Abstract
Recently, several countries have been using silicon (Si) fertilization in agricultural plants. The application of Si has a beneficial role on plant growth via affecting the cellular metabolites and physiological events. However, there are little findings that interpret the impact of different Si sources on physiological and agronomical traits of Brunfelsia grandiflora. Along the two seasons of 2022 and 2023, this study examined the impact of different Si sources (diatomite (DM), which comprises several elements and soluble SiO2 (86–89%), potassium silicate K2O5Si2 (PS), and silica-nanoparticles (SNP)) at different rates on biochemical constituents, nutritional status, growth and flowering of B. grandiflora. In addition to check treatment (no Si application), three levels of each of DM (2.5%, 5%, and 10%; DM2.5, DM5, and DM10, respectively), PS (1, 2 and 3 g L–1; PS1, PS2 and PS3, respectively), and SNP (100, 200, and 300 mg L− 1; SNP100, SNP200 and SNP300, respectively) were sprayed three times at four-week intervals, initiating 30 days after planting. The estimated data showed that DM and SNP as sources of Si had remarkable potential for ameliorating photosynthetic pigments, anthocyanin, nutrients content and secondary metabolites, hence the morphological and flowering traits of B. grandiflora. SNP had a positive impact comparable with DM or PS. Foliar application of SNP100 exhibited the maximum increases in plant pigments concentration with high healthy status and flower production. However, the supplementation of DM as a natural Si fertilizer should not be neglected where DM2.5 had acceptable growth and flowering potential compared to PS and untreated plants. Si supplementation, particularly with SNP and DM, improved morphological and floral traits by boosting pigment content (photosynthetic and anthocyanin), increasing phenolics and flavonoids level, and enhancing overall antioxidant capacity. The growers are advised to insert Si in fertilization programs of B. grandiflora to obtain high flower yield and quality. According to the availability, application of silica-nanoparticles at 100 mg L− 1 or diatomite 2.5% are costless and good practices to nourish B. grandiflora plants.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
As a result of the increasing interest and desire to acquire ornamental plants for the aesthetic appearance they provide, scientific attempts have increased to solve the problems of trading these plants1,2,3. Researchers are interested in finding effective ways to improve the productivity and quality of ornamentals to extend their life spam4,5,6. For enhancing the productivity and quality, plants should receive the appropriate amounts and types of nutrients7,8,9,10,11. The inappropriate nutrients supply could expose the plants to stress hazards, suppressing growth and development12,13,14,15. In particular, nutritional stress resulting from nutrient deficiencies leads to physiological dysfunction due to oxidative damage, reducing crop yield and quality16,17,18,19.
The Solanaceae family includes the genus Brunfelsia, which provides several flowering plants20. About 50 species of shrubs and small trees can be found in Brazil. The leaves are simple and often oval21. Brunfelsia species are sold under “yesterday-today-tomorrow” and “lady of the night”; the phrase “Yesterday-Today-Tomorrow” refers to the blossom’s change from a deep purple color yesterday to a lavender color today before turning white tomorrow22. It is nocturnally performed and color-changing flowers from dark purple over mauve to white23,24. Thickets and light woodland are the typical habitats for these plants. Numerous Brunfelsia species contain toxic alkaloids and medicinal. For instance, B. grandiflora is the source of the most significant native remedies used to treat arthritis, rheumatism, and snake bites in the upper Amazon region25. According to the phytochemical analysis, steroids, flavonoids, tannins, and saponins were found in the methanol leaf extract26. However, terpenoids, anthraquinones, and cardiac glycosides were absent. DPPH activity of leaf extract and ascorbic acid standard was found. The studies found that this plant has a high level of antioxidant activity. Other Brunfelsia species including B. calycinaand B. grandiflora have been cultivated for their ornamental properties for pot plants and a common garden due to their vast blue flowers and appealing aroma21,22.
Although micronutrients are required in small quantities, their abundance is absolutely essential for plants to complete their healthy growth and produce high-quality, marketable products27,28,29. In this respect, silicon (Si) is a crucial beneficial element for high-yield cultivation of ornamentals, and other economic crops30,31,32. Si deficiency causes suboptimal growth and induces stress, reducing photosynthetic efficiency and increasing susceptibility to pests and pathogenic diseases33,34. Contrariwise, the abundance of Si promotes the growth, making plants healthier by enhancing structural integrity and facilitating key physiological processes involved in cell development and differentiation35. This is because various plant species have differing abilities to absorb Si, largely determined by the presence and efficiency of specific Si transporters in their roots36,37. Furthermore, previous studies have shown that Si plays a crucial role in the tolerance of plants to heavy metal stress, primarily through mechanisms such as metal immobilization in the soil, compartmentalization within plants, and the upregulation of antioxidant defenses38,39. Similarly, Si is critical for mitigating biotic stress, as its deposition in plant tissues creates a physical barrier that deters pests and pathogens and primes the plant’s jasmonic acid and ethylene-mediated defense pathways40,41.
Utilization of natural sources of nutrients is considered a promising practice to enhance plant growth and yield with high quality42,43,44,45. Herein, diatomite de Mozambique is a naturally occurring sedimentary rock mostly made up of the fossilized remains of freshwater diatoms. Chemically, it comprises several elements and soluble SiO2 (86–89%) available to plants. Diatomite (DM) achieves a multifaceted positive influence on plant growth, flowering, and development. It showed a positive response for number, weight, and tonnage of melon fruits to diatomite application46. Studies on various flowering plants have shown that substrate amendment with DM can lead to earlier flowering, increased flower number, and prolonged bloom duration, attributed to the overall improvement in plant health and nutrient availability47.
Potassium silicate (PS) is a highly soluble potassium and Si source. It is used in agricultural production systems primarily as Si amendment source and uses a small amount of potassium (K) to improve the quality of flowers48. K-silicate is a source of highly soluble K and Si. PS does not volatile organic compounds49. The use of PS improved vegetative parameters and led to earlier flowering, increased flower number of Tagetes patula50. Application of PS increased carotenoids, total phenols, flavonoids, and anthocyanin and K content, while decreased malondialdehyde content at all salinity levels on Cichorium intybus51.
Fertilizers prepared in nano form exhibited beneficial role for efficiently utilization of nutrients and induction of plants to be more tolerant to adverse conditions52,53,54. Herein, silica-nanoparticles (SNP) are ultra-small particles made primarily of silicon dioxide (SiO2). It significantly affects plant growth, protection of plants, and physiology. SNP can dramatically enhance the processes of water absorption and nutrient supply, positively regular photosynthesis and gas exchange, and active metabolic processes, improving the antioxidant defense system and nitrogen metabolism55,56. Further, Using SNP reduces the harmful effects of stresses such as UV radiation, salinity, drought, metal toxicity, and biotic stress57,58. Additionally, SNP can act directly as nano-fertilization, nano pesticides, and nano–herbicides59.
