Abstract
Exposure evaluations for epidemiological investigations and risk assessments may require estimates of background concentrations and peak exposures, as well as the population mean and variance. The SB distribution is a theoretically appealing probability function for characterizing ratios, and random variables bound by extremes, such as human exposures and environmental concentrations. However, fitting the parameters of this distribution with maximum likelihood methods is often problematic, and some alternative methods are examined here. Two methods based on percentiles, a quantile estimator, and a method-of-moments fitting procedure are explored. The quantile and method-of-moments procedures are based on new explicit expressions for the first four moments of this distribution. The fitting procedures are compared by simulation, and with actual data sets consisting of measurements of human exposure to airborne contaminants.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 6 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $43.17 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout




Similar content being viewed by others
References
Carlton G., and Flynn M.R. The influence of spray painting parameters on breathing zone particle size distributions. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 1997: 12: 744–750.
Flynn M.R. A stochastic differential equation for exposure yields a beta distribution. Ann Occup Hyg 2004a: 48: 491–497.
Flynn M.R. The beta distribution — a physically consistent model for human exposure to airborne contaminants. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 2004b: 18: 306–308.
Flynn M.R. The 4 parameter lognormal (Sb) model of human exposure. Ann Occup Hyg 2004c: 48: 617–622.
Flynn M.R. On the moments of the 4-parameter lognormal distribution. Commun Stats Theory Methods 2005: 34(4): 745–751.
George D.K., Flynn M.R., and Harris R.H. Autocorrelation of interday exposures at an automobile assembly plant. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1995: 56: 1187–1194.
Hill I.D., Hill R., and Holder R. Algorithm AS99: fitting Johnson curves by moments. Appl Stat 1976: 25: 180–189.
Jacobs D.E., and Smith M.S. Exposures to carbon dioxide in the poultry processing industry. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1988: 49: 624–629.
Johnson N.L. Systems of frequency curves generated by methods of translation. Biometrika 1949: 36: 149–176.
Johnson N.L., and Kitchen J.O. Some notes on tables to facilitate fitting SB curves. Biometrika 1971: 58: 223–226.
Johnson N.L., Kotz S., and Balakrishnan N. Continuous Univariate Distributions, Vol. 1. Wiley, New York, 1994.
Kottegoda N.T. Fitting Johnson Sb curve by the method of maximum likelihood to annual maximum daily rainfalls. Water Resour Res 1987: 23: 728–732.
Lambert J.A. Estimation of parameters in the four-parameter lognormal distribution. Austral J Stat 1970: 12: 33–43.
Mage D.T. An explicit solution for SB parameters using four percentile points. Technometrics 1980: 22: 247–251.
Siekierski K. Comparison and evaluation of three methods of estimation of the Johnson Sb distribution. Biom J 1992: 34: 879–895.
Slifker J.F., and Shapiro S.S. The Johnson system: selection and parameter estimation. Technometrics 1980: 22: 239–246.
Tolentino D., Zenari E., Dall’Olio M., Ruani G., Gelormini A., and Mirone G. Application of statistical models to estimate the correlation between urinary benzene as a biological indicator of exposure and air concentrations determined by personal monitoring. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 2003: 64: 625–629.
Tsionas E.G. Likelihood and posterior shapes in Johnson's SB system. Sankhya Ser B 2001: 63: 3–9.
Vroon W.J. A class of variate transformation causing unbounded likelihood. J Austral Stat 1981: 76: 709–712.
Wheeler R.E. Quantile estimators of Johnson curve parameters. Biometrika 1980: 67: 725–728.
Zhang L., Packard P.C., and Liu C. A comparison of estimation methods for fitting Weibull and Johnson's Sb distributions to mixed spruce-fir stands in northeastern North America. Can J Forest Res 2003: 33: 1340–1347.
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the helpful comments of the late Dr. Norman L. Johnson.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix A
Appendix A
SB equations:
The mean of y is (Johnson, 1949)

where φ=A−B and ψ=CD and




The variance of y is

where μ′2 is the second moment of y about the origin and

Application of the chain rule to expression (A.7) and some algebraic simplification yields the following explicit expression for the variance of y:

The partial derivatives are



Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Flynn, M. Fitting human exposure data with the Johnson SB distribution. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 16, 56–62 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jea.7500437
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jea.7500437
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
On a heavy-tailed parametric quantile regression model for limited range response variables
Computational Statistics (2020)
-
General approach for video traffic: from modeling to optimization
Multimedia Systems (2019)
-
Modeling mixed exposures: an application to welding fumes in the construction trades
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment (2010)
-
The correct application of Mage's Johnson SB procedure for fitting exposure data
Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology (2007)


