Anaesthesiology tries to move on after fraud investigations.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Kranke, P., Apfel, C. C. & Roewer, N. Anesth. Analg. 90, 1004–1007 (2000).
Fujii, Y. Anesth. Analg. 90, 1004–1007 (2000).
Carlisle, J. B. Anaesthesia 67, 521–537 (2012).
White, P. F., Roscow, C. E. & Shafer, S. L. Anesth. Analg. 112, 512–515 (2011).
Additional information
See Editorial page 335
Related links
Related links
Related links in Nature Research
We must be open about our mistakes 2012-Sep-05
Research fraud: Speed up reviews of misconduct 2012-Aug-29
Research community: Pilot scheme for misconduct database 2011-Oct-05
Science publishing: The trouble with retractions 2011-Oct-05
Related external links
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cyranoski, D. Retraction record rocks community. Nature 489, 346–347 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/489346a
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/489346a
This article is cited by
-
Sustainable development goals for Japanese anesthesiologists: how to survive in times of turmoil
Journal of Anesthesia (2023)
-
Reasons for article retraction in anesthesiology: a comprehensive analysis
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie (2020)
-
Japan to learn from biomedical cases
Nature (2014)