Si was used on bushy growing plants such as Glycyrrhiza uralensis and Glycyrrhiza inflata60, and Thunbergia erecta61. Practically, B. grandiflora have not received any studies regarding the importance of Si and its various forms in regulating metabolic processes and stimulating growth and flowering. Therefore, the current research hypothesized that the different types of Si fertilizers could influence the biochemical constituents, nutritional status, growth and flowering of plants. To prove this assumption, the effects of three Si sources at three rates each on B. grandiflora were investigated.
Materials and methods
Location and plant materials
The present research was conducted under open-field conditions at the experimental site of the Ornamental Horticulture Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt. The experiment spanned the growing seasons from March to September in 2022 and 2023 seasons. The region experiences a Mediterranean climate characterized by arid summers and negligible precipitation. Throughout the primary growth period, the mean ambient temperature, relative humidity and mean daily solar radiation were 25.0 °C, 52.4%, 28.7 MJ m⁻² day⁻¹, respectively. The study tested the impact of different silicon sources (diatomite DM, potassium silicate, PS, and silica-nanoparticles, SNP) on biochemical constituents, nutritional status, growth and flowering of B. grandiflora. The seedlings of B. grandiflora were obtained from a commercial farm in Giza, Egypt. The seedlings were cultivated in 40 cm lengths in plastic pots (40 cm diameter). Each pot involved one seedling, and the soil mixture medium was peat moss, perlite, and compost 1:1:1 by volume (totally, 25 kg).
The applied treatments and design
The treatments were arranged in randomized complete block design with three replicates. DM was added to the soil medium a week before transplanting at three levels (2.5%, 5%, and 10%, denoted DM2.5, DM5 and DM10, respectively). PS (K2SiO3) was applied at three concentrations (1, 2, and 3 g L− 1 abbreviated as PS1, PS2 and PS3, respectively), as a foliar spray. SNP were sprayed at three concentrations (100, 200, and 300 mg L-1 coded as SNP100, SNP200 and SNP300, respectively), applied as leaf application. The control plants (CK) were treated with distilled water. For PS and SNP, the plants received the spray solutions three times until the runoff point, the first spray applied 30 days after planting, then in four-week intervals, “Tween 20” was applied at one ml L− 1 as a surfactant substance.
Specification of SNP
The Electron NRC microscopy unit was used to characterize SNP that were obtained from Sigma Cor. in the USA. According to Zafar et al. 201662, SNP are suspended in uniformly dispersed and distilled water. The specification of SNP is illustrated in Table 1; Fig. 1.
Assessments
Plant pigments
The photosynthetic pigments, i.e. chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and carotenoids were determined as explained by Saric et al. 196763 in mature leaves. According to the method of Fuleki and Francis 196864, an ethanol hydrochloric acid solution (15 ml 1.5 N HCl + 85 ml ethanol 95%) was used for extraction to determine the anthocyanin pigment in fully open flower at full bloom; four months after beginning of the treatments.
Biochemical constituents
Nutrients content
Nitrogen (N) content of dried shoots was performed by the modified Kjeldahl method68. Phosphorus (P) content was determined by the method of the ammonium molybdate in dry shoots69. The extract for determination of potassium (K) content was prepared from a digested solution in the dry shoot according to Chapman and Pratt 196170.
Application inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) was used to determine Si content utilizing the microwave-assisted digestion technique71. The concentrations of magnesium (Mg) and iron (Fe) were assessed by an atomic absorption spectrophotometer with air acetylene and fuel (PyeUnicam, model SP-1900, US) as explained by Cheng and Bray 195172.
Plant growth and flowering
After 6 months from transplanting, plant height (measured from the base of plant to the tip of the plant by measuring tape), branches number plant–1, leaves number plant–1, leaf area (estimated as total leaf dry weight × disks area / disks dry weight), and flowers number plant–1 were recorded.
Statistical analysis
The results were statistically analyzed by employing COSTATV-63 program73. One way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to evaluate the significance by Duncan’s new multiple-range tests at p < 0.05. Pearson correlation coefficients matrix between the studied traits expressed in heat map was prepared using excel program, and COSTATV-63 program was employed to estimate the significance test at p < 0.05, p < 0.01 and p < 0.001.
Results
Plant pigments
The impacts of DM, PS and SNP on the concentration of plant pigments were significant. In this concern, data illustrated that the concentration of chlorophyll a (Fig. 2), chlorophyll b (Fig. 3), and carotenoids (Fig. 4) decreased and anthocyanin (Fig. 5) increased gradually with increasing the application rate of all silicon forms. For diatomite rates, application of DM2.5 outperformed DM10 in chlorophyll a as well as DM5 and DM10 in carotenoids in both seasons. Also, PK1 application showed greater values of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and carotenoids that of PK2 or PK3 in both seasons. SNP100 increased chlorophyll a by 24.0 and 23.0%, chlorophyll b by 22.3 and 22.1%, and carotenoids by 15.2 and 14.1% in the first and second seasons, respectively, as compared to SNP300. Among the potassium sources overall, SNP100 was the potent treatment for improving all photosynthetic pigments in both seasons, significantly leveling SNP200 for chlorophyll b.
Effect of diatomite, potassium silicate and silica-nanoparticles on chlorophyll a content (mg g–1 FW) of Brunfelsia grandiflora in 2022 and 2023 seasons. DM2.5, DM5 and DM10 are application 2.5, 5 and 10% of diatomite, respectively; PS1, PS2 and PS3 are application of potassium silicate at a rate of 1, 2 and 3 g L–1, respectively; SNP100, SNP200 and SNP300 are application of silica-nanoparticles at a rate of 100, 200, and 300 mg L− 1, respectively; CK is check treatment. Values are means of 3 replicates ± SE; the same alphabets means that statistically non-significant by Duncan’s new multiple range test at p < 0.05.
Effect of diatomite, potassium silicate and silica-nanoparticles on chlorophyll b content (mg g–1 FW) of Brunfelsia grandiflora in 2022 and 2023 seasons. DM2.5, DM5 and DM10 are application 2.5, 5 and 10% of diatomite, respectively; PS1, PS2 and PS3 are application of potassium silicate at a rate of 1, 2 and 3 g L–1, respectively; SNP100, SNP200 and SNP300 are application of silica-nanoparticles at a rate of 100, 200, and 300 mg L− 1, respectively; CK is check treatment. Values are means of 3 replicates ± SE; the same alphabets means that statistically non-significant by Duncan’s new multiple range test at p < 0.05.
