Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

Chemical mimicry

Male ants disguised by the queen's bouquet

Abstract

Males of the tropical ant Cardiocondyla obscurior are either wingless and aggressive or winged and docile, and both compete for access to virgin queens in the nest1,2. Although the fighter males (ergatoids) attack and kill other ergatoids, they tolerate and even attempt to mate with their winged rivals. Here we show that the winged males avoid the aggression of wingless males by mimicking the chemical bouquet of virgin queens, but that their mating success is not reduced as a result. This example of female mimicry by vigorous males is surprising, as in other species it is typically used as a protective strategy by weaker males, and may explain the coexistence and equal mating success of two male morphs.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Discriminant analysis of the hydrocarbon profiles of 1-day-old (filled symbols) and 10-day-old (hollow symbols) Cardiocondyla obscurior ants.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kinomura, K. & Yamauchi, K. J. Ethol. 5, 75–81 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Heinze, J., Hölldobler, B. & Yamauchi, K. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 42, 239–246 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hölldobler, B. & Bartz, S.H. in Experimental Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology (eds Hölldobler, B. & Lindauer, M.) 167–220 (Academic, New York, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson, C., Cremer, S. & Heinze, J. Behav. Ecol. (in the press).

  5. Dettner, K. & Liepert, C. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 39, 129–154 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lahav, S., Soroker, V. & Hefetz, A. Naturwissenschaften 86, 246–249 (1999).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lenoir, A., D'Ettorre, P., Errard, C. & Hefetz, A. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 46, 573–599 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Singer, T. L. Am. Zool. 38, 394–405 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Turillazzi, S., Sledge, M. F., Cremer, S. & Heinze, J. Insect Soc. Life 4, 169–175 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Andersson, M. in Sexual Selection (eds Krebs, J. R. & Clutton-Brock, T.) Ch. 16 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Peschke, K. J. Chem. Ecol. 13, 1993–2008 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Shine, R., Harlow, P., LeMaster, M. P., Moore, I. T. & Mason, R. T. Anim. Behav. 59, 349–359 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Heinze, J., Stengl, B. & Sledge, M. F. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 52, 59–65 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sylvia Cremer.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cremer, S., Sledge, M. & Heinze, J. Male ants disguised by the queen's bouquet. Nature 419, 897 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/419897a

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/419897a

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing