitus (DM) is thought to affect people all over the globe49. It may be caused by either a hereditary tendency or a learned malfunction of the pancreas, which in turn causes insulin resistance at receptors in the peripheral or a failure of insulin to carry out its intended function50. When insulin isn’t present, the metabolism of a diabetic gets out of hand, leading to an overabundance of carbohydrate, proteins, and fats. The most severe complications of diabetes mellitus include malfunction and failure of many organs as well as consistently high blood glucose levels. Diabetes mellitus (DM) is characterized by persistently high blood sugar levels, which raises microvascular and macro vascular risks of cardiovascular disease, hinders the metabolism of carbohydrates, lipids, and proteins, and causes prolonged damage that ultimately results in organ failure at sites like the renal system, eyes, nerve endings, heart, and vessel walls51,52. Recent estimates put the global diabetes population at about 150 million, with projections showing that figure rising to close to 300 million by the year 2025. over 8.5% of adults had a diabetes diagnosis in 2014, and the disease was a contributing factor in over 1.6 million fatalities in 201753. Pakistan is one of the top ten nations in terms of the prevalence of diabetes, and it ranks seventh globally. Recent estimates put Pakistan’s diabetes prevalence at 7.6–11%; experts predict it will rise to 15% by 2030, putting the country in fourth place globally. Over 700 billion (or 10% more) is spent yearly on diabetes care worldwide, and popular drugs may have negative side effects if taken for too long54. Consequently, less invasive and more natural methods of preventing and treating diabetes are gaining popularity. There are several all-natural medications that can manage glucose metabolism and stop the deterioration of patients’ health, and they’re cheap and safe.

The smaller zone of inhibition indicates stronger enzyme inhibition, showing more effective antidiabetic action. The findings show that the antidiabetic effects of the AuNPs were higher than those of the plant extract and were comparable to the positive control, Acarbose, for two concentrations of green synthesized gold nanoparticles (ED@AuNPs) (20 µg/mL and 30 µg/mL, respectively). Figure 9A (20 µg/mL) shows that the AuNPs (well c) exhibited a zone of inhibition of 20 mm at 41.17% inhibition, which is superior to the 24 mm zone at 29.41% inhibition in the plant extract (well d) and the 18 mm zone at 47.05% inhibition in the positive control Acarbose (well b). Figure 9B (30 µg/mL) shows that the AuNPs (well c) had a 47.05% inhibition zone of 18 mm, which was greater than the plant extract (well d), 23.35% inhibition zone and comparable to the positive control (well b), 55.88% inhibition zone. The results demonstrate that the AuNPs outperform the plant extracts and comparable results to the control group in terms of antidiabetic action, with larger inhibition percentages that render them more efficient in preventing starch hydrolysis. % inhibition of starch hydrolysis is shown in Table 4.

Fig. 9
figure 9

Inhibitory effect of ED@AuNPs on α-amylase enzyme using starch hydrolysis assay (A), (a) 20 µg/mL α-amylase enzyme only, (b) 20 µg/mL Standard Acarbose, (c) 20 µg/mL ED@AuNPs and (d) 20 µg/mL ED Extract and (B), (a) 30 µg/mL α-amylase enzyme only (b) 30 µg/mL Standard Acarbose, (c) 30 µg/mL ED@AuNPs and (d) 30 µg/mL ED Extract.

Table 4 % inhibition of starch hydrolysis at concentration of 20 and 30 µg/mL of ED@AuNPs.

Enzyme kinetic study

Depending on the concentration, AuNPs mediated through ED extract demonstrated significant α-amylase activity. At a dose of 30 µg/mL, the synthesized ED@AuNPs exhibited the highest inhibitory activity (70.85%) compared to 10 and 20 µg/mL, 41.39 and 53.42% respectively (Fig. 10A). Similarly, at a dosage of 30 µg/mL, the conventional medication Acarbose had the maximum inhibitory activity of 79.99% (Fig. 10B). The current research showed that ED extract mediated AuNPs showed strong α-amylase inhibitory action. Researchers looked at how antibiotics and antidiabetic medications interact with one another. It is hypothesized that ED@AuNPs also possess antidiabetic action, given their excellent antibacterial activity1.

Fig. 10
figure 10

Enzyme kinetic study of green synthesized ED@AuNPs against α-amylase enzyme.