Effect of diatomite, potassium silicate and silica-nanoparticles on carotenoids content (mg g–1 FW) of Brunfelsia grandiflora in 2022 and 2023 seasons. DM2.5, DM5 and DM10 are application 2.5, 5 and 10% of diatomite, respectively; PS1, PS2 and PS3 are application of potassium silicate at a rate of 1, 2 and 3 g L–1, respectively; SNP100, SNP200 and SNP300 are application of silica-nanoparticles at a rate of 100, 200, and 300 mg L− 1, respectively; CK is check treatment. Values are means of 3 replicates ± SE; the same alphabets means that statistically non-significant by Duncan’s new multiple range test at p < 0.05.
Effect of diatomite, potassium silicate and silica-nanoparticles on anthocyanin content (mg 100 g–1 FW) of Brunfelsia grandiflora in 2022 and 2023 seasons. DM2.5, DM5 and DM10 are application 2.5, 5 and 10% of diatomite, respectively; PS1, PS2 and PS3 are application of potassium silicate at a rate of 1, 2 and 3 g L–1, respectively; SNP100, SNP200 and SNP300 are application of silica-nanoparticles at a rate of 100, 200, and 300 mg L− 1, respectively; CK is check treatment. Values are means of 3 replicates ± SE; the same alphabets means that statistically non-significant by Duncan’s new multiple range test at p < 0.05.
Concerning the anthocyanin pigment, SNP300 showed the highest values surpassed the other treatments in both seasons, except SNP200 in the first season. Compared to the check treatment, SNP300 increases the concentration of anthocyanin by about 4.32 and 5.2 times in 2022 and 2023 seasons, respectively.
Biochemical constituents
Remarkable influences of DM, PS, and SNP on the total flavonoids (Fig. 6), phenolics (Fig. 7), and DPPH (Fig. 8) in the leaves of Brunfelsia grandiflora were obtained in both seasons. SNP100 gave the maximum values of total flavonoids, phenolics and DPPH%, significantly equaling DM2.5, SNP200 and SNP300 for phenolics in the first season as well as DM2.5 and SNP200 for DPPH in both seasons. The increases in flavonoids, phenolics, and DPPH due to application of SNP100 were 2.81 and 2.85 folds, 1.84 and 1.97 folds and 1.25 and 1.23 folds, greater than the check treatment in the first and second seasons, respectively. It should be noted progressive decreases in all measured biochemical constituents with increasing the application rates of any potassium source. Thus, DM10, PK3 and SNP300 exhibited lower values of flavonoids, phenolics, and DPPH as compared DM2.5, PK1 and SNP100, respectively.
Effect of diatomite, potassium silicate and silica- nanoparticles on flavonoids content (mg 100 g–1 FW) of Brunfelsia grandiflora in 2022 and 2023 seasons. DM2.5, DM5 and DM10 are application 2.5, 5 and 10% of diatomite, respectively; PS1, PS2 and PS3 are application of potassium silicate at a rate of 1, 2 and 3 g L–1, respectively; SNP100, SNP200 and SNP300 are application of silica-nanoparticles at a rate of 100, 200, and 300 mg L− 1, respectively; CK is check treatment. Values are means of 3 replicates ± SE; the same alphabets means that statistically non-significant by Duncan’s new multiple range test at p < 0.05.
Effect of diatomite, potassium silicate and silica-nanoparticles on phenolics content (mg g–1 FW) of Brunfelsia grandiflora in 2022 and 2023 seasons. DM2.5, DM5 and DM10 are application 2.5, 5 and 10% of diatomite, respectively; PS1, PS2 and PS3 are application of potassium silicate at a rate of 1, 2 and 3 g L–1, respectively; SNP100, SNP200 and SNP300 are application of silica-nanoparticles at a rate of 100, 200, and 300 mg L− 1, respectively; CK is check treatment. Values are means of 3 replicates ± SE; the same alphabets means that statistically non-significant by Duncan’s new multiple range test at p < 0.05.
Effect of diatomite, potassium silicate and silica-nanoparticles on total antioxidant activity (DPPH) (%) of Brunfelsia grandiflora in 2022 and 2023 seasons. DM2.5, DM5 and DM10 are application 2.5, 5 and 10% of diatomite, respectively; PS1, PS2 and PS3 are application of potassium silicate at a rate of 1, 2 and 3 g L–1, respectively; SNP100, SNP200 and SNP300 are application of silica-nanoparticles at a rate of 100, 200, and 300 mg L− 1, respectively; CK is check treatment. Values are means of 3 replicates ± SE; the same alphabets means that statistically non-significant by Duncan’s new multiple range test at p < 0.05.
Nutrients content
The rates of DM, PS, and SNP affected the concentration of N, P, K, Mg, Si and Fe in Brunfelsia grandiflora leaves. Data results in Table 2 showed that the lowest application rates of each potassium form concentrations were more effective for increasing nutrients content. Among the different forms of Si, SNP100 exhibited the highest efficiency for raising the leaf content of N, P, Mg, Si and Fe in both seasons. However, there were no significant differences between SNP100 and SNP200 or DM2.5 for Mg and SNP200 for Si in both seasons. On the other hand, PK1 was the efficient treatment for elevating K content surpassing the other treatments in both seasons.
Plant growth and flowering
According to the results of Table 3, different silicon sources (DM, PS and SNP) significantly influenced growth and flowering yield of Brunfelsia grandiflora. All Si sources and their concentrations remarkably enhanced plant height, branches number plant–1, leave number plant–1, leaf area and flowers number plant–1 comparing to the check treatment in both seasons, except PS and its rates for branches number plant–1, which equaled the check treatment in this respect. SNP100 was the most effective practice for promoting plant growth and flowering traits in both season. However, there were no significant variations between SNP100 and each of SNP200 and SNP100 for enhancing branches number plant–1 and plant leaf area in both season, in addition to SNP100 and SNP200 for leave number plant–1, in the first season.
Correlation analysis
The correlation coefficients matrix between different biochemical and morphological parameters of B. grandiflora are illustrated in a heat map (Fig. 9). In this respect, the correlation coefficients between each pairs of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, carotenoids, anthocyanin, flavonoids, phenolics, total antioxidant activity, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, silicon, magnesium, iron, plant height, branches number plant− 1, leaves number plant− 1, leaf area and flower number plant− 1 were estimated. All possible combinations between the studied pairs of traits showed a highly significant (p < 0.01) positive correlation, except for the pairs involved potassium with all other traits. In this concern, there was significant (p < 0.05) and negative correlation between potassium and anthocyanin. Also, there were no significant correlation relationships between potassium and each of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, carotenoids, flavonoids, phenolics, total antioxidant activity, nitrogen, phosphorus, silicon, magnesium, iron, plant height, branches number plant− 1, leaves number plant− 1, leaf area and flower number plant− 1. Furthermore, the correlation between phenolics and leaf area was not significant.
