Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

Pollinator attraction

Crab-spiders manipulate flower signals

Abstract

Some European species of crab-spider match the colour of the flower on which they lie in wait to ambush insect pollinators, a tactic that is presumed to camouflage them from their intended prey and from predators1,2. Here we show that the coloration of an Australian species of crab-spider, Thomisus spectabilis, which is cryptic on the white daisy Chrysanthemum frutescens to the human eye, is highly conspicuous to ultraviolet-sensitive insect prey — but that, instead of repelling foraging honeybees (Apis mellifera) as might be expected, the contrast of the spider against the petals makes the flowers more attractive. The spider is apparently exploiting the bee's pre-existing preference for flowers with colour patterning.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: The effect of the presence of the crab-spider Thomisus spectabilis on the white daisy (Chrysanthemum frutescens) on flower visitation by honeybees (Apis mellifera).

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chittka, L. Entomol. Genet. 25, 181–187 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Thery, M. & Casas, J. Nature 415, 133 (2002).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Endler, J. A. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 41, 315–352 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bennett, A. T. D., Cuthill, I. C., Partridge, J. C. & Lunau, K. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 8618–8621 (1997).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chittka, L., Shmida, A., Troje, N. & Menzel, R. Vision Res. 34, 1489–1508 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Giurfa, M., Vorobyev, M., Brandt, R., Posner, B. & Menzel, R. J. Comp. Physiol. A 180, 235–243 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Briscoe, A. D. & Chittka, L. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 46, 471–510 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lunau, K., Wacht, S. & Chittka, L. J. Comp. Physiol. A 178, 477–489 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Astrid M. Heiling.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heiling, A., Herberstein, M. & Chittka, L. Crab-spiders manipulate flower signals. Nature 421, 334 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/421334a

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/421334a

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing