Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • TECHNOLOGY FEATURE

Embryo-like models shed fresh light on early human development

A wave of stem-cell systems are enabling researchers to unpick what happens after an embryo implants in the uterus.
By
  1. Sandeep Ravindran

    1. Sandeep Ravindran is a freelance writer in Washington DC.

Composite image of iBlastoids with different cellular staining

Embryo models of the blastocyst stage of early development, reprogrammed from skin cells. Credit: Monash University

Cells in culture typically form continuous sheets, like skin. But in 2017, bioengineer Jianping Fu realized that if he cultured human stem cells in a 3D scaffold, they would spontaneously organize into structures that looked, under a microscope, a bit like an embryo1. Gene-expression analyses suggested the cells were similar to those in an embryo immediately after it implants in the uterus, meaning they could serve as experimental models for a previously opaque point in early development.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Nature 600, 767-769 (2021)

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-03711-z

References

  1. Shao, Y. et al. Nature Commun. 8, 208 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rivron, N. C. et al. Nature 557, 106–111 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Yu, L. et al. Nature 591, 620–626 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu, X. et al. Nature 591, 627–632 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kagawa, H. et al. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04267-8 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fan, Y. et al. Cell Discov. 7, 81 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sozen, B. et al. Nature Commun. 12, 5550 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zheng, Y. et al. Nature 573, 421–425 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Warmflash, A., Sorre, B., Etoc, F., Siggia, E. D. & Brivanlou, A. H. Nature Meth. 11, 847–854 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. van den Brink, S. C. et al. Development 141, 4231–4242 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Moris, N. et al. Nature 582, 410–415 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Haremaki, T. et al. Nature Biotechnol. 37, 1198–1208 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. van den Brink, S. C. et al. Nature 582, 405–409 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Veenvliet, J. V. et al. Science 370, eaba4937 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mantziou, V. et al. Reprod. Toxicol. 105, 72–90 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lovell-Badge, R. et al. Stem Cell Rep. 16, 1398–1408 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Subjects

Latest on:

Nature Careers

Jobs

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing

Search

Advanced search

Quick links