Heat map illustrates the correlation analysis between different pairs of Brunfelsia grandiflora traits. Cha: chlorophyll a, Chb: chlorophyll b, Caro: carotenoids, Anth: anthocyanin, Flav: flavonoids, Phen: phenolics, DPPH: total antioxidant activity, N: nitrogen, P: phosphorus, K: potassium, Si: silicon, Mg: magnesium, Fe: iron, PH: plant height, BNP: branches number plant− 1, LNP: leaves number plant− 1, LA: leaf area and FNP: flower number plant− 1. ns: not significant, *: significant at P < 0.05, **: significant at P < 0.01 and ***: significant at P < 0.001.
Discussion
Plant growth, development, and flowering productivity are critical for economic ornamental trees and shrubs. Si application showed positive effects on the growth and flowering of the ornamental plants74. Si fertilizers can enhance nutrient uptake by maximizing soil fertility and plant water absorption, while improving soil physical and chemical characteristics46. Additionally, Si is an abundant, practical, and non-toxic element involved in various plant functions75. Physiologically, Si can enhance photosynthesis at the expense of reduced transpiration, which will help with carbon build-up and nitrogen metabolism. Better leaf architecture and increased capacity for light absorption are made possible by Si absorption and subsequent formation of a double silicate layer on the leaf epidermis76.
The current research study was performed to examine the influence of different silicon sources (DM, PS, and SNP) on growth, flower yield as well as the chemical composition of B. grandiflora. Photosynthetic pigments (chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and carotenoids) and anthocyanin significantly were increased by application different silicon treatments. In this regard, DM, PS, and SNP enhanced chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and carotenoids concentrations as well as anthocyanin comparing to the check treatment. Treating plants with DM at 30% gave the greatest increase in chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and carotenoids in Moringa oleifera77. Foliar application of nano silicon at 75 mg L− 1 increased chlorophyll index (46%), stomatal conductance (34.6%), and relative water content (46.3%) in Lathyrus sativus78.
Interestingly, we observed a strong correlation between the morphological and flowering production and the secondary metabolite accumulation obtained in the leaves. For this reason, abundance of Si is essential to enhance the levels of total phenolics and flavonoids, increase the antioxidant activity, and stimulate the carbohydrates transportation to different sections of plant organs, leading to improved growth and flower production79. SNP at 300 mg L− 1 as foliar application increased total sugars, total phenolics, and total free amino acids80. As well, treating marigold seedlings with silicon enhanced carbohydrate contents and total flavonoids81.
The findings also depicted that the contents of N, P, K, Si, Mg and Fe, in response to different applications of Si, were improved comparable with control. Uses of DM improved NPK% on Zea mays plants compared to other treatments and the control82. The treatment of SNP in Polianthes tuberosa increased leaf P and Si contents74. Furthermore, treating chrysanthemum plants with PS significantly increased the content of K, P, Mg, Fe, S and Zn83. In another study, it was observed that spraying of Si on marigold seedlings enhanced N, P, and protein81. Si has a function in preventing an imbalance of nutrients during the growth and production of plants84. The higher nutrient content resulting from the use of Si as a fertilizer can also be attributed to the fact that it reduces the leaching of minerals such as N and K away from the root medium85.
Concerning the growth and flowering, it has been reported that DM increases morphological and flowering parameters in Antirrhinum majus plants86. In another study, Zaman et al. 202287 revealed that applying DM increased the morphological yield of Cicer arietinum. Obklin et al. 202388 illustrated that treated plants with DM at the rate of 5 t ha− 1 had a significant effect on plant height and dry weight of maize plants. It has been documented that Si increases the endogenous gibberellin formation in seedlings leading to stem elongation89. In addition, PS foliar application at 12 ml L− 1 on Rosmarinus officinalls showed increases in growth characteristics compared to control90. Moreover, using of PS at 1 to 3 g L− 1 as foliar application enhanced the growth and flowering traits of Antirrhinum majus91. Additionally, it should not be neglected that PS fertilizer contains K which has a stimulatory effect and crucial function in plant growth92,93. As for SNP, their application at 1000 mg L− 1 in Rosa chinensis had improvements of growth traits80. SNP spraying at 200 mg L− 1 and 400 mg L− 1 enhanced leaf fresh weight, root and bulblet dry weight, and root valium in tuberose plants74. In addition, using foliar application of silica nanoparticles boosted leaf area and relative chlorophyll content while improved all morphological and flowering properties of carnation plants94.
For economic ornamental plants, flower number is a critical parameter for beautiful aspects. More significant flowers number are essential, particularly in B. grandiflora because they are commonly used in landscape gardening and easily identified by the color change (violet to white) of their flowers and fragrance, and difficult to be distinguished22. In the current study, the flower numbers were improved significantly by the application of different silicon sources (DM, PS, and SNP) compared to the check treatment (Fig. 10). Since DM is typified by minute sized-particle with high permeability and porosity95, the improvements in growth and flowering of DM-treated plants are expected. Previous studies on Polianthes tuberosa74, Antirrhinum majus86,91, Rosa chinensis80, Tagetes erecta L96. , and Lilium orientalis97 cited an increase in flower yield by treating with Si as a result of increase its content in the leaves. Such findings could be ascribed to the Si’s potential impact on sugar metabolism, which could raise the concentrations of soluble carbohydrates in PS-sprayed leaves98. As for Si in nano from, SNP with diameters of 5–20 nm can readily penetrate the cell wall and reach the plasma membrane. They may enter through stomatal openings or at the base of trichomes, allowing foliar-applied particles to move into various tissues. Following their accumulation and translocation, SNP induce alterations in multiple cellular and physiological functions of the plant99. In rice, SNP have been shown to enter the xylem via active transport pathways100.
Conclusions
Supplying Brunfelsia grandiflora plants with the appropriate form of silicon is so crucial for high flower yield and quality. In this connection, modification of plant pigments, nutrient contentment and biological molecules via application of silicon achieved substantial enhancements in growth and flowering. Herein, the tested various silicon sources, especially silica-nanoparticles and diatomite improved photosynthetic and anthocyanin pigments, total contents of phenolics, flavonoids and antioxidant activity, hence, morphological and floral traits were improved. Eventually, in Brunfelsia grandiflora the cultivation system, farmers have distinctive options involving silica-nanoparticles at 100 mg L− 1 (if available) or diatomite at 2.5% to be applied to modify the physiological and nutritional status for high yield and quality flowers.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the present investigation available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Abass MMM, Thabet RS., Lasheen FF, Abdelhamid AN, Hassan KM, Saudy HS, Boghdady MS. Modulating the rhizosphere medium and indole – 3–butyric acid supply influence rooting, nutrients and biochemical constituents and histological features of Pedilanthus tithymaloids. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 6880–6892. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-024-02011-5 (2024).
