Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Research Article
  • Published:

Fitting human exposure data with the Johnson SB distribution

A Corrigendum to this article was published on 15 July 2006

Abstract

Exposure evaluations for epidemiological investigations and risk assessments may require estimates of background concentrations and peak exposures, as well as the population mean and variance. The SB distribution is a theoretically appealing probability function for characterizing ratios, and random variables bound by extremes, such as human exposures and environmental concentrations. However, fitting the parameters of this distribution with maximum likelihood methods is often problematic, and some alternative methods are examined here. Two methods based on percentiles, a quantile estimator, and a method-of-moments fitting procedure are explored. The quantile and method-of-moments procedures are based on new explicit expressions for the first four moments of this distribution. The fitting procedures are compared by simulation, and with actual data sets consisting of measurements of human exposure to airborne contaminants.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Carlton G., and Flynn M.R. The influence of spray painting parameters on breathing zone particle size distributions. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 1997: 12: 744–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn M.R. A stochastic differential equation for exposure yields a beta distribution. Ann Occup Hyg 2004a: 48: 491–497.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn M.R. The beta distribution — a physically consistent model for human exposure to airborne contaminants. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 2004b: 18: 306–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn M.R. The 4 parameter lognormal (Sb) model of human exposure. Ann Occup Hyg 2004c: 48: 617–622.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn M.R. On the moments of the 4-parameter lognormal distribution. Commun Stats Theory Methods 2005: 34(4): 745–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George D.K., Flynn M.R., and Harris R.H. Autocorrelation of interday exposures at an automobile assembly plant. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1995: 56: 1187–1194.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hill I.D., Hill R., and Holder R. Algorithm AS99: fitting Johnson curves by moments. Appl Stat 1976: 25: 180–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs D.E., and Smith M.S. Exposures to carbon dioxide in the poultry processing industry. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1988: 49: 624–629.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson N.L. Systems of frequency curves generated by methods of translation. Biometrika 1949: 36: 149–176.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson N.L., and Kitchen J.O. Some notes on tables to facilitate fitting SB curves. Biometrika 1971: 58: 223–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson N.L., Kotz S., and Balakrishnan N. Continuous Univariate Distributions, Vol. 1. Wiley, New York, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kottegoda N.T. Fitting Johnson Sb curve by the method of maximum likelihood to annual maximum daily rainfalls. Water Resour Res 1987: 23: 728–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert J.A. Estimation of parameters in the four-parameter lognormal distribution. Austral J Stat 1970: 12: 33–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mage D.T. An explicit solution for SB parameters using four percentile points. Technometrics 1980: 22: 247–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siekierski K. Comparison and evaluation of three methods of estimation of the Johnson Sb distribution. Biom J 1992: 34: 879–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slifker J.F., and Shapiro S.S. The Johnson system: selection and parameter estimation. Technometrics 1980: 22: 239–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolentino D., Zenari E., Dall’Olio M., Ruani G., Gelormini A., and Mirone G. Application of statistical models to estimate the correlation between urinary benzene as a biological indicator of exposure and air concentrations determined by personal monitoring. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 2003: 64: 625–629.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tsionas E.G. Likelihood and posterior shapes in Johnson's SB system. Sankhya Ser B 2001: 63: 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vroon W.J. A class of variate transformation causing unbounded likelihood. J Austral Stat 1981: 76: 709–712.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler R.E. Quantile estimators of Johnson curve parameters. Biometrika 1980: 67: 725–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L., Packard P.C., and Liu C. A comparison of estimation methods for fitting Weibull and Johnson's Sb distributions to mixed spruce-fir stands in northeastern North America. Can J Forest Res 2003: 33: 1340–1347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the helpful comments of the late Dr. Norman L. Johnson.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael R Flynn.

Appendix A

Appendix A

SB equations:

The mean of y is (Johnson, 1949)

where φ=A−B and ψ=CD and

The variance of y is

where μ′2 is the second moment of y about the origin and

Application of the chain rule to expression (A.7) and some algebraic simplification yields the following explicit expression for the variance of y:

The partial derivatives are

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Flynn, M. Fitting human exposure data with the Johnson SB distribution. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 16, 56–62 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jea.7500437

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jea.7500437

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links