Antioxidant activity

Two different assays, the Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP) and the DPPH free radical scavenging test, were used to evaluate the antioxidant activity of biosynthesized ED@AuNPs. The biosynthesized ED@AuNPs showed concentration-dependent activity in the FRAP experiment (Fig. 11A), with values varying between 31.86 and 62.59 (AAE µg/mL). The antioxidant activity of the biosynthesized ED@AuNPs was comparable to that of the conventional antioxidant, ascorbic acid, at a concentration of 500 μL, indicating significant antioxidant activity. This indicates that the green-synthesized AuNPs show promise as antioxidants that may reduce ferric ions at greater concentrations. Figure 11B shows that the biosynthesized ED@AuNPs had a substantial free radical scavenging impact in the DPPH test, with values that range from 42.09 to 68.24 (%RSA). At 500 μg/mL, the activity was almost the same as the conventional ascorbic acid. This suggests that the AuNPs have great antioxidant properties, as they can successfully neutralize free radicals at larger concentrations. These findings demonstrate that green-synthesized AuNPs are effective antioxidants, particularly at high concentrations, and point to a wide range of possible uses for these NPs.

Fig. 11
figure 11

antioxidant activity of the green synthesized ED@AuNPs (A) FRAP assay and (B) DPPH assay.

Compression with previous literature

The Table 5 presents a comparison of diverse plant and algae sources, their particle sizes, and related biological activity. The sources vary from P. minima (15 nm), recognized for anti-diabetic and antibacterial capabilities, to E. diffusum (69 nm), which is being studied for medicinal purposes. Most sources demonstrate antibacterial action, with particle diameters range from 10 nm in C. ternatea to 100 nm in A. calamus. B. propolis (15 nm) stands out for its combination of antibacterial and anticancer properties. Furthermore, some sources such as B. hispida (23 nm) are examined for in vitro toxicity. This comparison demonstrates the varied bioactivities associated with different NPs sizes, providing insights into possible uses in health and therapy.

Table 5 Compression of biosynthesized ED@AuNPs with previous literature.

Conclusions

This study successfully demonstrates the eco-friendly synthesis of gold nanoparticles (ED@AuNPs) using Equisetum diffusum a medicinal plant rich in phytochemicals that served as natural reducing and stabilizing agents. The nanoparticles, with a uniform size distribution of 60–80 nm and high stability, were thoroughly characterized using UV–vis spectroscopy, XRD, FTIR, SEM, EDX, and dynamic light scattering (DLS) analysis. The DLS analysis revealed that the synthesized nanoparticles had an average particle size of 98.27 ± 2.8 nm, indicating a narrow size distribution and minimal aggregation. The zeta potential of ED@AuNPs was recorded as -28.89 ± 0.78 mV, signifying excellent colloidal stability due to strong electrostatic repulsion, which prevents nanoparticle aggregation. The biological evaluations revealed significant multifunctional activities. ED@AuNPs exhibited broad-spectrum antibacterial activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, with inhibition zones ranging from 24 to 37 mm, showing the strongest activity at 40 µg/mL. The anticancer potential of the nanoparticles was evident from the MTT assay against hepatic carcinoma (HePG2) cells, showing dose-dependent cytotoxicity. At low concentrations (10 µg/mL), cell viability remained high at 71.28%, while at the highest concentration (200 µg/mL), it reduced to 47.62%, indicating strong anticancer activity. Furthermore, ED@AuNPs demonstrated notable antidiabetic activity, with α-amylase inhibitory rates reaching up to 70.85% at 30 µg/mL, comparable to the standard drug Acarbose. The nanoparticles also exhibited robust antioxidant properties, as evidenced by FRAP and DPPH assays, where maximum reduction and free radical scavenging activities were achieved at 500 µg/mL, comparable to ascorbic acid. These results highlight the potential of ED@AuNPs as effective agents for biomedical applications, including antibacterial, anticancer, antidiabetic, and antioxidant therapies. The green synthesis approach provides a sustainable and cost-effective alternative to conventional methods, eliminating hazardous chemicals and reducing environmental impact. Future studies should focus on elucidating the molecular mechanisms of these activities and validating there in vivo efficacy to further explore their therapeutic potential.