Lasheen FF, Hewidy M, Abdelhamid AN, Thabet RS, Abass MMM, Fahmy AA, Saudy HS, Hassan KM. Exogenous application of humic acid mitigates salinity stress on Pittosporum (Pittosporum tobira) plant by adjusting the osmolytes and nutrient homeostasis. Gesun Pflanz. 76:317–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-023-00939-9 (2024).
El-Sayed IM, El-Ziat RAM, Saudy HS, Hewidy M. Ameliorating quality and vase life of Solidago Canadensis flowers via supplementation of eucalyptus, Neem and Rosemary as phyto-preserver oils. BMC Plant Biol. 25:1070. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-025-07131-3 (2025).
Ali IAA, Hassan SE, Abdelhafez AA, Hewidy M, Nasser MA, Saudy HS, Hassan KM, Abou-Hadid AF. Modifying the growing media and bio stimulants supply for healthy Gerbera (Gerbera jamesonii) flowers Gesun Pflanz. 76: 337–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-023-00943-z (2024).
El-Ziat RAM, Saudy HS, Hewidy M. The alteration in physiological status, growth and essential oil profile of French marigold (Tagetes patula L.) owing to seaweed extract and Salicylic acid application. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 24:3909–3922 https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-024-01811-z (2024).
Emam TM, Hosni AM, Ismail A, El-Kinany RG, Hewidy M, Saudy HS, Omar MMA, Ibrahim MTS, Sui S, El-sayed SM. Physiological and molecular responses of red Amaranth (Amaranthus cruentus L.) and green Amaranth (Amaranthus hypochondriacus L.) to salt stress. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 25:171–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-024-02125-w (2025).
Noureldin NA, Saudy HS, Ashmawy F, Saed HM. Grain yield response index of bread wheat cultivars as influenced by nitrogen levels. Ann. Agric. Sci., Ain Shams Univ. 58:147–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aoas.2013.07.012 (2013).
Saudy HS. Chlorophyll meter as a tool for forecasting wheat nitrogen requirements after application of herbicides. Archiv. Agron. Soil Sci. 60:1077–1090. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2013.866226 (2014).
Saudy HS, Hamed MF, Abd El–Momen WR, Hussein H. Nitrogen use rationalization and boosting wheat productivity by applying packages of humic, amino acids and microorganisms. Comm Soil Sci Plant Anal 2020;51:1036–1047. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2020.1744631 (2020).
Saudy HS, El-Metwally IM. Effect of irrigation, nitrogen sources and Metribuzin on performance of maize and its weeds. Comm. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 54:22–31 https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2022.2109659 (2023).
Emam YTM, Tolba AM, El-Gabry YA, El–Metwally IM, Saudy HS, Sayed AN. Relationship between grain yield response index and wheat genotypes adapted to nitrogen–deficient environments. J. Soil. Sci. Plant Nutr. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-025-02527-4 (2025).
Saudy HS. Maize–cowpea intercropping as an ecological approach for nitrogen-use rationalization and weed suppression. Archiv. Agron Soil Sci. 61:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2014.920499 (2015).
Saudy HS, El-Metwally IM. Nutrient utilization indices of NPK and drought management in groundnut under sandy soil conditions. Comm. Soil Sci. Plant. Anal. 50:1821–1828. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2019.1635147 (2019).
Saudy HS, Noureldin NA, Mubarak M, Fares W, Elsayed M. Cultivar selection as a tool for managing soil phosphorus and Faba bean yield sustainability. Archiv. Agron Soil Sci. 66:414–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2019.1619078 (2020).
Mansour N, Shawky I, EL-Gazzar A, Saudy HS. Efficacy of peroxidase activity and isozyme as molecular markers for assessing iron deficiency and toxicity via in vitro culture as a rapid technique in banana. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 25:4112–4124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-025-02387-y (2025).
Saudy HS, Abd El–Momen WR, El–khouly NS. Diversified nitrogen rates influence nitrogen agronomic efficiency and seed yield response index of Sesame (Sesamum indicum, L.) cultivars. Comm Soil Sci Plant Anal. 49:2387–2395. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2018.1510949 (2018).
Abd–Elrahman SH, Saudy HS, Abd El–Fattah DA, Hashem FA. Effect of irrigation water and organic fertilizer on reducing nitrate accumulation and boosting lettuce productivity. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 22, 2144–2155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-022-00799-8 (2022).
Ramadan KMA, El-Beltag HS, Abd El Mageed TA, Mazrou KE, Mohamed GF, El-Saadony MT, El-Saadony FMA, Roby MHH, Saudy HS, Abou-Sreea AIB. Significance of selenium in ameliorating the effects of irrigation deficit via improving photosynthesis efficiency, cell integrity, osmo-protectants, and oil profile of Anise crop. Not Bot Horti Agrobo. 51:13437. https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha51413437 (2023).
Shaaban A, Saudy HS, Eid MAM, Zahran SF, Mekdad AAA. Synergistic effect of indole–3–acetic acid and nitrogen on yield, sugar profile, and nitrogen utilization of salt-stressed sugar beet crop. BMC Plant Biol. 25:632. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-025-06531-9 (2025).
Filipowicz N, Renner SS. Brunfelsia (Solanaceae): A genus evenly divided between South America and radiations on Cuba and other Antillean islands. Mol. Phylogenet Evol. 64(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2012.02.026 (2012).
Marsola SJ, Jorge LF, Meniqueti AB, Bertéli MBD, de Lima TEF, Bezerra JL, Lopes AD, Gazim ZC, do Valle JS, Colauto NB, Linde GA. Endophytic fungi of Brunfelsia uniflora: Isolation, cryopreservation, and determination of enzymatic and antioxidant activity. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 38:94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-022-03278-5 (2022).
De Sousa CE, Oliveira FL, Sant’Anna-Santos BF, Zuffellato-Ribas KC. Physiological and anatomical aspects of the rooting of Brunfelsia pauciflora cuttings. Sci Hort. 307:111491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2022.111491 (2023).
Crowley JD, Thomas KA, Donahoe SL, Child G, Hickey MC, Mooney ET. Hypoventilation, cardiac dysrhythmia, and cardiac arrest following acute Brunfelsia species (Yesterday, today, tomorrow) intoxication in a dog. Australian Veter J. 97:202–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/avj.12815 (2019).
Sayed SS, Marzouk M, Sokkar N. Determination of phenolics and flavonoids with antioxidant effect of Brunfelsia pauciflora (Cham. & Schtdl) Benth through in vitro propagated cultures. Egyptian J. Chem. 66:237–244. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejchem.2022.144435.6306 (2023).
Luzuriaga-Quichimbo CX, Hernandez del Barco M, Blanco-Salas J, Cerón-Martínez CE, Ruiz-Téllez T. Chiricaspi (Brunfelsia grandiflora, Solanaceae), a Pharmacologically promising plant. Plants 7:67. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants7030067 (2018).
de Cássia Thiesen L, Colla IM, Silva GJ, Kubiak MG, Faria MGI, Gazim ZC, Linde GA, Colauto NB. Antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of Brunfelsia Uniflora leaf extract. Arq Ciênc Vet Zool UNIPAR, Umuarama. 2193–97. https://doi.org/10.25110/arqvet.v21i3.2018.7203 (2018).
El-Metwally IM, Saudy HS. Interactive application of zinc and herbicides affects broad–leaved weeds, nutrient uptake, and yield in rice. J. Soil. Sci. Plant Nutr. 21:238–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-020-00356-1 (2021).
Saudy HS, El-Metwally IM, Shahin MG. Co–application effect of herbicides and micronutrients on weeds and nutrient uptake in flooded irrigated rice: does it have a synergistic or an antagonistic effect?. Crop Prot.149:105755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2021.105755 (2021).
Shaaban A, Abd El-Mageed TA, Abd El-Momen WR, Saudy HS, Al-Elwany OAAI. The integrated application of phosphorous and zinc affects the physiological status, yield and quality of Canola grown in phosphorus-suffered deficiency saline soil. Gesun Pflanz. 75:1813–1821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-023-00843-2 (2023).
Saudy HS, Mubarak M. Mitigating the detrimental impacts of nitrogen deficit and fenoxaprop-p-ethyl herbicide on wheat using silicon. Comm Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 46:913–923. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2015.1011753 (2015).
Salem EMM, Kenawey MKM, Saudy HS, Mubarak M. Influence of silicon forms on nutrient accumulation and grain yield of wheat under water deficit conditions. Gesun Pflanz.74:539–548. (2022).
Saudy HS, Salem EMM, Abd El–Momen WR. Effect of potassium silicate and irrigation on grain nutrient uptake and water use efficiency of wheat under calcareous soils. Gesun Pflanz. 75:647–654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-022-00729-9 (2023).
Kandil EE, Abdelsalam NR, Mansour MA, Ali HM, Siddiqui MH. Potentials of organic manure and potassium forms on maize (Zea Mays L.) growth and production. Sci Rep. 10:8752. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65749-9 (2020).
Pavlovic J, Kostic L, Bosnic P, Kirkby EA, Nikolic M. Interactions of silicon with essential and beneficial elements in plants. Front Plant Sci. 12:697592. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.697592 (2021).
Coskun D, Deshmukh R, Sonah H, Menzies JG, Reynolds O, Ma JF, Kronzucker HJ, Bélanger, RR. The controversies of silicon’s role in plant biology. New Phytol. 221:67–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15343 (2019).
Trejo-Téllez LI, García-Jiménez A, Escobar-Sepúlveda HF, Ramírez-Olvera SM, Bello-Bello JJ, Gómez-Merino FC. Silicon induces hormetic dose-response effects on growth and concentrations of chlorophylls, amino acids and sugars in pepper plants during the early developmental stage. Peer J. 8:e9224. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9224 (2008).
Sarkar MM, Mathur P, Roy S. Silicon and nano-silicon: new frontiers of biostimulants for plant growth and stress amelioration. In: silicon and Nano-silicon in environmental stress management and crop quality improvement, Elsevier. 17–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-91225-9.00010-8 (2022).
Adrees M, Ali S, Rizwan M, Zia-ur-Rehman M, Ibrahim M, Abbas F, Farid M, Qayyum MF Irshad MK. Mechanisms of silicon-mediated alleviation of heavy metal toxicity in plants: a review. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 119:186–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.05.011 (2015).
Oliva KM, do Nascimento CW, da Silva FB, Araújo PRM, de Oliveira ECA, Feitosa MM, Lima LHV. Biomass and concentration of nutrients and silicon in sugarcane grown on soil fertilized with diatomite. Revista Brasileira De Ciências Agrárias 15:1–7. https://doi.org/10.5039/agraria.v15i4a8755 (2020).
Reynolds OL, Padula MP, Zeng R, Gurr GM. Silicon: potential to promote direct and indirect effects on plant defense against arthropod pests in agriculture. Front Plant Sci. 7:744. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00744 (2016).
Ansabayeva A, Makhambetov M, Rebouh NY, Abdelkader M, Saudy HS, Hassan KM, Nasser MA, Ali MAA, Ebrahim M. Plant growth-promoting microbes for resilient farming systems: mitigating environmental stressors and boosting crops productivity. A review. Hort. 11:260. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11030260 (2025).
Elgala AM, Abd-Elrahman ShH, Saudy HS, Nossier MI. Exploiting Eichhornia crassipes shoots extract as a natural source of nutrients for producing healthy tomato plants. Gesun Pflanz. 74:457–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-022-00622-5 (2022).
El-Metwally IM, Saudy HS, Elewa TA. Natural plant by-products and mulching materials to suppress weeds and improve sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) yield and quality. J. Soil Sci. Plant. Nutr. 22:5217–5230 https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-022-00997-4 (2022).
Ali MAA, Nasser MA, Abdelhamid AN, Ali IAA, Saudy HS, Hassan KM. Melatonin as a key factor for regulating and relieving abiotic stresses in harmony with phytohormones in horticultural plants — a review. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 24:54–73 https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-023-01586-9 (2024).
Ramadan KMA, El-Beltagi HS, Al Saikhan MS, Almutairi HH, Al-Hashedi SA, Saudy HS, Al-Elwany OAAI, Hemida KA, Abd El-Mageed TA, Youssef SM. β-carotene supply to dill plants grown in sulphur and humic acid-amended soil improves salinity tolerance via quenching the hazard molecules. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 71:45. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1021443724602441 (2024).
do Nascimento CW, de Souza Nunes GH, Preston HA, da Silva, FBV, Preston W, Loureiro FLC. Influence of silicon fertilization on nutrient accumulation, yield and fruit quality of melon grown in Northeastern Brazil. Silicon 12:937–943. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-019-00187-5 (2020).
Mills-Ibibofori T, Dunn B, Maness N, Payton M. Use of diatomaceous Earth as a silica supplement on potted ornamentals. Horti https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae5010021 (2019).
Galindo FS, Pagliari PH, Rodrigues WL, Fernandes GC, Boleta EHM, Santini JMK, Jalal A, Buzetti S, Lavres J, Teixeira Filho MCM. Silicon amendment enhances agronomic efficiency of nitrogen fertilization in maize and wheat crops under tropical conditions. Plants 10:1329. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10071329 (2021).
de Souza Junior JP, de Mello Prado R, Soares MB, da Silva JLF, de Farias Guedes VH, dos Santos Sarah MM, Cazetta JO. Effect of different foliar silicon sources on cotton plants. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 21:95–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-020-00345-4 (2021).
Ayyat AM, Abdel-Mola MAM. Response of Tagetes patula plants to foliar application of potassium silicate and seaweed extract under various irrigation intervals. Sci. J. Flowers Ornam Plants. 7:513–526. https://doi.org/10.21608/sjfop.2020.138588 (2020).
Mohammadi H, Abdollahi-Bastam S, Aghaee A, Ghorbanpour M. Foliar-applied silicate potassium modulates growth, phytochemical, and physiological traits in Cichorium intybus L. under salinity stress. BMC Plant Biol. 24:288. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-05015-6 (2024).
Saudy HS, Abd El–Samad GA, El–Temsah ME, El–Gabry YA. Effect of iron, zinc and manganese nano–form mixture on the micronutrient recovery efficiency and seed yield response index of Sesame genotypes. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 22:732–742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-021-00681-z (2022).
Abou El-Enin MM, Sheha AM, El-Serafy Rasha S, Ali OAM, Saudy HS, Shaaban A. Foliage-sprayed nano-chitosan-loaded nitrogen boosts yield potentials, competitive ability, and profitability of intercropped maize-soybean. Int. J. Plant Prod. 17:517–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42106-023-00253-4 (2023).
Elbordiny MM, Ahmed SA, El-Sebaay AS, Attia YA, Saudy HS, Abd-Elrahman SH. Potentiality of chitosan/titanium oxide nanocomposite for removing iron and chromium from hydrous solutions. Environ Sci. Poll Res. 31:66796–66807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-35455-4 (2024).
Hatami M, Khanizadeh P, Bovand F, Aghaee A. Silicon nanoparticle-mediated seed priming and Pseudomonas spp. Inoculation augment growth, physiology, and antioxidant metabolic status in Melissa officinalis L. plants. Ind Crops Prod. 162:113238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.113238 (2021).
Mukarram M, Khan MM, Corpas FJ. Silicon nanoparticles elicit an increase in Lemongrass (Cymbopogon flexuosus (Steud.) Wats) agronomic parameters with a higher essential oil yield. J. Hazard Mater. 412:125254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125254 (2021).
Rajput VD, Minkina T, Feizi M, Kumari A, Khan M, Mandzhieva S, Sushkova S, El-Ramady H, Verma KK, Singh A, Hullebusch EDV. Effects of silicon and silicon-based nanoparticles on rhizosphere microbiome, plant stress and growth. Biol. 10:791. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10080791 (2021).
Abdo RA, Hazem MM, El-Assar AE, Saudy HS, El-Sayed SM. Efficacy of nano-silicon extracted from rice husk to modulate the physio-biochemical constituents of wheat for ameliorating drought tolerance without causing cytotoxicity. Beni-Suef Univ. J. Basic App. Sci. 13:75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43088-024-00529-2 (2024).
Xia L, Huang H, Feng W, Chen Y. Silica nanoparticles boost plant resistance against pathogens. Sci. Bull. 66:1151–1153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2021.02.034 (2021).
Shen Z, Cheng X, Li X, Deng X, Dong X, Wang S, Pu X. Effects of silicon application on leaf structure And physiological characteristics of Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch. And Glycyrrhiza inflata Bat. Under salt treatment. BMC Plant Biol. 22:390. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-022-03783-7 (2022).
Manokari M, Cokul Raj M, Dey A, Faisal M, Alatar AA, Singh RK, Shekhawat MS. Silicon nanoparticles moderated morphometric deficiencies by improving micro-morpho-structural traits in Thunbergia erecta (Benth.) T. Anderson. Silicon. 15, 5415–5427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-023-02451-1 (2023).
Zafar H, Ali A, Ali JS, Haq IU, Zia M. Effect of ZnO nanoparticles on Brassica Nigra seedlings and stem explants: growth dynamics and antioxidative response. Front Plant Sci. 7:535. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00535 (2016).
Saric M, Kastrori R, Curic R, Cupina T, Gric I. Chlorophyll determination. Univ. Noven Sadu Prakitikum is Kiziologize Bilijaka-Beogard, Haucana Anjiga. (1967).
Fuleki T, Francis FJ. Quantitative methods for anthocyanins. J. Food Sci. 33:72–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1968.tb00887.x (1968).
Quettier-Deleu C, Gressier B, Vasseur J, Dine T, Brunet C, Luyckx M, Cazin M, Cazin JC, Bailleul F, Trotin, F. Phenolic compounds and antioxidant activities of buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) hulls and flour. J. Ethnopharmacol. 72:35–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8741(00)00196-3 (2000).
Swain T, Hillis WT. The phenolic constituents of Prunnus domestica. II.— the quantitative analysis of phenolic constituents, J. Sci. Food Agric. 10:135–144. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740100211 (1959).
Brand-Williams W, Cuvelier ME, Berset C. Use of free radical method to evaluate the antioxidant activity. LWT - Food Sci Technol 1995;28:25–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0023-6438(95)80008-5
Cottenie A, Verloo M, Kiekens L, Velghe G, Camerlynck R. Chemical Analysis of Plant and Soils; Laboratory of Analytical and Agrochemistry, State University of Ghent: Ghent, Belgium: Academic Press. (1982).
Snell FD, Snell CT, Snell CA. Colorimetric Methods of Analysis. Soil Sci. 1959;88:59.
Chapman HD, Pratt PF. Methods of Analysis for Soil, Plants and Water; Division of Agricultural Science, University of California: Berkeley, CA, USA. (1961).
Frantz JM, Locke JC, Datnoff L, Omer M, Widrig A, Sturtz D, Horst L, Krause CR. Detection, distribution, and quantification of silicon in floricultural crops utilizing three distinct analytical methods. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 39:2734–2751. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103620802358912 (2008).
Cheng KL, Bray RH. Determination of calcium and magnesium in soil and plant material. Soil Sci. (1951).
Duncan DB. Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics 11:1–42. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001478 (1955).
Karimian N, Nazari F, Samadi S. Morphological and biochemical properties, leaf nutrient content, and vase life of tuberose (Polianthes tuberosa L.) affected by root or foliar applications of silicon (Si) and silicon nanoparticles (SiNPs). J. Plant Growth Regul. 40:2221–2235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-020-10272-4 (2021).
Pozza EA, Pozza AA, Botelho DM. Silicon in plant disease control. Revista Ceres. 62:323–331. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-737X201562030013 (2015).
Campos CN, Silva Júnior GB, Prado RD, David CHOD, Souza Junior JPD, Teodoro PE. Silicon mitigates ammonium toxicity in plants. Agron J. 112:635–647. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20069 (2020).
El-Sherif F, El-Zaina D, Yap YK. Diatomite improves productivity and quality of Moringa Oleifera grown in greenhouse. Electronic J. Biol. 14:1–6. (2018).
Sharifi RS, Sharifi RS, Narimani H. Effect of nano silicon and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on biomass, nodulation and some physiological traits of Grasspea (Lathyrus sativus L.). Iranian J. Field Crops Res. 20:435–449. https://doi.org/10.22067/jcesc.2022.75528.1149 (2022).
Khan MA, Ali A, Mohammad S, Ali H, Khan T, Mashwani ZUR, Jan A, Ahmad P. Iron nano modulated growth and biosynthesis of steviol glycosides in Stevia rebaudiana. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult. 143:121–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-020-01902-6 (2020).
Asgari F, Diyanat M. Effects of silicon on some morphological and physiological traits of Rose (Rosa chinensis var. minima) plants grown under salinity stress. J. Plant Nutr. 44:536–549. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2020.1845367 (2021).
Redeef MA, Al-Taey DK, Al-Attabi BR. Effect of salt stress and nano SiO2 on growth, flowering and active components in Tagete erecta L. Plant Cell Biotechnol. Molecul. Biol. 22:152–158. (2021).
Chen H, Zhang F, Zhao S, Wang R, Chen Y, He Y, Song P. Diatomite geopolymer carrying potassium Poly (dihydroxymethyl) Urea phosphate for efficient nutrient management. ACS Appl Polym Mater. 6 6077–6086. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsapm.4c00795 (2024).
Sivanesan I, Son MS, Soundararajan P, Jeong BR. Growth of chrysanthemum cultivars as affected by silicon source and application method. Kor. J. Hort Sci. Technol. 31, 544–551. https://doi.org/10.7235/hort.2013.13046 (2013).
Ma JF, Takahashi E. Soil, fertilizer, and Plant Silicon Research in Japan, 1st (ed) Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. (2002).
Matichenkov VV, Bocharnikova EA. Technology for natural water protection against pollution from cultivated areas, 2020. 15th Annual Australian Agron Conf. 210–225 (2010).
Badawy EM, Kandil MM, Habib AM, El-Sayed IM. Influence of Diatomite, Putrescine and Alpha-Tocopherol on some vegetative growth and flowering of Antirrhinum majus L. plants. J. Hort Sci. Ornam Plants 7:7–18. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.jhsop.2015.7.1.1151 (2015).
Zaman Brohi RO, Khuhawar MY, Mahar RB, Ibrahim MA, Ali A, Lanjwani, MF. Vanadium-doped MnO2 nanocatalyst for visible‐light‐driven photodegradation of selected fluoroquinolone antibiotics from contaminated water. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 3406–3418. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.7201 (2022).
Obklin N, Anusontpornperm S, Thanachit S, Kheoruenromne I. Effect of diatomite on yield and nutrient uptake of maize grown in Warin soil series: online first. Songklanakarin J. Plant Sci. 10:46–54. (2023).
Hwang SJ, Hamayun M, Kim HY, Na CI, Kim KU, Shin DH, Kim SY, Lee IJ. Effect of nitrogen and silicon nutrition on bioactive Gibberellin and growth of rice under field conditions. J. Crop Sci. Biotechnol. 10:281–286. (2007).
Waly AA, El-Fattah A, Hassan MAE, El-Ghadban EM, Abd Alla AS. Enhancing growth, productivity and essential oil percentage of Thymus vulgaris L. plant using seaweeds extract, Chitosan and potassium silicate in sandy soil. Sci J Flowers Ornam Plants. https://doi.org/10.21608/SJFOP.2020.148056 (2020).
Abd El Gayed ME, Knany RE. Effect of foliar application of different potassium forms on the growth and flowering of snapdragon (Antirrhinum majus L.) plants. J Plant Prod. 11:1035–1040. https://doi.org/10.21608/jpp.2020.122660 (2020).
Abd El-Mageed TA, Mekdad AAA, Rady MOA, Abdelbaky AS, Saudy HS, Shaaban A. Physio-biochemical and agronomic changes of two sugar beet cultivars grown in saline soil as influenced by potassium fertilizer. J. Soil. Sci. Plant. Nutr. 22:3636–3654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-022-00916-7 (2022).
Rizk TY, kholousy ASO, Saudy HS., Sultan ShS, Abd Alwahed SHA. Breaking dormancy and enhancing germination of Avena sterilis L. and Amaranthus retroflexus L. weeds by gibberellic acid and potassium nitrate to keep soil and crops healthy. Gesun Pflanz.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-022-00780-6 (2023).
El-Sayed IM, Soliman DM. Silica nanoparticles improve growth, chemical bioactive, and antioxidant enzyme activity of Dianthus caryophyllus L., plant. Egypt Pharmaceutical J. 23:279–289. https://doi.org/10.4103/epj.epj_224_23 (2024).
Prakash NB, Savant NK, Sonar KR. Silicon in Indian Agriculture. Westville Publishing House, New Delhi. (2018)..
Attia EA, Elhawat N. Combined foliar and soil application of silica nanoparticles enhances the growth, flowering period and flower characteristics of marigold (Tagetes erecta L.). Sci. Hort. 282:110015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110015 (2021).
Sánchez-Navarro JF, González-García Y, Benavides-Mendoza A, Morales-Díaz AB, González-Morales S, Cadenas-Pliego G, García-Guillermo MDS, Juárez-Maldonado A. Silicon nanoparticles improve the shelf life and antioxidant status of Lilium. Plants 10:2338. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10112338 (2021).
Figueiredo FC, Botrel PP, Teixeira CP, Petrazzini LL, Locarno M, Carvalho JGD. Leaf spraying and fertirrigation with silicon on the physicochemical attributes of quality and coloration indices of strawberry. Ciência E Agrotecnologia 34:1306–1311. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542010000500032 (2010).
Goswami P, Mathur J, Srivastava N. Silica nanoparticles as novel sustainable approach for plant growth and crop protection. Heliyon 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09908 (2022).
Etesami H, Jeong BR. Silicon (Si): Review and future prospects on the action mechanisms in alleviating biotic and abiotic stresses in plants. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 147:881–896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.09.063 (2018).
Disclaimer
"Regarding Experimental research and field studies on plants, we cultivated brunfelsia plants by ourselves."
Funding
Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Author contribution statement IME, EZO, MH, HSS, RAME: designed implemented the experiments; IME, EZO, MH, RAME: collected the data; MH, HSS: analyzed the data and wrote the drafted manuscript; IME, EZO, MH, HSS, RAME: revised and finalized the article. Whole authors agree with the article contents and with its submission.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
El-Sayed, I.M., Othman, E.Z., Hewidy, M. et al. Modulation of biochemical constituents, nutritional status, growth and flowering of Brunfelsia grandiflora via supplying diverse silicon sources. Sci Rep 15, 34293 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-21117-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-21117-z